Przyczyny przestępczości. Nowe aspekty międzynarodowej dyskusji o teoriach kryminologicznych

Zgłoś artykuł


Słowa kluczowe

teorie kryminologiczne
choroba psychiczna
criminological theory
mental illness

Jak cytować

Schneider, H. J. (1998). Przyczyny przestępczości. Nowe aspekty międzynarodowej dyskusji o teoriach kryminologicznych. Archiwum Kryminologii, (XXIII-XXIV), 13–44.


This survey intends to critically inform the reader about new and further developments of criminological theories on causality and about how successful these theories have proved in empirical and practical terms during the last three decades. From the point of view of mainstream criminology the criminalbiological, criminalpsychological, criminalsociological, socialpsychological, victimological, critical-radical, feminist, postmodernist and integrated theories are being considered. Preceding this is a discussion of the theory of national choise, according to which criminality is based on a costprofit-analysis and which, empirically speaking, has not exactly held good. Among the criminalbiological approaches the theory of constitutional predisposition is being discussed which assumes an interaction between genes and environment to produce criminality. Since the studies on family, twins and adoption, while attempting to prove this interaction, show both theoretical and methodological shortcomings, this theory is being rejected. Under the headline of "criminalbiological theories" a discussion of mental illness and crime can be found. A psychiatrisation of crime is not held advisable: Only between 0.2 % and 2 % of all schizophrenic persons are arrested for violent crimes per year, which amounts 1.1 % to 2.3 % of the total arrests for violent crime. Among the criminalpsychological theories the following three approaches are being discussed: the psychopathological theory, the theory of criminal personality according to Hans Jürgen Eysenck and the biosocial theory of inherited criminal tendencies according to Sarnoff A. Mednick. It is proposed to give up the term "psychopathy'' altogether since it contradicts modern findings of dark field research that personality traits not socially desirable are restricted to and concentrated in only a small section of the human race. The theories of Eysneck and Mednick, according to which criminal behaviour is tfre result of interaction between certain social environmental factors and inherited predispositions of the central nervous system, have empirically not been sufficiently proven.

The survey's emphasis lies on criminalsociological, socialpsychological and victimological theories. In the context o criminalsociological approaches the theories of social disorganization and of anomie are being discussed. A society is socially disorganized when social bonds dissolve, when social control breaks down and when interpersonal disorientation spreads among its members. The theory of social disorganization has been further developed inasmuch as the social structuring of delinquency areas has been described as a dynamic process and as the spiral-like social downfall and dereliction of a neighbourhood ("community crime career"). In empirical studies making use of data from accounts showing how people have become perpetrator or victim ("British Crime Surveys"), this theory of social disorganization has been widely confirmed. The theory of anomie has undergone further development by the adaptation of two new approaches: the theory of institutional anomie according to Steven F. Messner and Richard Rosenfeld and the theory of general strain according to Robert Agnew. The theory of institutional anomie underlines the extreme importance western societies ascribe to monetary success while at the same time not stressing the component of achieving this success by legal means. One institution – economy – assumes priority over all non-economic institutions such as family, education or politics, which on their part are only insufficiently capable of restricting the criminogenic pressure phenomenon, i.e. the overestimation of monetary success. According to the theory of general strain the incapability of reaching positively marked aims results in overstraining (pressure). This pressure can be measured by ascertaining the gap between aspirations (ideal aims) and expectations on the one hand and actual achievements and successes on the other.

The socialpsychological theories, which are theories of social processes can be subdivided into theories of cognitive-social learning, control, interaction and life-course. According to the theory of cognitive-social learning a person acquires his/her behaviour by way of reinforcement and modeling. In self-reinforcement processes people both reward and punish themselves. Finally, this theory regards human learning as an active, cognitively controlled psychical process of assimilating experience. Criminal behaviour is learned by reaffirming (rewarding) it more than socially conforming behaviour. Delinquents acquire it in criminal subcultures, in which criminal behaviour is justified by means of neutralisation techniques as being "not really'' criminal. The theory of cognitive-social learning of criminal behaviour (the theory of differential reinforcement and imitation) has held good empirically and practically and has been complemented by the theory of crime seduction according to Jack Katz stating that the euphoria of criminal success is relevant factor. The robber f.i. is not only rewarded by his material profit but also by experiencing domination during the criminal act.

