Make a Submission
ONLINE FIRST
Articles

Dark personality traits and cyber-dating abuse: The moderating role of empathy

Dark personality traits and cyber-dating abuse: The moderating role of empathy

PDF (Polish)
  • Krzysztof Nowakowski,
  • Aleksandra Gubała
Krzysztof Nowakowski
Jesuit University Ignatianum in Krakow
Aleksandra Gubała
Stowarzyszenie Widzących Więcej

Published 2025-02-14

Keywords

  • cyber dating abuse,
  • intimate violence,
  • dark triad,
  • dark tetrad,
  • psychopathy,
  • sadism,
  • empathy
    • ...More
    Less

Copyright (c) 2024 Krzysztof Nowakowski, Aleksandra Gubała

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

How to Cite

“Dark personality traits and cyber-dating abuse: The moderating role of empathy: Dark personality traits and cyber-dating abuse: The moderating role of empathy” (2025) Archives of Criminology, p. 29 ss. doi:10.7420/AK2024.16.
Crossref
Scopus
Google Scholar
Europe PMC

Abstract

The results of research on cyber-dating abuse in intimate relationships are presented in this article. The study analysed dark personality traits (i.e. narcissism, Machiavellianism, psychopathy and sadism) treated as relevant individual risk factors for this kind of violence. The sample consisted of 200 young adults (72% women). The following measures were used in the research: the Cyber Dating Abuse Questionnaire, the Short Dark Tetrad and the Interpersonal Reactivity Index. The results indicate that the severity of both the Dark Triad and sadism is related to the perpetration of cyber-violence and victimisation from an intimate partner. The research also showed that men more often than women use direct aggression in cyber-dating abuse. Moreover, the moderating role of empathy in the relationship between dark personality traits and cyber-dating abuse was confirmed.

PDF (Polish)

