Make a Submission
Vol. 44 (2024)
General Articles

The Enforcement of the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights by the Administrative Justice in Poland and Czechia

PDF
  • Jan Denka
Jan Denka
Adam Mickiewicz University

Published 2025-11-14

Keywords

  • ICESCR,
  • ESC rights,
  • enforcement,
  • justiciability,
  • administrative justice

How to Cite

The Enforcement of the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights by the Administrative Justice in Poland and Czechia . (2025). Polish Yearbook of International Law, 44, 113-153. https://doi.org/10.24425/PYIL.2025.156717

Abstract

The article aims to explore the enforcement of the International Covenant 
on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights (ICESCR) by administrative courts in 
Poland and Czechia. The concluding observations of the Committee on Economic, 
Social and Cultural Rights have suggested significant differences between the two 
countries in this regard for many years. However, the exact reasons underlying this 
discrepancy remained unclear. The paper provides comprehensive insight into this 
legal phenomenon. Firstly, the author reconstructs the obligations relating to the eco
nomic, social and cultural (ESC) rights imposed on administrative courts. Secondly, 
the results of a large-scale review of the domestic rulings are presented. Based on the 
quantitative and qualitative analysis of the existing case law, it is revealed that the 
Polish and Czech courts share significant similarities in enforcing ESC rights. The 
study indicates that comparable shortcomings in terms of judicial enforcement of the 
Covenant are inherent in both jurisdictions. Thirdly, the author points to the existing 
methods available for the administrative courts that can still be used to strengthen 
the protection of the rights recognised in the ICESCR.

