Make a Submission
Vol. 43 (2023)
Special section

Domestic and International Criminal Jurisdiction in the Context of the Initiative for a Special Tribunal for the Crime of Aggression

PDF
  • Łukasz Kułaga
Łukasz Kułaga
Cardinal Stefan Wyszynski University, Poland

Published 2024-06-25

Keywords

  • crime of aggression,
  • criminal jurisdiction,
  • special tribunal,
  • Ukraine

How to Cite

Domestic and International Criminal Jurisdiction in the Context of the Initiative for a Special Tribunal for the Crime of Aggression. (2024). Polish Yearbook of International Law, 43, 339–351. https://doi.org/10.24425/pyil.2024.152306

Abstract

Russia’s aggression against Ukraine and the efforts to prosecute the perpetrators have renewed the debate regarding domestic and international criminal jurisdiction over the crime of aggression. Given the inter-state nature of this crime and its link to an act of aggression, the existence of which can be determined by the Security Council, the International Law Commission’s (ILC) relatively restrictive approach to the exercise of criminal jurisdiction prevailed, at least until 2022. Against this background, the discussion regarding the establishment of a Special Tribunal for the crime of aggression against Ukraine has significantly influenced the trajectory of the understanding of general international law concerning individual criminal responsibility for the crime of aggression. The interpretative paths adopted in the mid-1990s are gradually being abandoned. At the same time, an intense ongoing debate concerning the understanding of the phrase “international criminal courts, where they have jurisdiction” has not led to any conclusive arrangements. Still, what is known is that there is a certain group of states for which such courts can be created through bilateral agreement between the state concerned and the United Nations, on the recommendation of the UN General Assembly.

