Prześlij tekst
Nr 4 (94) (1987)
Artykuły

Konkubinat w świetle prawa państw kapitalistycznych

  • Andrzej Szlęzak
Andrzej Szlęzak
Uniwersytet im. Adama Mickiewicza w Poznaniu

Opublikowane 2023-04-30

Słowa kluczowe

  • państwa kapitalistyczne,
  • systemy prawne państw obcych,
  • konkubinat,
  • współwłasność,
  • capitalist states,
  • legal systems of foreign states,
  • concubinage,
  • co-ownership
    • ...Więcej
    Less
Creative Commons License

Utwór dostępny jest na licencji Creative Commons Uznanie autorstwa 4.0 Międzynarodowe.

Jak cytować

Konkubinat w świetle prawa państw kapitalistycznych. (2023). Studia Prawnicze The Legal Studies, 4 (94), 177-219. https://doi.org/10.37232/sp.1987.4.6

Bibliografia

  1. Adamski F., Socjologia małżeństwa i rodziny. Wprowadzenie, Państwowe Wydawnictwo Naukowe, Warszawa 1982.
  2. Agell A., Cohabitation Without Marriage in Swedish Law [w:] J.M. Eekelaar, S.N. Katz (red.), Marriage and Cohabitation in Contemporary Societies, Butterworths, Boston 1980.
  3. Agell A., The Swedish Legislation on Marriage and Cohabitation. A Journey Without a Destination, „Scandinavian Studies in Law” 1980, t. 24.
  4. Astor H., Nothdurft J., Report of the New South Wales Law Reform Commission on De Facto Relationships, „The Modern Law Review” 1985, t. 48, nr 1.
  5. Blumberg G.G., Cohabitation Without Marriage. A Different Perspective, „UCLA Law Review” 1981, t. 28, nr 6.
  6. Bromley P.M., Family Law, Butterworths, London 1981.
  7. Bruch C.S., Nonmarital Cohabitation in the Common Law Countries. A Study in Judicial- Legislative Interaction, „The American Journal of Comparative Law” 1981, t. 29, nr 2.
  8. Bruch C.S., Property Rights of De Facto Spouses Including Thoughts on the Value of Homemaker’s Services, „Family Law Quarterly” 1976, t. 10.
  9. Caudill D.S., Legal Recognition of Unmarried Cohabitation. A Proposal to Update and Reconsider Common-Law Marriage, „Tennessee Law Review” 1982, t. 49, nr 3.
  10. Crutchfield Ch., Nonmarital Relationships and Their Impact on the Institution of Marriage and the Traditional Family Structure, „Journal of Family Law” 1980/81, t. 19.
  11. Deech R.L., The Case Against Legal Recognition of Cohabitation, „The International and Comparative Law Quarterly” 1980, t. 29.
  12. Fox D.W., The Role of Constructive, Implied and Resulting Trusts in Domestic Property Disputes, „Family Law” 1980, t. 10.
  13. Frank R., The Status of Cohabitation in the Legal Systems of West Germany and Other West European Countries, „The American Journal of Comparative Law” 1985, t. XXXIII, nr 2.
  14. Giron D.A., Domestic Relations - Cohabitation Not Grounds for Alimony Modification Absent Showing of Recipient’s Reduced Financial Need, „Suffolk University Law Review” 1981, t. 15, nr 5.
  15. Glendon M.A., The New Family and the New Property, Butterworths, Toronto 1981.
  16. Graue E.D., Cohabitation Without Marriage as a Problem of Law and Legislative Policy in West Germany and other Codified Systms [w:] J.M. Eekelaar, S.N. Katz (red.), Marriage and Cohabitation in Contemporary Societies, Butterworths, Boston 1980.
  17. Grossen J.M., Aspects of de facto Marriage under Switzerland’s Private Law [w:] J.M. Eekelaar, S.N. Katz (red.), Marriage and Cohabitation in Contemporary Societies, Butterworths, Boston 1980.