PDF

References

  1. Antoš M., The Czech Constitutional Court and Social Rights: Analysis of the Case Law, in: P. Šturma, N.L.X. Baez (eds.), International and Internal Mechanisms of Fundamental Rights Effectiveness, Právnická fakulta UK, Praha: 2015, pp. 187–196.
  2. Bartoň M., Kratochvíl J., Kopa M., Tomoszek M., Jirásek J., Svaček O., Základní práva [Fundamental Rights], Leges, Praha: 2016.
  3. Bartoň M., Úvod. The Introduction, in: F. Husseini, M. Bartoň, M. Kokeš, M. Kopa (eds.), Listina základních práv a svobod. Komentář [The Charter of Fundamental Rights and Freedoms. A Commentary], C.H. Beck, Praha: 2021, pp. 52–53.
  4. Capik A., Łazowski A., Komentarz do art. 91 [Commentary on Art. 91], in: M. Safjan, L. Bosek (eds.), Konstytucja RP. Tom II. Komentarz do art. 87–243 [The Constitution of Poland Vol. 2. Commentary on Articles 87–243], C.H. Beck, Warszawa: 2016, pp. 153–188.
  5. CESCR, Concluding observations on the fifth periodic report of Poland (E/C.12/POL/CO/5).
  6. CESCR, Concluding observations on the fourth periodic report of Poland (E/C.12/1/Add.82).
  7. CESCR, Concluding observations on the initial report of the Czech Republic (E/C.12/1/Add.76).
  8. CESCR, Concluding observations on the second periodic report of the Czech Republic (E/C.12/CZE/CO/2).
  9. CESCR, Concluding observations on the seventh periodic report of Poland (E/C.12/POL/CO/7).
  10. CESCR, Concluding observations on the sixth periodic report of Poland (E/C.12/POL/CO/6).
  11. CESCR, Concluding observations on the third periodic report of Poland (E/C.12/1/Add.26).
  12. CESCR, General Comment No. 3 on the Nature of States Parties’ Obligations, 14 December 1990 (E/1991/23).
  13. CESCR, General Comment No. 5 on Persons with Disabilities, 9 December 1994 (E/1995/22).
  14. CESCR, General Comment No. 9 on the Domestic Application of the Covenant, 3 December 1998 (E/C.12/1998/24).
  15. CESCR, Statement on the Coronavirus Disease (COVID-19) Pandemic and Economic, Social and Cultural Rights, 17 April 2020 (E/C.12/2020/1).
  16. Chapman A.R., The Status of Efforts to Monitor Economic, Social, and Cultural Rights, in: S. Hertel, L. Minkler (eds.), Economic Rights: Conceptual, Measurement, and Policy Issues, Cambridge University Press: New York: 2007, pp. 143–164.
  17. Chilton A., Versteeg M., How Constitutional Rights Matter, Oxford University Press, New York: 2020.
  18. Chybalski P., The Problem of the So-called Dispersed Judicial Review of Parliamentary Acts in Poland – Traditions and Current Perspectives, in: M. Granat (ed.), Constitutionality of Law without a Constitutional Court, Routledge, London: 2023, pp. 48–64.
  19. Committee on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights, Rules of Procedures of the Committee, 1 September 1993, E/C.12/1990/4/Rev.1.
  20. Consolidated version of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union Protocol (No 30) on the application of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union to Poland and to the United Kingdom [2008] OJ C 115, 09/05/2008, pp. 313–314.
  21. Constantinides A., Economic and Social Rights, in: A. Nollkaemper, A. Reinisch, R. Janik, F. Simlinger (eds), International Law in Domestic Courts. A Casebook, Oxford University Press, Oxford: 2018, pp. 657–715.
  22. ECtHR, M.L. v. Poland (App. No. 40119/21), 14 December 2023.
  23. ECtHR, Xero Flor w Polsce sp. z o.o. v. Poland (App. No. 4907/18), 7 May 2021.
  24. European Parliament Resolution of 22 May 2013 on the Draft Protocol on the Application of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union to the Czech Republic (Article 48(3) of the Treaty on European Union), 00091/2011 – C7-0385/2011 – 2011/0817(NLE).
  25. International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights (adopted 16 December 1966, entered into force 3 January 1976) 993 UNTS 3.
  26. Jarosz-Żukowska S., Żukowski Ł., Prawo do nauki i jego gwarancje [The Right to Education and its Guarantees], in: M. Jabłoński (ed.), Realizacja i ochrona konstytucyjnych wolności i praw jednostki w polskim porządku prawnym [The Realisation and Protection of Constitutional Freedoms and Rights of Individuals in the Polish Legal Order], E-Wydawnictwo, Wrocław: 2014, pp. 631–658.
