Make a Submission
Vol. 43 (2023)
General Articles

Putin’s Russia before the International Court of Justice

PDF
  • Nikolay A. Marin,
  • Bilyana Manova
Nikolay A. Marin
Faculty of Law and History, South-West University Neofit Rilski, Bulgaria
Bilyana Manova
Faculty of Law and History, South-West University Neofit Rilski, Bulgaria

Published 2024-06-25

Keywords

  • admissibility,
  • ICJ,
  • jurisdiction,
  • Russia,
  • Ukraine,
  • war
    • ...More
    Less

How to Cite

Putin’s Russia before the International Court of Justice. (2024). Polish Yearbook of International Law, 43, 149–174. https://doi.org/10.24425/pyil.2024.152297

Abstract

In the past 15 years, Georgia and Ukraine have both brought cases against Russia before the International Court of Justice (ICJ). Georgia’s 2008 application addressed the separatist movements in South Ossetia and Abkhazia. Ukraine’s 2017 case (Ukraine v. Russian Federation I) accuses Russia of discriminating against Crimean Tatars, supporting terrorism in Eastern Ukraine and downing Malaysia Airlines flight MH-17. The 2022 case (Allegations of Genocide) claims that Russia’s war against Ukraine violates the Genocide Convention. This article examines Russia’s role in these disputes, comparing outcomes in Georgia v. Russian Federation and Ukraine v. Russian Federation I, both alleging breaches of the Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Racial Discrimination. Only the latter reached the merits phase. The article also analyses the controversial judgment on preliminary objections in Allegations of Genocide. It argues that the ICJ’s consensual jurisdiction limits its effectiveness, restricting its ability to rule on Russia’s actions against Ukraine. Additionally, it assesses Russia’s strategies in these proceedings, focussing on the “rhetorical adaptation” of international norms.

