Make a Submission
No. XLVI/1 (2024)
Articles

The reform of administrative detention in Italy: A “declaration of war” to irregular migrants and asylum seekers

Reforma detencji administracyjej we Włoszech. „Wypowiedzenie wojny” migrantom o nieuregulowanym statusie i osobom ubiegającym się o ochronę

PDF
  • Costanza Agnella,
  • Eleonora Celoria
Costanza Agnella
University of Turin
Eleonora Celoria
University of Turin

Published 2024-09-30

Keywords

  • administrative detention,
  • borders,
  • asylum seekers,
  • deterrence,
  • symbolic policies

Copyright (c) 2024 Costanza Agnella, Eleonora Celoria

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

How to Cite

“The reform of administrative detention in Italy: A ‘declaration of war” to irregular migrants and asylum seekers: Reforma detencji administracyjej we Włoszech. „Wypowiedzenie wojny’ migrantom o nieuregulowanym statusie i osobom ubiegającym się o ochronę” (2024) Archives of Criminology, (XLVI/1), pp. 101–129. doi:10.7420/AK2024.11.
Crossref
Scopus
Google Scholar
Europe PMC

Abstract

Dating back to Italy’s first comprehensive immigration law in the 1990s, the practice of detaining irregular migrants has served various explicit and implicit purposes, both practical and symbolic. Two decrees passed in 2023, under the far-right government of Giorgia Meloni, were explicitly framed as responses to the increasing number of migrants arriving at the borders. The aim of these decrees was to prolong the detention of asylum seekers and irregular migrants, with the stated aim of increasing returns. However, despite these measures, available data suggests that the capacity of detention centres has not increased significantly, and the rate of returns has remained stable. Against this backdrop, this article seeks to explore the explicit and implicit functions of detention by examining recent reforms and publicly available quantitative data obtained through a request under Italy’s Freedom of Information Act. It suggests that whilst detention serves practical purposes for a minority of migrants, its symbolic role in conveying state sovereignty and strict border control is equally important.