PDF

References

  1. Draft Code of Crimes Against the Peace and Security of Mankind, Art. 8, Commentary, available at: https://legal.un.org/ilc/texts/instruments/english/draft_articles/7_4_1996.pdf (accessed 30 August 2024).
  2. Report of the working group on the question of an international criminal jurisdiction, 2(2) Yearbook of the International Law Commission 58 (1992), pp. 58–80.
  3. Dinstein Y., War Aggression and SelfDefence, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge: 2005.
  4. ILC, Draft code of crimes against the peace and security of mankind (Part II) – including the draft statute for an international criminal court, 14 July 1992, A/CN.4/SR.2284.
  5. Wrange P., The Crime of Aggression, Domestic Prosecutions and Complementarity, in: C. Kreß, S. Barriga (eds.), The Crime of Aggression: A Commentary, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge: 2016, pp. 704–751.
  6. Macedo S. (ed.), The Princeton Principles on Universal Jurisdiction, Program in Law and Public Affairs, Princeton University, Princeton, New Jersey: 2001, available at: https://tinyurl.com/jc7yy8m5 (accessed 30 August 2024).
  7. Grzebyk P., Crime of Aggression Against Ukraine: The Role of Regional Customary Law, (21)3 Journal of International Criminal Justice 435 (2023), pp. 435–459.
  8. Strapatsas N., Complementarity and Aggression: A Ticking Time Bomb?, in: C. Stahn, L. van den Herik (eds.), Future Perspectives on International Criminal Justice, TMC Asser Press, Leiden: 2010, pp. 450–474.
  9. Reisinger Coracini A., Evaluating Domestic Legislation on the Customary Crime of Aggression under the Rome Statute’s Complementarity Regime, in: C. Stahn, G. Sluiter (eds.), The Emerging Practice of the International Criminal Court, Martinus Nijhoff, Leiden: 2009, pp. 725–754.
  10. Jurdi N.N., The Domestic Prosecution of the Crime of Aggression After the International Criminal Court Review Conference: Possibilities and Alternatives, 14(2) Melbourne Journal of International Law 1 (2014), pp. 1–20.
  11. Kress C., Holtzendorff L. von, The Kampala Compromise on the Crime of Aggression, 8(5) Journal of International Criminal Justice 1179 (2010), pp. 1179–1217.
  12. McDougall C., The Crime of Aggression Under the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge: 2021.
  13. Challenges in Prosecuting the Crime of Aggression: Jurisdiction and Immunities, The Advisory Committee on Issues of Public International Law, Hague: 2022.
  14. Van Schaack B., Par in Parem Imperium Non Habet Complementarity and the Crime of Aggression, 10 Journal of International Criminal Justice 133 (2012), pp. 133–164.
  15. Hongju Koh H., Buchwald T., The Crime of Aggression: The United States Perspective, 109 American Journal of International Law 257 (2015), pp. 257–295.
  16. Grzebyk P., Criminal Responsibility for the Crime of Aggression, Routledge, Oxon: 2014.
  17. Akande D., The Jurisdiction of the International Criminal Court over Nationals of Non-Parties: Legal Basis and Limits, 3 Journal of International Criminal Justice 618 (2003), pp. 618–650.
  18. G7 Japan 2023 Foreign Ministers’ Communiqué, U.S. Department of State, 18 April 2023, available at: https://www.state.gov/g7-japan-2023-foreign-ministers-communique/ (accessed 30 August 2024).
  19. Ambassador Van Schaack’s Remarks on the U.S. Proposal to Prosecute Russian Crimes of Aggression, U.S. Department of State, 27 March 2023, available at: https://www.state.gov/ambassador-van-schaacks-remarks/ (accessed 30 August 2024).
  20. “Strengthening International Law in Times of Crisis” – Speech by Federal Foreign Minister Annalena Baerbock in The Hague, Federal Foreign Office, 16 January 2023, available at: https://www.auswaertiges-amt.de/en/newsroom/news/strengthening-internationallaw-in-times-of-crisis/2573492?view (accessed 30 August 2024).
  21. UK joins core group dedicated to achieving accountability for Russia’s aggression against Ukraine, Gov.uk, 20 January 2023, available at: https://tinyurl.com/58663e2k (accessed 30 August 2024).
  22. United around our values – Reykjavik declaration, Council of Europe, London: 2023, available at: https://tinyurl.com/57z5a2vb (accessed 30 August 2024).
  23. European Council meeting (29 and 30 June 2023) – Conclusions, EUCO 7/23, 30 June 2023, available at: https://data.consilium.europa.eu/doc/document/ST-7-2023-INIT/en/pdf (accessed 30 August 2024).
  24. International Centre for the Prosecution of the Crime of Aggression against Ukraine, EuroJust, available at: https://tinyurl.com/4uzh8tm3 (accessed 30 August 2024).
  25. Ljubljana – The Hague Convention on International Cooperation in the Investigation and Prosecution of the Crime of Genocide, Crimes Against Humanity, War Crimes and Other International Crimes (signed 26 May 2023), 2024 Tractatenblad 120.
