Prześlij tekst
Nr 1 (99) (1989)
Artykuły

Problem kary śmierci w orzecznictwie Sądu Najwyższego Stanów Zjednoczonych

  • Krzysztof Krajewski

Opublikowane 2023-04-30

Słowa kluczowe

  • systemy prawne państw obcych,
  • kara śmierci,
  • Stany Zjednoczone Ameryki,
  • orzecznictwo,
  • Sąd Najwyższy Stanów Zjednoczonych,
  • legal systems of foreign states,
  • death penalty,
  • United States of America (USA),
  • judicial decisions,
  • The Supreme Court of the United States
    • ...Więcej
    Less
Creative Commons License

Utwór dostępny jest na licencji Creative Commons Uznanie autorstwa 4.0 Międzynarodowe.

Jak cytować

Problem kary śmierci w orzecznictwie Sądu Najwyższego Stanów Zjednoczonych . (2023). Studia Prawnicze The Legal Studies, 1 (99), 125-161. https://doi.org/10.37232/sp.1989.1.4

Bibliografia

  1. Baldus D.C., Pulaski Ch., Woodworth G., Comparative Review of Death Sentences. An Empirical Study of the Georgia Experience, „The Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology” 1983, t. 74.
  2. Bedau H.A. (ed.) The Death Penalty in America, Oxford University Press, New York, Oxford 1982.
  3. Berger R., Death Penalties. The Supreme Courts Obstacle Course, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Mass. 1982.
  4. Berger R., Government by Judiciary. The Transformation of the Fourteenth Amendment, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Mass, 1977.
  5. Black C.L., Capital Punishment. The Inevitability of Caprice and Mistake, W.W Norton, New York 1978.
  6. Blasi V. (ed.), The Burger Court. The Counter Revolution that Wasn't, New Haven 1983.
  7. Bowers W.J., Legal Homicide. Death as Punishment in America, 1864-1982, Northwestern University Press, Boston 1984.
  8. Brennan W.J., Constitutional Adjudication and the Death Penalty. A View from the Court, „Harvard Law Review” 1986, t. 100.
  9. Capital Punishment 1985, US Department of Justice, Bureau of Justice Statistics, Washington DC 1984.
  10. Capital Punishment After Furman, „The Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology” 1973, t. 64.
  11. Capital Punishment for Minors. An Eighth Amendment Analysis, „The Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology” 1983, t. 74.
  12. Capital Punishment. Death for Murder Only, „The Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology” 1978, t. 69.
  13. Cherif Bassiouni M., Substantive Criminal Law, Thomas, Springfield 1978.
  14. Cox A., The Warren Court. Constitutional Decision as an Instrument of Reform, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Mass. 1968.
  15. Ehrhardt C.W., The Future of Capital Punishment in Florida. Analysis and Recomendations, „The Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology” 1973, t. 64.
  16. Ely J.H., Foreword : On Discovering Fundamental Values, „Harvard Law Review” 1978, t. 92.
  17. Erlich I., The Deterrent Effect of Capital Punishment. A Question of Life and Death, „American Economic Review” 1975, t. 65.
  18. Filier L., Movement to Abolish the Death Penalty in the United States, „The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science” 1952, t. 284.
  19. Flanagan T.J., McGarell E.F. (eds): Sourcebook of Criminal Justice Statistics - 1985, US. Department of Justice, Bureau of Justice Statistics, Washington D.C. 1986.
  20. Garlicki L., Aktualne kierunki orzecznictwa Sądu Najwyższego Stanów Zjednoczonych, „Państwo i Prawo” 1978, nr 6-9, s. 153-165.
  21. Garlicki L., Sąd Najwyższy Stanów Zjednoczonych Ameryki, Zakład Narodowy Im. Ossolińskich - Wydaw. Polskiej Akademii Nauk, Wrocław 1982.
  22. Goldberg A.J., Dershowitz A.M., Declaring the Death Penalty Unconstitutional, „Harward Law Review” 1970, t. 83.
  23. Goodpaster G., Judicial Review of Death Sentences, „The Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology” 1983, t. 74.
  24. Górecki J., Capital Punishment. Criminal Law and Social Evolution, Columbia University Press, New York 1983.