References

  1. Ali F., Amorim I.S. i Chamorro-Premuzic T. (2009). ‘Empathy deficits and trait emotional intelligence in psychopathy and Machiavellianism’. Personality and Individual Differences 47(7), s. 758–762. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2009.06.016
  2. Álvarez-García D., Núñez J.C., García T. i Barreiro-Collazo A. (2018). ‘Individual, family, and community predictors of cyber-aggression among adolescents’. The European Journal of Psychology Applied to Legal Contex 10(2), s. 79–88. https://doi.org/10.5093/ejpalc2018a8
  3. Andreassen C.S., Pallesen S. i Griffiths M.D. (2017). ‘The relationship between addictive use of social media, narcissism, and self-esteem: Findings from a large national survey’. Addictive Behaviors 64, s. 287–293. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addbeh.2016.03.006
  4. Bańka A. i Orłowski K. (2012). ‘The structure of the teacher Machiavellianism model in social interactions in a school environment’. Polish Psychological Bulletin 43(4), s. 215–222. http://dx.doi.org/10.2478/v10059-012-0024-3
  5. Bazińska R. i Drat-Ruszczak K. (2000). ‘Struktura narcyzmu w polskiej adaptacji kwestionariusza NPI Ruskina i Halla’ [Structure of narcissism in the Polish adaptation of the Narcissistic Personality Inventory]. Czasopismo Psychologiczne 6, s. 171–188.
  6. Bennett D.C., Guran E.L., Ramos M.C. i Margolin G. (2011). ‘College students’ electronic victimization in friendships and dating relationships: Anticipated distress and associations with risky behaviors’. Violence and Victims 26(4), s. 410–429. https://doi.org/10.1891/0886-6708.26.4.410
  7. Biolcati R., Pupi V. i Mancini G. (2022). ‘Cyber dating abuse and ghosting behaviours: Personality and gender roles in romantic relationships’. Current Issues in Personality Psychology 10(3), s. 240–251. https://doi.org/10.5114/cipp.2021.108289
  8. Borrajo E., Gámez-Guadix Pereda N. i Calvete E. (2015). ‘The development and validation of the cyber dating abuse questionnaire among young couples’. Computers in Human Behavior 48, s. 358–365. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2015.01.063
  9. Brazil K.J., Volk A.A. i Dane A.V. (2023). ‘Is empathy linked to prosocial and antisocial traits and behavior? It depends on the form of empathy’. Canadian Journal of Behavioural Science 55(1), s. 75–80. https://doi.org/10.1037/cbs0000330
  10. Brown C. i Hegarty K. (2018). ‘Digital dating abuse measures: A critival review’. Aggresion and Violent Behavior 40, s. 44–59. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.avb.2018.03.003
  11. Buckels E.E., Jones D.N. i Paulhus D.L. (2013). ‘Behavioral confirmation of everyday sadism’. Psychological Science 24(11), s. 2201–2209. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797613490749
  12. Buckels E.E., Trapnell P.D. i Paulhus D.L. (2014). ‘Trolls just want to have fun’. Personality and Individual Differences 67, s. 97–102. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2014.01.016
  13. Caridade S. i Braga T. (2020). ‘Youth cyber dating abuse: A meta-analysis of risk and protective factors’. Cyberpsychology: Journal of Psychosocial Research on Cyberspace 14(3). https://doi.org/10.5817/CP2020-3-2
  14. Caridade S., Braga T. i Borrajo E. (2019). ‘Cyber dating abuse (CDA): Evidence from a systematic review’. Aggression and Violent Behavior 48, s. 152–168. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.avb.2019.08.018
  15. Chabrol H., Van Leeuwen N., Rodgers R. i Séjourné N. (2009). ‘Contributions of psychopathic, narcissistic, Machiavellian, and sadistic personality traits to juvenile delinquency’. Personality and Individual Differences 47(7), s. 734–739. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2009.06.020
  16. Choi J., Kruis N. i Lee J. (2022). ‘Empathy, self-control, and online harassment: A partial test of Agnew’s social concern theory’. Computers in Human Behavior 136(4). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2022.107402
  17. Christie R. i Geis F.L. (1970). Studies in Machiavellianism. New York: Academic Press.
  18. Chrysikou E.G. i Thompson W.J. (2016). ‘Assessing cognitive and affective empathy through the interpersonal reactivity index: An argument against a two-factor model’. Assessment 23(6), s. 769–777. https://doi.org/10.1177/1073191115599055
  19. Davis M.H. (1980). ‘A multidimensional approach to individual differences in empathy’. JSAS Catalog of Selected Documents in Psychology 10, s. 85.
  20. Davis M.H. (1999). Empatia. O umiejętności współodczuwania [Empathy. A social psychological approach]. Gdańsk: Wydawnictwo GWP.
  21. De Los Reyes V., Jaureguizar J. i Redondo I. (2022). ‘Cyberviolence in young couples and its predictors’. Behavioral Psychology 30(2), s. 391–410. https://doi.org/10.51668/bp.8322204n
  22. Deans H. i Bhogal M.S. (2019). ‘Perpetrating cyber dating abuse: A brief report on the role of aggression, romantic jealousy and gender’. Current Psychology 38(5), s. 1077–1082. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-017-9715-4
