Vol. 41 (2021)
General Articles

Escalation of the Conflict between Russia and Ukraine in 2022 in Light of the Law on Use of Force and International Humanitarian Law

Patrycja Grzebyk
Faculty of Political Science and International Studies, University of Warsaw (Warsaw)

Published 2022-06-30

Keywords

  • Ukraine,
  • Russia,
  • war,
  • international armed conflict,
  • war crimes,
  • international humanitarian law,
  • use of force,
  • aggression
  • ...More
    Less

How to Cite

Escalation of the Conflict between Russia and Ukraine in 2022 in Light of the Law on Use of Force and International Humanitarian Law. (2022). Polish Yearbook of International Law, 41, 145-162. https://doi.org/10.24425/PYIL.2022.142344

Abstract

The aim of this article is to assess the military operation started on 24 February 2022 by Russia against Ukraine in light of the law on use of force, having in mind all the justifcations ofcially expressed by Russian authorities and in light of international humanitarian law. The author claims that there is no justifcation for the Russian military action and thus it must be qualifed as aggression. This, due to the serious violation of the peremptory norm, implies obligations on the part of states and international organizations (i.e. the international community). In addition, the current conduct of hostilities clearly shows that it is mainly Russian forces which neglect international humanitarian law principles, which might amount to war crimes.

