Make a Submission
No. XLVI/1 (2024)
Articles

Social sorting in Europe: Self-censorship in a digital asylum

Sortowanie społeczne w Europie. Autocenzura w cyfrowym azylu

PDF
  • Veronika Nagy
Veronika Nagy
Utrecht University

Published 2024-09-30

Keywords

  • surveillance,
  • censorship,
  • hardware,
  • imaginaries,
  • migration

Copyright (c) 2024 Veronika Nagy

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

How to Cite

“Social sorting in Europe: Self-censorship in a digital asylum: Sortowanie społeczne w Europie. Autocenzura w cyfrowym azylu” (2024) Archives of Criminology, (XLVI/1), pp. 149–179. doi:10.7420/AK2024.13.
Crossref
Scopus
Google Scholar
Europe PMC

Abstract

In recent decades, global mobility control and digital surveillance measures have increasingly prioritised affective aspects and perception-based policies. However, these practices encounter resistance, particularly in the everyday use of connected migrants. Through qualitative data analysis within the tradition of critical surveillance studies, this paper investigates how marginalised mobile groups – often labelled suspects of terrorism and organised crime – circumvent mobile surveillance and social sorting mechanisms within and beyond Fortress Europe. Rising tech literacy and surveillance awareness among users challenge digital policing, reshaping interactions between suspected newcomers and border control authorities. While existing studies focus on countersurveillance activities, less attention is given to strategic “silences” and social filters used to evade profiling and sorting mechanisms, protecting those who fear the risks of crossing a border. Based on notions of secure connectivity, this research employs a multi-site analysis of refugee polymedia use to examine countersurveillance strategies and digital self-censorship practices in transit countries.