PDF

References

  1. Aas Franko F. and Bosworth M. (eds.) (2013). The Borders of Punishment: Citizenship, Crime Control and Social Exclusion. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  2. Agamben G. (2003). Stato di eccezione [State of exception]. Torino: Bollati Boringhieri.
  3. ASGI (2020). Ombre in frontiera. Politiche informali di detenzione e selezione dei cittadini stranieri [Border shadows: Informal policies of selection and detention of foreigners]. Available online: https://www.asgi.it/wp-content/uploads/2020/04/Ombre-in-frontiera.-Politiche-informali-di-detenzione-e-selezione-dei-cittadini-stranieri-2.pdf [30.08.2024].
  4. ASGI (2024). Mappatura dei luoghi di frontiera: monitoraggio e azioni [Mapping border zones: Monitoring and actions], Inlimine.asgi.it. Available online: https://inlimine.asgi.it/mappatura-dei-luoghi-di-frontiera-monitoraggio-e-azioni/ [30.08.2024].
  5. Ashworth A. and Zedner L. (2014). Preventive Justice. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  6. Barbieri A., Francini C., Mori N., Peca M., Tavoso M.A., and Zanchetta M. (2013). Arcipelago CIE – Indagine sui centri di identificazione e espulsione italiani [Archipelago CIE – Investigation on Italian identification and deportations centres]. Roma: Medici per i Diritti Umani. Available online: http://www.mediciperidirittiumani.org/pdf/ARCIPELAGOCIEsintesi.pdf [30.08.2024].
  7. Bathia M. (2015) ‘Turning asylum seekers into ‘dangerous criminals’: Experiences of the criminal justice system of those seeking sanctuary.’ International Journal for Crime, Justice and Social Democracy 4(3), pp. 97–111. https://doi.org/10.5204/ijcjsd.v4i3.245
  8. Beckett K. and Murakawa N. (2012). ‘Mapping the shadow carceral state: Toward an institutionally capacious approach to punishment.’ Theoretical Criminology 16(2), pp. 221–244. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362480612442113
  9. Blengino C. (2015). Stranieri e sicurezza. Riflessioni sul volto oscuro dello stato di diritto [Foreigners and security. Reflections on the dark face of the rule of law]. Napoli: Editoriale Scientifica.
  10. Boswell C. and Smell S. (2023). Comparative Analysis of Migration Narratives in Political Debate and in Policymaking. Cross-National Report. Barcelona: Barcelona Centre for International Affairs. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.10590198
  11. Bosworth M. (2019). ‘Immigration detention, punishment and the transformation of justice.’ Social & Legal Studies 28, pp. 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1177/0964663917747341
  12. Brandariz García J.A. and Fernandéz Bessa C. (2016). ‘Transformaciones de la penalidad migratoria en el contexto de la crisis económica: El giro gerencial del dispositivo de deportación’ [Transformations of migration penalties in the context of the economic crisis: The managerial turn of the deportation system]. InDret. Revista para el Análisis del Derecho 4, pp. 1–25.
  13. Caja E., Celoria E., and Mattiello G. (2022). ‘E dopo il lock down, cosa?’ [And after the lockdown?]. In E. Caja, F. Esposito, and G. Mattiello (eds.) Corpi Reclusi in Attesa di Espulsione [Detained bodies awaiting deportation]. Torino: Seb77, pp. 123–151.
  14. Caja E., Esposito F., and Mattiello G. (2020) No One Is Looking at Us Anymore, Blogs.law.ox.ac.uk. Available online: https://blogs.law.ox.ac.uk/research-subject-groups/centre-criminology/centreborder-criminologies/blog/2020/11/no-one-looking-us [28.08.2024].
  15. Campesi G. (2013). La detenzione amministrativa degli stranieri: storia, diritto, politica [Administrative detention of foreigners: History, law and politics] Roma: Carocci Editore.
  16. Campesi G. (2020a). ‘Genealogies of immigration detention: Migration control and the shifting boundaries between the ‘penal’ and the ‘preventive’ state.’ Social & Legal Studies 29(4), pp. 527–548. https://doi.org/10.1177/0964663919888275
  17. Campesi G. (2020b). ‘The reinvention of immigration detention in Italy in the aftermath of the “refugee crisis”: A study of parliamentary records (2013–2018).’ Refugee Survey Quarterly 39(3), pp. 381–403. https://doi.org/10.1093/rsq/hdaa012
  18. Campesi G. (2024). ‘Regulating mobility through detention: Understanding the new geography of control and containment at the Southern European border.’ Theoretical Criminology (Online First). https://doi.org/10.1177/13624806241249665
