Ocenianie i ulepszanie procedur prawnych: apel o wartości procesowe

Zgłoś artykuł

PDF

Słowa kluczowe

prawo
proces
filozofia prawa
law
legal process
legal philosophy

Jak cytować

Summers, R. S., & Pszczółkowski, P. (2022). Ocenianie i ulepszanie procedur prawnych: apel o wartości procesowe: Evaluating and Improving Legal Processes A Plea for Process Values by Robert Summers. Studia Prawnicze, (2 (224), 183–249. https://doi.org/10.37232/sp.2021g
https://doi.org/10.37232/sp.2021g
PDF

Bibliografia

Opinia Holmesa w sprawie McDonald v. Mabee, „United States Reports” 1917, t. 243, s. 90-92, https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/243/90/ [dostęp: 17.10.2021].

Wyrok Sądu Najwyższego USA w sprawie Lisenba v. California, „United States Reports” 1941, t. 314, s. 219, 236, https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/314/219/ [dostęp: 17.10.2021].

Wyrok Sądu Najwyższego USA w sprawie United States v. United Mine Workers, „United States Reports” 1947, t. 330, s. 258-262, https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/330/258/ [dostęp: 17.10.2021].

Wyrok Sądu Najwyższego USA w sprawie Rochin v. California, „United States Reports” 1952, t. 342, s. 165, 172-173, https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/342/165/ [dostęp: 17.10.2021].

Wyrok Sądu Najwyższego USA w sprawie Baker v. Carr, „United States Reports” 1962, t. 369, s. 186, 208-209, https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/369/186/ [dostęp: 17.10.2021].

Wyrok Sądu Najwyższego USA w sprawie Gideon v. Wainwright, „United States Reports” 1963, t. 372, s. 335-336, https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/372/335/ [dostęp: 17.10.2021].

Opinia w sprawie In Re-Gault, „United States Reports” 1967, t. 387, s. 1-20, https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/387/1/ [dostęp: 17.10.2021].

Wyrok Sądu Najwyższego USA w sprawie Benton v. Maryland, „United States Reports” 1969, t. 395, s. 784-796, https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/395/784/ [dostęp: 17.10.2021].

Wyrok Sądu Najwyższego USA w sprawie New York Times Co. v. United States, „United States Reports” 1971, t. 403, s. 713-714, https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/403/713/ [dostęp: 17.10.2021].

Wyrok Sądu Najwyższego USA w sprawie Argersinger v. Hamlin, „United States Reports” 1972, t. 407, s. 25-26, https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/407/25/ [dostęp: 17.10.2021].

Hearings on Presidential Campaign Activities of 1972 before the Senate Select Committee on Presidential Campaign Activities, „Congressional Hearings” 1973, t. 93, ks. 2, https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/CHRG-93shrg96296Ob2/pdf/CHRG-93shrg96296Ob2.pdf [dostęp: 17.10.2021].

Hearings on Presidential Campaign Activities of 1972 before the Senate Select Committee on Presidential Campaign Activities, „Congressional Hearings” 1973, t. 93, ks. 6, https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/CHRG-93shrg96296Ob6/pdf/CHRG-93shrg96296Ob6.pdf [dostęp: 17.10.2021].

Aristotle, The ethics of Aristotle. The Nicomachean Ethics, Penguin Classics, Baltimore 1953.

Arrow K.J., The Organization of Economic Activity: Issues Pertinent to the Choice of Market Versus Non-Market Allocation, [w:] The Analysis and Evaluation of Public Expenditures: The PBB System. A Compendium of Papers Submitted to the Subcommittee on Economy in Government of the Joint Economic Committee Congress of The United States, t. 1, cz. 1-3, Joint Economic Committee Of Congress, Washington DC 1969, s. s. 47-66, pkt. 1, https://www.jec.senate.gov/reports/91st%20Congress/The%20Analysis%20and%20Evaluation%20of%20Public%20Expenditures%20-%20The%20PPB%20System%20Volume%20I%20(444) [dostęp: 17.10.2021];

Ayer A.J., Language, Truth and Logic, Victor Gollancz Ltd., London 1946.

Baxter W.F., Faculty and Government Roles in Campus Unrest, „Education Record” 1969, t. 50, nr 4, s. 411-419.

Baylis C.A., Grading, Values, and Choice, „Mind” 1958, t. 67, nr 268, s. 485-501.

Beinart B., The Rule of Law, „Acta Juridica” 1962, t. 99, s. 99-138.

Berns W., Law and Behavioral Science, „Law and Contemporary Problems” 1964, t. 28, s. 185-212, https://scholarship.law.duke.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=2953&context=lcp [dostęp: 17.10.2021].

Bickel A.M., Watergate and the Legal Order, „Commentary” 1974, t. 57, nr 1, s. 19-25.