PDF

References

  1. Aalberts T., Gammeltoft-Hansen T., Sovereignty Games, International Law and Politics, in: T. Aalberts, T. Gammeltoft-Hansen (eds.), The Changing Practices of International Law, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge: 2018, pp. 26–44.
  2. Allison R., Russia, the West, and Military Intervention, Oxford University Press, Oxford: 2013.
  3. Allison R., Russian Revisionism, Legal Discourse and the “Rules-Based” International Order, 72(6) Europe-Asia Studies 976 (2020), pp. 976–995.
  4. Allison R., The Russian Case for Military Intervention in Georgia: International Law, Norms and Political Calculation, 18(2) European Security 173 (2009), pp. 173–200.
  5. Bonafe B., The Collective Dimension of Bilateral Litigation: The Ukraine v Russia Case Before the ICJ, 96 Questions of International Law 27 (2022), pp. 27–47.
  6. Bonafé B.I., Establishing the Existence of a Dispute Before the International Court of Justice: Drawbacks and Implications, 45 Questions of International Law 3 (2017), pp. 3–32.
  7. Búzás Z.I., Evading International Law: How Agents Comply with the Letter of the Law but Violate its Purpose, 23(4) European Journal of International Relations 857 (2017), pp. 857–883.
  8. Chiappa C., Russia Puts International Court’s Top Leadership on Wanted List, Politico Europe, 25 September 2023, available at: https://tinyurl.com/utudn4b9 (accessed 30 August 2024).
  9. Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide (Genocide Convention) (adopted 9 December 1948, entered into force 12 January 1951), 78 UNTS 277.
  10. Corder M., Ukraine Brands Russia “Terrorist State” in Opening Statement at International Court, PBS News, 6 June 2023, available at: https://www.pbs.org/newshour/world/ukraine-brands-russia-terroriststate-in-opening-statement-at-international-court-case (accessed 30 August 2024).
  11. Decaux E., The Potential for InterState Conciliation within the Framework of the UN Treaties for the Protection of Human Rights, in: C. Tomuschat, M. Kohen (eds.), Flexibility in International Dispute Settlement, Brill Nijhoff, Leiden: 2020, pp. 39–82.
  12. Desierto D., Human Rights Reparations and Fact-Finding Quandaries in the 2024 ICJ Judgments in Ukraine v. Russian Federation, EJIL: Talk!, 11 March 2024, available at: https://tinyurl.com/5ayd8kss (accessed 30 August 2024).
  13. Dixon J.M., Rhetorical Adaptation and Resistance to International Norms, 15(1) Perspectives on Politics
  14. (2017), pp. 83–99.
  15. ECtHR, European Court joins inter-State case concerning Russian military operations in Ukraine to inter-State case concerning eastern Ukraine and downing of flight MH17, Press release, 20 February 2023, available at: https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng-press#{%22itemid%22:[%22003-7575325-10413252%22]} (accessed 30 August 2024).
  16. ECtHR, Ukraine and the Netherlands v. Russia (App. No. 8019/16, 43800/14, 28525/20 and 11055/22), 17 February 2023.
  17. Escobar G.G., ICJ’s Judgment in Ukraine v. Russia regarding CERD’s Scope of Racial Discrimination: ICJ’s Approach to CERD Committee’s Views, EJIL: Talk!, 29 February 2024, available at: https://tinyurl.com/ykjwdf9m (accessed 30 August 2024).
  18. Gehani B., Is the ICJ’s Standard of Proof for Genocide Unattainable?, Conflict Law Centre blog, 16 February 2024, available at: https://rsilpak.org/2024/is-the-icjs-standard-of-proof-for-genocide-unattainable/ (accessed 30 August 2024).
  19. Goldenziel J.I., An Alternative to Zombieing: Lawfare Between Russia and Ukraine and the Future of International Law, 108(1) Cornell Law Review 1 (2022), pp. 1–15.
  20. Hill-Cawthorne L., International Litigation and the Disaggregation of Disputes: Ukraine/Russia as a Case Study, 68(4) International & Comparative Law Quarterly 779 (2019), pp. 779–815.
  21. ICJ, Allegations of Genocide under the Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide (Ukraine v. Russian Federation), Written observations of Poland on the subject-matter of its intervention, 5 July 2023, ICJ Rep. 2023.
  22. ICJ, Allegations of Genocide under the Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide (Ukraine v. Russian Federation), Application Instituting Proceedings, 27 February 2022, ICJ Rep 2022.
  23. ICJ, Allegations of Genocide under the Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide (Ukraine v. Russian Federation), Request for the indication of provisional measures submitted by Ukraine, 27 February 2022, ICJ Rep 2022.
  24. ICJ, Allegations of Genocide under the Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide (Ukraine v. Russian Federation), Order, 16 March 2022, ICJ Rep 2022.
  25. ICJ, Allegations of Genocide under the Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide (Ukraine v. Russian Federation), Preliminary objections of the Russian Federation, 1 October 2022, ICJ Rep 2022.
  26. ICJ, Allegations of Genocide under the Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide (Ukraine v. Russian Federation), Judgment, 2 February 2024, ICJ Rep 2024.
  27. ICJ, Allegations of Genocide under the Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide (Ukraine v. Russian Federation), Memorial Submitted by Ukraine, 1 July 2022, ICJ Rep 2022.