  19. Campesi G. and Coresi F. (2023). Trattenuti. Una radiografia del Sistema detentivo per stranieri [Detainees. A radiology of foreignersʼ detention system]. Roma: Università di Bari. Available online: https://trattenuti.actionaid.it/wp-content/uploads/2023/10/Rapporto-Trattenuti_10_03.pdf [30.08.2024].
  20. Campesi G. and Fabini G. (2019). ‘Immigration detention as social defence: Policing ‘dangerous mobility’ in Italy.’ Theoretical Criminology 24(1), pp. 50–70. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362480619859350
  21. Caprioglio C. and Gennari L. (2021). Dopo lo sbarco: La filiera del trattenimento dentro e oltre la pandemia [After disembarkation: The detention chain in and beyond the pandemic], Blogs.law.ox.ac.uk. Available online: https://blogs.law.ox.ac.uk/research-subject-groups/centre-criminology/centreborder-criminologies/blog/2021/06/dopo-lo-sbarco-la [30.08.2024].
  22. Carvalho H. (2017). The Preventive Turn in Criminal Law. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  23. Christie N. (1986). ‘Suitable enemy.ʼ In H. Bianchi and R. von Swaaningen (eds.) Abolitionism: Toward a Non-Repressive Approach to Crime. Amsterdam: Free University Press, pp 42–55.
  24. CILD (2021). Buchi neri. La detenzione senza reato nei Centri di Permanenza per i Rimpatri (CPR) [Black holes: Administrative detention in CPRs]. Roma: Coalizione Italiana Libertà e Diritti Civili. Available online: https://cild.eu/wp-content/uploads/2021/10/ReportCPR_Web.pdf [30.08.2024].
  25. De Genova N. (2002). ʻMigrant “illegality” and deportability in everyday life.ʼ Annual Review of Anthropology 31, pp. 419–447.
  26. Di Luciano C. (2021). Molti rimpatri, poche garanzie: un’analisi dei dati sui rimpatri dei cittadini tunisini [Many deportations, few guarantees: a data analysis of the returns of Tunisian national], Inlimine.asgi.it. Available online: https://inlimine.asgi.it/molti-rimpatri-poche-garanzie-unanalisi-dei-dati-sui-rimpatri-dei-cittadini-tunisini-degli-ultimi-mesi/ [30.08.2024].
  27. Directive 2013/32/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 26 June 2013 on common procedures for granting and withdrawing international protection (recast). Official Journal of the European Union of 29.06.2013, L 180, pp. 60–95.
  28. Edelman M. (1985). The Symbolic Uses of Politics. Illinois: University of Illinois Press.
  29. European Commission (2015). Communication: A European Agenda on Migration, COM(2015) 240.
  30. Fabini G. (2022). ʻIl confinamento della mobilità: innovazioni e continuità nella storia della detenzione amministrativa in Italiaʼ [The confinement of mobility: Innovations and continuity in the history of administrative detention in Italy]. In E. Caja, F. Esposito, and G. Mattiello (eds.) Corpi Reclusi in Attesa di Espulsione [Detained bodies awaiting deportation]. Torino: Seb77, pp. 41–73.
  31. Fabini G. (2024). I numeri della detenzione amministrativa in Italia [The numbers of administrative detention in Italy], Adimblog.com. Available online: https://www.adimblog.com/2024/04/05/10683/ [30.08.2024].
  32. Favilli C. (2023). ‘Presupposti, limiti e garanzie applicabili al trattenimento del richiedente protezione internazionale soggetto a procedura di frontiera: commento al decreto del Tribunale di Catania del 29 settembre 2023’ [Grounds, limits and guarantees of the administrative detention of asylum seekers involved in a border procedure: a comment to the Court of Catania judgment of 29th September 2023]. Diritto, Immigrazione e Cittadinanza 3, pp. 1–23. Available online: https://www.dirittoimmigrazionecittadinanza.it/archivio-saggi-commenti/note-e-commenti/fascicolo-n-3-2023-2/1295-presupposti-limiti-e-garanzie-applicabili-al-trattenimento-del-richiedente-protezione-internazionale-soggetto-a-procedura-di-frontiera/file [30.08.2024].
  33. Fernández Bessa C. (2021). Los centros de internamiento de extranjeros (CIE): Una introducción desde las Ciencias Penales [Foreigners administrative detention centres: An introduction from criminal sciences]. Madrid: Iustel.
  34. Ferraris V. (2021). ‘Mamadou Moussa Balde: una storia che ci interroga su che cosa sia la detenzione amministrativa’ [Mamadou Moussa Balde: An episode that interrogates us on what administrative detention is]. Il Piemonte delle Autonomie. Available online: https://www.piemonteautonomie.it/mamadou-moussa-balde-una-storia-che-ci-interroga-su-cosa-sia-la-detenzione-amministrativa/?pdf=2951 [30.08.2024].
