Prześlij tekst
Nr 1(231) (2025)
Artykuły

Nuisance Law and Human Rights: Brigding the Gap Between Article 8 and Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 to the European Convention on Human Rights [Prawo immisji a prawa człowieka: niwelowanie rozbieżności między artykułem 8 a artykułem 1 Protokołu nr 1 do Europejskiej Konwencji Praw Człowieka]

PDF
  • Víðir Smári Petersen

Opublikowane 2025-09-30

Słowa kluczowe

  • uciążliwości,
  • prawa własności,
  • dom,
  • artykuł 8 EKPC,
  • artykuł 1 Protokołu nr 1 EKPC
Creative Commons License

Utwór dostępny jest na licencji Creative Commons Uznanie autorstwa 4.0 Międzynarodowe.

Jak cytować

Nuisance Law and Human Rights: Brigding the Gap Between Article 8 and Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 to the European Convention on Human Rights [Prawo immisji a prawa człowieka: niwelowanie rozbieżności między artykułem 8 a artykułem 1 Protokołu nr 1 do Europejskiej Konwencji Praw Człowieka]. (2025). Studia Prawnicze The Legal Studies, 1(231). https://doi.org/10.37232/

Abstrakt

Europejski Trybunał Praw Człowieka zazwyczaj rozpatruje roszczenia dotyczące uciążliwości, takie jak te dotyczące hałasu lub zanieczyszczenia, na podstawie artykułu 8 Europejskiej Konwencji Praw Człowieka, który chroni między innymi prawo do posiadania własnego domu. Z drugiej strony, roszczenia takie są generalnie wyłączone z zakresu ochrony własności na mocy artykułu 1 Protokołu nr 1. Niniejszy artykuł kwestionuje to podejście, argumentując, że wynika ono z wąskiej interpretacji własności i pozostawia luki w ochronie. Te dwa przepisy mogą się wzajemnie uzupełniać i zapewniać bardziej kompleksową ochronę interesów, które na nią zasługują. Artykuł kończy się propozycją dwuwymiarowego podejścia, w którym uciążliwości są analizowane w kontekście obu przepisów.