  18. Huet-Weiller D., L’union libre (La cohabitation sans mariage), „The American Journal of Comparative Law” 1981, t. XXIX, nr 2.
  19. J.O.T., Alimony, Cohabitation and the Wages of Sin. A Statutory Analysis, „Alabama Law Review” 1982, t. 33, nr 3.
  20. Kaska S.B., Iowa Unmarried Cohabitants Denied Recovery for Loss of Consortium, „Iowa Law Review” 1984, t. 69.
  21. Lipp M., Die nichteheliche Lebensgemeinschaft und das burgerliche Recht. Eine dogmatisch-methodische Studie, „Archiv fur die civilistische Praxis” 1980, t. 180, z. 6.
  22. Maede D., Consortium Rights of the Unmarried - Time for a Reappraisal, „Family Law Quarterly” 1981, t. XV, nr 3.
  23. Mazeaud H., Mazeaud L., Mazeaud J., Chabas F., Lecons de droit civil, Obligations. Theorie generale, t. II, cz. 1, Montchrestien, Paris 1985.
  24. Mendel E.V., Custody and the Cohabitating Parent, „Journal of Family Law” 1981-1982, t. 20, nr 4.
  25. Meulders-Klein M.T., Cohabitation and Children in Europe, „The American Journal of Comparative Law” 1981, t. XXIX, nr 2.
  26. Müller-Freienfels W., Familienrecht im In- und Ausland. Aufsätze, Verlag für Standesamtswesen, Frankfurt 1986.
  27. Nerson R., Les couples non marlies en France [w:] J.M. Eekelaar, S.N. Katz (red.), Marriage and Cohabitation in Contemporary Societies, Butterworths, Boston 1980.
  28. Oldham J.T., Caudill D.S., A Reconnaissance of Public Policy Restrictions upon Enforcement of Contracts between Cohabitants, „Family Law Quarterly” 1984, t. XVIII, nr 1.
  29. Oldham J.T., Cohabitation by an Alimony Recipient Revisited, „Journal of Family Law” 1981-1982, t. 20, nr 4.
  30. Pearl D., Cohabitation in English Social Security and Supplementary Benefits Legislation, „Family Law” 1979, nr 9.
  31. Pearl D., The Legal Implications of a Relationship Outside Marriage, „Cambridge Law Journal” 1978, t. 37, nr 2.
  32. Peyrard G., Les couples non maries [w:] R. Nerson (red.), Mariage et famille en question, t. 1, Paris 1978.
  33. Rubellin-Devichi J., L’attitude du legislateur contemporain face au mariage de fait, „Revue Trimestrielle de Droit Civil” 1984, nr 3.
  34. Samuels A., The Mistress and the Law, „Family Law” 1976, t. 6.
  35. Schneider C.E., Moral Discourse rand the Transformation of American Family Law, „Michigan Law Review” 1985, t. 83.
  36. Schwarz-Libermann von Wahlendorf H.A. (red.), Mariage et familie en question, Ed. du CNRS, Lyon 1980.
  37. Tyszka Z., Socjologia rodziny, Państwowe Wydawnictwo Naukowe, Warszawa 1979.
  38. Weitzman L.J., The Marriage Contract. Spouses, Lovers and the Law, Free Press, London 1981.
  39. Weyrauch W.O., Metamorphoses of Marriage, „Family Law Quarterly” 1980, t. 13, nr 4.
  40. Wiel van de A.M., Cohabitation Outside Marriage in Dutch Law [w:] J. M. Eekelaar, S.N. Katz (red.), Marriage and Cohabitation in Contemporary Societies, Butterworths, Boston 1980.
  41. Wolk B., Federal Tax Consequences of Wealth Transfers Between Unmarried Cohabitants, „UCLA Law Review” 1980, t. 27, nr 6.
  42. Woods G., Loss of Consortium. Extending Recovery to Unmarried Couples in Texas, „Baylor Law Review” 1983, t. 35, nr 3.