Make a Submission
No. 3-4 (113-114) (1992)
Artykuły

Traktat antarktyczny jako reżim obiektywny

[The Antarctic Treaty as an objective regime]

  • Anna Wyrozumska

Published 1992-04-30

Keywords

  • Antarctic Treaty,
  • Antarctic,
  • legal norm,
  • international law,
  • legal order
Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

How to Cite

Traktat antarktyczny jako reżim obiektywny: [The Antarctic Treaty as an objective regime]. (1992). Studia Prawnicze The Legal Studies, 3-4 (113-114), 99-116. https://doi.org/10.37232/sp.1992.3-4.6

Abstract

Divergent opinions still exists in the science of international law regarding the existence of objective regimes, as well as their legal consequences. This doctrine is not universally accepted. This is because its adoption marks a departure from the voluntarist concept of international law. However, the problem of the effectiveness of treaties against third countries remains, and the statement that this problem can be resolved on the basis of the principle of res inter alios acta is not convincing. It is even less convincing in the case of the Antarctic Treaty.

The article is principally related to the objective regime concept, stating that the consequences of the Antarctic Treaty towards third countries results from the “quasi-legislative” properties of the Treaty (the Antarctic Treaty creates an objective, effective regime erga omnes), however, it presents the concepts of objective regimes of two Special Reporting Officers of the International Law Commission (ILC), which have been largely based on the state approval element.