  28. ICJ, Allegations of Genocide under the Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide (Ukraine v. Russian Federation), Written statement of Ukraine on the preliminary objections raised by the Russian Federation, 3 February 2023, ICJ Rep 2023.
  29. ICJ, Alleged Breaches of Certain International Obligations in Respect of the Occupied Palestinian Territory (Nicaragua v. Germany), Application instituting proceedings and Request for the indication of provisional measures, 1 March 2024, ICJ Rep 2024.
  30. ICJ, Application of the Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide (Bosnia and Herzegovina v. Serbia and Montenegro), Judgment, 26 February 2007, ICJ Rep 2007.
  31. ICJ, Application of the Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide in the Gaza Strip (South Africa v. Israel), Application instituting proceedings and Request for the indication of provisional measures, 29 December 2023, ICJ Rep 2023.
  32. ICJ, Application of the Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide (The Gambia v. Myanmar), Application instituting proceedings and Request for the indication of provisional measures, 11 November 2019, ICJ Rep 2019.
  33. ICJ, Application of the International Convention for the Suppression of the Financing of Terrorism and of the International Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Racial Discrimination (Ukraine v. Russian Federation), Judgment, 8 November 2019, ICJ Rep 2019.
  34. ICJ, Application of the International Convention for the Suppression of the Financing of Terrorism and of the International Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Racial Discrimination (Ukraine v. Russian Federation), Judgment, 31 January 2024, ICJ Rep 2024.
  35. ICJ, Application of the International Convention for the Suppression of the Financing of Terrorism and of the International Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Racial Discrimination (Ukraine v. Russian Federation), Application Instituting Proceedings, 16 January 2017, ICJ Rep 2017.
  36. ICJ, Application of the International Convention for the Suppression of the Financing of Terrorism and of the International Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Racial Discrimination (Ukraine v. Russian Federation), Order, 19 April 2017, ICJ Rep 2017.
  37. ICJ, Application of the International Convention for the Suppression of the Financing of Terrorism and of the International Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Racial Discrimination (Ukraine v. Russian Federation), Order, 19 April 2017, ICJ Rep 2017.
  38. ICJ, Application of the International Convention for the Suppression of the Financing of Terrorism and of the International Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Racial Discrimination (Ukraine v. Russian Federation), Preliminary objections submitted by the Russian Federation, 12 September 2018, ICJ Rep 2018.
  39. ICJ, Application of the International Convention for the Suppression of the Financing of Terrorism and of the International Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Racial Discrimination (Ukraine v. Russian Federation), Counter-Memorial of the Russian Federation on the case concerning the Application of the International Convention for the Suppression of the Financing of Terrorism, 9 April 2021, ICJ Rep 2021.
  40. ICJ, Application of the International Convention for the Suppression of the Financing of Terrorism and of the International Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Racial Discrimination (Ukraine v. Russian Federation), Counter-Memorial of the Russian Federation on the case concerning the Application of the International Convention on the Elimination of all Forms of Racial Discrimination, 9 August 2021, ICJ Rep 2021.
  41. ICJ, Application of the International Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Racial Discrimination (Georgia v. Russian Federation), Judgment, 1 April 2011, ICJ Rep 2011.
  42. ICJ, Application of the International Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Racial Discrimination (Georgia v. Russian Federation), Application Instituting Proceedings, 12 August 2008, ICJ Rep 2008.
  43. ICJ, Application of the International Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Racial Discrimination
  44. (Georgia v. Russian Federation), Judgment, 1 April 2011, ICJ Rep 2011.
  45. ICJ, Pulp Mills on the River Uruguay (Argentina v. Uruguay), Judgment, 20 April 20210, ICJ Rep 2010.
  46. In First, Russian Judge Loses UN World Court Seat, The Moscow Times, 10 November 2023, available at: https://tinyurl.com/3dt27v53 (accessed 30 August 2024).
  47. Keane D., Mapping the International Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Racial Discrimination as a Living Instrument, 20(2) 2020 Human Rights Law Review 236 (2020), pp. 236–268.
  48. Konończuk W., The Polish–Ukrainian Bond Is Here to Stay, Strategic Europe, 3 October 2023, available at: https://carnegieeurope.eu/strategiceurope/90686 (accessed 30 August 2024).
  49. Kulick A., Provisional Measures after Ukraine v Russia (2022), 13(2) Journal of International Dispute Settlement 323 (2022), pp. 323–340.
  50. Lattmann T., From Partner to Pariah: The Changing Position of Russia in Terms of International Law, in: B. Madlovics, B. Magyar (eds.), Russia’s Imperial Endeavor and its Geopolitical Consequences: The Russia–Ukraine War, Central European University Press, Budapest: 2023, pp. 183–198.
