Rethinking populism and its threats and possibilities

Zgłoś artykuł

PDF (English)

Słowa kluczowe

populism
liberalism
neo-liberalism
post-democracy
populizm
liberalizm
neoliberalizm
postdemokracja

Jak cytować

Hogg, R. (2022). Rethinking populism and its threats and possibilities: Ponowne zastanowienie się nad populizmem – jego wyzwaniami i możliwościami. Archiwum Kryminologii, (XLIV/1), 15–38. https://doi.org/10.7420/AK2021.22

Abstrakt

Resurgent populism – with crime as a core theme - is depicted as a dangerous perversion of liberal democracy. But by avoiding a definition of populism, critics tend to simply conflate populism with contemporary right-wing authoritarianism. Academic analysis, including criminological, is not free of such tendencies. After a brief consideration of criminology’s engagement with penal populism and the recent spread of a more far-reaching authoritarian political populism, the article argues for the need to more carefully conceptualise populism. Theoretical clarity is needed for assessing the character of contemporary populism; for grasping its drivers in, for example, neo-liberal globalization and what Crouch calls “post democracy”; and for discerning its possible future trajectories, progressive as well as regressive. It is also argued that simple denunciations of populism often reflect a complacent liberal mentality that contributes to political disaffection fuelling populist movements, and overlooks legitimate grievances, including the (often criminal) failings of liberal institutions. Rather than being a political aberration, populism, it is argued, should be seen as a “normal” dimension of democratic politics with implications for criminal policy (as well as politics at large).

 

Odradzający się populizm – który w dużej mierze odnosi się do przestępczości – przedstawiany jest jako niebezpieczne wypaczenie demokracji liberalnej. Jednak brak zdefiniowania terminu „populizm”, prowadzi do tego, że jego krytycy nierzadko mają tendencję do mylenia go ze współczesnym prawicowym autorytaryzmem. Także analiza naukowa, w tym kryminologiczna, nie jest wolna od takich tendencji. Niniejszy artykuł, po krótkim omówieniu zaangażowania kryminologii w opisanie populizmu penalnego i rozprzestrzenienia się daleko idącego autorytarnego populizmu politycznego, przekonuje o potrzebie dokładniejszej konceptualizacji terminu „populizm”. By ocenić charakter współczesnego populizmu potrzeba bowiem pewnej wiedzy teoretycznej. Jest ona także niezbędna do uchwycenia i zrozumienia m.in. neoliberalnej globalizacji czy tego, co Crouch nazywa „postdemokracją”, jak również do zorientowania się co do jej przyszłych możliwych trajektorii – zarówno postępowych, jak i regresywnych. Potępienie populizmu, co zostało podkreślone w artykule, jest często przejawem zadowolonej z siebie liberalnej mentalności, która przyczynia się do politycznego niezadowolenia napędzającego ruchy populistyczne, pomijając przy tym uzasadnione skargi m.in. na błędy instytucji liberalnych (często mające charakter przestępczy). Populizm, zamiast być aberracją polityczną, powinien być postrzegany jako „normalny” wymiar demokratycznej polityki, mający implikacje dla polityki kryminalnej (jak również polityki w ogóle).

https://doi.org/10.7420/AK2021.22
PDF (English)

Bibliografia

Alexander M. (2012). The New Jim Crow – Mass Incarceration in the Age of Colorblindness. New York: New Press.

Anthony T. (2017). Factcheck Q&A: Are Indigenous Australians the Most Incarcerated People on Earth? The Conversation. Available online: https://theconversation.com/factcheck-qanda-are-indigenous-australians-the-most-incarcerated-people-on-earth-78528 [11.08.2021].

Bagehot W. (1867) (1993). The English Constitution. London: Fontana.

Bauman Z. (1998). Globalization – The Human Consequences. Cambridge: Polity Press.

Berlin I. (2008). ‘Russian populism.’ In H. Hardy and A. Kelly (eds.) Russian Thinkers. Bury St Edmunds: Penguin Books, pp. 240–272.

Bottoms A. (1995). ‘The philosophy and politics of punishment and sentencing.’ In C. Clarkson and R. Morgan (eds.) The Politics of Sentencing Reform. Oxford: Clarendon, pp. 17–49.

Canovan M. (1981). Populism. London: Junction Books.

Canovan M. (1999). ‘Trust the people! Populism and the two faces of democracy.’ Political Studies 47, pp. 2–16.

Coggan P. (2014). The Last Vote – the Threats to Western Democracy. London: Penguin.

Cohen S. (1973). Folk Devils and Moral Panics. London: Paladin.

Crouch C. (2004). Post-Democracy. Cambridge: Polity Press.

Crouch C. (2011). The Strange Non-Death of Neoliberalism. Cambridge: Polity Press.

Crouch C. (2019). ‘Post-democracy and populism.’ In A. Gamble and T. Wright (eds.) Rethinking Democracy. Chichester: Wiley, pp. 124–137.

Crouch C. (2020). Post-Democracy After the Crises. Cambridge: Polity.