  23. Decety J. (2015). ‘The neural pathways, development and functions of empathy’. Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences 3, s. 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cobeha.2014.12.001
  24. Declercq F., Willemsen J., Audenaert K. i Verhaeghe P. (2012). ‘Psychopathy and predatory violence in homicide, violent, and sexual offences: Factor and facet relations’. Legal and Criminological Psychology 17(1), s. 59–74. https://doi.org/10.1348/135532510X527722
  25. DeLisi M. (2009). ‘Psychopathy is the unified theory of crime’. Youth Violence and Juvenile Justice 7(3), s. 256–273. https://doi.org/10.1177/1541204009333834
  26. DeMatteo D., Desai A. i Tansey A. (2022). Psychopathy. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780367198459-REPRW4-1
  27. Derbis R. i Filipkowski J. (2018). ‘Motywacja osiągnięć, ciemna triada i zaangażowanie w pracę jako korelaty zachowań kontrproduktywnych’. Czasopismo Psychologiczne 24(3), s. 627–639.
  28. Domínguez C.R., Moreno P.J. i Segura M.D. (2020). ‘Cyber dating violence: A review of its research methodology’. Anales De Psicologia 36, s. 200–209. https://doi.org/10.6018/analesps.36.2.370451
  29. Duradoni M., Gursesli M.C., Fiorenza M., Donati A. i Guazzini A. (2023). ‘Cognitive empathy and the dark triad: A literature review’. European Journal of Investigation in Health, Psychology and Education 13, s. 2642–2680. https://doi.org/10.3390/ejihpe13110184
  30. Edens J.F., Marcus D.K., Lilienfeld S.O. i Poythress N.G. (2006). ‘Psychopathic, not psychopath: Taxometric evidence for the dimensional structure of psychopathy’. Journal of Abnormal Psychology 115(1), s. 131–144. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-843X.115.1.131
  31. Ferenczi N., Marshall T.C. i Bejanyan K. (2017). ‘Are sex differences in antisocial and prosocial Facebook use explained by narcissm and relational self-construal?’. Computers in Human Behavior 77, s. 25–31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2017.08.033
  32. Furnham A., Richards S.C. i Paulhus D.L. (2013). ‘The dark triad of personality: A 10 year review’. Social and Personality Psychology Compass 7(3), s. 199–216. https://doi.org/10.1111/spc3.12018
  33. Gajda A., Moroń M., Królik M., Małuch M. i Mraczek M. (2023). ‘The Dark Tetrad, cybervictimization and cyberbullying: The role of moral disengagement’. Current Psychology 42, s. 23413–23421. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-022-03456-6
  34. Gámez-Guadix M., Borrajo E. i Calvete E. (2018). ‘Partner abuse, control and violence through Internet and smartphones: Characteristics, evaluation and prevention’. Psychologist Papers 39(3), s. 218–227. https://doi.org/10.23923/pap.psicol2018.2874
  35. Gierowski K. (2009). ‘Czynniki ryzyka przemocy i psychopatyczne zaburzenia osobowości u sprawców przestępstw seksualnych’ [Risk factors for violence and psychopathic personality disorder in sex offenders]. Przegląd Więziennictwa Polskiego 64–65, s. 21–47.
  36. Goodboy A.K. i Martin M.M. (2015). ‘The personality profile of a cyberbully: Examining the Dark Triad’. Computers in Human Behavior 49, s. 1–4. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2015.02.052
  37. Grzyb M. i Habzda-Siwek E. (2013). ‘Płeć a przestępczość. o problemie dysproporcji płci wśród sprawców przestępstw z użyciem przemocy’ [Gender and crime. On unequal distribution of sexes in violent offending]. Archiwum Kryminologii 35, s. 95–136. https://doi.org/10.7420/AK2013D
  38. Hare R.D. (2006). Psychopaci są wśród nas [Psychopaths are among us]. Karków: Wydawnictwo Znak.
  39. Hughes S. i Samuels H. (2021). ‘Dark desires: The Dark Tetrad and relationship control’. Personality and Individual Differences 171(3). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2020.110548
  40. Jolliffe D. i Farrington D.P. (2004). ‘Empathy and offending: A systematic review and meta-analysis’. Aggression and Violent Behavior 9(5), s. 441–476. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.avb.2003.03.001
  41. Jonason P.K. i Krause L. (2013). ‘The emotional deficits associated with the Dark Triad traits: Cognitive empathy, affective empathy and alexithymia’. Personality and Indyvidual Differences 55(5), s. 523–537. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2013.04.027
  42. Jones D.N. i Paulhus D.L. (2009). ‘Machiavellianism’. W M.R. Leary i R.H. Hoyle (red.), Handbook of Individual Differences in Social Behavior. New York: The Guilford Press, s. 93–108.
  43. Kircaburun K., Jonason P.K. i Griffiths M.D. (2018). ‘The Dark Tetrad traits and problematic social media use: The mediating role of cyberbullying and cyberstalking’. Personality and Individual Differences 135, s. 264–269. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2018.07.034
