Make a Submission
ONLINE FIRST
Articles

Comparison of Albert K. Cohenʼs theory of delinquent subculture with selected psychological theories

Comparison of Albert K. Cohenʼs theory of delinquent subculture with selected psychological theories

PDF (Polish)
  • Jakub Orłowski
Jakub Orłowski
Instytut Psychologii PAN

Published 2025-05-06

Keywords

  • self-esteem,
  • status,
  • agression,
  • delinquent subculture,
  • Albert K. Cohen

Copyright (c) 2024 Jakub Orłowski

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

How to Cite

“Comparison of Albert K. Cohenʼs theory of delinquent subculture with selected psychological theories: Comparison of Albert K. Cohenʼs theory of delinquent subculture with selected psychological theories” (2025) Archives of Criminology, p. 21 ss. doi:10.7420/AK2025.02.
Crossref
Scopus
Google Scholar
Europe PMC

Abstract

In this article, I reinforce Albert K. Cohen’s theory with selected psychological theories. Cohen’s concept may seem outdated today, as it presents a twentieth-century social structure. A comparison between the theory of delinquent subcultures and psychological theories brings to light similarities and convergences between the theses put forward by Cohen and the remarks of more contemporary authors. These analogies make it possible to present the concept of delinquent subcultures in the form of a model that could be empirically verified in the future. The similarities I discuss include issues of self-esteem, status, aggression, and adjustment.

PDF (Polish)

References

  1. Brewer M.B. (1991). ʻThe social self: On being the same and different at the same timeʼ. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 17(5), s. 475–482. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167291175001
  2. Cohen A.K. (1955). Delinquent Boys; The Culture of the Gang. Glencoe: The Free Press.
  3. Daly M. i Wilson M. (2001). ʻRisk-taking, intrasexual competition, and homicideʼ. Nebraska Symposium on Motivation. Nebraska Symposium on Motivation 47, s. 1–36.
  4. Erikson E.H. (2000). Dzieciństwo i społeczeństwo [Childhood and society]. Poznań: Rebis.
  5. Erikson E.H. i Erikson J.M. (2012). Dopełniony cykl życia [The life cycle completed]. Gliwice: Helion.
  6. Gałecki P. (red.) (2024). Desk reference. Kryteria diagnostyczne DSM-5-TR [Desk reference to the diganostic criteria from DSM-5-TR]. Wrocław: Edra Urban & Partner.
  7. Gecas V. (1982). ʻThe self-conceptʼ. Annual Review of Sociology 8, s. 1–33. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.so.08.080182.000245
  8. Gubbels J., Assink M. i van der Put C.E. (2024). ʻProtective factors for antisocial behavior in youth: What is the meta-analytic evidence?ʼ. Journal of Youth and Adolescence 53, s. 233–257. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-023-01878-4
  9. Hogg M.A. (2016). ʻSocial identity theoryʼ. W S. McKeown, R. Haji i N. Ferguson (red.) Understanding Peace and Conflict Through Social Identity Theory: Contemporary Global Perspectives. Cham: Springer, s. 3–17. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-29869-6_1
  10. Leary M.R. (2001). ʻToward a conceptualization of interpersonal rejectionʼ. W M.R. Leary (red.) Interpersonal Rejection. New York: Oxford University Press, s. 3–20.
  11. Leary M.R. (2003). ʻCommentary on self-esteem as an interpersonal monitor: The sociometer hypothesis (1995)ʼ. Psychological Inquiry 14(3–4), s. 270–274. https://doi.org/10.1080/1047840X.2003.9682891
  12. Leary M.R. (2005). ʻSociometer theory and the pursuit of relational value: Getting to the root of self-esteemʼ. European Review of Social Psychology 16, s. 75–111. https://doi.org/10.1080/10463280540000007
  13. McClelland D.C. (1967). Achieving Society. New York: Free Press.
  14. Mier C. i Ladny R.T. (2018). ʻDoes self-esteem negatively impact crime and delinquency? A meta-analytic review of 25 years of evidenceʼ. Deviant Behavior 39(8), s. 1006–1022. https://doi.org/10.1080/01639625.2017.1395667
  15. OECD (2010). PISA 2009 Results: Overcoming Social Background: Equity in Learning Opportunities and Outcomes (T. 2). http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/9789264091504-en
  16. Siemaszko A. (1993). Granice tolerancji: O teoriach zachowań dewiacyjnych [Limits of tolerance: On theories of deviant behaviour]. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN.
  17. Tajfel H. i Turner J.C. (2004). ʻThe social identity theory of intergroup behaviorʼ. W J.T. Jost i J. Sidanius (red.) Political Psychology: Key Readings. New York-Hove: Psychology Press, s. 367–390. http://dx.doi.org/10.4324/9780203505984-16
  18. Trivers R. (1972). ʻParental investment and sexual selectionʼ. W B.G. Campbell (red.) Sexual Selection and the Descent of Man. New York: Transactions Publishers, s. 136–179.
  19. Vignoles V.L. (2012). ʻIdentity motivesʼ. W S.J. Schwartz, K. Luyckx i V.L. Vivian (red.) Handbook of Identity Theory and Research. Structures and Processes. Volume 1. New York: Springer, s. 403–432. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-7988-9_18
  20. Vignoles V.L., Chryssochoou X. i Breakwell G.M. (2000). ʻThe distinctiveness principle: Identity, meaning, and the bounds of cultural relativityʼ. Personality and Social Psychology Review 4(4), s. 337–354. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327957PSPR0404_4
  21. Vignoles V.L., Regalia C., Manzi C., Golledge J. i Scabini E. (2006). ʻBeyond self-esteem: Influence of multiple motives on identity constructionʼ. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 90(2), s. 308–333. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.90.2.308
  22. Wannamethee S.G. i Shaper A.G. (1997). ʻSocioeconomic status within social class and mortality: A prospective study in middle-aged British menʼ. International Journal of Epidemiology 26(3), s. 532–541. https://doi.org/10.1093/ije/26.3.532