Among the theories of control the theory of social bonds according to Travis Hirschi is widely appreciated in practical terms. Empirically speaking, however, it has not quite achieved what it promised. It has been further developed by the theory of self-control, according to which delinquents are persons with a low level of self-control as a result from ineffective and inadequate socialization. Another new development is the theory of control balance according to Charles R. Tittle. The central statement of this theory is that the amount of control a person is subjected to, as compared to the control this person exercises, influences both the probability of committing delinquencies and the possibility to commit certain types of crime. The theory of interaction, which is a theory of social process, has been converted in the seventies and eighties to a radical socialstructural labeling approach. Control institutions (f.i police, law-courts) are assumed to produce delinquency and criminality by selectively sanctioning the lower class in the order to preserve the power of the ruling class. In the nineties, however, the interaction theory is distancing itself from this radical power conflict approach and reverting to its original focus: its connection to the cognitive-social learning theory. The interaction theory has been supplemented by the Australian criminologist John Braithwaite. He regards shame as an essential means of informal social control and distinguishes between reintegrative and disintegrative shaming.

The life-course-theories are new developments stemming from the late eighties and early nineties. According to these theories, delinquency and criminality develop in interactive processes spanning the whole cycle of life. Developmental crirninology focusses on the questions why people become delinquent (onset, activation), why their delinquencies continue (maintenance), why delinquencies often increase both in frequency and in seriousness (acceleration, escalation, aggravation) and, lastly, why people stop being delinquent (deceleration, desistance, termination). It is concept of casuality is dynamic and interactive. Personal and social damages cause delinquency and criminality which in their turn again result in personal and social damages. Basically, three life-course-theories have recently been developed: the interaction theory by Terence P. Thornberry, the theory of social turning-points by Robert J. Sampson and John H. Laub and the theory of criminal tendencies by David P. Farrington.

Victimological theories open a range of completely new criminal-aetiological perspectives. For victimogenesis (enquiring into the causes for becoming a victim) the model of lifestyle-exposure and opportunity deals with the probability of individuals being in certain places at certain times and under certiatin circumstances and thereby meeting certain categories of people. The routine-activity-theory according to Lawrence E. Cohen and Marcus Felson distinguishes between three elements: a motivated offender, a suitable target and the absence of capable protectors (guardians) of this object against a violation. The routine-activity-approach accordingly predicts the highest risk of delinquency when the victim's suitability is highest: best social visibility, easiest access, strongest attraction and when the level of object observation is low. The routine-activity-theory has been further developed into a structural-choise model of victimization. Within this reconsidered and verified model the nearness and protection of a potential victim represent components of choise.

The critical-radical school in modern criminology intends to develop an alternative to mainstream criminology and in the long run to replace mainstream criminology. While having achieved their first aim, thus far they have failed in thier second. The critical-radical school of thought can be divided into three theories: According to marxist theory the basis of crime can be found in the contradictions of capitalism oppresing and exploiting the working class. Crime originates in the basic conflict between the bourgeoisie and the working class, which is a conflict of power and interests. The anarchistic theory aims at showing that that kind of justice by which our modern1egal system defines itself is in reality a facade for an intrinsic system of institutionalized injustice. Left-wing realism holds a „theory” consisting of four variables: victim, offender, state agencies and the public. Without disregarding the victims of so-called street-crimes, radical realism is based not-only on comprehending the victimization of the offender by the state, but also on the understanding of victimizition of the working class by the working class.

Feminist theories in criminology focus on the four following issues:

  • the problem of generalization: It is questionable whether the criminological theories developed so far are readily applicable to women and girls;
  • the problem of gender relations: an explanation is required on why women and girls;
  • commit fewer and less serious crimes and delinquencies than man and boys and how significant a factor masculinity is for the genesis of crime;
  • the victimalization problem: Both the manifestations and the causes of male physical and sexual violence towards woman have to be describeds much more accurately;
  • the problem of equal treatment of man and woman in the criminal justice system: It is questionable whether the principles of masculinity or feminity, should define the climate of the criminal justice system.

