No. 2 (188) (2011)
Artykuły

Przymusowe małżeństwo jako zbrodnia przeciwko ludzkości w świetle orzecznictwa Specjalnego Trybunału dla Sierra Leone

[Forced marriage as a crime against humanity under the jurisprudence of the Special Court for Sierra Leone]

Published 2011-06-30

Keywords

  • forced marriage,
  • Sierra Leone,
  • women,
  • Special Court for Sierra Leone,
  • crime against humanity

How to Cite

Przymusowe małżeństwo jako zbrodnia przeciwko ludzkości w świetle orzecznictwa Specjalnego Trybunału dla Sierra Leone : [Forced marriage as a crime against humanity under the jurisprudence of the Special Court for Sierra Leone]. (2011). Studia Prawnicze The Legal Studies, 2 (188), 177-199. https://doi.org/10.37232/sp.2011.2.6

Abstract

This article attempts to make progress on understanding the problems linked to forced marriage, as The Special Court for Sierra Leone the first time ever acknowledged it as a crime against humanity, and consequently recognized the women afflicted by it (bush wives, rebel wives) as victims. The forced marriage was not embraced in the international agreements until now. The need of protection of women in the armed conflicts has become indispensable, because of the very frequent use of such strategy of violence against women during armed conflicts. It found a reflection in several UN Security Council resolutions: S/RES/1820 (2008), S/RES/1829 (2008) and S/RES/1325 (2000), which in particular are concerned with the protection of women’s rights through the mechanisms of transitional justice and criminal justice. Yet, forced marriage has not been recognized as a separate crime by other international criminal courts. Nevertheless, the jurisprudence of the International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia and International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda contributed to creating a new crime on the ground of international law. Undoubtedly, forced marriage results in extreme feelings of humiliation and indignity both by the victims and their families. The bush wives instead of being accepted are being excluded from the community. This emotional and social rejection becomes the worst consequence for the victims. Against this background the judgments of the Special Court for Sierra Leone is very important for the international criminal justice, since the Appeals Chamber of the Court in the AFRC case underlined the particular suffering of victims and their stigmatization, which were considered different than in other forms of sexual violence, especially sexual slavery.

