No. XXXVI (2014)
Articles

Accommodating Foreigners Given Custodial Sentences in Light of the Cultural Aspects of Their Presence in Polish Penal Institutions

Agnieszka Gutkowska
University of Warsaw
Michał Fajst
University of Warsaw

Published 2014-01-01

Keywords

  • penal institutions,
  • accommodating foreigners

How to Cite

Gutkowska, A., & Fajst, M. (2014). Accommodating Foreigners Given Custodial Sentences in Light of the Cultural Aspects of Their Presence in Polish Penal Institutions. Archives of Criminology, (XXXVI), 293–323. https://doi.org/10.7420/AK2014J

Abstract

The cultural diversity of people serving custodial sentences in Poland is an issue that requires intensive research and analysis. In theory, the number of foreigners in Polish prisons might not seem great enough to warrant the interest of either researchers or practitioners. There are said to be around 500 such people (in custody and provisional detention) annually in a population of approx. 80,000. It has to be borne in mind, however, that the presence of people with a completely alien, and therefore often incomprehensible, cultural code in such a closed environment as a penal institution poses a great challenge, despite their small numbers. This article discusses the results of research conducted on foreigners in selected Polish penal institutions in 2014. The methodology involved analysing case files and conducting in-depth interviews with Prison Service officials and employees as well as the foreign prisoners themselves. These examinations attempted to determine, inter alia, the extent to which the cultural differences that incarcerated foreigners bring with them affect the status of foreigners serving custodial sentences and the way penal institutions function, and how well adapted the Polish prison system is to dealing with people from other cultures. One of the aspects discussed is the issue of accommodating foreigners given custodial sentences. This is analysed from the standpoint of possible cultural differences. According to the current legislation, foreigners are subject to the same rules as Polish prisoners when serving their sentences. The officials who were interviewed stressed that the rules for accommodating foreigners in detention centres and penal institutions are no different from those that apply to Poles – and nor should they be. As the interview progressed, however, these same officials would give examples of situations where the cultural differences of incarcerated foreigners affected e.g. the way they were accommodated in their cells and certain additional difficulties they had in adapting and relating to the prison subculture. Therefore, in practice, despite the lack of regulations and/or recommendations from above, these officials are forced to respond to the additional challenges resulting from the fact that foreigners do not speak Polish and exhibit behavioural patterns that differ to a greater or lesser extent from the norm. The experience and “penitentiary intuition” of the official actually turned out to be the only guide in these situations. The attitude of the foreign inmates themselves is no less important for the proper functioning of a penal institution. The examination shows that most of them are not looking for extra hassles but are trying to serve their sentences with as little trouble as possible. In view of the above, it would seem legitimate to argue that the main reason for there not being greater problems with foreigners in Polish prisons is that there are so few of them.

References

  1. Bulenda T., Dąbrowiecki M., Cudzoziemcy w polskich aresztach śledczych i zakładach karnych, Biuro Rzecznika Praw Obywatelskich, Warszawa 1993.
  2. Carrabine E., Cox P., Lee Maggy M., Plummer K., South N., Criminology. A Sociological Introduction, Routledge, London-New York 2009.
  3. Centralny Zarząd Służby Więziennej, Miesięczna informacja statystyczna. Styczeń 2014, Warszawa, styczeń 2014, [wersja online], http://sw.gov.pl/Data/Files/001c169lidz/styczen-2014.pdf [dostęp: sierpień 2014].
  4. Centralny Zarząd Służby Więziennej, Roczna informacja statystyczna za rok 2013, Warszawa 2014, http://sw.gov.pl/Data/Files/001c169lidz/rok-2013.pdf [dostęp: sierpień 2014].
  5. Gajdus D., Gronowska B., Europejskie standardy traktowania więźniów (rekonstrukcja standardów oraz ich znaczenie dla polskiego prawa i praktyki penitencjarnej). Zarys wykładu, TNOiK Dom Organizatora, Toruń 1998.
  6. Kamiński M.M., Gry więzienne. Tragikomiczny świat polskiego więzienia, Oficyna Naukowa, Warszawa 2006.
  7. Loader I., Sparks R., Contemporary landscapes of crime, order, and control. Governance, risk, and globalization [w:] M. Maguire, R. Morgan, R. Reiner (red.), The Oxford Handbook of Criminology, Oxford University Press, Oxford 2007.
  8. Malec J., Cudzoziemcy w polskich jednostkach penitencjarnych [w:] J. Lipka, Stan i węzłowe problemy polskiego więziennictwa, Biuro Rzecznika Praw Obywatelskich, Agencja Master, Warszawa, Łódź 1995.
  9. Martynowicz A., Warehouses For the Deportable Foreign National Prisoners in the UK, „Archiwum Kryminologii” 2013, t. XXXV, s. 305-331, https://doi.org/10.7420/AK2013K.
  10. National Economic Accounts for Countries and Regions around the World. Compared National Income Accounting in relation to the standards of living across countries, Nations Online, http://www.nationsonline.org/oneworld/GNI_PPP_of_countries.htm [dostęp: grudzień 2014].
  11. Perkowska M., Przestępczość graniczna cudzoziemców, Wydawnictwo C.H. Beck, Warszawa 2013.
  12. Rodak M., Mit a rzeczywistość. Przestępczość osób narodowości żydowskiej. Casus województwa lubelskiego w II Rzeczypospolitej, Polskie Towarzystwo Historyczne, Warszawa 2012.
  13. Sauvy A., Trois mondes, une planète, „L’Observateur” 1952, nr 118.
  14. Wróbel W., Zoll A., Polskie prawo karne. Część ogólna, Wydawnictwo Znak, Kraków 2010.