Constutive criminology is a postmodernist school. It questions the attempt of institutions and individuals to claim priority of ''expert'' knowledge. Truth to them is a form of domination. Linked with constitutive criminology is the peacemaking criminology, which tries to soothe human sufferings and reduce criminality in this way. Solutions of the criminal justice system are rejected as violent. Individual violence cannot be overcome through state violence. Integrated theories attempt to take the best of every ''middle-range" theory and combine this into a more comprehensive new theory. Finally, as an example of an integrated theory, John Hagan's theory of power control is put forward which aims at explaining the lower frequency and seriousness of woman's criminality and girls' delinquency by looking at patriarchy and class structures.


Adler F., Mueller G.O.W., Laufer W.S., Criminology, wyd. 2, McGraw-Hill, New York 1995.

Adler F., Nations not Obsessed with Crime, F.B. Rothman, Littleton (Col.) 1983.

Agnew R., Foundation for a general strain theory of crime and delinquency, „Criminology” 1992, t. 30, nr 1.

Agnew R., Strain and Subcultural Theories of Criminality [w:] J.F. Sheley (red.), Criminology, wyd. 2, Wadsworth, Belmont 1995.

Agnew R., White H.R., An empiricial test of general strain theory, „Criminology” 1992, t. 30, nr 4.

Akers R.L., Criminological Theories. Introduction and Evaluation, wyd. 2, Roxbury, Los Angeles 1997.

Akers R.L., Deviant Behavior. A Social Learning Approach, wyd. 3, Wadsworth, Belmont 1985.

Akers R.L., Rational choice, deterrence, and social learning theory in criminology. The path not taken, „Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology” 1990, t. 81, nr 3.

Arbuthnot J., Gordon D.A., Personality [w:] H.C. Quay (red.), Handbook of Juvenile Delinquency, Wiley, New York 1987.

Bandura A., Sozial-kognitive Lerntheorie, Klett-Cotta, Stuttgart 1979.

Barlow H.D., Introduction to Criminology, wyd. 7, HarperCollins, New York 1996.

Bartol C.R., Criminal Behavior. A Psychosocial Approach, wyd. 4, Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs 1995.

Beirne P., Messerschmidt J., Criminology, wyd. 2, Harcourt Brace College Publishers, Fort Worth 1995.

Bernard T.J., Snipes J.B., Theoretical Integration in Criminology [w:] M. Tonry (red.), Crime and Justice, t. 20, University of Chicago Press, Chicago 1996.

Blackburn R., On moral judgements and personality disorders. The myth of psychopathic personality revisited, ,,British Journal of Psychiatry” 1988, t. 153.

Blackburn R., The Psychology of Criminal Conduct, Wiley, Chichester 1993.

Bonger W., Criminality and Economic Conditions, Indiana University Press, Bloomington, London 1969.

Bonger W.A., An Introduction to Criminology, Methuen, London 1936.

Braithwaite J., Crime, Shame, and Reintegration, Cambridge University Press, New York 1989.

Brennan P.A., Mednick S.A., Volavka J., Biomedical Factors in Crime [w:] J.Q. Wilson, J. Petersilia (red.), Crime, ICS Press, Institute for Contemporary Studies, San Francisco (Cal.) 1995.

Brown S.E., Esbensen F.-A., Geis G., Criminology, wyd. 2, Ohio Anderson, Cincinnati 1996.

Burgess R.L., Akers R.L., A differential association-reinforcement theory of criminal behavior, „Social Problems” 1966, t. 14, nr 2.

Bussmann K.D., Kreissl R. (red.), Kritische Kriminologie in der Diskussion, VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften, Wiesbaden 1996.