  35. Ferraris V. and Anastasia S. (2013). ‘La detenzione amministrativa in Italia. Una analisi attraverso i dati’ [Administrative detention in Italy: An analysis through data]. Antigone 8(1), pp. 110–116.
  36. Figoni L. and Rondi L. (2023). Rinchiusi e sedati: l’abuso quotidiano di psicofarmaci nei Cpr italiani [Locked up and sedated: The daily abuse of psychiatric medication in Italian detention centres], Altraeconomia.it. Available online: https://altreconomia.it/rinchiusi-e-sedati-labuso-quotidiano-di-psicofarmaci-nei-cpr-italiani/ [30.08.2024].
  37. Garante Nazionale dei diritti delle persone detenute o private della libertà personale [National Guarantor for the rights of of people deprived of their liberty] (2023). Relazione al Parlamento 2023 [Report to the Parliament 2023]. Available online: https://www.garantenazionaleprivatiliberta.it/gnpl/resources/cms/documents/24447ddbb0b3093d479d7da93ebcda98.pdf [14.10.2024].
  38. Garante Nazionale dei diritti delle persone detenute o private della libertà personale [National Guarantor for the rights of of people deprived of their liberty] (2022). Relazione al Parlamento 2022 [Report to the Parliament 2022]. Available online: https://www.garantenazionaleprivatiliberta.it/gnpl/resources/cms/documents/8d31d77e25e800f9c0eb31448e8f03d8.pdf [14.10.2024].
  39. Garante Nazionale dei diritti delle persone detenute o private della libertà personale [National Guarantor for the rights of of people deprived of their liberty] (2021). Relazione al Parlamento 2021 [Report to the Parliament 2021]. Available online: https://www.garantenazionaleprivatiliberta.it/gnpl/resources/cms/documents/d4cc5b2d5560fb4455d53edb573dd76a.pdf [14.10.2024].
  40. Garante Nazionale dei diritti delle persone detenute o private della libertà personale [National Guarantor for the rights of of people deprived of their liberty] (2020). Relazione al Parlamento 2020 [Report to the Parliament 2020]. Available online: https://www.garantenazionaleprivatiliberta.it/gnpl/resources/cms/documents/a5fa1a499fdaf9e241f537006675c158.pdf [14.10.2024].
  41. Garante Nazionale dei diritti delle persone detenute o private della libertà personale [National Guarantor for the rights of of people deprived of their liberty] (2019). Relazione al Parlamento 2019 [Report to the Parliament 2019]. Available online: https://www.garantenazionaleprivatiliberta.it/gnpl/resources/cms/documents/b356a1eef850a31f18553126887a274c.pdf [14.10.2024].
  42. Garante Nazionale dei diritti delle persone detenute o private della libertà personale [National Guarantor for the rights of of people deprived of their liberty] (2018). Relazione al Parlamento 2018 [Report to the Parliament 2018]. Available online: http://www.garantenazionaleprivatiliberta.it/gnpl/resources/cms/documents/29e40afbf6be5b608916cad716836dfe.pdf [14.10.2024].
  43. García Hernández C. (2014). ‘Immigration detention as punishment.’ UCLA Law Review 61(5), pp. 1347–1414.
  44. Guild E. (2005). A Typology of Different Types of Centres for Third Country Nationals in Europe. Strasbourg: European Parliament Briefing Paper.
  45. Judgment of the Civil Court of Catania, Specialised Section on Asylum and Immigration of 29 September 2023 (2023). RG 10459/23.
  46. Judgment of the Civil Court of Catania, Specialised Section on Asylum and Immigration of 29 September 2023 (2023). RG 10460/23.
  47. Judgment of the Civil Court of Catania, Specialised Section on Asylum and Immigration of 29 September 2023 (2023). RG 10461/23.
  48. Judgment of the Civil Court of Catania, Specialised Section on Asylum and Immigration of 8 October 2023 (2023). RG 4285/23.
  49. Judgment of the European Court of Human Rights of 19 October 2023 (2023). A.B. v. Italy, no. 13755/18.
  50. Judgment of the European Court of Human Rights of 19 October 2023 (2023). A.S. v. Italy, no. 20860/18.
  51. Judgment of the European Court of Human Rights of 30 March 2023 (2023). J.A. and Others v. Italy, no. 21329/18.
  52. Judgment of the European Court of Human Rights of 31 August 2023 (2023). A.M. v. Italy, no. 70583/17.
  53. Law Decree 19 September 2023, n. 124/2023, converted into Law 13 November 2023, n. 162/2023 (G.U. 16/11/2023, n. 268) [Law Decree 124/2023, converted into Law 162/2023].
