Human rights are an integral part of an open society and a democratic state governed by the rule of law. Among them, the right to a legal identity occupies an important place, however, ensuring its proper implementation in today's difficult conditions of war conflicts has not been an easy task. Not surprisingly, the necessity to provide a legal identity for all, including birth registration, is among the global goals of sustainable development, as this helps a person`s recognition before the law and protection of their rights, any of which may be violated unnoticed (right to a health care, education and others). Proper registration of a person's death also ensures that the rights of that person's heirs can be exercised.
In this article, we examine the Ukrainian experience when ensuring the right of a person to birth and death registration through special civil proceedings. In the conclusions we justify a new approach to protecting the right to a legal identity and the method of its implementation within court procedure, in particular, in military conflicts, residence or permanent stay in temporarily occupied territories, etc. territories in which there are no legitimate public authorities.
Goals, https://sdgs.un.org/goals [accessed: 23.12.2020].
Analitychnyy zvit. Pereshkody v realizatsiyi prav i svobod osib na okupovaniy Terytoriyi Kryms’koho pivostrova ta tymchasovo nepidkontrol’nykh Terytoriyakh Donets’koyi ta Luhans’koyi obla (reyestratsiya faktiv narodzhennya I smerti) [Analytical Report: Obstacles to the realization of the rights and freedoms of persons in the occupied territory of the Crimean Peninsula and temporarily uncontrolled territories of Donetsk and Luhansk regions (registration of facts of birth and death], Lviv 2017, https://helsinki.org.ua/wp-content/uploads/2018/02/Zvi1t.pdf [accessed: 24.12.2020].
Decision of Central City District Court of the city of Kryvyi Rih in Dnipropetrovsk Oblast, case no. 16/6250/19 of 9 October 2019, https://reyestr.court.gov.ua/Review/84837452 [accessed: 27.12.2020].
Decision of Energodar City Court of Zaporizhzha Oblast, case no. 316/1147/19 of 14 June 2019, https://reyestr.court.gov.ua/Review/82434062 [accessed: 27.12.2020].
Decision of Malinovskyi District Court of Odesa, case no. 521/18714/19 of 13 November 2019, https://reyestr.court.gov.ua/Review/85609625 [accessed: 27.12.2020].
Decision of the Kramatorsk City Court of Donetsk region, case No. 234/12199/20 of 1 September 2020, http://reyestr.court.gov.ua/Review/91921144 [accessed: 24.12.2020].
Decision of the Kyiv District Court of the city of Poltava, case No. 552/5900/19 of 25 October 2019, http://www.reyestr.court.gov.ua/Review/85246253 [accessed: 24.12.2020].
Decision of the Malynivsky District Court of the Zhytomyr Oblast case no. 283/1265/19 of 7 June 2019, https://reyestr.court.gov.ua/Review/82259504 [accessed: 24.12.2020].
Decision of the Novopskovsky District Court of the Luhansk Oblast, case no. 942/876/20 of 23 September 2020, https://reyestr.court.gov.ua/Review/91898150 [accessed: 24.12.2020].
Decision of the Obolonsky District Court of Kyiv, case No. 756/4979/19 of 10 April 2019, http://reyestr.court.gov.ua/Review/81259980 [accessed: 24.12.2020].
Decision of the Selydiv City Court of the Donetsk Oblast, case no. 242/2317/19 of 23 April 2019, http://reyestr.court.gov.ua/Review/81381139 [accessed: 24.12.2020].
Decision of the Slavic City District Court of the Donetsk Oblast, case No. 243/7164/19 of 5 July 2019, http://reyestr.court.gov.ua/Review/82834398 [accessed 24 December 2020].
Decision of the Slavyansk city District Court of the Donetsk Oblast, case No. 243/8450/20 of 28 September 2020, http://reyestr.court.gov.ua/Review/91860096 [accessed: 24.12.2020].
Decision of the Slovyansk City District Court of the Donetsk Oblast, case No. 243/2383/19 of 13 March 2019, http://reyestr.court.gov.ua/Review/80430608 [accessed: 24.12.2020].
Decision of the Suvorov District Court of the city of Odessa, case No. 523/11553/19 of 5 December 2019, http://reyestr.court.gov.ua/Review/86205376 [accessed: 24.12.2020].
Decision of the Suvorov District Court of the city of Odessa, case No. 523/18599/19 of 13 February 2020, http://reyestr.court.gov.ua/Review/87583139 [accessed: 24.12.2020].
Decision of Zhovtnevyi District Court of Mariupol, case no. 263/14640/19 of 15 October 2019, https://reyestr.court.gov.ua/Review/84927570 [accessed: 27.12.2020].
Drogozyuk K.B., Predmet ta sub'yekty dokazuvannya u tsyvil’nomu protsesi Ukrayiny ta Frantsiyi [Subject of proof in the civil process of Ukraine and France], Odessyjka Yurydycheskaya Akademyya, Odessa 2018, http://dspace.onua.edu.ua/handle/11300/9115 [accessed: 6.12.2021].