Caulfield S., Wonders N., Gender and Justice. Feminist Contributions to Criminology [w:] G. Barak (red.), Varieties of Criminology, Praeger, Westport (Conn) 1994.

Chambliss W.J., Exploring Criminology, Macmillan, New York 1988.

Chamlin M.B., Cochran J.K., Assessing Messner and Rosenfeld’s Institutional Anomie Theory. A Partial Test, „Criminology” 1995, t. 33, nr 3.

Chesney-Lind M., Girls' crime and woman's place. Toward a feminist model of female delinquency, „Crime and Delinquency” 1989, t. 35, nr 1.

Chesney-Lind M., Shelden R.G., Girls Delinquency, and Juvenile Justice, Brooks/Cole Publishing Company, Pacific Grove 1992.

Clarke R.V., Cornish D.B., Modeling Offenders' Decisions. A Framework for Research and Policy [w:] M. Tonry, N. Morris (red.), Crime and Justice, t. 6, University of Chicago Press, Chicago 1985.

Cohen L.E., Felson M., Social Change and Crime Rate Trends. A Routine Activity Approach, „American Sociological Review” 1979, t. 44, nr 4.

Cohen S., Against Criminology, Transaction Books, New Brunswick, Oxford 1988.

Cornish D., Theories of Action in Criminology, Learning Theory and Rational Choice Approaches [w:] R.V. Clarke, M. Felson (red.), Routine Activity and Rational Choice, Transaction Publishers, New Brunswick 1993.

Cornish D.B., Clarke R.V., Introduction [w:] D.B. Cornish, R.V. Clarke (red)., The Reasoning Criminal, Springer-Verlag, New York 1986.

Currant D.J., Renzetti C.M., Theories of Crime, Allyn and Bacon, Boston 1994.

Daly K., Chesney-Lind M., Feminism and Criminology [w:] P. Cordella, L. Siegel (red.), Readings in Contemporary Criminological Theory, Northeastern University Press, Boston 1996.

DeKeseredy W.S., Schwartz M.D., British and U.S. left realism. A critical comparison, „International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology” 1991, t. 35.

DeKeseredy W.S., Schwartz M.D., Contemporary Criminology, Wadsworth Publishing, Belmont 1996.

Downes D., Rock P., Understanding Deviance, Clarendon Press, Oxford 1995.

Durkheim E., Der Selbstmord, Kraus, Neuwied 1973.

Einstadter W., Henry S., Criminological Theory, Harcourt Brace College Publishers, Fort Worth 1995.

Eysenck H.J., Gudjonsson G.H., The Causes of Cures of Criminality, Plenum Press, New York 1989.

Falandysz L., W kręgu kryminologii radykalnej, Wiedza Powszechna, Warszawa 1986.

Farrington D.P., Explaining the Beginning, Progress, and Ending of Antisocial Behavior from Birth to Adulthood [w:] J. McCord (red.), Facts, Frameworks, and Forecasts, Transaction Publishers, New Brunswick 1992.

Farrington D.P., The Development of Offending and Antisocial Behavior from Childhood to Adulthood [w:] P. Cordella, L. Siegel (red.), Readings in Contemporary Criminological Theory, Northeastern University Press, Boston 1996.

Farrington D.P., The Explanation and Prevention of Youthful Offending [w:] J.D. Hawkins (red.), Delinquency and Crime. Current Theories, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge 1996.

Felson M., Crime and Everyday Life, Pine Forge Press, Thousand Oaks 1994.

Ferrell F., Sanders C.R., Cultural Criminology, Northeastern University Press, Boston 1995.

Ferrell J., Confronting the Agenda of Authority, Critical Criminology, Anarchism, and Urban Graffiti [w:] G. Barak (red.), Varieties of Criminology, Praeger, Westport (Conn) 1994.

Fishbein D.H., Biological Perspectives in Criminology, „Criminology” 1990, t. 28, nr 1.

Gibbons D.C., Talking about Crime and Criminals, Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs 1994.

Gottfredson M. R., Hirschi T., A General Theory of Crime, Stanford University Press, Stanford 1990.