  54. Law Decree 20 October 2020, n. 130, converted into Law 18 December 2020, n. 173 (G.U. 19/12/2020, n. 314) [Law Decree 130/2020, converted into Law 173/2020].
  55. Leerkes A. and Broeders D. (2010) ‘A case of mixed motives? Formal and informal functions of administrative immigration detention.’ British Journal of Criminology 50(5), pp. 830–850. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjc/azq035
  56. Leerkes A. and Kox D. (2017). ‘Pressured into a preference to leave? A study on the “specific” deterrent effects and perceived legitimacy of immigration detention.’ Law & Society Review 51(4), pp. 895–929. https://doi.org/10.1111/lasr.12297
  57. Mainwaring C. and Silverman S. (2017). ‘Detention-as-spectacle.’ International Political Sociology 11(1), pp. 21–38. https://doi.org/10.1093/ips/olw016
  58. Majcher I. (2014). ‘Discipline and punish? Analysis of the purposes of immigration detention in Europe”’. AmeriQuests 11(2). https://doi.org/10.15695/amqst.v11i2.3964
  59. Maneri M. (2016). ‘Media discourse on immigration: Control practices and the language we live.’ In S. Pallida (ed.) Racial Criminalization of Migrants in the 21st Century. Farnham: Ashgate, pp. 77–93.
  60. Maneri M. and Quassoli F. (2016). ‘Humanity and security under siege. European discursive politics on immigration and asylum.’ DIJALOG 1–2, pp. 69–81.
  61. Medici Senza Frontiere [MSF] (2004). Rapporto sui centri di permanenza temporanea e assistenza [Report on the centres of assistance and temporary stay]. Available online: https://www.medicisenzafrontiere.it/wp-content/uploads/2018/06/Anatomia-di-un-fallimento.pdf [30.08.2024].
  62. Mountz A., Coddington K., Catania R.T., and Loyd J.M. (2012). ‘Conceptualizing detention: Mobility, containment, bordering, and exclusion.’ Progress in Human Geography 37(4), pp. 522–541. https://doi.org/10.1177/0309132512460903
  63. Radjenovic A. (2024). ʻSafe Country of Origin’ Concept in EU Asylum Law. European Union: European Parliament Research Service. Available online: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/etudes/BRIE/2024/762315/EPRS_BRI(2024)762315_EN.pdf [30.08.2024].
  64. Sampson R. and Mitchell G. (2013). ‘Global trends in immigration detention and alternatives to detention: Practical, political and symbolic rationales.’ Journal on Migration and Human Security 1(3), pp. 97–121. https://doi.org/10.1177/233150241300100302
  65. Spena A. (2019). ‘The double-deviant identity of the mass-foreigner and the lack of authority of the crimmigrationist state.’ New Criminal Law Review 22(3), pp. 301–317. https://doi.org/10.1525/nclr.2019.22.3.301
  66. Tiberio L. (2023). Migranti: Il governo Meloni parla di invasion, ma è crisi umanitaria [Migrants: Meloni’s government talks about invasion, but it is a humanitarian crisis], Valigiablu.it. Availeble online: https://www.valigiablu.it/migranti-governo-lampedusa-crisi-umanitaria/ [28.08.2024].
  67. Trattenuti (n.d.), Trattenuti.actionaid.it. Availble online: https://trattenuti.actionaid.it/ [28.08.2024].
  68. Valentini E. (2023). Il trattenimento in Italia, tra passato, presente e futuro: verso un ricorso massiccio alla detenzione amministrativa? [Administrative detention in Italy between past, present and future: Towards a massive use of detention?], Adimblog.com. Available online: https://www.adimblog.com/2023/11/02/il-trattenimento-in-italia-tra-passato-presente-e-futuro-verso-un-ricorso-massiccio-alla-detenzione-amministrativa/ [30.08.2024].
  69. Veglio M. (2018). ‘La restrizione amministrativa della libertà personale del richiedente asilo prima, durante e dopo il processo di protezione’ [The administrative restriction of the asylum seeker's personal liberty before, during and after the protection process]. Questione Giustizia 2, pp. 167–175.
  70. Veglio M. (2023). ‘La bestia tentacolare. Forme, tempi e luoghi del trattenimento degli stranieri in Italia’ [The tentacolar beast: Shapes, times and places of foreigners’ administrative detention in Italy]. Questione Giustizia 3, pp. 127–133.
  71. Wacquant L. (1999). ‘Suitable enemies’ foreigners and immigrants in the prisons of Europe.’ Punishment & Society 1(2), pp. 215–222. https://doi.org/10.1177/14624749922227784

Similar Articles

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.