Make a Submission
Vol. 39 (2019)
General Articles

Krzysztof Skubiszewski and the Right to Self-determination: Past and Future

PDF
  • Peter Hilpold
Peter Hilpold
Universität Innsbruck

Published 2021-07-19

Keywords

  • Chagos Islands,
  • East Timor,
  • human rights,
  • ICJ,
  • International Court of Justice,
  • self-determination,
  • Skubiszewski
    • ...More
    Less
Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

How to Cite

Krzysztof Skubiszewski and the Right to Self-determination: Past and Future. (2021). Polish Yearbook of International Law, 39, 21-35. https://doi.org/10.24425/pyil.2020.134474

Abstract

In 1995, Professor Krzysztof Skubiszewski added a Dissenting Opinion to the East Timor Judgment, wherein the ICJ declined jurisdiction in a proceeding started by Portugal against Australia for its having concluded the East Timor Gap treaty with Indonesia, in blatant violation of the East Timorese’s right to self-determination. Ad-hoc Judge Skubiszewski posited that the Court should have accepted jurisdiction and he presented a series of convincing arguments for this proposition. In 2019 the ICJ rendered an Opinion in the Chagos Islands case. The fact that the ICJ accepted jurisdiction in this case demonstrates that an impressive development has taken place since 1995, one whereby many of Professor Skubiszewki’s requests have been implemented. At the same time however, the Chagos Opinion is not fully satisfying as it neglects, to a considerable extent, the human rights issue. This contribution shows that Skubiszewski’s Dis­senting Opinion would have provided guidance also for these questions and that it remains as topical today as it was in 1995.