Gottfredson M.R., Hirschi T., The Positive Tradition [w:] M.R. Gottfredson, T. Hirschi (red.), Positive Criminology, Sage, Newbury Park 1987.

Grasmick H.G., Tittle C.R., Bursik R.J., Arneklev B.J., Testing the core empirical implications of Gottfredson and Hirschi’s General Theory of Crime, „Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency” 1993, t. 30, nr 1.

Hagan F.E., Research methods in Criminal Justice and Criminology, wyd. 4, Allyn and Bacon, Boston 1997.

Hagan J., Gillis A.R., Simpson J., The class structure and delinquency. Toward a power-control of common delinquent behaviour, „American Journal of Sociology” 1985, t. 90, nr 6.

Hagan J., Simpson J.H., Gillis A.R., Class in the household. A power-control theory of gender and delinquency, „American Journal of Sociology” 1987, t. 92, nr 4.

Hagan J., The structuration of gender and deviance. A power‐control theory of vulnerability to crime and the search for deviant role exits, „Canadian Review of Sociology and Anthropology” 1990, t. 27, nr 2.

Hare R.D., Forth A.E., Psychopathy and Crime. A Review [w:] K. Howells, C.R. Hollin, Clinical Approaches to the Mentally Disordered Offender, J. Wiley, Chichester, New York, Brisbane 1993.

Hare R.D., Hart S.D., Psychopathy, Mental Disorder and Crime [w:] S. Hodgins (red.), Mental Disorder and Crime, Sage, Newbury Park 1993.

Heimer K., Matsueda R.L., Role taking, role commitment and delinquency. A theory of differential social control, „American Sociological Review” 1994, t. 59, nr 3.

Henry S., Milovanovic D., Constitutive Criminology, Sage, London 1996.

Henry S., Milovanovic D., Constitutive Criminology. The Maturation of Critical Theory, „Criminology” 1991, t. 29, nr 2.

Henry S., Milovanovic D., The Constitution of Constitutive Criminology. A Postmodern Approach to Criminological Theory [w:] D. Nelken, The Futures of Criminology, Sage, London 1994.

Hindelang M.J., Gottfredson M.R., Garofalo J., Victims of Personal Crime. An Empirical Foundation for a Theory of Personal Victimization, Ballinger, Cambridge (Mass.) 1978.

Hirschi T., Causes of Delinquency, Berkeley, Los Angeles 1969.

Hirschi T., Gottfredson M.R., The Generality of Deviance [w:] T. Hirschi, M.R. Gottfredson (red.), The Generality of Deviance, Transaction Publisher, New Brunswick 1994.

Hodgins S., The Criminality of Mentally Disordered Persons [w:] S. Hodgins (red.), Mental Disorder and Crime, Sage, Newbury Park 1993.

Janssen H., Kautitzky R., Michalowski R. (red.), Radikale Kriminologie, Bielefeld 1988.

Jeffery C.R., Biological and Neuropsychiatric Approaches to Criminal Behavior [w:] G. Barak (red.), Varieties of Criminology, Praeger, Westport (Conn) 1994.

Jeffery C.R., Criminal Behavior and Learning Theory [w:] J. McCord, J.H. Laub (red), Contemporary Masters in Criminology, Plenum Press, New York 1995.

Jeffery C.R., Criminology, Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs 1990.

Katz J., Chambliss W.J., Biology and Crime [w:] J.F. Sheley (red.), Criminology, wyd. 2, Wadsworth, Belmont 1995.

Katz J., Seductions of Crime, New York 1988.

Katz J., The Motivation of the Persistent Robber [w:] M. Tonry, Crime and Justice, t. 14, University of Chicago Press, Chicago 1991.

Kempf K.L., The Empirical Status of Hirschi’s Control Theory [w:] F. Adler, W.S. Laufer (red.), New Directions in Criminological Theory, Transaction Publishers, New Brunswick 1993.

Kornhauser R.R., Social Sources of Delinquency, University of Chicago Press, Chicago 1978.