ECHR judgment on 13 February 2018 in case Tsezar and Others v. Ukraine, 73590/14, 73593/14, 73820/14, 4635/15, 5200/15, 5206/15, and 7289/15, Strada Lex.
ECHR judgment on 25 July 2017 in case Khlebik v. Ukraine, 2945/16, HUDOC.
Explanation of the National Bank of Ukraine on the practical application of certain requirements of the regulations of the National Bank of Ukraine of 3.04.2008, https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/v4193500-08#Text [accessed: 24.12.2020].
Grazhdanskiy Protsessual'nyy Kodeks Gruzii [Civil Procedure Code of Georgia of 14.11.1997], Parlament·Skiye Vedomosti 1997, No. 47-48.
Grazhdanskiy Protsessual'nyy Kodeks Respubliki Kazakhstan [Civil Procedure Code of the Republic of Kazakhstan of 31.10.2015 no. 377-V (amended and supplemented as of 07.07.2020)], Zakon RK 2021, No. 84-VII.
Home United Nations Legal Identity Agenda, https://unstats.un.org/legal-identity-agenda/ [accessed: 11.03.2022].
International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, adopted and opened for signature, ratification and accession by General Assembly resolution 2200A (XXI) of 16 December 1966 entry into force 23 March 1976, in accordance with Article 49, https://www.ohchr.org/en/professionalinterest/pages/ccpr.aspx [accessed: 10.03.2022].
Izarova I., Independent Judiciary: Experience of Current Reforms in Ukraine as Regards Appointment of Judges, [in:] K. Gajda-Rosczynialska, D. Szumilo-Kulczycka (eds.), Judicial Management Versus Independence of Judiciary, Wolters Kluwer, Warsaw 2018, p. 242-263.
Karchevskyi K.A., Rodynnyy kryteriy ponyattya «afiliyovanaosoba» (v konteksti pravovoho rezhymu pravochyniv iz zainteresovanityu) [Kindred criterion of the concept «affiliated person» (within the context of legal regime of transactions with the interest)], „Visnyk KHNUVS”, 2004, nr 1(64), s. 160-171.
Kompleksni statystychni publikatsiyi / Complex Statistical Publications, http://www.ukrstat.gov.ua/druk/publicat/kat_u/publ1_u.htm [accessed: 24.12.2020].
Konstytutsiya Ukrayiny [Constitution of Ukraine], WWР 1996, No. 30, p. 141.
Kuibida R., Moroz L., R. Smilax, Justice in the East of Ukraine During the Ongoing Armed Conflict, „International Journal for Court Administration” 2020, no. 11(2), pp. 1-9, http://doi.org/10.36745/ijca.341.
Law of Ukraine No. 1207-VII of 15 April 2014 on Ensuring the Rights and Freedoms of Citizens and Legal Regime in the Temporarily Occupied Territory of Ukraine, https://www.legislationline.org/download/id/5489/file/Ukraine_law_%20On%20Securing%20the%20Rights%20and%20Freedom%20of%20Citizens_2014_en.pdf [accessed: 10.03.2022].
López L.G. et al., Civil Registration, Human Rights, and Social Protection in Asia and the Pacific, “Asia-Pacific Population Journal” 2014, no. 29(1), pp. 75-99, https://www.unescap.org/sites/default/files/APPJ-Vol-29-No-1.pdf [accessed: 10.03.2022].
Member States, https://www.un.org/en/member-states/ [accessed: 23.12.2020].
Ndeunyema N., The Namibian Constitution, International Law and the Courts: a Critique, „Global Journal of Comparative Law” 2020, vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 271-296, https://doi.org/10.1163/2211906X-00902005.
Prylutskyi S., Strieltsova O., The Ukrainian Judiciary under 21st-Century Challenges, „Access to Justice in Eastern Europe” 2020, no. 2/3(7), pp. 78-99, https://www.doi.org/ 10.33327/AJEE-18-3.2-3-a000027.
Resolution of Kyiv Appellate Court, case No. 761/3106/20 of 3. June 2020, http://reyestr.court.gov.ua/Review/89698903 [accessed: 27.12.2020].
Resolution of the CCC as a part of the Supreme Court, case No. 185/9816/16-ц of 1 July 2020, http://reyestr.court.gov.ua/Review/90349589 [accessed: 24.12.2020].
Resolution of the CCC as a part of the Supreme Court, case No. 310/1739/17 of 25 March 2020, http://reyestr.court.gov.ua/Review/88575080 [accessed: 24.12.2020].
Resolution of the CCC as a part of the Supreme Court, case No. 490/5054/15-ц of 24 October 2018, http://reyestr.court.gov.ua/Review/77473491 [accessed: 24.12.2020].
Resolution of the CCC as a part of the Supreme Court, case No. 707/1607/16-ц of 20 December 2018, http://reyestr.court.gov.ua/Review/78978236 [accessed: 27.12.2020].
Resolution of the Kharkiv Court of Appeal, case No. 645/1211/19 of 16 September 2019, http://reyestr.court.gov.ua/Review/84342680 [accessed: 24.12.2020].