References

  1. Akt oskarżenia przeciwko Brima, Kamara, Kanu, SCSL – 2004 – 16 – PT, http://www.sc-sl.org/LinkClick.aspx?fileticket=Of5nG3SDgf0=&tabid=106 [dostęp: 1.12.2010 r.].
  2. Amnesty International Report, Sierra Leone. Getting reparations right for survivors of sexual violence, 1.11.2007, AFR 51/005/2007, http://www.amnesty.org/en/library/asset/AFR51/005/2007/en/4cda5d8e-d370-11dd-a329-2f46302a8cc6/afr510052007en.pdf [dostęp: 20.12.2010 r.].
  3. Bangura Z., Expert Report on the Phenomenon of “Forced Marriage” in the context of the Conflict In Sierra Leone and more specifically, In the context of the Trials against the RUF and AFRC Accused only.
  4. Bass G.J., Stay the Hand of Vengeance. The Politics of War Crimes Tribunals, Princeton University Press, Princeton 2000.
  5. Daccess-dds-ny.un.org, http://daccess-dds-ny.un.org/doc/UNDOC/GEN/N08/448/13/PDF/N0844813.pdf?OpenElement [dostęp: 9.12.2010 r.].
  6. Decisions on Defence Motions for Judgment of Acquittal Pursuant to Rule 98, SCSL – 04 – 16 - T SCSL-04-16-T, http://www.sc-sl.org/Link-Click.aspx?fileticket=PVnTbmxuZck=&tabid=157 [dostęp: 20.12.2010 r.].
  7. Decisions on Defence Motions for Judgment of Acquittal Pursuant to Rule 98.
  8. Decyzja Izby Apelacyjnej dostępny na: http://www.sc-sl.org/LinkClick.aspx?fileticket=an39Vi%2fwKos%3d&tabid=195 [dostęp: 2011 r.].
  9. Forced Marriage Appeal May Influence ICC, 24.07.2007 r., http://iwpr.net/index.php?m=p&o=337374&s=f&apc [dostęp: 20.12.2010 r.].
  10. Frulli M., Advancing International Criminal Law. The Special Court for Sierra Leone recognizes forced marriage as a ‘new’ crime against humanity, „Journal of International Criminal Justice” 2008, s. 1033–1042.
  11. Gong-Gershowitz J., Forced marriage. A “new” crime against humanity?, „Northwestern Journal of International Human Rights” 2009, nr 1, s. 53–76.
  12. Haye E. La, Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court, Elements of Crimes, art. 8 ust. 2 lit. b) xxii -2 – Sexual Slavery [w:] R.S.K. Lee (red.), The International Criminal Court. Elements of crimes and rules of procedure and evidence, Transnational Publishers, Ardsley 2001.
  13. Karta Międzynarodowego Trybunału Wojskowego w Norymberdze z dnia 8.08.1945 r., http://www.law.umkc.edu/faculty/projects/ftrials/nuremberg/NurembergIndictments.html [dostęp: 10.12.2010 r.].
  14. McKay S., Mazurana D., Where are the girls? Girls fighting forces northern Uganda, Sierra Leone and Mozambique, their lives after the war, Rights & Democracy, Montréal 2004.
  15. Meron T., Prawa człowieka wkraczają na nowe terytoria: dochodzenie odpowiedzialności za naruszenia praw człowieka przed Międzynarodowymi Trybunałami Karnymi, http://www.hfhrpol.waw.pl/Nowicki/images/stories/file/Theodor_Meron.pdf [dostęp: 5.12.2010 r.].
  16. Niarchos C., Women, war and rape. Challenges facing the International Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia, „Human Rights Quarterly” 1995, nr 4, 1995, s. 649–690.
  17. Nuremberg Trials Final Report Appendix D. Control Council Law No. 10 Punishment of Persons Guilty of War Crimes, Crimes against Peace and against Humanity, http://avalon.law.yale.edu/imt/imt10.asp [dostęp: 10.12.2010 r.].
  18. Pck.org.pl, http://www.pck.org.pl/pliki/konwencje/ii_pd.pdf [dostęp: 10.12.2010 r.].
  19. Prokurator v. Brima, Kamara & Kanu, Case No. SCSL-04-16-PT, Decision on Prosecution Request for Leave to Amend the Indictment z 6.05.2004 r., http://www.sc-sl.org/LinkClick.aspx?fileticket=b9rzrNZKzBU=&tabid=157 [dostęp: 4.12.2010 r.].
  20. Prosecutor v Sesay, Kallon and Gbao, SCSL-04-15-T, wyrok Izby Procesowej z 25.02.2009 r., http://www.sc-sl.org/LinkClick.aspx?fileticket=AoknUKBsH50%3d&tabid=215 [dostęp: 1.12.2010 r.].
  21. Prosecutor v. Dragoljub Kunarac, Radomir Kovac and Zoran Vukovic, IT-96-23-PT, akt oskarżenia, 1.12.1999 r.
  22. Prosecutor v. Mitar Vasiljevic (Trial Judgement) IT-98-32-T, 29.11.2002 r.