  44. Kliś M. (2012). ‘Adaptacyjna rola empatii w różnych sytuacjach życiowych’ [The adaptive role of empathy in different life situations]. Horyzonty Psychologii 2, s. 147–171.
  45. Kowalski R.M., Giumetti G.W., Schroeder A.N. i Lattanner M.R. (2014). ‘Bullying in the digital age: A critical review and meta-analysis of cyberbullying research among youth’. Psychological Bulletin 140(4), s. 1073–1137. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0035618
  46. Kranenbarg M.W., van Gelder J.L., Barends A.J. i de Vries R.E. (2023). ‘Is there a cybercriminal personality? Comparing cyber offenders and offline offenders on HEXACO personality domains and their underlying facets’. Computers in Human Behavior 140(5). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2022.107576
  47. Kulczyk J. (2016). ‘Empatia i styl przywiązania w kontekście bliskich związków młodych dorosłych’ [Empatience and attachment style in the context of young adults’ close relationships]. Acta Universitatis Lodziensis. Folia Psychologica 20, s. 89–104. https://doi.org/10.18778/1427-969X.20.06
  48. Lara L. (2020). ‘Cyber dating abuse: Assessment, prevalence, and relationship with offline violence in young Chileans’. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships 37(5), s. 1681–1699. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265407520907159
  49. Lu Y., Van Ouytsel J. i Temple J.R. (2021). ‘In-person and cyber dating abuse: A longitudinal investigation’. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships 38(12), s. 3713–3731. https://doi.org/10.1177/02654075211065202
  50. Maciantowicz O., Witkowska J., Zajenkowska A., Bodecka M. i Skrzypek M. (2017). ‘Relacja narcyzmu wielkościowego i wrażliwego z typem popełnionego przestępstwa pośród osadzonych w polskich zakładach karnych’ [Relationship of grandiose and sensitive narcissism with the type of crime committed among inmates in Polish prisons]. Psychiatria 14(4), s. 249–254.
  51. Main A., Walle E.A., Kho C. i Halpern J. (2017). ‘The interpersonal functions of empathy: A relational perspective’. Emotion Review 9(4), s. 358–366. https://doi.org/10.1177/1754073916669440
  52. March E., Grieve R., Marrington J. i Jonason P.K. (2017). ‘Trolling on Tinder® (and other dating apps): Examining the role of the Dark Tetrad and impulsivity’. Personality and Individual Differences 110, s. 139–143. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2017.01.025
  53. Marcus D.K. i Zeigler-Hill V. (2015). ‘A big tent of Dark Personality Traits’. Social and Personality Psychology Compass 9(8), s. 434–446. https://doi.org/10.1111/spc3.12185
  54. Masui K. (2019). ‘Loneliness moderates the relationship between Dark Tetrad personality traits and internet trolling’. Personality and Individual Differences 150(1). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2019.06.018
  55. Međedović J. (2017). ‘Aberrations in emotional processing of violence-dependent stimuli are the core features of sadism’. Motivation and Emotion 41(2), s. 273–283. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11031-016-9596-0
  56. Melander L.A. i Marganski A.J. (2020). ‘Cyber and in-person intimate partner violence victimization: Examining maladaptive psychosocial and behavioral correlates’. Cyberpsychology: Journal of Psychosocial Research on Cyberspace 14(1). https://doi.org/10.5817/CP2020-1-1
  57. Monteiro A.P., Guedes S. i Correia E. (2023). ‘Cyber dating abuse in higher education students: Self-esteem, sex, age and recreational time online’. Social Sciences 12(3). https://doi.org/10.3390/socsci12030139
  58. Muñoz-Fernández N. i Sánchez-Jiménez V. (2020). ‘Cyber-aggression and psychological aggression in adolescent couples: A short-term longitudinal study on prevalence and common and differential predictors’. Computers in Human Behavior 104(11), s. 106–191. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2019.106191
  59. Pastwa-Wojciechowska B. (2013). Psychopaci. Sprawcy przestępstw seksualnych [Psychopaths. Perpetrators of sexual offences]. Gdańsk: Grupa Wydawnicza Harmonia.
  60. Patrick C.J. (2018). ‘Psychopathy as masked pathology’. W C.J. Patrick (red.) Handbook of Psychopathy. New York: Guilford Press, s. 3–21.
  61. Paulhus D.L. i Williams K. (2002). ‘The Dark Triad of personality: Narcissism, Machiavellianism, and psychopathy’. Journal of Research in Personality 36, s. 556–563. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0092-6566(02)00505-6
  62. Paulhus D.L., Buckels E.E., Trapnell P.D. i Jones D.N. (2021). ‘Screening for dark personalities: The Short Dark Tetrad (SD4)’. European Journal of Psychological Assessment 37(3), s. 208–222. https://doi.org/10.1027/1015-5759/a000602
  63. Penney L.M. i Spector P.E. (2002). ‘Narcissism and counterproductive work behavior: Do bigger egos mean bigger problems?’. International Journal of Selection and Assessment 10 (1–2), s. 126–134. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2389.00199