  27. Kędzia Z., Do We Need to Revise the Constitutional Charter of Rights?, 80(1) Ruch Prawniczy, Ekonomiczny i Socjologiczny 61 (2018), pp. 61–80.
  28. Kędzia Z., Hernandez-Połczyńska A. (eds.), Międzynarodowy Pakt Praw Gospodarczych, Socjalnych i Kulturalnych. Komentarz [International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights: A Commentary], C.H. Beck, Warszawa: 2018.
  29. Kierznowski Ł., Prawo do nauki w aktach prawa międzynarodowego [The Right to Education in Acts of International Law], in: M. Perkowski, W. Zoń (eds.), Umiędzynarodowienie krajowego obrotu prawnego [The Internationalisation of the Domestic Legal Order], Wydawnictwo Prawo i Partnerstwo, Białystok: 2016, pp. 61–75.
  30. Klima K., Constitutional Law of the Czech Republic, 5 Cuestiones Constitucionales 173 (2001), pp. 173–194.
  31. Klíma K., Ústavní právo [The Constitutional Law], Aleš Čeněk, Plzeň: 2016.
  32. Koldinská K., Pichrt J., Ústavněprávní aspekty ochrany základních sociálních práv [The Constitutional Aspects of the Protection of Fundamental Social Rights], in: K. Koldinská (ed.), Právo sociálního zabezpečení [Social Security Law], C.H. Beck, Praha: 2022, pp. 437–458.
  33. Konstytucja Rzeczypospolitej Polskiej [The Constitution of the Republic of Poland], 2 April 1997, Dz.U. 1997, no. 78, item 483.
  34. Kosař D., Šipulová K., Smekal H., Vyhnánek L., Janovský J., Domestic Judicial Treatment of European Court of Human Rights Case Law: Beyond Compliance, Routledge, Milton Park: 2020.
  35. Kratochvíl J., Judikovatelnost sociálních práv: nějaké mezery? [The Justiciability of Social Rights: Are There Any Gaps?], 155(11) Právník 1161 (2007), pp. 1161–1188.
  36. Kratochvíl J., Test racionality: skutečně vhodný test pro sociální práva? [The Reasonability Test: Really a Suitable Test for Social Rights?], 154(12) Právník 1052 (2015), pp. 1052–1074.
  37. Kryska D., Konstytucyjny model czeskiego sądownictwa administracyjnego [The Constitutional Model of the Czech Administrative Courts], 52(1) Zeszyty Naukowe Sądownictwa Administracyjnego 175 (2014), p. 175–192.
  38. Kryska D., Organization of Czech and Polish Administrative Judiciary, 12(1) International and Comparative Law Review 81 (2012), pp. 81–102.
  39. Langford M., King J.A., Committee on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights: Past, Present and Future, in: M. Langford (ed.), Social Rights Jurisprudence: Emerging Trends in Comparative and International Law, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge: 2008, pp. 477–516.
  40. Langford M., The Justiciability of Social Rights: From Practice to Theory, in: M. Langford (ed.), Social Rights Jurisprudence: Emerging Trends in Comparative and International Law, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge: 2008, pp. 3–45.
  41. Leckie S., Another Step towards Indivisibility: Identifying the Key Features of Violations of Economic, Social and Cultural Rights, 20(1) Human Rights Quarterly 81 (1998), pp. 81–124.
  42. Listina základních práv a svobod [The Charter of Fundamental Rights and Freedoms], 9 January 1991, Ústavní zákon č. 23/1991 Sb.
  43. Lucherini F., The Constitutionalization of Social Rights in Italy, Germany, and Portugal: Legislative Discretion, Minimal Guarantees, and Distributive Integration, 25(2) German Law Journal 335 (2024), pp. 335–350.
  44. Mezinárodní pakt o hospodářských, sociálních a kulturních právech [The International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights], Viáda České republiky, 6 November 2006, available at https://vlada.gov.cz/cz/ppov/rlp/dokumenty/zpravy-plneni-mezin-umluv/mezinarodni-pakt-o-hospodarskych--socialnich-a-kulturnich-pravech-19856/ (accessed 30 June 2025).
  45. Mikule V., Suchánek R., Commentary on Article 10, in: V. Sládeček, V. Mikule, J. Syllová, (eds.), Ustava České republiky. Komentář [The Constitution of the Czech Republic: A Commentary], C.H. Beck, Praha: 2016, pp. 121–130.
  46. Mlsna P., Commentary on Article 10, in: P. Rychetský, T. Langášek, T. Herc, P. Mlsna, Ústava Ceske Republiky. Ústavní zákon o bezpečnosti České republiky. Komentář [The Constitution of the Czech Republic. The Act on the Security of the Czech Republic: A Commentary], Wolters Kluwer, Praha: 2015, pp. 108–131.