Cunneen C., Baldry E., Brown D., Brown M., Schwartz M., and Steel A. (2013). Penal Culture and Hyperincarceration: The Revival of the Prison. London: Ashgate.

Davis J. and Shear M. (2019). Border Wars – Inside Trump’s Assault on Immigration. New York: Simon & Schuster.

Douglas M. (1970). Purity and Danger – an Analysis of Concepts of Pollution and Taboo. Harmondsworth: Penguin.

Douglas M. (1992). Risk and Blame – Essays in Cultural Theory. London: Routledge.

Eatwell R. and Goodwin M. (2018). National Populism – the Revolt Against Liberal Democracy. Milton Keynes: Pelican Books.

Economist (2021). ‘Biden’s beginning – 100 days of aptitude.’ Economist May 1–7, pp. 27–29.

Ferguson C. (2012). Inside Job. Oxford: Oneworld.

Freiberg A. and Gelb K. (eds.) (2008). Penal Populism, Sentencing Councils and Sentencing Policy. Annandale: Hawkins Press.

Fukuyama F. (2020). ‘The pandemic and political order – it takes a state.’ Foreign Affairs 99(4), pp. 26–32.

Garland D. (1996). ‘The limits of the sovereign state: Strategies of crime control in contemporary society.’ British Journal of Criminology 36(4), pp. 445–471.

Garland D. (2001). The Culture of Control. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Garland D. (2013). ‘Penality and the penal state: The 2012 Sutherland address.’ Criminology 51(3), pp. 475–517.

Garton Ash T. (2021). ‘The future of liberalism.’ Prospect January/February, pp. 18–28.

Giuffrida A. (2021). ‘Success of far-right brothers of Italy raises fears of fascist revival.’ The Guardian 3 August.

Goodhart D. (2017). The Road to Somewhere – the Populist Revolt and the Future of Politics. London: Hurst & Company.

Goodwyn L. (1976). Democratic Promise: The Populist Moment in America. New York: Oxford University Press.

Grayling A. (2018). Democracy and its Crisis. London: Oneworld.

Gusfield J. (1963). Symbolic Crusade – Status Politics and the American Temperance Movement. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.

Hage G. (1998). White Nation – Fantasies of White Supremacy in a Multicultural Society. Sydney: Pluto Press.

Hall S. (1979). Drifting Into a Law and Order Society. London: Cobden Trust.

Hall S. (1980). ‘Popular-democratic vs authoritarian populism: Two ways of “taking democracy seriously”.’ In A. Hunt (ed.) Marxism and Democracy. London: Lawrence and Wishart, pp. 157–185.

Hall S. (1983). ‘The great moving right show.’ In S. Hall and M. Jacques (eds.) The Politics of Thatcherism. London: Lawrence and Wishart, pp. 19–40.

Hogg R. (2013). ‘Populism, law and order and the crimes of the 1%.’ International Journal for Crime, Justice and Social Democracy 2(1), pp. 113–130.

Hogg R. (2013). ‘Punishment and “the people”: Rescuing populism from its critics.’ In M. Ball, K. Carrington, E. O’Brien, and J. Tauri (eds.) Crime, Justice and Social Democracy. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 105–119.

Ionesco G. and Gellner E. (eds.) (1969). Populism: Its Meaning and National Character. London: Weidenfeld and Nicolson.

ʻIs democracy dying? A global report.ʼ (2018). Foreign Affairs 97(3), pp. 10–56.

Johnstone G. (2000). ‘Penal policy making: Elitist, populist or participatory?.’ Punishment and Society 2(2), pp. 161–180.

Judis J. (2016). The Populist Explosion – How the Great Recession Transformed American and European Politics. New York: Columbia Global Reports.

Kakutani M. (2018). The Death of Truth. London: William Collins.

Kazin M. (1998). The Populist Persuasion – an American History. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.

Lacey N. (2008). The Prisoners Dilemma. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Laclau E. (2005). ‘Populism: What’s in a name?.’ In F. Panizza (ed.) Populism and the Mirror of Democracy. London, New York: Verso, pp. 32–49.

Laclau E. (2007). On Populist Reason. London: Verso.

Laclau E. and Mouffe C. (1985). Hegemony and Socialist Strategy – Towards a Radical Democratic Politics. London/New York: Verso.

Levitsky S. and Ziblatt D. (2017). How Democracies Die – What History Reveals about Our Future. New York: Viking.

Lind M. (1997). Up from Conservatism – What the Right is Wrong for America. New York: Free Press Paperbacks.

Luce E. (2018). The Retreat of Western Liberalism. London: Abacus.

MacLean N. (2017). Democracy in Chains. Melbourne: Scribe.

Mair P. (2013). Ruling the Void – the Hollowing of Western Democracy. London/New York: Verso.

Marr D. (2017). The White Queen: One Nation and the Politics of Race. Collingwood: Victoria Quarterly Essay.

McKnight D. (2018). Populism Now! The Case for Progressive Populism. Sydney: NewSouth.