PDF

References

  1. Allen S., Self-Determination, the Chagos advisory opinion and the Chagossians, 69 International & Comparative Law Quarterly 203 (2020).
  2. Bedi S.R.S., The development of human rights law by the judges of the International Court of Justice, Hart Publishing, Oxford–Portland (Oregon) 2007.
  3. Bedjaoui M., Achievements and prospect, Martinus Nijhoff, Dordrecht 1991.
  4. Chinkin C.M., East Timor moves into the world court, 4 European Journal of International Law 206 (1993).
  5. Clark R.S., The „decolonization” of East Timor and the United Nations norms on self-determination and aggression, 7 The Yale Journal of World Public Order 2 (1980).
  6. Cot J.-P., Pellet A. (eds.), La Charte des Nations Unies – Commentaire Article par Article, 2e Édition, Revue et Augmentée, Economica, Paris & Bruylant, Bruxelles 1991.
  7. Demsar U. et al., The concept of duress in the world of decolonization, 55 Questions of International Law 119 (2018), p. 119.
  8. Dissenting opinion of Judge K. Skubiszewski in case concerning East Timor (Portugal v. Australia), https://www.icj-cij.org/public/files/case-related/84/084-19950630-JUD-01-06-EN.pdf [accessed: 7.07.2021].
  9. Etinson A., Human Rights: Moral or Political?, OUP Scholarship Online, Oxford 2018.
  10. Focarelli C., Le contromisure pacifiche collettive e la nozione di obblighi erga omnes, 1 Rivista di Diritto Internazionale 52 (1993).
  11. Friedmann W., The Changing Structure of International Law, Stevens&Sons, London 1964.
  12. Hilpold P., Der Ost Timor-Fall, Peter Lang, Frankfurt a.M. 1996.
  13. Hilpold P., R2P and humanitarian intervention in a historical perspective, [in:] P. Hilpold (ed.), The responsibility to protect, Brill/Martinus Nijhoff, Leiden/Boston 2015, pp. 60-122.
  14. Hilpold P., The International Court of Justice’s advisory opinion on Kosovo: perspectives of a delicate question, 14 Austrian Review of International and European Law 259 (2009 (2013)).
  15. Hilpold P., Understanding Solidarity within EU Law: An Analysis of the ‘Islands of Solidarity’ with Particular Regard to Monetary Union, 34 Yearbook of European law 257 (2015).
  16. Hudson M.O., Progress in international organisation, Stanford University Press, Stanford 1932.
  17. ICJ Judgment of 15 June 1954 - Preliminary question in case of the monetary gold removed from Rome in 1943 (Italy v. France, United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland and United States of America), ICJ Reports of Judgments, Advisory Opinions and Orders 1954, p. 19, http://www.worldlii.org/int/cases/ICJ/1954/2.html [accessed: 7.07.2021].
  18. ICJ judgment of 30 June 1995 in case concerning East Timor (Portugal v. Australia), ICJ Reports of Judgments, Advisory Opinions and Orders 1995, item 90, https://www.icj-cij.org/public/files/case-related/84/084-19950630-JUD-01-00-EN.pdf [accessed: 7.07.2021].
  19. ICJ, Accordance with international law of the Unilateral Declaration of Independence in respect of Kosovo, Advisory opinion, 22 july 2010, ICJ Reports of Judgments, Advisory Opinions and Orders 2010, item 403.
  20. ICJ, Application of the Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide, provisional Measures, ICJ Reports of Judgments, Advisory Opinions and Orders 1993, item 408.
  21. ICJ, Legal consequences of the separation of the Chagos Archipelago from Mauritius in 1965, Advisory opinion, 25 February 2019, https://www.icj-cij.org/public/files/case-related/169/169-20190225-01-00-EN.pdf [accessed: 7.07.2021].
  22. ICJ, The legal consequences of the construction of a wall in the occupied Palestinian territory, advisory opinion, 9 July 2004, ICJ Reports of Judgments, Advisory Opinions and Orders 1994, item 136.
  23. Kjeldgaard-Pedersen A., The international legal personality of the individual, OUP, Oxford 2018.
  24. Maffei M.C., The case of East Timor before the International Court of Justice – some tentative comments, 4 European Journal of International Law 223 (1993).
  25. McCorquodale R., Group Rights, [in:] D. Moeckli et al. (eds.), International human rights law, Oxford University Press, Oxford 2014, pp. 344-366.
  26. Meron T., The humanization of international law, Brill/Martinus Nijhoff, Leiden/Boston 2006.
  27. Miller R.A., Bratspies R.M. (eds.), Progress in international law, Martinus Nijhoff, Leiden/Boston 2008.
  28. Oellers-Frahm K., Rechtsfragen IGH: Portugal gegen Australien, in Sachen Osttimor, 44(2) Vereinte Nationen 66 (1996).
  29. Oppenheim L., International law, vol. 1: A treatise – peace, London Longmans, Green 1905.
  30. Parlett K., The Individual in the International Legal System: Continuity and Change in International Law, CUP, Cambridge 2011.
  31. Picone P., Comunità internazionale e obblighi “erga omnes”, Jovene, Naples 2013.
  32. Picone P., Gliobblighi erga omnes tra passato e futuro, 3 Questions of International Law (2015).
  33. Ranjevy R., Peoples and National Liberation Movements, [in:] M. Bejaoui (ed.), International law: achievements and prospects, UNESCO, Netherlands, Martinus Nijhoff, Paris Dordrecht 1991.
  34. Schwartz B., Self-determination: The tyranny of freedom, 55(1) American Psychologist 79 (2000).
  35. Taylor D., Slavery in the Chagos Archipelago, 14 Chagos News (2000), pp. 1-4.
  36. Tomuschat Ch., Individual and collective identity: factual givens and their legal reflection in international law. Words in commemoration of Krzysztof Skubiszewski, 37 Polish Yearbook of International Law 11 (2017).
  37. Tomuschat Ch., Secession and self-determination, [in:] M.G. Kohen (ed.), Secession, CUP, Cambridge 2006, pp. 23-45.
  38. UN GA Resolution 3485(XXX), adopted at the 2439th plenary meeting, 12 December 1975, [in:] Resolutions adopted by the General Assembly during its 30th session, 16 September-17 December 1975. - A/10034. - 1976. - p. 118-119. - (GAOR, 30th session, Suppl. no. 34), https://digitallibrary.un.org/record/189768 [accessed: 7.07.2021].
  39. UN GA Resolution 35/27 (1980) Question of East Timor [1980] UNGA 30; A/RES/35/27 (11 November 1980), http://www.worldlii.org/int/other/UNGA/1980/30.pdf [accessed: 7.07.2021].
  40. UN GA, Question of East Timor, 23 November 1982, A/RES/37/30, available at: https://www.refworld.org/docid/3b00f01728.html [accessed: 7.07.2021].
  41. UN GA, Question of East Timor, 23 November 1982, A/RES/37/30, https://www.refworld.org/docid/3b00f01728.html [accessed: 7.07.2021].
  42. UN GA, Question of East Timor, 24 November 1981, A/RES/36/50, available at: https://www.refworld.org/docid/3b00f02920.html [accessed: 7.07.2021].
  43. UN GA, Question of East Timor, adopted at the 83rd plenary meeting, 28 November 1977, [in:] Resolutions and decisions adopted by the General Assembly during its 32nd session, 20 September-21 December 1977. - A/32/45. - 1978. - p. 169-170. - (GAOR, 32nd sess., Suppl. no. 45), https://digitallibrary.un.org/record/188593?ln=en [accessed: 7.07.2021].
  44. UN GA, Resolution 33/39 of 13 December 1978, Question of East Timor, adopted on the Reports of the Fourth Committee, http://www.worldlii.org/int/other/UNGA/1978/45.pdf [accessed: 7.07.2021].
  45. UN GA, Resolution 34/40 of 21 November 1979, http://www.worldlii.org/int/other/UNGA/1978/45.pdf [accessed: 7.07.2021].
  46. UN SC Resolution 384 (1975) [adopted by the Security Council at its 1869th meeting], of 22 December 1975, https://digitallibrary.un.org/record/93735 [accessed: 7.07.2021].
  47. UN SC, Security Council Resolution 389 (1976) [East Timor] of 22 April 1976, S/RES/389 (1976), https://www.refworld.org/docid/3b00f1710.html [accessed: 7.07.2021].
  48. Zimmermann A., Die Zuständigkeit des Internationalen Gerichtshofs zur Entscheidung über Ansprüche gegen am Verfahren nicht beteiligte Staaten – Anmerkungen aus Anlaß der Entscheidung des IGH im Streitfall zwischen Portugal und Australien betreffend Ost-Timor, 55(4) Zeitschrift für Ausländisches Öffentliches Recht und Völkerrecht 1051 (1995).

Similar Articles

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.