PDF

Bibliografia

  1. Akkermans B., Property Law, in: J. Hage, A. Waltermann, B. Akkermans (eds), Introduction to Law, Springer, Cham 2018, p. 79–108.
  2. Axelsson K., Ragnarsdóttir Á., Eignarnám, Fons Juris, Reykjavík 2021.
  3. Beeler-Sigron M., Protection of Property, in: P. van Dijk, F. van Hoof, A. van Rijn, L. Zwaak (eds), Theory and Practice of the European Convention on Human Rights, Intersentia, Louvain-la-Neuve 2018, p. 851–888.
  4. Beever A., The Law of Private Nuisance, Hart Publishing, Oxford 2013.
  5. Dagan H., Reimagining Takings Law, in: G. Alexander, E. Peñalver (eds), Property and Community, Oxford University Press, Oxford 2010, p. 39–56.
  6. Gordley J., Disturbances among Neighbours: An Introduction, in: J. Gordley (ed.), The Development of Liability Between Neighbours, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge 2010, p. 1–28.
  7. Gordley J., Foundations of Private Law, Oxford University Press, New York 2006.
  8. Gordley J., Takings, “Tulane Law Review” 2008, vol. 82, no. 4, p. 1505–1526.
  9. Habdas M., Compensating Landowners in the Vicinity of Airports, Routledge, New York 2024.
  10. Harris D.J., O’Boyle M., Bates E., Buckley C.M., Harris, O’Boyle and Warbrick: Law of the European Convention on Human Rights, Oxford University Press, New York 2023.
  11. Kommers D., Miller R., The Constitutional Jurisprudence of the Federal Republic of Germany, Duke University Press, Durham 2012.
  12. Lifshitz Y., The Geometry of Property, “University of Toronto Law Journal” 2021, vol. 71, no. 4, p. 480–509.
  13. Maxwell D., The Human Right to Property: A Practical Approach to Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 to the ECHR, Hart Publishing, Oxford 2022.
  14. McCarthy F., Protection of Property and the European Convention on Human Rights, “Brigham-Kanner Property Rights Conference Journal” 2017, vol. 6,
  15. p. 299–328.
  16. Merrill T.W., Smith H.E., Introduction to Property, Oxford University Press, New York 2010.
  17. Petersen V., Climate Change and the Social Function of Property: A Human Flourishing Reading of Article 1 of Protocol No 1 to the European Convention on Human Rights, in: M. Habdas, L. Verstappen, H. Mostert, E. Marais (eds), Rethinking Expropriation Law IV: Takings for Climate Justice and Resilience, Eleven Publishing, The Hague 2024, p. 213–246.
  18. Petersen V., Ragnarsson K., Obligations for Owners to Climate-Proof Buildings in Iceland, “European Property Law Journal” 2024, vol. 13, no. 1, p. 104–126.
  19. Petersen V., Vavourakis F., Review of Permits: The Interplay between Article 11(5) of the Water Framework Directive and Article 1 of Protocol 1 to the European Convention on Human Rights, in: M. van Rijswick, C. Suykens (eds),
  20. EU Research Handbook on Water Law, Edward Elgar Publishing (forthcoming 2025).
  21. Radin M., Property and Personhood, “Stanford Law Review” 1982, vol. 34, no. 5,
  22. p. 957–1015.
  23. Rainey B., McCormick P., Ovey C., Jacobs, White, and Ovey: The European Convention on Human Rights, Oxford University Press, New York 2021.
  24. Smith H.E., Property beyond Flatland, “Brigham-Kanner Property Rights Conference Journal” 2021, vol. 10, p. 9–56.
  25. Bacharach B., David H., A House Is Not a Home, Scepter Records, New York 1964.
  26. Decision of the European Commission of Human Rights of 14 May 1986, Case No. 11716/85, S. v. the United Kingdom, CE:ECHR:1986:0514DEC001171685.
  27. Judgment of the European Court of Human Rights of 18 February 1991, 12033/86, Fredin v. Sweden, LEX 81122.
  28. Judgment of the European Court of Human Rights of 21 February 1990, 9310/81, Powell and Rayner v. the United Kingdom, LEX 81097.
  29. Decision of the European Court of Human Rights of 6 September 2005, 63512/00 and 63513/00, Leveau and Fillon v. France, LEX 281497.
  30. Judgment of the European Court of Human Rights of 15 November 2007, 72118/01, Khamidov v. Russia, LEX 318799.
  31. Judgment of the European Court of Human Rights of 16 November 2004, 4143/02, Moreno Gómez v. Spain, LEX 142240.
  32. Judgment of the European Court of Human Rights of 16 November 2004, 41673/98, Bruncrona v. Finland, LEX 142265.
  33. Judgment of the European Court of Human Rights of 18 November 2004, 58255/00, Prokopovich v. Russia, LEX 142246.
  34. Judgment of the European Court of Human Rights of 30 November 2004, 48939/99, Öneryıldız v. Turkey, LEX 142252.
  35. Judgment of the European Court of Human Rights of 15 November 2011, 31339/04, Darkowska and Darkowski v. Poland, LEX 1060259.
  36. Judgment of the European Court of Human Rights of 13 December 2012, 3675/04 and 23264/04, Flamenbaum and others v. France, LEX 1230217.
  37. Judgment of the European Court of Human Rights of 15 December 2015, 32794/07, Matczynski v. Poland, LEX 1936311.
  38. Judgment of the European Court of Human Rights of 14 December 2021, 49108/11, Samoylova v. Russia, LEX 3271895.
  39. Judgment of Federal Constitutional Court of 15 July 1981, BVerfGE 58, 300.
  40. Judgment of the European Court of Human Rights of 26 June 1986, 8543/79, 8674/79, 8675/79 and 8685/79, Van Marle and Others v. the Netherlands, LEX 81017.
  41. Judgment of the European Court of Human Rights of 7 July 1989, 10873/84, Tre Traktörer Aktiebolag v. Sweden, LEX 81085.
  42. Judgment of the European Court of Human Rights of 9 December 1994, 16798/90, López Ostra v. Spain, LEX 80503.
  43. Decision of the European Court of Human Rights of 29 June 1999, 29121/95, Asselbourg and Others v. Luxembourg, LEX 524783.
  44. Judgment of the European Court of Human Rights of 18 January 2001, 27238/95, Chapman v. the United Kingdom, LEX 76533.
  45. Judgment of the European Court of Human Rights of 8 July 2003, 36022/97, Hatton and Others v. the United Kingdom, LEX 80309.
  46. Judgment of the European Court of Human Rights of 31 July 2003, 16219/90, Demades v. Turkey, LEX 80335.
  47. Judgment of the European Court of Human Rights of 27 May 2004, 66746/01, Connors v. the United Kingdom, LEX 125977.
  48. Judgment of the European Court of Human Rights of 11 January 2007, 73049/01, Anheuser-Busch Inc. v. Portugal, LEX 211949.
  49. Icelandic Planning Act No. 123/2010 of 1 January 2010.
  50. Judgment of the European Court of Human Rights of 29 March 2011, 33949/05, Potomska and Potomski v. Poland, LEX 784737.
  51. Judgment of the European Court of Human Rights of 6 December 2011, 7097/10, Gladysheva v. Russia, LEX1054644.
  52. Decision of the European Court of Human Rights of 14 May 2013, 26367/10, Fürst von Thurn und Taxis v. Germany, LEX 1315916.
  53. Judgment of the European Court of Human Rights of 17 October 2013, 27013/07, Winterstein and Others v. France, LEX 1375709.
  54. Judgment of the European Court of Human Rights of 24 April 2014, 27310/09, Udovičić v. Croatia, LEX 1451482.
  55. Judgment of the European Court of Human Rights of 21 April 2016, 46577/15, Ivanova and Cherkezov v. Bulgaria, LEX 2021199.
  56. Judgment of the European Court of Human Rights of 30 October 2018, 22677/10, Kurşun v. Turkey, LEX 2594174.
  57. Judgment of the European Court of Human Rights of 28 September 2004, 44912/98, Kopecký v. Slovakia, LEX 141516.
  58. Judgment of the European Court of Human Rights of 9 June 2022, 42858/11, Hasanali Aliyev and Others v. Azerbaijan, LEX 3351593.
  59. Judgment of the European Court of Human Rights of 9 April 2024, 53600/20, Verein Klimaseniorinnen Schweiz and Others v. Switzerland, LEX 3701706.