Kossowska A., Funkcjonowanie kontroli społecznej. Analiza kryminologiczna, Agencja Scholar, Warszawa 1992.

Krajewski K., Teorie kryminologiczne a prawo karne, Dom Wydawniczy ABC, Warszawa 1994.

Lamnek S., Neue Theorien abweichenden Verhaltens, Fink, München 1994.

Lamnek S., Theorien abweichenden Verhaltens, wyd. 5., Fink, München 1993.

Lemert E.M., Social Pathology, McGraw-Hill, New York 1951.

Lindqvist P.,. Allebeck P, Schizophrenia and Crime, A Longitudinal Follow-up of 644 Schizophrenics in Stockholm, „British Journal of Psychiatry” 1990, t. 157, nr 3.

Loeber R., LeBlanc M., Toward a Developmental Criminology [w:] M. Tonry, N. Morris (red.), Crime and Justice, t. 12, University of Chicago Press, Chicago 1990.

Loeber R., Stouthamer-Loeber M., Family Factors as Correlates and Predictors of Juvenile Conduct. Problems and Delinquency [w:] M. Tonry, N. Morris, Crime and Justice, t. 7, University of Chicago Press, Chicago 1986.

Lowman J., MacLean B.D. (red.), Realist Criminology, University of Toronto Press, Toronto 1992.

Matsueda R.L., Reflected appraisals, parental labeling, and delinquency: Specifying a symbolic interactionist theory, „American Journal of Sociology” 1992, t. 97, nr 6.

Matthews R., Young J. (red.), Issues in Realist Criminology, New Delhi Sage, London, Newbury Park 1992.

Maxfield M.G., Babbie E., Research methods in Criminal Justice and Criminology, Wadsworth, Belmont 1995.

McCord W., McCord J., Psychopathy and Delinquency, Grune & Stratton, New York 1956.

Mead G.H., Sozialpsychologie, Darmstadt 1996.

Mednick S.A., A Biosocial Theory of the Learning of Learning of Law-Abiding Behavior, [w:] S.A. Mednick, K.O. Christiansen (red.), Biosocial bases of criminal behavior, Gardner Press, New York 1977.

Meier R.F., Miethe T.D., Understanding Theories of Criminal Victimization, [w:] M. Tonry (red.), Crime and Justice, t. 17, University of Chicago, Chicago 1993.

Merton R.K., Social Theory and Social Structure, Free Press, New York 1968.

Messner S.F., Krohn M.D., Liska A.E., Theoretical Integration in the Study of Deviance and Crime. Problems and Prospects, State University of New York Press, Albany 1989.

Messner S.F., Rosenfels R., An Institutional-Anomie Theory of the Social Distribution of Crime [w:] P. Cordella, L. Siegel (red.), Readings in Contemporary Criminological Theory, Northeastern University Press, Boston 1996.

Messner S.F., Rosenfels R., Crime and the American Dream, wyd. 2, Wadsworth Publishing, Belmont 1997.

Michalowski R.J., Order, Law, and Crime, Random House, New York 1985.

Miethe T.D., Meier R.F., Crime and its Social Context, State University of New York Press, Albany 1994.

Miethe T.D., Meier R.F., Opportunity, choice, and criminal victimization. A test of a theoretical model, „Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency” 1990, t. 27, nr 3.

Monahan J., Mental Disorder and Violence. Another Look [w:] S. Hodgins (red.), Mental Disorder and Crime, Sage, Newbury Park 1993.

Morash M., Chesney-Lind M., A reformulation and partial test of the power control theory of delinquency, „Justice Quarterly” 1991, t. 8, nr 3.

Morrison W., Theoretical Criminology. From Modernity to Post-Modernism, Cavendish, London 1995.

Ostrowska K., Wójcik D., Teorie kryminologiczne, ATK, Warszawa 1986.

Paternoster R., Iovanni L., The Labeling perspective and delinquency. An elaboration of the theory and an assessment of the evidence, „Justice Quarterly” 1989, t. 6, nr 3.

Paternoster R., Mazerolle P., General strain theory and delinquency. A replication and extension, „Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency” 1994, t. 31, nr 3.