References

  1. Address by the President of the Russian Federation, Kremlin, 24 February 2022, available at: http://en.kremlin.ru/events/president/transcripts/67843.
  2. Ahmed K., UN warns Russian blockade of Ukraine’s grain exports may trigger global famine, The Guardian, 18 April 2022; Ukraine: UN expert warns of global famine, urges end to Russia aggression, OCHR, 18 March 2022, available at: https://bit.ly/3suVBsS (accessed 30 June 2022).
  3. Barber R.J., Cooperating Through the General Assembly to End Serious Breaches of Peremptory Norms, 71 International and Comparative Law Quarterly 1 (2022), pp. 1-35.
  4. Bílková V., The Use of Force by the Russian Federation in Crimea, 75 Heidelberg Journal of International Law 27 (2015), pp. 37-50.
  5. Brown D., Ukraine conflict: Where are Russia’s troops?, BBC News, 23 February 2022, available at: https://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-60158694 (accessed 30 June 2022).
  6. CBS, Russian troops tortured and executed a village mayor and her family, Ukrainian officials say, CBS News, 4 March 2022, https://cbsn.ws/3N6Oejs (accessed 30 June 2022).
  7. Christiakis Th., Les conflits de secession en Crimée et dans l’est de l’Ukraine et le droit international, 141 Journal de droit international 733 (2014), pp. 23-48.
  8. Collins I.K. et al., Russia’s Attacks on Civilian Targets Have Obliterated Everyday Life in Ukraine, New York Times, 23 March 2022, available at: https://nyti.ms/3FDknwf (accessed 30 June 2022).
  9. Convention (IV) respecting the Laws and Customs of War on Land and its annex: Regulations concerning the Laws and Customs of War on Land. The Hague, 18 October 1907, available at: https://ihl-databases.icrc.org/en/ihl-treaties/hague-conv-iv-1907 (accessed 30 June 2022).
  10. Convention for the Protection of Cultural Property in the Event of Armed Conflict with the Protocol (adopted 14 May 1954, entered into force 7 August 1956) 249 UNTS 240.
  11. Convention on Prohibitions or Restrictions on the Use of Certain Conventional Weapons which may be deemed to be Excessively Injurious or to have Indiscriminate Effects (with Protocols I, II and III) (adopted 10 October 1980, entered into force 2 December 1983), 1342 UNTS 137.
  12. Czapliński W. et al. (eds.), The Case of Crimea’s Annexation Under International Law, Wydawnictwo Scholar, Warszawa: 2017.
  13. Dannenbaum T., Siege Starvation: A War Crime of Societal Torture, 22 Chicago Journal of International Law 368 (2021-2022).
  14. Déclaration de l’Institut de Droit International sur l’Aggression en Ukraine, 1 March 2022, available at: https://www.idi-iil.org/fr/declaration-de-linstitut-de-droit-international-sur-lagression-en-ukraine/ (accessed 30 June 2022).
  15. Foreign Secretary condemns Russian aggression in the Sea of Azov, available at: https://www.gov.uk/government/news/foreign-secretary-condemns-russian-aggression-in-the-sea-of-azov (accessed 30 June 2022).
  16. Gardam J., Necessity, Proportionality and the Use of Force by States, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge: 2004.
  17. Grant T.D., Aggression Against Ukraine. Territory, Responsibility, and International Law, Palgrave Macmillan, New York: 2015.
  18. Green J.A., Henderson Ch., Ruys T., Russia’s Attack on Ukraine and the Jus Ad Bellum, Journal on the Use of Force and International Law (2022), published online, DOI: 10.1080/20531702.2022.2056803.
  19. Greenemeier L., What is the ‘Mother of All Bombs’ That the US Just Dropped on Afghanistan, Scientific American, 13 April 2017, available at: https://bit.ly/3w4dVv4 / (accessed 30 June 2022).
  20. Grzebyk P., Classification of the Conflict between Ukraine and Russia in International Law (Ius ad Bellum and Ius in Bello), XXXIV Polish Yearbook of International Law 39 (2014), pp. 38-60.
  21. Grzebyk P., Impact of Western military interventions on the evolution of law on use of force, in: M. Madej (ed.), Western Military Interventions After the Cold War. Evaluating the Wars of the West, Routledge London: 2019.
  22. Henckaerts J.-M., Doswald-Beck L., Customary International Humanitarian Law, Vol. I-III, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge: 2005.
  23. How much influence will ex-Baathists have in the new Iraqi government?, available at: https://www.cfr.org/backgrounder/iraq-debaathification (accessed 30 June 2022).
  24. https://ria.ru/20220302/miny-1776096271.html, 2 March 2022 (accessed 30 June 2022).
  25. ICJ, Armed Activities on the Territory of the Congo (Democratic Republic of the Congo v. Uganda, Judgment, 19 December 2005, ICJ Rep 2005, pp. 168.
  26. ICJ, Oil Platforms (Islamic Republic of Iran v. United States of America), Judgment, 6 November 2003, ICJ Rep 2003, pp. 161.
  27. ICRC on its team being unable to reach Mariupol, 1 April 2022, available at: https://www.icrc.org/en/document/ukraine-icrc-team-unablereach-mariupol-renewed-attempt-tomorrow (accessed 30 June 2022).
  28. ILA Statement on the Ongoing and Evolving Aggression in and against Ukraine, 3 March 2022, available at: https://www.ila-hq.org/index.php/news (accessed 30 June 2022).
  29. International Court of Justice, Press Release No. 2022/4, Ukraine institutes proceedings against the Russian Federation and requests the Court to indicate provisional measures, 27 February 2022, available at: https://www.icj-cij.org/public/files/case-related/182/182-20220227-PRE-01-00-EN.pdf (accessed 30 June 2022).
  30. John I.T. et al., Bodies of ‘executed people’ strewn across street in Bucha as Ukraine accuses Russia of war crimes, CNN, 3 March 2022, available at: https://edition.cnn.com/2022/04/03/europe/bucha-ukraine-civilian-deaths-intl/index.html (accessed 30 June 2022).
  31. Kardaś S., Konończuk W., Minsk 2 – a fragile truce, Ośrodek Studiów Wschodnich, 12 February 2015, available at: https://bit.ly/39hJl8E (accessed 30 June 2022).
  32. Kretzmer D., The Inherent Right to Self-Defence and Proportionality in Jus Ad Bellum, 24(1) European Journal of International Law 235 (2013), pp. 235-282.
  33. Kupiecki R., Menkiszak M. (eds.), Documents Talk NATO-Russia Relations After the Cold War, The Polish Institute of International Relations, Warszawa: 2020, available at: https://bit.ly/3N3p5pK (accessed 30 June 2022).