Boyer B.B., Alternatives to Administrative Trial-Type Hearings for Resolving Complex Scientific, Economic and Social Issues, „Michigan Law Review” 1972, t. 71, nr 1, s. 111-171, https://repository.law.umich.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=4414&context=mlr [dostęp: 26.10.2021].

Brock D.W., Recent Work in Utilitarianism, „American Philosophical Quarterly” 1973, t. 10, nr 4, s. 241-276.

Brown D.G., The Value of Time, „Ethics” 1970, t. 80, nr 3, s. 173-184.

Burin F.S., The Theory of the Rule of Law and the Structure of the Constitutional State, „The American University Law Review” 1966, t. 15, s. 313-340.

Cardozo B., Paradoxes of Legal Science, Westport, Greenwood 1928.

Cardozo B.N., The Nature of the Judicial Process, Yale University Press, New Haven 1921.

Carswell Smart J.J., Williams B.A.O., Utilitarianism For and Against, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge 1973.

Cohen C., Democracy, Free Press, New York 1971.

Cox A., Civil Rights, The Constitution and the Courts, „New York State Bar Journal” 1968, t. 40.

Cox A., Ends, „New York Times” z 19.05.1974 r., s. 27.

Downie R., Telfer E., Respect For Persons, Allen & Unwin, London 1969.

Dworkin R., Is Law a System of Rules?, [w:] R. Summers (red.), Essays in Legal Philosophy, University of California Press, Berkeley-Los Angeles 1968, s. 25-60.

Eckoff T., Impartiality, Separation of Powers, and Judicial Independece, „Scandinavian Studies w Law” 1965, t. 9, s. 9-48, https://www.scandinavianlaw.se/pdf/9-1.pdf [dostęp: 17.10.2021].

Emery F.E., Systems Thinking. Selected Readings, Penguin, Harmondsworth 1969.

Feigl H., Validation and Vindication – An Analysis of the Nature and Limits of Ethical Arguments, [w:] W. Sellars, J. Hospers (red.), Readings in Ethical Theory, Appleton-Century-Crofts, New York 1952..

Frankena W.K., Ethics, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs 1973.

Fried C., An Anatomy of Values. Problems of Personal and Social Choice, Harvard University Press, Cambridge 1970.

Fuller L.L., Jurisprudence, [w:] Encyclopedia Britannica, t. 13, Chicago, Encyclopaedia Britannica 1965.

Fuller L.L., The Adversary System, [w:] H.J. Berman (red.), Talks on American Law. A Series of Broadcasts to Foreign Audiences by Members of the Harvard Law School Faculty, Vintage Books, New York 1971.

Fuller L.L., The Law in Quest of Itself, The Foundation Press, Chicago 1940.

Fuller L.L., The Problems of Jurisprudence, Foundation Press, Brooklyn 1949.

Gomperz H., When Does the End Justify the Means?, „Ethics” 1943, t. 53, nr 3, s. 173-183.

Hand L., Dilliard I., The Spirit of Liberty, Knopf, New York 1952.

Hart H.L.A., The Concept of Law, The Clarendon Press, Oxford 1961.

Hart H.M., Holmes’ Positivism – An Addendum, „Harvard Law Review” 1951, t. 64, nr 6, s. 929-937.

Hurst J.W., Problems of Legitimacy in the Contemporary Legal Order, „Oklahoma Law Review” 1971, t. 24.

Israel J.H., LaFave W.R., Criminal Procedure in a Nutshell. Constitutional Limitations, West Publishing Company, St. Paul 1971.

Kadish S.H., Methodology and Criteria in Due Process Adjudication ‑ A Survey and Criticism, „The Yale Law Journal” 1957, t. 66, nr 3, s. 319, 346-363, https://digitalcommons.law.yale.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=8524&context=ylj [dostęp: 16.10.2021].

Lapenna I., Soviet Penal Policy, The Bodley Head, London 1968.

Liebermann J., How the Government Breaks the Law, Stein and Day, New York 1972.

MacCormick N., Law as Institutional Fact, „Law Quarterly. Review” 1974, t. 90.

Marshall H.H., Natural Justice, Sweet & Maxwell, London 1959.

Moskowitz M., Human Rights and World Order. The Struggle for Human Rights in the United Nations, Oceana Publications, New York 1958.

Newman F.C., The Process of Prescribing Due Process, „California Law Review” 1961, t. 49, s. 215, 219, https://lawcat.berkeley.edu/record/1109692/files/

fulltext.pdf [dostęp: 16.10.2021].

Oaks D.H., Studying the Exclusionary Rule in Search and Seizure, „The University of Chicago Law Review” 1970, t. 37, s. 665-757, https://www.ojp.gov/pdffiles1/Digitization/203NCJRS.pdf [dostęp: 17.10.2021].