McNamara L. and Quilter J. (2016). ʻThe bikie effect and other forms of demonisation: The origins and effects of hyper-criminalisation.ʼ Law in Context 34(2), pp. 5–35.

Moffitt D. (2020). Populism. Cambridge: Polity Press.

Mouffe C. (2018). For a Left Populism. London, New York: Verso.

Mounk S. (2018). The People vs. Democracy – Why Our Freedom Is in Danger & How to Save it. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

Mudde C. (2004). ‘The populist zeitgeist.’ Government and Opposition 39(4), pp. 542–563.

Mudde C. (2019). The Far Right Today. Cambridge: Polity Press.

Mudde C. and Kaltwasser C. (2017). Populism – A Very Short Introduction. New York: Oxford University Press.

Müller J. (2016). What Is Populism?. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.

Nichols T. (2019). The Death of Expertise – The Campaign against Established Knowledge and Why it Matters. New York: Oxford University Press.

Panizza F. (2013). ‘Introduction: Populism and the mirror of democracy.’ In F. Panizza (ed.) Populism and the Mirror of Democracy. London, New York: Verso.

Pappas T. (2019). Populism and Liberal Democracy: A Comparative and Theoretical Analysis. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Pettit P. (2002). ‘Is criminal justice politically feasible?.’ Buffalo Criminal Law Review 5(2), pp. 427–450.

Pilkington E. (2021). ‘”It’s chilling what is happening”: A rightwing backlash to Biden takes root in Republican states.’ The Guardian 19 July.

Porta D. della (2013). Can Democracy Be Saved?: Participation, Deliberation and Social Movements. Cambridge: Polity Press.

Postel C. (2009). The Populist Vision. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Pratt J. (2006). Penal Populism. London: Routledge.

Pratt J. (2008). ‘Penal populism and the contemporary role of punishment.’ In T. Anthony and C. Cunneen (eds.) The Critical Criminology Companion. Annandale: Hawkins Press, pp. 265–277.

Pratt J. (2020). Law, Insecurity and Risk Control: Neo-liberal Governance and the Populist Revolt. Palgrave Macmillan.

Pratt J. and Miao M. (2017). Penal Populism: The End of Reason. Available online: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/312594772_Penal_Populism_The_End_of_Reason [7.09.2021].

Quilter J. (2013). ‘Contemporary comment: Responses to the death of Thomas Kelly: Taking populism seriously.’ Current Issues in Criminal Justice 24(3), pp. 439–448.

Roberts L., Stalans D., Indermaur D., and Hough M. (2003). Penal Populism and Public Opinion – Lessons from Five Countries. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Roggeveen S. (2019). Our Very Own Brexit. A Lowy Institute Paper. Melbourne: Penguin Books.

Royal Commission into Misconduct in the Banking, Superannuation and Financial Services Industry (2018). Interim Report. Canberra.

Runciman D. (2018). How Democracy Ends. London: Profile Books.

Ryan M. (2003). Penal Policy and Political Culture in England and Wales. Winchester: Waterside Press.

Sexton J. (2021). ‘Tucker Carlson’s Orban lovefest is a dark glimpse of the future MAGA wants.’ Daily Beast 5 August.

Sparrow J. (2019). Fascists Among Us – Online Hate and the Christchurch Massacre. Melbourne: Scribe.

Standing G. (2011). The Precariat – the New Dangerous Class. London: Bloomsbury Academic.

Stuntz W. (2011). The Collapse of American Criminal Justice. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

ʻThe power of populism.ʼ (2016). Foreign Affairs 95(6), pp. 2–54.

Tooze A. (2019). Crashed – How a Decade of Financial Crises Changed the World. London: Penguin Books.

Torres C. de la (ed.) (2015). The Promise and Perils of Populism. Lexington: University Press of Kentucky.

Torres C. de la (ed.) (2019). Routledge Handbook of Global Populism. London, New York: Routledge.

Torres C. de la and Arnson C. (eds.) (2013). Latin American Populism in the Twenty-First Century. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press.

Walker S. (2019). ‘The battle for Europe’s sole starts with Viktor Orbán.’ Guardian Weekly 22 March, p. 18.

Weyland K. (2017). ‘Populism: A political-strategic approach.’ In C. Rovira Kaltwasser, P. Taggart, P. Ochoa Espejo, and P. Ostiguy (eds.) Oxford Handbook of Populism. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 48–72.

Young J. (2007). The Vertigo of Late Modernity. London: Sage.

Zedner L. (2009). ‘Fixing the future?: The pre-emptive turn in criminal justice.’ In B. McSherry, A. Norrie, and S. Bronitt (eds.) Regulating Deviance: The Redirection of Criminalisation and the Futures of Criminal Law. London: Hart Publishing, pp. 35–58.

Zimring F. and Johnson D. (2006). ‘Public opinion and the governance of punishment in democratic political systems.’ Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 605, pp. 265–280.

Creative Commons License

Utwór dostępny jest na licencji Creative Commons Uznanie autorstwa 4.0 Międzynarodowe.

Copyright (c) 2021 INP PAN

Pobrania

Download data is not yet available.