Pepinsky H.E., Quinney R. (red.), Criminology as peacemaking, Indiana University Press, Bloomington, Indianapolis 1991.

Philips M.R., Wolf A.S, Coons D.J., Psychiatry and the criminal justice system. Testing the myths, „American Journal of Psychiatry” 1988, t. 145, nr 5.

Płatek M., What it’s like for Women. Criminology in Poland and Eastern Europe [w:] N.H. Rafter, F. Heidensohn (red.), International Feminist Perspectives in Criminology, Open University Press Buckingham 1995.

Polk K., Review of a General Theory of Crime, „Crime and Delinquency” 1991, t. 37.

Quinney R., Class, State, and Crime, wyd. 2, Longman, New York 1980.

Raine A., The Psychopathology of Crime, Academic Press, San Diego 1993.

Redd G.E., Yeager P.C., Organizational Offending and Neoclassical Criminology. Challenging the Teach of a General Theory of Crime, „Criminology” 1996, t. 34, nr 3.

Reiss A.J. Why are Communities Important in Understanding Crime? [w:] A.J. Reiss, M. Tonry (red.), Crime and Justice, t. 8, Communities and Crime, University of Chicago Press, Chicago 1986.

Reiss A.J., Tonry M. (red.), Crime and Justice, t. 8, Communities and Crime, University of Chicago Press, Chicago 1986.

Sack F., Definition von Kriminalität als politisches Handeln. Der Labeling approach [w:] Arbeitskreis Junger Kriminologen (red.), Kritische Kriminologie, München 1974.

Sampson R.J., Groves W.B., Community Structure and Crime. Testing Social Disorganization Theory, „American Journal of Sociology” 1989, t. 94, nr 4.

Sampson R.J., Laub J.H., Crime in the Making, Harvard University Press, Cambridge (Mass.) 1993.

Sampson R.J., The Community [w:] J.Q. Wilson, J. Petersilia (red.), Crime, ICS Press, Institute for Contemporary Studies, San Francisco (Cal.) 1995.

Schneider H.J., Ausländer als Täter und Opfer [w:] E. Schlüchter (red.), Kriminalistik und Strafrecht, Festschrift für Friedrich Geerds, Schmidt-Römhild, Lübeck 1995.

Schneider H.J., Einfuhrung in die Kriminologie, wyd. 3., Gruyter, Berlin 1993.

Schneider H.J., Kriminologie, De Gruyter, Berlin, New York 1987.

Schneider K., Die psychopathischen Personlichkeiten, wyd. 9, Wien 1950.

Schuerman L., Kobrin S., Communities of Crime [w:] A.J. Reiss, M. Tonry (red Crime and Justice, t. 8, Communities and Crime, University of Chicago Press, Chicago 1986.

Sellin T, Culture Conflict and Crime, Social Science Research Council, New York 1938.

Shaw C.R., McKay H.D., Juvenile Delinquency and Urban Areas, University of Chicago Press, Chicago, London 1969.

Shoemaker D.J., Theories of Delinquency, wyd. 3, Oxford University Press, New York 1996.

Siemaszko A., Granice tolerancji. O teoriach zachowań dewiacyjnych, PWN, Warszawa 1993.

Siemaszko A., Społeczna geneza przestępczości. Wokół teorii zróżnicowanych powiązań, PWN, Warszawa 1979.

Simmel G., Sociologie 1908, Berlin 1983.

Simpson S.S., Feminist Theory, Crime and Justice [w:] P. Cordella, L. Siegel (red.), Readings in Contemporary Criminological Theory, Northeastern University Press, Boston 1996.

Skogan W.S., Disorder and Decline, Crime and the Spiral of Decay in American Neighborhoods, Free Press, New York 1990.

Skogan W.S., Fear of Crime and Neighborhood Change [w:] A.J. Reiss, M. Tonry (red.), Crime and Justice, t. 8, Communities and Crime, University of Chicago Press, Chicago 1986.