  47. Piątek W., Potěšil L., A Right to Have One’s Case Heard within a Reasonable Time before the Czech and the Polish Supreme Administrative Courts – Standards, the Reality and Proposals for the Future, 17(1) Utrecht Law Review 20 (2021), pp. 20–32.
  48. Piątek W., Skoczylas A., Geneza, rozwój i model sądownictwa administracyjnego w Polsce [The genesis, the development and the model of administrative justice in Poland], in: R. Hauser, Z. Niewiadomski, A. Wróbel (eds.), Sądowa kontrola administracji publicznej, System Prawa Administracyjnego, t. 10. [Judicial control over public administration, “Administrative Law System” vol. 10], C.H. Beck, Warszawa: 2016, pp. 1–70.
  49. Ploszka A., Lista hańby. Komitet ONZ wskazuje, jak poprawić ochronę praw społecznych w Polsce [The List of Shame: The UN Committee Indicates How to Improve the Protection of Social Rights in Poland], OKO.press, 21 October 2024, available at https://oko.press/komitet-onz-wskazuje-jak-poprawic-ochronepraw-spolecznych (accessed 30 June 2025).
  50. Ploszka A., The Right to Subsistence Minimum and Its Role in the Protection of People Living in Extreme Poverty – The Polish Experience, 24 Comparative Law Review 225 (2018), pp. 225–248.
  51. Postanowienie WSA w Warszawie [Decision of the Voivodeship Administrative Court in Warsaw], 15 May 2009, III SA/Wa 644/09, LEX 574036.
  52. Postanowienie WSA w Warszawie [Decision of the Voivodeship Administrative Court in Warsaw], 20 November 2008, III SA/Wa 1879/04, LEX 988856.
  53. Postanowienie WSA w Warszawie [Decision of the Voivodeship Administrative Court in Warsaw], 11 April 2008, III SA/Wa 558/08, LEX 1073037.
  54. Potěšil L., The Administrative Justice in the Czech Republic – Changes and Expectations, 4(2) Opolskie Studia Administracyjno-Prawne 87 (2018), pp. 87–95.
  55. Ratifcation Status for the Optional Protocol to the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights, available at https://tbinternet.ohchr.org/_layouts/15/TreatyBodyExternal/treaty.aspx (accessed 30 June 2025).
  56. Ray B., Policentrism, Political Mobilization and the Promise of Socioeconomic Rights, 45(1) Stanford Journal of International Law 151 (2009), pp. 151–200.
  57. Recommendation Rec(2004)20 of the Committee of Ministers to Member States on Judicial Review of Administrative Acts, 15 December 2004.
  58. Rekomendacje Komitetu Praw Gospodarczych, Społecznych i Kulturalnych ONZ dotyczące Polski [The Recommendations of the UN Committee on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights Concerning Poland], available at https://bip.brpo.gov.pl/pl/node/8934/revisions/8985/view (accessed 30 June 2025).
  59. Rozsudek Krajského soudu v Brně [Judgment of the Regional Court in Brno], 10 October 2018, 33 Az 2/2018-53.
  60. Rozsudek Krajského soudu v Hradci Králové – pobočka v Pardubicích [Judgment of the Regional Court in Hradec Králové – Branch in Pardubice], 19 March 2018, 52 Ad 12/2017-89.
  61. Rozsudek Krajského soudu v Hradci Králové [Judgment of the Regional Court in Hradec Králové], 8 April 2016, 32 Az 20/2015-43.
  62. Rozsudek Krajského soudu v Hradci Králové [Judgment of the Regional Court in Hradec Králové], 30 May 2017, 43 Az 26/2016-57.
  63. Rozsudek Krajského soudu v Ostravě – pobočka v Olomouci [Judgment of the Regional Court in Ostrava – Branch in Olomouc], 30 October 2020, 72 Ad 17/2019-24.
  64. Rozsudek Krajského soudu v Ostravě – pobočka v Olomouci [Judgment of the Regional Court in Ostrava – Branch in Olomouc], 31 January 2020, 72 Ad 44/2018-28.
  65. Rozsudek Krajského soudu v Plzni [Judgment of the Regional Court in Plzeň], 9 April 2021, 60 Az 8/2021-25.
  66. Rozsudek Městského soudu v Praze [Judgment of the Municipal Court in Prague], 15 June 2018, 13 A 69/2018-24.
  67. Rozsudek Městského soudu v Praze [Judgment of the Municipal Court in Prague],
  68. 25 June 2018, 13 A 56/2018-27.
  69. Rozsudek Městského soudu v Praze [Judgment of the Municipal Court in Prague], 15 June 2022, 14 A 101/2021-248.
  70. Rozsudek Městského soudu v Praze [Judgment of the
  71. Municipal Court in Prague], 13 May 2020, 10 A 148/2018-65.