  34. Lawless R., Are Mercenaries in Ukraine?, Lieber Institute, 21 March 2022, available at: https://lieber.westpoint.edu/are-mercenaries-in-ukraine/ (accessed 30 June 2022).
  35. Letter dated 24 February 2022 from the Permanent Representative of the Russian Federation to UN addressed to the Secretary-General, S/2022/154, 5 March 2022.
  36. Montazzoli M., Are Thermobaric Weapons Lawful, Liber Institute, 23 March 2022, available at: https://lieber.westpoint.edu/are-thermobaric-weapons-lawful/ (accessed 30 June 2022).
  37. Mykhailov Iurii I., Russian Bomb AG Machinery Warehouses, Says Ukrainian AG Journalist, Successful Farming, 15 March 2022, available at: https://bit.ly/3ssOt0h (accessed 30 June 2022).
  38. Nieczypor K., Wilk A., Żochowski P., The Donbas crisis: between bluff and war, OSW, 6 April 2021, available at https://bit.ly/3PcYMze (accessed 30 June 2022).
  39. ODIHR, Report on Violations of International Humanitarian and Human Rights Law, War Crimes and Crimes against Humanity Committed in Ukraine since 24 February 2022 by Professors Wolfgang Benedek, Veronika Bílková and Marco Sassòli, ODIHR.GAL/26/22/Rev.1, 13 April 2022.
  40. Package of measures for the Implementation of the Minsk agreements available at: https://peacemaker.un.org/sites/peacemaker.un.org/files/UA_150212_MinskAgreement_en.pdf (accessed 30 June 2022).
  41. Protocol additional to the Geneva Conventions of 12 August 1949, and relating to the protection of victims of international armed conflicts (Protocol I) (adopted 8 June 1977, entered into force 7 December 1978), 1125 UNTS 3.
  42. Redaelli Ch., Intervention in Civil Wars. Effectiveness, Legitimacy and Human Rights, Oxford University Press, Oxford: 2021.
  43. Report of the International Law Commission on the Work of its 71st Session (29 April – 7 June and 8 July – 9 August 2019), UN Doc A/74/10, pp. 194.
  44. Reuters, Conscripts sent to fight by pro-Russia Donbas get little training, old rifles, poor supplies, 4 April 2022, available at: https://reut.rs/3L73Oda (accessed 30 June 2022).
  45. Reuters, Russia, without evidence, says Ukraine making nuclear “dirty bomb”, The Intercept, 6 March 2022, available at: https://reut.rs/3FFA8TK (accessed 30 June 2022).
  46. RIA Novosti news, available at: https://ria.ru/20220302/dnr-1776111551.html, 2 March 2022 (accessed 30 June 2022).
  47. Sayapin S., Tsybulenko E. (eds.), The Use of Force against Ukraine and International Law – Jus ad Bellum, Jus in Bello, Jus Post Bellum, T.M.C. Asser Press, Den Haag: 2018.
  48. Speri A., Russia’s Newest Weapon in Ukraine May be Mercenaries Linked to Putin, The Intercept, 31 March 2022, available at: https://bit.ly/3wdKaqw (accessed 30 June 2022).
  49. Statement and right of reply by Permanent Representative Vassily Nebenzia at UNSC briefing on the humanitarian situation in Ukraine of 7 March 2022, available at: https://russiaun.ru/en/news/070322n (accessed 30 June 2022).
  50. Statement by Members of the International Law Association Committee on the Use of Force, 4 March 2022 published in many languages on https://bit.ly/39guRWx (accessed 30 June 2022).
  51. Statement by the President and the Board of the European Society of International Law on the Russian Aggression against Ukraine, 24 February 2022, available at: https://bit.ly/3kZEeMX (accessed 30 June 2022).
  52. Statement of ASIL President Catherine Amirfar Regarding the Situation in Ukraine, 23 February 2022, available at: https://www.asil.org/sites/default/files/pdfs/ASIL_Statement_Situation_in_Ukraine.pdf (accessed 30 June 2022).
  53. Statement of the Riigikogu in Support of the Sovereignty and Territorial Integrity of Ukraine in Connection with the Aggression in the Kerch Strait, available at: https://www.riigikogu.ee/wpcms/wp-content/uploads/2018/12/UKRAINA-avaldus-inglise-k.pdf (accessed 30 June 2022).
  54. Statements of Dmitry Polyanskiy, First Deputy Permanent Representative of Russia to the UN of 9 March 2022, available at: https://twitter.com/Dpol_un/status/1501688008621363205 (accessed 30 June 2022).
  55. Statements of Michail Mizincev of 10 March 2022 cited in: https://russian.rt.com/ussr/news/974261-ognevye-tochki-v-avtobusah (accessed 30 June 2022).
  56. Statements of Vladimir Putin of 9 March 2022 cited in: http://kremlin.ru/events/president/news/67953 (accessed 30 June 2022).
  57. Sulivan I. R., Russian troops ‘open fire on Ukrainian protesters’ in Kherson, The Independent, 21 March 2022, available at: https://bit.ly/38khzrO (accessed 30 June 2022).
  58. Supreme Court (Canada), Reference re. secession of Quebec, Judgment, 20 August 1998, 2 SCR 217.
  59. UN Office of the High Commissioner, Report on the Human Rights Situation in Ukraine, 1 August 2021-31 January 2022, 28 March 2022, available at: https://www.ohchr.org/en/documents/countryreports/report-human-rights-situation-ukraine-1-august-2021-31-january-2022 (accessed 30 June 2022).
  60. Uppsala Conflict Data Program, Department of Peace and Conflict Research, Ukraine, available at: https://ucdp.uu.se/country/369 (accessed 30 June 2022).
  61. Wall M., Russia’s devastation of Mariupol, Ukraine visible from space in satellite photos, Space 25 March 2022, available at: https://www.space.com/russia-ukraine-invasion-mariupol-damage-satellite-photos (accessed 30 June 2022).
  62. Watts S., Are Molotov Cocktails Lawful Weapons?, Liber Institute, 2 March 2022, available at: https://lieber.westpoint.edu/are-molotov-cocktails-lawful-weapons/ (accessed 30 June 2022).
  63. Wilde W., Fact Check: Is Russia using butterfly mines in Ukraine?, DW, 15 March 2022, available at: https://www.dw.com/en/fact-check-is-russia-using-butterfly-mines-in-ukraine/a-61120270 (accessed 30 June 2022).
  64. Wilson G., Crimea: Some Observations on Secession and Intervention in Partial Response to Müllerson and Tolstykh, 14 Chinese Journal of International Law 217 (2015), pp. 217-223.
  65. В Минобороны России отвергли обвинения Киева в нанесении авиаудара по театру в Мариуполе, available at: https://bit.ly/3wn4Psh (accessed 30 June 2022).
  66. Минобороны России предупредило об ударе по объектам СБУ и 72-го главного центра ПСО в Киеве, available at: https://russian.rt.com/ussr/news/969829-minoborony-udar-sbu-pso (accessed 30 June 2022).