PDF

References

  1. Aouragh M. and Chakravartty P. (2016). ʻInfrastructures of empire: Towards a critical geopolitics of media and information studies.ʼ Media, Culture & Society 38(4), pp. 559–575. https://doi.org/10.1177/0163443716643007
  2. Bar-Tal D. (2017). ʻSelf-censorship: The conceptual framework.ʼ In D. Bar-Tal, R. Nets, and K. Sharvit (eds.) Self-Censorship in Contexts of Conflict: Theory and Research. Cham: Springer, pp. 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-63378-7_1
  3. Bastianutti L. (2024). ʻDigital practices on social media: New perspectives on the production of space and geopolitical inquiry.ʼ In H. Gülen, C. Sungur, and A. Yeşilyurt (ed.) At the Frontiers of Everyday Life: New Research in Cramped Spaces. Cham: Springer Nature Switzerland, pp. 135–153.
  4. Bauman Z. and Lyon D. (2013). Liquid Surveillance: A Conversation. Cambridge: Polity Press.
  5. Bennett C.J. (2010). The Privacy Advocates: Resisting the Spread of Surveillance. Cambridge: Mit Press.
  6. Bigo D. (2008). ʻGlobalized (in)security: The field and the ban-opticon.ʼ In D. Bigo and A. Tsoukala (eds.) Terror, Insecurity, and Liberty. London: Routledge, pp. 3–22.
  7. Bloch A. (2007). ʻMethodological challenges for national and multi-sited comparative survey research.ʼ Journal of Refugee Studies 20(2), pp. 230–247. https://doi.org/10.1093/jrs/fem007
  8. Campesi G. (2021). Policing Mobility Regimes: Frontex and the Production of the European Borderscape. New York: Routledge.
  9. Casas-Cortes M., Cobarrubias S., and Pickles J. (2015a). ʻNew directions in the study of migration: The autonomy of migration and its implications.ʼ Antipode 47(4), pp. 885–895. https://doi.org/10.1111/anti.12157
  10. Casas-Cortes M., Cobarrubias S., and Pickles J. (2015b). ʻRiding routes and itinerant borders: Autonomy of migration and border externalization.ʼ Antipode 47(4), pp. 894–914. https://doi.org/10.1111/anti.12157
  11. Chen X., Xie J., Wang Z., Shen B., and Zhou Z. (2023). ʻHow we express ourselves freely: Censorship, self-censorship, and anti-censorship on a Chinese social media.ʼ In International Conference on Information. Cham: Springer Nature Switzerland, pp. 93–108.
  12. Couldry N. and Mejias U.A. (2019). The Costs of Connection: How Data is colonizing Human Life and Appropriating it for Capitalism. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
  13. Cupać J., Schopmans H., and Tuncer-Ebetürk İ. (2024). ʻDemocratization in the age of artificial intelligence: introduction to the special issue.ʼ Democratization, 31(5), pp. 899–921. https://doi.org/10.1080/13510347.2024.2338852
  14. De Certeau M. (1984). ʻWalking in the city.ʼ In M.M. Lock and J. Farquhar (ed.) Beyond the Body Proper: Reading the Anthropology of Material Life. Durham: Duke University Press, pp. 249–258.
  15. De Genova N. (2002). ʻMigrant ‘illegality’ and deportability in everyday life.ʼ Annual Review of Anthropology 31(1), pp. 419–447. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.anthro.31.101401.090029
  16. De Genova N. (2013). ʻSpectacles of migrant ‘illegality’: The scene of exclusion, the obscene of inclusion.ʼ Ethnic and Racial Studies 36(7), pp. 1180–1198. https://doi.org/10.1080/01419870.2013.783241
  17. Dekker R., Engbersen G., Klaver J., and Vonk H. (2018). ʻSmart refugees: How Syrian asylum migrants use social media information in migration decision-making.ʼ Social Media + Society 4(1). https://doi.org/10.1177/2056305118764439
  18. Deleuze G. (1992). ʻPostscript on the societies of control.ʼ Cultural Theory: An Anthology, pp. 139–142.
  19. Elish M.C. and Boyd D. (2017). ʻSituating methods in the magic of Big Data and AI.ʼ Communication Monographs 85(1), pp. 57–80. https://doi.org/10.1080/03637751.2017.1375130
  20. Falzon M. (2012). Multi-Sited Ethnography: Theory, Praxis and Locality in Contemporary Research. London: Routledge.
  21. Fenwick T. (2015). ʻSociomateriality and learning: A critical approach.ʼ In D. Scott and E. Hargreaves (ed.) The SAGE Handbook of Learning, Los Angeles: SAGE, pp. 83–93.
  22. Filak V.F. (2010). ʻSelf-interest, the common good and a sense of purpose: Examining precipitating factors of the willingness to self-censor.ʼ College Media Review 47(3–4), pp. 24–30.
  23. Gerhold L. and Brandes E. (2021). ʻSociotechnical imaginaries of a secure future.ʼ European Journal of Futures Research 9(1), pp. 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40309-021-00223-2
  24. Gillespie M., Osseiran S., and Cheesman M. (2018). ʻSyrian refugees and the digital passage to Europe: Smartphone infrastructures and affordances.ʼ Social Media + Society 4(1). https://doi.org/10.1177/2056305118808821
  25. Gonzalez S.M. and Deckard F.M. (2024). ʻ“We got witnesses” black women’s counter-surveillance for navigating police violence and legal estrangement.ʼ Social Problems 71(3), pp. 894–911. https://doi.org/10.1093/socpro/spac043