Resolution of the Kyiv Court of Appeal, case No. 756/3041/20 of 01 July 2020, http://reyestr.court.gov.ua/Review/90143292 [accessed: 24.12.2020].
Resolution of the Supreme Court of the Supreme Court, case No. 536/1039/17 of 23 January 2019, http://www.reyestr.court.gov.ua/Review/79516806 [accessed: 24.12.2020].
Resolution of Zaporizhzha Appellate Court, case No. 233/6471/18 of 11 June 2019, http://reyestr.court.gov.ua/Review/82439322 [accessed: 27.12.2020].
Rezolyutsiya Plenum Verkhovnoho Sudu Ukrayiny 5 on 31 March 1995 pro sudovu praktyku v spravakh pro vstanovlennya faktiv, shcho mayut’ yurydychne znachennya [Resolution of the Plenum of the Supreme Court of Ukraine no. 5 on Judicial Practice in Cases of Establishing Facts of Legal Significance of 31.03.1995], VVR 1998, p. 0005700-95.
Ruling of the Zhovtnevy District Court of Mariupol, case No. 263/7330/19 of 11 June 2019, http://reyestr.court.gov.ua/Review/82430176 [accessed: 24.12.2020].
SDG indicator metadata, https://unstats.un.org/sdgs/metadata/files/Metadata-16-09-01.pdf [accessed: 23.12.2020].
Taylor P.M., A Commentary on the International Covenant on Civil and Political, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge 2020, pp. 445–457, https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108689458.019.
The right to a legal identity or the right to a legal ID?, https://www.statelessness.eu/updates/blog/right-legal-identity-or-right-legal-id [accessed: 23.12.2020].
The Situation in Namibia, https://www.un.org/securitycouncil/sites/www.un.org.securitycouncil/files/en/sc/repertoire/85-88/Chapter%208/85-88_08-6-The%20situation%20in%20Namibia.pdf [accessed: 10.03.2022].
Ukaz Prezydenta Ukrayiny pro tsili staloho rozvytku Ukrayiny na period do 2030 roku [Decree of the President of Ukraine on the sustainable development goals of Ukraine until 2030], https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/722/2019 [accessed: 23.12.2020].
Uvaha: vyznannyam okremym dovidok z ORDLO vladu okupantiv nikhto ne lehalizuye [Attention: Recognizing separate certificates from SRDLO doesn’t mean legalization of the power of the occupiers], https://www.ukrinform.ua/rubric-society/2806155-uvaga-viznannam-okremim-dovidok-z-ordlo-vladu-okupantiv-nihto-ne-legalizue.html [accessed: 24.12.2020].
Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine adopts Law "On amendments to Civil Procedure Code of Ukraine concerning establishment of fact of birth or death in temporarily occupied territory of Ukraine", https://www.rada.gov.ua/en/news/News/126003.html [accessed: 10.03.2022].
Viala V., Why is Having a Legal Identity Fundamental to Human Rights?, https://dis-blog.thalesgroup.com/government/2019/06/18/why-is-having-a-legal-identity-fundamental-to-human-rights/ [accessed: 23.12.2020].
Vnutrishn’o peremishcheni osoby [Internally Displaced Persons], https://www.msp.gov.ua/timeline/Vnutrishno-peremishcheni-osobi.html [accessed: 23.12.2020].
Zadoroghnyi O., Porushennya ahresyvnoyu viynoyu Rosiys’koyi Federatsiyi proty Ukrayiny osnovnykh pryntsypiv mizhnarodnoho prava [Violation of the basic principles of international law by the aggressive war of the Russian Federation against Ukraine], KIS, Kyiv 2015.
Zakon Ukrayiny pro osoblyvosti derzhavnoyi polityky iz zabezpechennya derzhavnoho suverenitetu Ukrayiny na tymchasovo okupovanykh terytoriyakh u Donets’kiy ta Luhans’kiy oblastyakh [The Law of Ukraine No. 2268-VIII ‘On Particular Aspects of Public Policy Aimed at Safeguarding State Sovereignty of Ukraine over the Temporarily Occupied Territory of Donetsk and Luhansk Regions’ of 18.01.2018], VVR 2018, No. 10, p. 54.
Zakon Ukrayiny pro osoblyvyy poryadok mistsevoho samovryaduvannya v okremykh rayonakh Donets’koyi ta ta Luhans’koyi oblastey [Resolution of the Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine No. 254-VIII of 17.03.2015 ‘On the recognition of certain districts, cities, towns and villages of Donetsk and Luhansk regions temporarily occupied territories], VVR 2014, No. 45, p. 2043.
Zakon Ukrayiny pro zabezpechennya prav i svobod hromadyan ta pravovyy rezhym na tymchasovo okupovaniy terytoriyi Ukrayiny [The Law of Ukraine No. 1207-VII ‘On Ensuring the Rights and Freedoms of Citizens and Legal Regime in the Temporarily Occupied Territory of Ukraine of 15 April 2014], VVR 2014, No. 26, p. 892.
Utwór dostępny jest na licencji Creative Commons Uznanie autorstwa 4.0 Międzynarodowe.
Copyright (c) 2022 CC-BY