  51. Leeson S., Russia Rejects International Court Ruling to Stop Invasion of Ukraine, EURActiv, 17 March 2022, available at: https://www.euractiv.com/section/europe-s-east/news/russia-rejects-international-court-ruling-to-stop-invasionof-ukraine (accessed 30 August 2024).
  52. Mälksoo L., Russian Approaches to International Law, Oxford University Press, Oxford: 2015.
  53. Marchuk I., Introductory Note to Application of the International Convention for the Suppression of the Financing of Terrorism and of the International Convention on the Elimination of all Forms of Racial Discrimination (Ukraine v. Russian Federation) (Preliminary Objections) (I.C.J.), 59(3) International Legal Materials 339 (2020), pp. 339–416.
  54. Marchuk I., Powerful States and International Law: Changing Narratives and Power Struggles in International Courts, 26(1) UC Davis Journal of International Law & Policy 65 (2019), pp. 65–97.
  55. Marchuk I., Unfulflled Promises of the ICJ Litigation for Ukraine: Analysis of the ICJ Judgment in Ukraine v. Russia (CERD and ICSFT), EJIL: Talk!, 22 February 2024, available at: https://tinyurl.com/2fvmunp7 (accessed 30 August 2024).
  56. Marchuk I., Wanigasuriya A., Beyond the False Claim of Genocide: Preliminary Reflections on Ukraine’s Prospects in Its Pursuit of Justice at the ICJ, 25(3–4) Journal of Genocide Research 256 (2022), pp. 256–278.
  57. Marin N., Manova B., The Constraints of International Courts as a Tool for Resolving the Ukrainian–Russian Conflicts, 62 German Yearbook of International Law 371 (2019), pp. 371–406.
  58. Marxsen C., International Law in Crisis: Russia’s Struggle for Recognition, 58 German Yearbook of International Law 11 (2015), pp. 11–48.
  59. McIntyre J., Lyophilization and Lawfare in Ukraine v. Russia, Australian and New Zealand Society of International Law, available at: https://anzsilperspective.com/lyophilization-and-lawfare-in-ukraine-v-russia/ (accessed 30 August 2024).
  60. McIntyre J., Wigard K., Pomson O., Goliath v. David (and Friends): A Recap of the Preliminary Objections Hearings in Ukraine v. Russia, EJIL: Talk!, 2 October 2023, available at: https://tinyurl.com/3nszxrz6 (accessed 30 August 2024).
  61. Milanovic M., Allegations of Genocide Under the Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide (Ukraine v. Russian Federation), EJIL: Talk!, 16 March 2022, available at: https://tinyurl.com/4vbwushy (accessed 30 August 2024).
  62. Milanovic M., ICJ Delivers Preliminary Objections Judgment in the Ukraine v. Russia Genocide Case, Ukraine Loses on the Most Important Aspects, EJIL: Talk!, 2 February 2024, available at: https://tinyurl.com/2r43se2a (accessed 30 August 2024).
  63. Okowa P., The International Court of Justice and the Georgia/Russia Dispute, 11 Human Rights Law Review 739 (2011), pp. 739–757.
  64. Orakhelashvili A., Adjudicating Racial Discrimination Claims: Issues of Jurisdiction and Admissibility in Ukraine v. Russia, 1(1) Moscow Journal of International Law 57 (2021), pp. 57–69.
  65. Poland fled a declaration of intervention to the International Court of Justice in Ukraine’s case against Russia, Ministry of Foreign Affairs, Republic of Poland, 16 September 2022, available at: https://tinyurl.com/4am3pxaz (accessed 30 August 2024).
  66. Proulx V.-J., The World Court’s Jurisdictional Formalism and its Lost Market Share: The Marshall Islands Decisions and the Quest for a Suitable Dispute Settlement Forum for Multilateral Disputes, 30(4) Leiden Journal of International Law 925 (2017), pp. 925–946.
  67. Ramsden M., Strategic Litigation in Wartime: Judging the Russian Invasion of Ukraine through the Genocide Convention, 56(1) Vanderbilt Journal of Transnational Law 181 (2023), pp. 181–210.
  68. Reis F. dos, Grzybowski J., Moving “Red Lines”: The Russian–Ukrainian War and the Pragmatic (Mis-)Use of International Law, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge: 2023.
  69. Sanger A., False Claims of Genocide Have Real Effects: ICJ Indicates Provisional Measures in Ukraine’s Proceedings Against Russia, 81(2) The Cambridge Law Journal 217 (2022), pp. 217–221.
  70. UN Security Council Resolution 2202/(2015), 17 February 2015, S/RES/2202 (2015).
  71. Weller M., Time for Another Ukrainian Genocide Case?, EJIL: Talk!, 6 February 2024, available at: https://www.ejiltalk.org/time-for-another-ukrainian-genocide-case/ (accessed 30 August 2024).
  72. Wigard K., Pomson O., McIntyre J., Keeping Score: An Empirical Analysis of the Interventions in Ukraine v Russia, 14(3) Journal of International Dispute Settlement 305 (2023), pp. 305–327.
  73. Wilmshurst E., Ukraine: Debunking Russia’s Legal Justifcations, Chatham House, 24 February 2022, available at: https://www.chathamhouse.org/2022/02/ukraine-debunking-russias-legal-justifcations (accessed 30 August 2024).
  74. Zimmermann A., Five, Four, Three… and Counting Down? – The Outcome of the Recent Triennial Elections at the International Court of Justice, EJIL: Talk!, 17 November 2023, available at: https://tinyurl.com/msedv3xu (accessed 30 August 2024).

Similar Articles

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.