  72. Rozsudek Nejvyššího správního soudu [Judgment of the Supreme Administrative Court], 25 April 2019, 8 Ads 271/2018-34.
  73. Rozsudek Nejvyššího správního soudu [Judgment of the Supreme Administrative Court], 7 December 2022, 10 As 320/2020-58.
  74. Rozsudek Nejvyššího správního soudu [Judgment of the Supreme Administrative Court], 28 August 2007, 2 Afs 212/2006-147; Rozsudek Nejvyššího správního soudu [Judgment of the Supreme Administrative Court], 19 September 2007, 1 Afs 143/2006-68.
  75. Rozsudek Nejvyššího správního soudu [Judgment of the Supreme Administrative Court], 16 April 2008, 1 Afs 62/2008-93.
  76. Rozsudek Nejvyššího správního soudu [Judgment of the Supreme Administrative Court], 22 March 2013, 5 Afs 71/2012-37.
  77. Rozsudek Nejvyššího správního soudu [Judgment of the Supreme Administrative Court], 15 February 2021, 4 Azs 325/2020-29.
  78. Rozsudek Nejvyššího správního soudu [Judgment of the Supreme Administrative Court], 27 September 2016, 1 Ads 92/2016-23.
  79. Rozsudek Nejvyššího správního soudu [Judgment of the Supreme Administrative Court], 27 September 2016, 1 Ads 94/2016-20.
  80. Scheppele K.L., A Realpolitik Defense of Social Rights, 82(7) Texas Law Review 1921 (2004), pp. 1921–1961.
  81. Scheu H.C., Brodská J., The Impact of the United Nations Human Rights Treaties on the Domestic Level in the Czech Republic, in: C. Heyns, F.J. Viljoen, R. Murray (eds.), The Impact of the United Nations Human Rights Treaties on the Domestic Level: Twenty Years On, Brill, Leiden: 2024, pp. 288–354.
  82. Sękowska-Kozłowska K., Baranowska G., Grygiel-Zasada J., Szoszkiewicz Ł., The Impact of the United Nations Human Rights Treaties on the Domestic Level in Poland, in: C. Heyns, F.J. Viljoen, R. Murray (eds.), The Impact of the United Nations Human Rights Treaties on the Domestic Level: Twenty Years On, Brill, Leiden: 2024, pp. 823–898.
  83. Šimáčková K., The Rights of the Elderly in the Case-Law of the Constitutional Court of the Czech Republic from the Perspective of Old-Age Pensions, 10 Czech Yearbook of Public & Private International Law 248 (2019), pp. 248–265.
  84. Šimíček V., Kokeš M., Der Schutz der sozialen Grundrechte in der Rechtsordnung Tschechiens, in: J. Iliopoulos-Strangas (ed.), Soziale Grundrechte in den “neuen” Mitgliedstaaten der Europäischen Union. Zugleich eine Einführung in die mitgliedstaatlichen Allgemeinen Grundrechtslehren, Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft, Baden-Baden: 2019, pp. 761–830.
  85. Ssenyonjo M., Economic, Social and Cultural Rights in International Law, Bloomsbury Publishing, London: 2016.
  86. Svoboda T., Skládalová D., The Qualifcation of Action in Administrative Justice and its Perils – The Czech Experience, 14 Adam Mickiewicz University Law Review 281 (2022), pp. 281–295.
  87. The Czech Supreme Administrative Court database, Nejvyšší Správní Soud, available at: https://vyhledavac.nssoud.cz/ (accessed 30 June 2025).
  88. The initial report submitted by the Czech Republic on the implementation of the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights, 25 May 2001 (E/1990/5/Add.47).
  89. The Polish Central Database of Administrative Court Decisions, Naczelny Sąd Administracyjny, available at: https://orzeczenia.nsa.gov.pl/ (accessed 30 June 2025).
  90. The seventh periodic report submitted by Poland on the implementation of the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights, 3 December 2021, E/C.12/POL/7.
  91. The third periodic report submitted by Czechia on the implementation of the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights, 2 December 2019, E/C.12/CZE/3.
  92. The third report submitted by Czechia on the implementation of the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights, 2 December 2019 (E/C.12/CZE/3).
  93. Tomoszek M., Commentary on Article 41, in: F. Husseini, M. Bartoň, M. Kokeš, M. Kopa (eds.), Listina základních práv a svobod. Komentář [The Charter of Fundamental Rights and Freedoms: A Commentary], C.H. Beck, Praha: 2021, pp. 1271–1287.