  64. Pilch I. (2008). Osobowość makiawelisty i jego relacje z ludźmi [The personality of a Machiavellian and his/her relationships with people]. Katowice: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Śląskiego.
  65. Pilch I. (2014). ‘Makiawelizm, narcyzm, psychopatia: ciemna triada jako próba opisania osobowości eksploatatora’ [Machiavellianism, narcissism, psychopathy – The dark triad as an attempt at describing the personality of an explorer]. Chowanna 43, s. 165–181.
  66. Pineda D., Galán M., Martínez-Martínez A., Campagne D.M. i Piqueras J.A. (2022). ‘Same personality, new ways to abuse: How Dark Tetrad Personalities are connected with cyber intimate partner violence’. Journal of Interpersonal Violence 37(13–14). https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260521991307
  67. Pineda D., Martinez-Martinez A., Galan M., Rico-Bordera P. i Piqueras J.A. (2023). ‘The Dark Tetrad and online sexual victimization: Enjoying in the distance’. Computers in Human Behavior 142(2), s. 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2023.107659
  68. Ramos M.C., Miller K.F., Moss I.K. i Margolin G. (2021). ‘Perspective-taking and empathy mitigate family-of-origin risk for electronic aggression perpetration toward dating partners: A brief report’. Journal of Interpersonal Violence 36(3–4), s. 1155–1164. http://doi.org/10.1177/0886260517747605
  69. Reidy D.E., Zeichner A. i Seibert L.A. (2011). ‘Unprovoked aggression: Effects of psychopathic traits and sadism’. Journal of Personality 79, s. 75–100.
  70. Rodríguez-Domínguez C., Pérez-Moreno P.J. i Durán M. (2020). ‘Cyber dating violence: A review of its research methodology’. Anales de Psicología 36, s. 200–209.
  71. Rogoza R. i Cieciuch J. (2020). ‘The Dark Triad traits and their structure: An empirical approach’. Current Psychology 39(4), s. 1287–1302.
  72. Rogoza R., Rogoza M. i Wyszyńska P. (2016). ‘Polska adaptacja modelu narcystycznego podziwu i rywalizacji’ [Polish adaptation of the narcissistic admiration and rivalry concept]. Polskie Forum Psychologiczne 21(3), s. 410–431.
  73. Sánchez V., Muñoz-Fernández N. i Ortega-Ruíz R. (2015). ‘“Cyberdating Q&A”: An instrument to assess the quality of adolescent dating relationships in social networks’. Computers in Human Behavior 48, s. 78–86. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2015.01.006
  74. Sest N. i March E. (2017). ‘Constructing the cyber-troll: Psychopathy, sadism, and empathy’. Personality and Individual Differences 119, s. 69–72.
  75. Siemieniecka D., Skibińska M. i Majewska K. (2020). Cyberagresja – zjawisko, skutki, zapobieganie [Cyber aggression – phenomenon, effects, prevention]. Toruń: Wydawnictwo Naukowe UMK.
  76. Strus W. i Kozłowska A. (2018). ‘Osobowość Psychopatyczna – Nowe ujęcia starej problematyki’ [Psychopathic Personality – new recognitions of old problems]. Biuletyn Kryminologiczny 25, s. 15–34. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5005149
  77. Thomas L. i Egan V. (2022). ‘Subclinical sadism: Examining temperamental predispositions and emotional processing’. Personality and Individual Differences 196(5). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2022.111756
  78. Urbonaviciute G. i Hepper E.G. (2020). ‘When is narcissism associated with low empathy? A meta-analytic review’. Journal of Research in Personality 89. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2020.104036
  79. Vachon D.D., Lynam D.R. i Johnson J.A. (2014). ‘The (non)relation between empathy and aggression: Surprising results from a meta-analysis’. Psychological Bulletin 140(3), s. 751–773. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0035236
  80. Verschuere B. i te Kaat L. (2020). ‘What are the core features of psychopathy ? A prototypicality analysis using the Psychopathy Checklist-Revised (PCL-R)’. Journal of Personality Disorders 34(3), s. 410–419. https://doi.org/10.1521/pedi_2019_33_396
  81. Wai M. i Tiliopoulos N. (2012). ‘The affective and cognitive empathic nature of the dark triad of personality’. Personality and Individual Differences 52(7), s. 794–799. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2012.01.008
  82. Zeigler-Hill V. i Vonk J. (2015). ‘Dark personality features and emotion dysregulation’. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology 34(8), s. 692–704. https://doi.org/10.1521/jscp.2015.34.8.692
  83. Zweig J., Lachman P., Dank J. i Yahner J. (2014). ‘Correlates of cyber dating abuse among teens’. Journal of Youth Adolescence 43, s. 1306–1321. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-013-0047-x
  84. Zweig J.M., Dank M., Yahner J. i Lachman P. (2013). ‘The rate of cyber dating abuse among teens and how it relates to other forms of teen dating violence’. Journal of Youth Adolescence 42, s. 1063–1077. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-013-9922-8

Similar Articles

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.