  26. Hage G. (2005). ʻA not so multi-sited ethnography of a not so imagined community.ʼ Anthropological Theory 5(4), pp. 463–475. https://doi.org/10.1177/1463499605057834
  27. Haggerty K.D. and Ericson R.V. (2006). The New Politics of Surveillance and Visibility. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
  28. Haile Y.R. (2021). ʻThe liberalities and tyrannies of ICTs for vulnerable migrants: The status quo, gaps and directions.ʼ arXiv. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2108.09782
  29. Hennink M.M., Kaiser B.N., and Weber M.B. (2019). ʻWhat influences saturation? Estimating sample sizes in focus group research.ʼ Qualitative Health Research 29(10), pp. 1483–1496.
  30. Hesselberth P. (2018). ʻDiscourses on disconnectivity and the right to disconnect.ʼ New Media & Society 20(5), pp. 1994–2010. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444817711449
  31. Kappeler K., Festic N., and Latzer M. (2023). ʻDataveillance imaginaries and their role in chilling effects online.ʼ International Journal of Human–Computer Studies 179. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhcs.2023.103120
  32. Kazansky B. (2021). ʻ‘It depends on your threat model’: the anticipatory dimensions of resistance to data-driven surveillance.ʼ Big Data & Society 8(1). https://doi.org/10.1177/2053951720985557
  33. Kerezsi K. and Nagy V. (2020). A Critical Approach to Police Science: New Perspectives in Post-Transitional Policing Studies. The Hague: Boom Uitgevers Den Haag.
  34. Khosravi S. (2007). ʻThe ‘illegal’traveller: An auto‐ethnography of borders.ʼ Social Anthropology/Anthropologie Sociale 15(3), pp. 321–334. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0964-0282.2007.00019.x
  35. Khosravi S. (2017a). After Deportation: Ethnographic Perspectives. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
  36. Khosravi S. (2017b). ʻPrecarious lives: Waiting and survival in the United States and Europe.ʼ The Sociological Review 65(5), pp. 858–876. https://doi.org/10.1177/0038038517696642
  37. Latonero M. and Kift P. (2018). ʻOn digital passages and borders: Refugees and the new infrastructure for movement and control.ʼ Social Media + Society 4(1). https://doi.org/10.1177/2056305118808821
  38. Latonero M. and Kift P. (2018). ʻOn digital passages and borders: Refugees and the new infrastructure for movement and control.ʼ Social Media + Society 4(1). https://doi.org/10.1177/2056305118764432
  39. Lawreniuk S. and Parsons L. (2017). ʻThe politics of migrant mobility: Power, protection, and support.ʼ Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies 43(3), pp. 365–383. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369183X.2017.1349463
  40. Leese M. (2022). ʻFixing state vision: Interoperability, biometrics, and identity management in the EU.ʼ Geopolitics 27(1), pp. 113–133. https://doi.org/10.1080/14650045.2020.1830764
  41. Leurs K. and Smets K. (2018). ʻFive questions for digital migration studies: Learning from interdisciplinary dialogue on migration, media and communication.ʼ Social Media + Society 4(1). https://doi.org/10.1177/2056305117753940
  42. Lock M.M. and Farquhar J. (eds.) (2007). Beyond the Body Proper: Reading the Anthropology of Material Life. Durham: Duke University Press.
  43. Lyon D. (2010). ʻSurveillance, power and everyday life.ʼ In P. Kalantzis-Cope and K. Gherab Martín (ed.) Emerging digital spaces in contemporary society: Properties of technology. London: Palgrave Macmillan UK, pp. 107–120.
  44. Maitland C. and Xu Y. (2015). ʻA social informatics analysis of refugee mobile phone use: A case study of Za’atari Syrian refugee camp.ʼ TPRC 43: The 43rd Research Conference on Communication, Information and Internet Policy Paper. https://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2588300
  45. Marcus G.E. (1995). ʻEthnography in/of the world system: The emergence of multi-sited ethnography.ʼ Annual Review of Anthropology 24(1), pp. 95–117.
  46. Miellet S. (2021). ʻFrom refugee to resident in the digital age: Refugees’ strategies for navigating in and negotiating beyond uncertainty during reception and settlement in the Netherlands.ʼ Journal of Refugee Studies 34(4), pp. 3629–3646.
  47. Milivojevic S. (2021). Crime and Punishment in the Future Internet: Digital Frontier Technologies and Criminology in the Twenty-First Century. Abingdon: Routledge.
  48. Milivojevic S. and Biles J. (2017). ʻThe paradox of border security: Migration, surveillance, and resistance.ʼ Critical Criminology 25(2), pp. 197–215. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10612-016-9354-5
  49. Minca C. and Collins J. (2021). ʻThe Game: Or ‘the making of migration’ along the Balkan Route.ʼ Political Geography 91(1). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polgeo.2021.102490
  50. Morgan H. (2023). ʻLiving digitally like a migrant: Everyday smartphone practices and the (Re) mediation of hostile state-affects.ʼ Progress in Human Geography 47(3), pp. 409–426. https://doi.org/10.1177/03091325231174311