Sutherland E.H., Luckenbill D.F., Principles of Criminology, wyd. 11, Dix Hills 1992.

Taylor I., Walton P., Young J., The New Criminology, London, Boston 1973.

Teplin L.A., The criminality of the mentally ill. a dangerous misconception, „American Journal of Psychiatry” 1985, t. 142, nr 5.

Thornberry T.P., Empirical Support for Interactional Theory: A Review of the Literature [w:] J.D. Hawkins (red.), Delinquency and Crime. Current Theories, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge 1996.

Thornberry T.P., Toward an interactional theory of delinquency, „Criminology” 1987, t. 25, nr 4.

Tittle C.R., Control Balance. Toward a General Theory of Deviance, Routledge, London 1995.

Tunnell K.D., Let’s Do It. Deciding to Commit a Crime [w:] J.E. Conklin (red.), New Perspectives in Criminology, Allyn and Bacon, Boston 1996.

Turk A.T., Criminality and Legal Order, Rand McNally, Chicago 1969.

Tyszkiewicz L., Od naturalizmu do humanizmu w kryminologii, Uniwersytet Śląski, Katowice 1991.

Vold G.B., Bernard T.J., Theoretical Criminology, wyd. 3, Oxford University Press, New York 1986.

Vold G.B., Theoretical Criminology, Oxford University Press, New York 1958.

Walker J.T., Human Ecology and Social Disorganization Revisit Delinquency in Little Rock, [w:] G. Barak (red.), Varieties of Criminology, Praeger, Westport (Conn) 1994.

Walters G.D., A meta-analysis of the gene-crime relationship, „Criminology” 1992, t. 30, nr 4.

Walters G.D., White T.W., Heredity and crime. Bad genes or bad research?, „Criminology” 1989, t. 27, nr 3.

Wellford C.F., Triplett R.A., The Future of Labeling Theory. Foundations and Promises [w:] F. Adler, W.S. Laufer (red.), New Directions in Criminological Theory, Transaction Publishers, New Brunswick 1993.

Winfree L.T., Abadinsky H., Understanding Crime, Nelson-Hall Publishers, Chicago 1996.

Wittig P., Der rationale Verbrecher, Duncker & Humblot, Berlin 1993.

Young J., Matthews R. (red.), Rethinking Criminology. The Realist Debate, Sage Publications, London, Newbury 1992.

Young J., The tasks facing a realist criminology, „Contemporary Crises” 1987, t. 11, nr 4.

Art. 11 Ustawy z dnia 4 lutego 1994 r. o prawie autorskim i prawach pokrewnych (t.j. Dz. U. z 2019 r. poz. 1231.) przyznaje autorskie prawa majątkowe do utworu zbiorowego (w tym publikacji periodycznej) wydawcy, zaś do poszczególnych części mających samodzielne znaczenie - ich twórcom. Pomimo, że przeważnie na treść utworów zbiorowych składają się utwory wielu autorów, to inicjatorem ich powstanie jest wydawca, któremu ustawa przyznała autorskie prawa majątkowe do całości takiego utworu jako takiego, czyli prawo do decydowania o sposobach eksploatacji i otrzymywania wynagrodzenia. Do poszczególnych części utworu zbiorowego, poszczególnych utworów, prawo przysługuje ich twórcom, chyba że przeniosą je na wydawcę.

Na platformie udostępniane są poszczególne artykuły wraz z zestawem metadanych tylko jeżeli autorzy wyrazili zgodę na wykorzystanie utworu (publikacji naukowej) na tym polu eksploatacji. Dostrzegając korzyści społeczne, jakie daje otwarty bezpłatny dostęp do publikacji prawniczych, Instytut Nauk Prawnych PAN jako Wydawca czasopisma, korzystając z legitymacji ustawowej,  zadecydował o opublikowaniu całych woluminów periodyku.

Autorzy artykułów opublikowanych w czasopiśmie, zainteresowani udostępnieniem publikacji w sposób otwarty, proszeni są o kontakt z Wydawcą w sprawie zawarcia umowy licencyjnej.


Download data is not yet available.