Paulsen M.G., The Fourteenth Amendment and the Third Degree, „Stanford Law Review” 1954, t. 6, nr 3, s. 411-437.

Pritchard M.S., Human Dignity and Justice, „Ethics” 1972, t. 82, nr 4, s. 299-313.

[Przemówienie senatora Williama Fulbrighta na Uniwersytecie Arkansas w Fayetteville, 13 kwietnia 1974 r.], „New York Times” z 25.05.1974 r.

Rawls J., A Theory of Justice, Belknap Press of Harvard University, Delhi 1971.

Rosenberg M., Devising Procedures That Are Civil To Promote Justice That Is Civilized, „Michigan Law Review” 1971, t. 69, nr 5, s. 797-820, https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/275873544.pdf [dostęp: 17.10.2021].

Searle J.R., Speech acts. An Essay in the Philosophy of Language, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge 1969, s. 3-54.

Shakespeare W., All’s Well That Ends Well, [w:] The Complete Works of Shakespeare, Garden City Books, Cambridge 1936.

Smart C., Utilitarianism, [w:] P. Edwards, D.M Borchert (red.), Encyclopedia of Philosophy, t. 7/8, Macmillan & The Free Press, New York 1967, s. 206-211.

Smith T.V., The Legislative Way of Life, University of Chicago Press, Chicago 1940.

Spiegelberg H., Human Dignity: A Challenge to Contemporary Philosophy, „Philosophy Forum” 1971, t. 9, s. 39-64.

Sternberger D., Legitimacy, [w:] D. Sills (red.), International Encyclopedia of the Social Sciences, t. 9, Macmillan, New York 1968.

Stigler G.J., The Law and Economics of Public Policy: A Plea to the Scholars, „The Journal of Legal Studies” 1972, t. 1, nr 1, s. 1-12.

Summers R.S., Good Faith in General Contract Law and the Sales Provisions of the Uniform Commercial Code, „Virginia Law Review” 1968, t. 54, nr 2, s. 195-267, ttps://scholarship.law.cornell.edu/cgi/viewcontent. cgi?article=2408&context=facpub [dostęp: 17.10.2021].

Summers R.S., Howard C., Law, Its Nature, Functions and Limits, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs N.J. 1972.

Summers R.S., Law, Adjudicative Processes, and Civil Justice, [w:] G. Hughes (red.), Law, Reason and Justice: Essays in Legal Philosophy, New York University Press, New York 1969.

Summers R.S., Process Values-How Our Law Does Its Jobs Also Counts, [w:] R. Summers, A. Cambell, J. Bozzone, Justice and Order Through Law, Ginn, Lexington 1974.

Taylor P., Normative Discourse, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs 1961.

Thibaut J., Walker L., Lind E.A., Adversary Presentation and Bias in Legal Decision Making, „Harvard Law Review” 1972, t. 86, nr 2, s. 386-401.

Tribe L.H., Policy Science: Analysis or Ideology?, „Philosophy & Public Affairs” 1972, t. 2, nr 1, s. 66-110.

Twining W.L., Twining P.L., Bentham on Torture, „Northern Ireland Legal Quarterly” 1973, t. 24, s. 305-356.

Vickers G., The Art of Judgment. A Study of Policy Making, Chapman & Hall, [London] 1965.

Wade L.L., Curry R.L., A Logic of Public Policy. Aspects of Political Economy, Wadsworth Publishing Company, Belmont 1970.

Walzer M., Political action – a Practical Guide to Movement Politics, NYRB Classics, New York 1971.

Wechsler H., Toward Neutral Principles of Constitutional Law, „Harvard Law Review” 1959, t. 73, nr 1, s. 1-35.

Wellman C., Challenge and Response – Justification in Ethics, Southern Illinois University Press, Carbondale, Edwardsville 1971.

Wolff R.P., Is Coercion Ethically Neutral?, [w:] J. Pennock, J. Chapman (red.), Coercion, Routledge, Aldine·Atherton, Chicago 1972, s. 144-148.

Wright C.A., Must the Criminal Go Free if the Constable Blunders?, „Texas Law Review” 1972, t. 50, nr 4, s. 736-745.

Wyzanski C.E., A Trial Judge’s Freedom and Responsibility, „Harvard Law Review” 1952, t. 65, nr 8, s. 1281-1304.

Creative Commons License

Utwór dostępny jest na licencji Creative Commons Uznanie autorstwa 4.0 Międzynarodowe.

Copyright (c) 2021 Niniejsze opracowanie zostało pierwotnie opublikowane w „Cornell Law Review”, tom 60, 1974 r., „Cornell Law Review”. Wszelkie prawa zastrzeżone. Tłumaczenie za zgodą. Przypisy bibliograficzne zostały podane zgodnie z formatem zapisu przyjętym w „Studiach Prawniczych”.