References

  1. Auburn F.M., Antarctic Law and Politics, London 1982.
  2. Ballreich H., Treaties, Effect on Third States [w:] Encyclopedia of Public International Law, t. 7, Oxford 1984.
  3. Bastid S., Les Trades Dans La Vie Internationale. Conclusion Et Effets, Paris 1985.
  4. Bhadauria Y.S., The Antarctic Treaty and its Legal Implications, „The Indian journal of international law : a quarterly Indian journal of international law” 1983, t. 23, s. 575-588.
  5. Bilder R., The Present Legal and Political Situation in Antarcitca [w:] J.I. Charney (red.), The New Nationalism and the Use of Common Spaces, Totowa 1982.
  6. Birnie P., The Antaarctic Regime and Third States [w:] Antarctic Challenge II, Berlin 1986.
  7. Bluntschli J.C., Le droit international codifie, Guillaumin, Paris 1874.
  8. Boczek B.A., The protection of the Antarctic ecosystem : a study in international environmental law, Kent 1983.
  9. Boczek B.A., The Protection of the Antarctic Ecosystem: A Study in International Environmental Law, „Ocean development and international law” 1983, t. 13, nr 3.
  10. Braud P., Recherches sur l’Etat tiers en droit international public, „Revue General de Brownlie I., Principles of Public International Law, Oxford 1985.
  11. Brunner S., Article 10 of the Antarctic Treaty Revisited [w:] F. Francioni, T. Scovazzi (red.), International Law for Antarctica, Milano 1987.
  12. Bush M.W., Antarctica and international law : a collection of inter-state and national documents, t. 1, Oceana Publications, London 1982.
  13. Cahier P., Effets des traite a Vegard des Etats tiers, „Recueil de Cour de l’Academie de Droit International” 1974, t. 143.
  14. Chaumont Ch., Cours général de droit international public, „Recueil de Cour de l’Academie de Droit International” 1970, t. 129, s. 335-546.
  15. Colliard C.A., Institutions des relationes internationales, Dalloz, Paris 1985.
  16. Droit International Public” 1968, t. 72.
  17. Dupuy R., Le Traite sur L’Antarctique, „AFDI” 1960.
  18. Greig D.W., Territorial Sovereignty and the Status of Antarctica, „Australian Outlook” 1978, t. 32, nr 2.
  19. Guyer R.E., The Antarctic System, „Recueil de Cour de l’Academie de Droit International” 1973, t. 139, s. 149-226.
  20. Hayton R.D., The Antarctic Settlement of 1959, „American Journal of International Law” 1960, t. 54, nr 2, s. 348-371.
  21. Hostie J., Examen des quelques regies du droit international dans le domaine des communications et du transit, „Recueil des cours” 1932, t. 40.
  22. „I.C.J. Reports” 1959.
  23. „I.C.J. Reports” 1962.
  24. Kish J., The Law of International Spaces, A. W. Sijthoff, Leiden 1973.
  25. Klein E., [w:] R. Wolfram (red.), Antarctic Challenge, Berlin 1986.
  26. Klein E., Statusvertrage im Volkerrecht, Springer, Berlin 1980.
  27. Lagoni R. [w:] Antarctic Challenge II, Berlin 1986.
  28. Lagoni R., The United Nations and the Antarctic, „Law and State” 1986, t. 33.
  29. Le Traite Antarctique: Creee-t-il Un Regime Objectif Ou Non? [w:] F. Francioni, T. Scovazzi (red.), International Law for Antarctica, Giuffrè, Milano 1987.
  30. Lefeber R., The Exercise of Jurisdiction in the Antarctic Region and the Changing Structure of International Law: The International Community and Common Interests, „Netherlands Yearbook of International Law” 1990, t. 21.
  31. MacDonald R.St.J., Fundamental Norms in Contemporary International Law, „Canadian Yearbook of International Law” 1987, t. 25, s. 115-149.
  32. Machowski J., Funkcjonowanie Układu w sprawie Antarktyki, „Sprawy Międzynarodowe” 1980, nr 2, s. 55-74.
  33. McNajr A., The Law of Treaties, Clarendon Press, Oxford 1961.
  34. Mouton M.W., The International Regime of the Polar Regions, „Recueil de Cour de l’Academie de Droit International” 1962, t. 107.
  35. Nguyên Q.D, Droit International Public, Paris 1980.
  36. Prevost J.F., Les effets des traites conclus entre etats a I’egard des etats tiers, Paris 1973.
  37. Prystrom A., Problemy aktualnego statusu prawnomiędzynarodowego Antarktyki, „Sprawy Międzynarodowe”, 1986, nr 4, s. 103-118.
  38. Reuter P., Principes du droit international public, „Recueil de Cour de l’Academie de Droit International” 1961, t. 103, s. 425-656.
  39. Rousseau Ch., Principes generaux de droit international public, t. 1, Paris 1944.
  40. Rozakis Ch.L., Treaties and Third States: a Study in the Reinforcement of the Consensual Scelle G., Précis de droit des gens principes et systématique, t. 2, Paris 1934.
  41. Simma B., The Antarctic Treaty as a Treaty Providing for an ,,Objective Regime”, „Cornell International Law Journal” 1986, t. 19, s. 189-209.
  42. Sollie F., [w:] Antarctic Challenge II, Berlin 1986.
  43. Standards in International Law, „Zeitschrift für ausländisches öffentliches Recht und Völkerrecht” 1975, t. 35, s. 1-40.
  44. Touscoz J., Le principe d’effectivite dans I’ordre international, Librairie Générale de Droit et de Jurisprudence, Paris 1964.
  45. Układ w sprawie Antarktydy podpisany w Waszyngtonie dnia 1 grudnia 1959 r., Dz.U. 1961 nr 46 poz. 237.
  46. Verdross A., Règles generales du droit international de la paix, „Recueil de Cour de l’Academie de Droit International” 1929, t.30, nr 5.
  47. Visscher Ch. de, Theorie et realites en droit international public, Paris 1953.
  48. Weil P., Towards Relative Normativity in International Law?, „American journal of international law” 1983, t. 78.
  49. Wiewiórowska K., Niektóre problemy prawne badania i eksploatacji Antarktyki, „Przegląd Stosunków Międzynarodowych” 1977, nr 5, s. 87-97.
  50. Wyrozumska A., Traktaty ustanawiające reżimy terytorialne, Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Łódzkiego, Łódź 1987.