  51. Nagy V. (2024). ʻThe risks of data litter in contemporary policing cultures: Interrogating data sharing between humanitarian NGOs and the Public Security Agencies.ʼ In T. Østbø Kuldova, Gundhus H.O.I., and Ch.T. Wathne (ed.) Policing and Intelligence in the Global Big Data Era. Volume II: New Global Perspectives on the Politics and Ethics of Knowledge. Cham: Springer Nature Switzerland, pp. 159–194.
  52. Nalbandian L. (2022). ʻAn eye for an ‘I:’a critical assessment of artificial intelligence tools in migration and asylum management.ʼ Comparative Migration Studies 10(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40878-022-00305-0
  53. Nedelcu M. and Soysüren I. (2022). ʻPrecarious migrants, migration regimes, and digital technologies: The empowerment-control nexus.ʼ Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies 48(8), pp. 1821–1837. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369183X.2020.1796263
  54. Ozkul D. (2023). Automating Immigration and Asylum: The Uses of New Technologies in Migration and Asylum Governance in Europe. Oxford: University of Oxford.
  55. Pallister-Wilkins P. (2022). Humanitarian Borders: Unequal Mobility and Saving Lives. London: Verso Books.
  56. Petit N. (2020). Big Tech and the Digital Economy: The Moligopoly Scenario. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  57. Pfeifer M. (2021). ʻIntelligent borders? Securitizing smartphones in the European border regime.ʼ Culture Machine 20, pp. 1–22.
  58. Pink S., Ardèvol E., and Lanzeni D. (2020). ʻDigital materiality.ʼ In S. Pink, E. Ardévol, D. Lanzeni (ed.) Digital Materialities: Design and Anthropology. Abingdon: Routledge, pp. 1–26.
  59. Rayes A. and Salam S. (2022). Internet of Things From Hype to Reality: The Road to Digitization. Cham: Springer International Publishing.
  60. Sadowski J. (2020). Too Smart: How Digital Capitalism is Extracting Data, Controlling our Lives, and Taking over the World. Cambridge: MIT Press.
  61. Sánchez-Querubín N. and Rogers R. (2018). ʻConnected routes: Migration studies with digital devices and platforms.ʼ Social Media + Society 4(4). https://doi.org/10.1177/2056305118808821
  62. Scheel S. (2018). ʻThe autonomy of migration: A new framework for understanding the politics of mobility.ʼ Geopolitics 23(1), pp. 110–127. https://doi.org/10.1080/14650045.2017.1342243
  63. Scheel S. and Ustek-Spilda F. (2019). ʻThe politics of expertise and ignorance in the field of migration management.ʼ Environment and Planning D: Society and Space 37(4), pp. 663–681.
  64. Schopmans H. and Tuncer-Ebetürk İ (2024). ʻTechno-authoritarian imaginaries and the politics of resistance against facial recognition technology in the US and European Union.ʼ Democratization 31(5), pp. 943–962. https://doi.org/10.1080/13510347.2023.2258803
  65. Susser D., Roessler B., and Nissenbaum H. (2019). ʻTechnology, autonomy, and manipulation.ʼ Internet Policy Review 8(2). https://doi.org/10.14763/2019.2.1410
  66. Tanczer L.M., Deibert R.J., Bigo D., Franklin M.I., Melgaço L., Lyon D., and Milan S. (2020). ʻOnline surveillance, censorship, and encryption in academia.ʼ International Studies Perspectives 21(1), pp. 1–36. https://doi.org/10.1093/isp/ekz016
  67. Trauttmansdorff P. (2022). ʻBorders, migration, and technology in the age of security: Intervening with STS.ʼ Tecnoscienza–Italian Journal of Science & Technology Studies 13(1), pp. 51–69. https://doi.org/10.33679/tec-2022-1951
  68. Učakar T. (2020). ʻThe rhetoric of European migration policy and its role in criminalization of migration.ʼ Causes and Consequences of Migrant Criminalization 81, pp. 91–108. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-43732-9_5
  69. Wahlberg A. (2022). ʻAssemblage ethnography: Configurations across scales, sites, and practices: post-structuralism.ʼ In M. Hojer Bruun, A. Wahlberg, R. Douglas-Jones, C. Hasse, K. Hoeyer, D. Brogård Kristensen, and B.R. Winthereik (ed.) The Palgrave Handbook of the Anthropology of Technology. Singapore: Springer Nature Singapore, pp. 125–144.
  70. Wang Y., Ahmed S., and Bee A.W.T. (2024). ʻSelective avoidance as a cognitive response: examining the political use of social media and surveillance anxiety in avoidance behaviours.ʼ Behaviour & Information Technology 43(3), pp. 590–604. https://doi.org/10.1080/0144929X.2023.2182609
  71. Zhang G. (2023). ʻMobile media in China: Media practice as a research orientation.ʼ Mobile Media & Communication 11(1), pp. 80–87. https://doi.org/10.1177/20501579221134947
  72. Zuboff S. (2019). The Age of Surveillance Capitalism: The Fight for a Human Future at the New Frontier of Power. New York: PublicAffairs.
  73. Zureik E. (2010). ʻSurveillance and control at the borders of the European Union: A critical approach.ʼ European Journal of Criminology 7(3), pp. 174–189. https://doi.org/10.1177/1477370810372234

Similar Articles

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.