  25. Granucci A.F., Nor Cruel and Unusual Punishment Inflicted. The Original Meaning, „California Law Review” 1969, t. 57.
  26. Haller W., Supreme Court und Politik in den USA, Stämpfli, Bern 1972.
  27. Halpern S.C., Lamb C.M., Supreme Court, Activism and Restraint, Lexington Books, Lexington 1982.
  28. Hertz R., Weisberg R., In Mitigation of the Penalty of Death: Lockett v. Ohio and Capital Defendant’s Right to Consideration of Mitigating Circumstances, „California Law Review” 1981, t. 69.
  29. Klotter J.C., Criminal Evidence, Anderson Pub. Co., Cincinnati 1980.
  30. Krajewski K., Instytucja plea bargaining w amerykańskim procesie karnym, „Państwo i Prawo” 1980, nr 6, s. 95-105.
  31. Mellsner M., Cruel and Unusual. The Supreme Court and Capital Punishment, Random House, New York 1973.
  32. Mental Suffering Under Sentence of Death. A Cruel and Unusual Punishment, „Iowa Law Review” 1972, t. 57.
  33. Munzer S.R., Nickel J.W., Does the Constitution Mean What It Always Meant?, „Columbia Law Review” 1977, t. 27.
  34. Paternoster R., Race of Victim and Location of Crime. The Decision to Seek the Death Penalty in South Carolina, „The Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology” 1983, t. 74.
  35. Poklewski-Koziełł K., Due process of law [w:] Instytucje i doktryny prawno-polityczne Stanów Zjednoczonych Ameryki, Zakład Narodowy im. Ossolińskich, Wrocław 1974.
  36. Radin J., Cruel Punishment and Respect for Persons. Super Due Process of Death, „Southern California Law Review” 1980, t. 53.
  37. Radin M., The Jurisprudence of Death. Evolving Standards for the Cruel and Unusual Punishment Clause, „The University of Pensylvania Law Review” 1978, t. 126.
  38. Rubin S., The Supreme Court, Cruel and Unusual Punishment and the Death Penalty, „Crime and Delinquency” 1969, t. 15.
  39. Sarat A., Vidmar N., Public opinion, the Death Penalty and the Eighth Amendment. Testing the Marshall Hypothesis [w:] H.A. Bedau, Ch.M. Pierce (eds.), Capital Punishment in the United States, AMS Pr., New York 1976.
  40. Schwartz B., Constitutional Law, Macmillan, New York 1979.
  41. Supreme Court Review, „The Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology” 1985, t. 76.
  42. Supreme Court Review, „The Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology” 1980, t. 71.
  43. The Cruel and Unusual Punishment Clause and Substantiue Criminal Law, „Harvard Law Review” 1966, t. 79.
  44. The Death Penalty Cases, „California Law Review” 1969, t. 57.
  45. The Supreme Court Review, „The Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology” 1985, t. 76.
  46. The Supreme Court. 1977 Term, „Harvard Law Review” 1978, t. 92.
  47. The Supreme Court. 1982 Term, „Harvard Law Review” 1983, t. 97.
  48. The Supreme Court. 1983 Term, „Harvard Law Review” 1984, t. 98.
  49. Vidmar N., Elleworth P.C., Public Opinion and the Death Penalty, „Stanford Law Review” 1974, t. 26.
  50. Waltoś S., Niektóre gwarancje procesowe oskarżonego w procesie karnym USA w świetle badań empirycznych, „Państwo i Prawo” 1978, nr 3, s. 126-137.
  51. Weigend T., Entwicklungen und Tendenzen der Kriminalpolitik in den USA, „ Zeitschrift für die gesamte Strafrechtswissenschaft” 1978, t. 90.
  52. Weisberg R., Deregulating Death [w:] The Supreme Court Review 1983, University of Chicago Press, Chicago 1983.
  53. Wheeler M.E., Toward a Theory of Limited Punishment. An Examination of the Eighth Amendment, „Stanford Law Review” 1972, t. 24.
  54. Wolfe Ch., The Rise of Modern Judicial Review. From Constitutional Adjudication to Judge-Made Law, New York 1986.
  55. Wolfgang M.E., Riedl M., Racial Discrimination, Rape and the Death Penalty [w:] H.A. Bedau, Ch.M. Pierce (eds.), Capital Punishment in the United States, AMS Pr., New York 1976.
  56. Woodward B., Armstrong S., The Brethren. Inside the Supreme Court, Simon and Schuster, New York 1979.
  57. Zielińska E., Oceny prawnokarne przerywania ciąży w Stanach Zjednoczonych, „Studia Prawnicze” 1981, nr 4, s. 159-190.