  94. Tychmańska A., Znaczenie Międzynarodowego Paktu Praw Obywatelskich i Politycznych oraz Międzynarodowego Paktu Praw Gospodarczych, Społecznych i Kulturalnych dla polskiego porządku prawnego na przykładzie analizy orzecznictwa polskich sądów administracyjnych [The signifcance of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights and the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights for the Polish legal order based on the analysis of judicature of Polish administrative courts], 34(20) Studenckie Zeszyty Naukowe 71 (2017), pp. 71–85.
  95. Uchwała NSA [Resolution of the Supreme Administrative Court], 13 October 2011, II GPS 1/11, LEX 951321.
  96. Ústava České Republiky [The Constitution of the Czech Republic], 16 December 1992, Ústavní zákon č. 1/1993 Sb.
  97. Ustawa Prawo o postępowaniu przed sądami administracyjnymi [The Act on Procedure before Administrative Courts] 30 August 2002, Dz.U. 2024, item 935.
  98. V. Nováková, Jak se daří ČR naplňovat Mezinárodní pakt o hospodářských, sociálních a kulturních právech? [How Is the Czech Republic Dealing with Implementing the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights?], Centrum pro lidská práva a demokracii, 29 July 2022, available at https://www.centrumlidskaprava.cz/jak-se-dari-cr-naplnovat-mezinarodni-pakt-o-hospodarskych-socialnichkulturnich-pravech (accessed 30 June 2025).
  99. Wintr J., Commentary on Article 41, in: I. Pospíšil, E. Wagnerová, V. Šimíček, T. Langášek (eds.), Listina základních práv a svobod – Komentář [The Charter of Fundamental Rights and Freedoms – A Commentary], Wolters Kluwer, Praha: 2012, pp. 831–839.
  100. Wiśniewski A., The Impact of the European Convention of Human Rights on the Polish Legal System, 9(1) Polish Review of International and European Law 153 (2020), pp. 153–184.
  101. Wyrok NSA [Judgment of the Supreme Administrative Court], 1 March 2017, I OSK 2163/15, LEX 2277807.
  102. Wyrok NSA [Judgment of the Supreme Administrative Court], 22 May 2000, II SA 2725/99, LEX 654789.
  103. Wyrok NSA [Judgment of the Supreme Administrative Court], 23 March 1999, II SA 202/99, LEX 46730.
  104. Wyrok NSA [Judgment of the Supreme Administrative Court], 8 December 2010, II GSK 4/10, LEX 686784.
  105. Wyrok WSA w Gliwicach [Judgment of the Voivodeship Administrative Court in Gliwice], 23 September 2009, II SA/Gl 582/09, LEX 631009.
  106. Wyrok WSA w Poznaniu [Judgment of the Voivodeship Administrative Court in Poznań], 28 December 2017, II SA/Po 948/17, LEX 3088121.
  107. Wyrok WSA w Poznaniu [Judgment of the Voivodeship Administrative Court in Poznań], 18 October 2017, II SA/Po 540/17, LEX 2390360.
  108. Wyrok WSA w Rzeszowie [Judgment of the Voivodeship Administrative Court in Rzeszów], 28 October 2020, II SA/Rz 818/20, LEX 3088121.
  109. Wyrok WSA w Szczecinie [Judgment of the Voivodeship Administrative Court in Szczecin], 14 December 2011, II SA/Sz 931/11, LEX 1134906.
  110. Wyrok WSA we Wrocławiu [Judgment of the Voivodeship Administrative Court in Wrocław], 4 January 2006, IV SA/Wr 175/04, LEX 836539.
  111. Wyrok WSA we Wrocławiu [Judgment of the Voivodeship Administrative Court in Wrocław], 10 July 2008, IV SA/Wr 194/08, LEX 1077360.
  112. Wyrok WSA we Wrocławiu [Judgment of the Voivodeship Administrative Court in Wrocław], 10 July 2008, IV SA/Wr 193/08, LEX 509288.
  113. Wyrok WSA we Wrocławiu [Judgment of the Voivodeship Administrative Court in Wrocław], 10 July 2008, IV SA/Wr 192/08, LEX 509353.
  114. Wyrzykowski M., Der Schutz der sozialen Grundrechte in der Rechtsordnung Polens, in: J. Iliopoulos-Strangas (ed.), Soziale Grundrechte in den “neuen” Mitgliedstaaten der Europäischen Union. Zugleich eine Einführung in die mitgliedstaatlichen Allgemeinen Grundrechtslehren, Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft, Baden-Baden: 2019, pp. 401–514.
  115. Young K.G., Proportionality, Reasonableness, and Economic and Social Rights, in: V.C. Jackson, M. Tushnet (eds.), Proportionality. New Frontiers, New Challenges, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge: 2017, pp. 248–272.
  116. Young K.G., The Minimum Core of Economic and Social Rights: A Concept in Search of Content, (33)1 Yale Journal of International Law 113 (2008), pp. 113–175.
  117. Zákon soudní řád správní [The Code of Administrative Justice], 21 March 2002, Zákon č. 150/2002 Sb.

Similar Articles

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.