Nr 4 (204) (2015)
Artykuły

Mechanizm odwoływania członka Izby Gmin w ustroju konstytucyjnym Zjednoczonego Królestwa

[Recall mechanism for a member of the House of Commons in the constitutional system of the United Kingdom]

Grzegorz Pastuszko
Uniwersytet Rzeszowski

Opublikowane 2015-09-30

Słowa kluczowe

  • Izba Gmin,
  • Zjednoczone Królestwo,
  • odwołanie,
  • członek parlamentu,
  • Wielka Brytania,
  • państwa obce,
  • członek,
  • parlament,
  • House of Commons,
  • United Kingdom,
  • recall,
  • member of parliament,
  • foreign country,
  • member,
  • parliament
  • ...Więcej
    Less

Jak cytować

Mechanizm odwoływania członka Izby Gmin w ustroju konstytucyjnym Zjednoczonego Królestwa: [Recall mechanism for a member of the House of Commons in the constitutional system of the United Kingdom]. (2015). Studia Prawnicze The Legal Studies, 4 (204), 123-140. https://doi.org/10.37232/sp.2015.4.5

Abstrakt

W 2009 r. w Wielkiej Brytanii wybuchł skandal, po tym jak tamtejsze media ujawniły praktykowany przez niektórych parlamentarzystów proceder opłacania pieniędzmi z kasy parlamentu swoich prywatnych wydatków. Wydarzenia te wywołały wielką falę społecznego oburzenia, pokazując jednocześnie, że istniejące dotychczas mechanizmy kontroli nad parlamentarzystami w pewnych sytuacjach okazują się zupełnie zawodne. Dla polityków oczywistym stał się fakt, iż muszą nastąpić zmiany, które dadzą społeczeństwu poczucie adekwatnej reakcji. Z tego też powodu w trakcie kampanii wyborczej do parlamentu z 2010 r. trzy wiodące ugrupowania, tj. Partia Konserwatywna, Partia Pracy oraz Partia Liberalno-Demokratyczna, wysunęły w swoich manifestach wyborczych, głośno dyskutowaną w debatach publicznych, propozycję wprowadzenia instytucji odwoływania posłów przez wyborców (tzw. recall). Była to śmiała, nieznana wcześniej parlamentaryzmowi westminsterskiemu, koncepcja, która zgodnie z intencją pomysłodawców miała przywrócić zaufanie wyborców w mocno nadszarpnięty wskutek afery autorytet polityków. Do jej realizacji doszło w okresie istnienia koalicyjnego rządu Dawida Cameron’a, sprawującego władzę w latach 2010–2015.

 

The article deals with a new legal institution recall of member of parliament that was established in 2015 in the UK. The aim of this institution is to give voters of a constituency a right to force a by-election, if they are unhappy with their MP. They can use it, however, only if certain conditions are fulfilled. According to the bill it becomes possible to initiate the recall procedure when a member of parliament: 1) is convicted by a UK court of an offence and receives a custodial sentence not more than 12 months, 2) is suspended by the House of Commons for more than 10 sitting days or more than 14 calendar days, 3) is convicted of an offence described in Parliamentary Standards Act 2009. These three restrictive provisions indicate that the recall procedure was not drafted as a mechanism of political accountability of deputies. The real intention of lawmaker was, as may be assumed, protection of ethical standards in the parliamentary life of the UK. As a matter of fact, with recall procedure voters can get rid of a member of parliament who broke some ethic elementary rules while holding his/her mandate. Analyzing the content of the new regulations and their ratio legis, the author tries to answer a question what role the new institution can play in functioning the constitutional system of the UK and following in its political life as well. His general conclusion is that even though we consider the new rules as a kind of revolutionary move in legal dimension (like for example the adjustment of the parliamentary mandate characteristics), we cannot expect any revolution in practice.

Bibliografia

  1. Cowen N., Wypowiedź ekspercka, House of Commons Political and Constitutional Reform Committee, Recall of MPs First Report of Session 2012–13 (Report, together with formal minutes, oral and written evidence), London 21 June 2012, ustęp 3.
  2. GriffithJ. A. G., Ryle M., Wheeler-Boot M. A. J., Parliament. Functions, Practice and Procedures, London 1989.
  3. House of Commons Information Office, Disciplinary and Penal Powers of the House, Factsheet G6 General Series, FS No.P11 Ed 3.4, London 2010.
  4. House of Commons Political and Constitutional Reform Committee, First Report of Session 2012–13 – Recall of MPs (Report, together with formal minutes, oral and written evidence), HC 373 [incorporating HC 1758-i-iv, Session 2010-12], London 2012.
  5. House of Commons Political and Constitutional Reform Committee, Recall of MPs First Report of Session 2012–13 (Report, together with formal minutes, oral and written evidence), London 21 June 2012, ustęp 88.
  6. http://static1.squarespace.com/static/5525bbf5e4b026f75314c09b/t/559d3eede4b0e849e26a35bd/1436368621070/242408349-Real-Recall-a-blueprint-for-recall-in-the-UK.pdf.
  7. http://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm201213/cmselect/cmpolcon/373/120119.htm.
  8. http://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm201213/cmselect/cmpolcon/373/373.pdf.
  9. Judge D., Recall of MPs in the UK: ‘if I were you I would start from here’, “Parliamentary Affairs” 2013, nr 66.
  10. Kelly R., White I., Recall of MPs Bill 2014–2015. Bill No 94 of 2014–15, Research Paper 14/53, 9 October 2014, www.parliament.uk/briefing-papers/RP14-53.pdf.
  11. Kręcisz W., Status prawny posła do Izby Gmin w Wielkiej Brytanii, Warszawa 2001.
  12. May E., The Law, Treatise on Privilages, Proceedings and Usage of Parliament, 19th Ed., London 1976.
  13. Miles P., Unlock Democracy. Real Recall: A blueprint for recall in the UK, London 2014.
  14. Parliamentary Privilege, Presented to Parliament by the Leader of the House of Commons and Lord Privy Seal by Command of Her Majesty, HM Government Cm 8318, London 2012.
  15. Political and Constitutional Reform Committee – Minutes of Evidence HC 373 (Oral Evidence Taken before the Political and Constitutional Reform Committee on Thursday 19 January 2012), Q15, http://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm201213/cmselect/cmpolcon/373/120119.htm.
  16. Qvortrup M., Hasta la Vista: a comparative institutionalist analysis of the recall, “Representation” 2011, vol. 47, No. 2.
  17. Recall of MPs Draft Bill, HM Government, Cm 8241, London 2011.
  18. Renwick A., Lamb M., Numan B., The expenses scandal and the politics of electoral reform, “The Political Quarterly” 2011, nr 82 (1).
  19. Rogers R., Political and Constitutional Reform Committee – Minutes of Evidence HC 373, Oral Evidence Taken before the Political and Constitutional Reform Committee on Thursday 19 January 2012, Q90.
  20. Twomey A., House of Commons Political and Constitutional Reform Committee, Recall of MPs First Report of Session 2012–13 (Report, together with formal minutes, oral and written evidence), London 21 June 2012.
  21. Wright T., Recalling MPs: Accountable to Whom?, “The Political Quarterly” 2015, Vol. 86, No. 2.
  22. Zimmerman J., House of Commons Political and Constitutional Reform Committee, Recall of MPs. First Report of Session 2012–13 (together with formal minutes, oral and written evidence), HC 373 [incorporating HC 1758-i-iv, Session 2010-12, London 2012.