  23. Prosecutor v. Norman et al., SCSL-04-14-PT, Reasoned Majority Decision on Prosecution Motion for a Ruling on the Admissibility of Evidence, 24.05.2005 r.
  24. Prosecutor v. Norman, Fofana & Kondewa, Case No. SCSL-04-14-PT, Decision on Prosecution Request for Leave to Amend the Indictment z 20.05.2004 r., http://www.sc-sl.org/LinkClick.aspx?fileticket=2HXkGYl7w80%3d&tabid=153 [dostęp: 4.12.2010 r.].
  25. Prosecutor v. Zoran Kupreškić et al., IT – 95 – 16 – T, 14.01.2000 r.
  26. Rapp S., Violence against women in conflicts. How can development policy help? High Level Conference 5 March 2009, Berlin 2009.
  27. Reguły Procesowe i Dowodowe z dnia 16.01.2002 r. ze zm., http://www.sc-sl.org/LinkClick.aspx?fileticket=xTBQdsmEuic%3d&tabid=176 [dostęp: 2.12.2010 r.].
  28. Report of the ILC, 6 May-26 July 1996, U.N. GAOR, 51st Sess. Supp. No. 10. UN Doc. A/51/10.
  29. Resolution 1820 (2008) Rady Bezpieczeństwa z 19.06.2008 r., http://daccess-dds-ny.un.org/doc/UNDOC/GEN/N08/391/44/PDF/N0839144.pdf?OpenElement [dostęp: 9.12.2010 r.].
  30. Rezolucji Parlamentu Europejskiego w sprawie roli kobiet w życiu społecznym, gospodarczym i politycznym Turcji (2004/2215(INI) http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=CELEX:52005IP0287:PL:HTML [dostęp: 2011 r.].
  31. Rzymski Statut Międzynarodowego Trybunału Karnego sporządzony w Rzymie dnia 17 lipca 1998 r., Dz.U. 2003 r. Nr 78, poz. 708.
  32. Separate Concurring Opinion of the Hon. Justice Julia Sebutinde Appended to Judgement Pursuant to Rule 88 (C).
  33. Special Rapporteur on Contemporary Forms of Slavery, Final report on Contemporary forms of Slavery. Systematic rape, sexual slavery and slavery-like practices during armed conflict, E/CN.4/Sub.2/1998/13, 22.06.1998 r.
  34. Special Rapporteur on Contemporary Forms of Slavery, Update to the Final Report on Systematic rape, Sexual Slavery and Slavery-like Practices during Armed Confl ict E/CN.4/Sub.2/2000/21, 6.06.2000 r.
  35. Statut Specjalnego Trybunału stanowi załącznik do porozumienia pomiędzy Organizacją Narodów Zjednoczonych a rządem Sierra Leone z dnia 16.01.2002 r., http://www.scsl.org/LinkClick.aspx?fileticket=uClnd1MJeEw%3d&tabid=176 [dostęp: 2.12.2010 r.].
  36. Steinberg D., Make Forced Marriage a Crime Against Humanity, „Christian Science Monitor” 2008, nr 9.
  37. The Impact of Conflict on Woman and Girls in West and Central Africa and the UNICEF Response 7, 2005, www.unicef.org/publications/fi les/Impact_final.pdf [dostęp: 29.03.2011 r.].
  38. The International Rescue Committee in Sierra Leone – Fact Sheet, October 2007, www.theirc.org/resources/2007/irc-sierra-leone-factsheet.pdf [dostęp: 2.12.2010 r.].
  39. Trzciński K., Wojny w Liberii i Sierra Leone (1989-2002). Geneza, przebieg i następstwa, Dialog, Warszawa 2002.
  40. United Nations Security Council, Resolution 1888 (2009), Women, Peace and Security, http://daccessdds.un.org/doc/UNDOC/GEN/N09/534/46/PDF/N0953446.pdf?OpenElement [dostęp: 9.12.2010 r.].
  41. United Nations Security Council, Resolution 1889 (2009), http://daccessdds.un.org/doc/UNDOC/GEN/N09/542/55/PDF/N0954255.pdf?OpenElement [dostęp: 9.12.2010 r.].
  42. Uzupełniająca Konwencja w sprawie zniesienia niewolnictwa, handlu niewolnikami oraz instytucji i praktyk zbliżonych do niewolnictwa, podpisana w Genewie dnia 7 września 1956 r., Dz.U. 1963 r. Nr 33, poz. 185.
  43. Wieczorek-Zeul H., Violence against women in conflicts. How can development policy help? High Level Conference 5 March 2009, Berlin, Development Policy Forum, Berlin 2009.
  44. Wyrok Izby Apelacyjnej w sprawie AFRC, SCSL – 2004 – 16 – A, Summary, http://www.sc-sl.org/LinkClick.aspx?fileticket=eqdB1%2fnMMYU%3d&tabid=173 [dostęp: 3.12.2010 r.].
  45. Wyrok Izby Apelacyjnej w sprawie Prosecutor v. Brima, Kamara, Kanu, SCSL-2004-16-A-675, 22.02.2008 r., http://www.scsl.org/CASES/ProsecutorvsBrimaKamaraandKanuAFRCCase/AppealJudgment/tabid/216/Default.aspx [dostęp: 2.12.2010 r.].