  26. List of Participants, MLA Diplomatic Conference, MLA/INF.1, 26 May 2023, MLA/INF.1, available at: https://www.gov.si/assets/ministrstva/MZEZ/projekti/MLA-pobuda/List-of-Participants.pdf (accessed 30 August 2024).
  27. UNGA resolution of 18 March 2022, Aggression against Ukraine, Doc. A/RES/ES-11/1.
  28. ICJ, Certain Expenses of the United Nations, Advisory Opinion, 20 July 1962, ICJ Rep 1962.
  29. ICJ, Military and Paramilitary Activities in and Against Nicaragua (Nicaragua v. United States), Judgment, 26 November 1984, ICJ Rep 1984.
  30. ICJ, Legal Consequences of the Construction of a Wall in the Occupied Palestinian Territory, Advisory Opinion, 9 July 2004, ICJ Rep 2004.
  31. Nazi Conspiracy and Aggression, Opinion and Judgment, United States Government Printing Office. Washington: 1947.
  32. Akande D., International Law Immunities and the International Criminal Court, 98 American Journal of International Law 407 (2004).
  33. Situation in Ukraine: ICC Judges Issue Arrest Warrants Against Vladimir Vladimirovich Putin and Maria Alekseyevna Lvova-Belova, International Criminal Court, 17 March 2023, available at: https://tinyurl.com/4ct3y63j (accessed 30 August 2024).
  34. Graham-Harrison E., Sauer P., Joe Biden Hails Decision to Issue ICC Arrest Warrant Against Vladimir Putin, The Guardian, 18 March 2023, available at: https://tinyurl.com/pj66a8ad (accessed 30 August 2024).
  35. Eboe-Osuji C., The Absolute Clarity of International Legal Practice’s Rejection of Immunity Before International Criminal Courts, Just Security, 8 December 2022, available at: https://tinyurl.com/44en7j3d (accessed 30 August 2024).
  36. Sadat L.N., The Conferred Jurisdiction of the International Criminal Court, 99(2) Notre Dame Law Review 549 (2024), pp. 549–609.
  37. ICC, Jordan Referral v. Al-Bashir, ICC-02/05-01/09-397, 6 May 2019.
  38. Joint Concurring Opinion of Judges Eboe-Osuji, Morrison, Hofmański and Bossa to ICC, The Prosecutor v. Omar Hassan Ahmad Al-Bashir, ICC-02/05-01/09-397-Corr, 6 May 2019.
  39. ICJ, Arrest Warrant of 11 April 2000 (Democratic Republic of the Congo v. Belgium), Judgment, 14 February 2002, ICJ Rep 2002.
  40. ICC, Jordan Referral v. Al-Bashir, ICC-02/05-01/09-397, 6 May 2019.
  41. Joint Concurring Opinion of Judges Eboe-Osuji, Morrison, Hofmański and Bossa to ICC, The Prosecutor v. Omar Hassan Ahmad Al-Bashir, ICC-02/05-01/09-397-Corr, 6 May 2019.
  42. Full Accountability is What Teaches an Aggressor to Live in Peace – Volodymyr Zelenskyy During the Bucha Summit, President of Ukraine, 31 March 2023, available at: https://tinyurl.com/ycymf98d (accessed 30 August 2024).
  43. Bucha Declaration on Accountability for the Most Serious Crimes Under International Law Committed on the Territory of Ukraine, President of Ukraine, 31 March 2023, available at: https://tinyurl.com/4bc7azpc (accessed 30 August 2024).
  44. European Council meeting (29 and 30 June 2023) – Conclusions, EUCO 7/23, 30 June 2023, available at: https://data.consilium.europa.eu/doc/document/ST-7-2023-INIT/en/pdf (accessed 30 August 2024).
  45. SCSL, Prosecutor v. Charles Taylor Decision on Immunity from Jurisdiction, SCSL-2003-01-I, 31 May 2004.
  46. Puka A., Korenica F., The Struggle to Dissolve the Kosovo Specialist Chambers in The Hague: Stuck Between Constitutional Text and Mission to Pursue Justice, 20 The Law and Practice of International, Courts and Tribunals, 548 (2021), pp. 548–575.
  47. Muharremi R., The Kosovo Specialist Chambers and Specialist Prosecutor’s Ofce, 76 Die Zeitschrift für ausländisches offentliches Recht und Volkerrecht 967 (2016), pp. 967–992.
  48. Goldston J.A., Khalfaoui A., In Evaluating Immunities Before a Special Tribunal for Aggression Against Ukraine, the Type of Tribunal Matters, Just Security, 1 February 2023, available at: https://tinyurl.com/mpmdehkb (accessed 30 August 2024).
  49. ICC, Jordan Referral v. AlBashir, ICC-02/05-01/09-397, 6 May 2019.
  50. Joint Concurring Opinion of Judges Eboe-Osuji, Morrison, Hofmański and Bossa to ICC, The Prosecutor v. Omar Hassan Ahmad Al-Bashir, ICC-02/05-01/09-397-Corr, 6 May 2019.
  51. Reisinger Coracini A., Trahan J., The Case for Creating a Special Tribunal to Prosecute the Crime of Aggression Committed Against Ukraine (Part VI): On the Non-Applicability of Personal Immunities, Just Security, 8 November 2022, available at: https://tinyurl.com/4xf9vjdv (accessed 30 August 2024).
  52. Trahan J., The Role of the UN Security Council & General Assembly In Responding to the Invasion of Ukraine, 12(2) Polish Review of International and European Law 23 (2024), pp. 23–64.
  53. Hoogh A. de, Personal Immunities Redux Before a Special Tribunal for Prosecuting Russian Crimes of Aggression: Resistance is Futile!, EJIL: Talk!, 5 January 2024, available at: https://tinyurl.com/y5apej2a (accessed 30 August 2024).
  54. O’Keefe R., Taking Putin to Court?, Bocconi, 21 December 2023, available at: https://tinyurl.com/5t27vwrb (accessed 30 August 2024).
  55. Trahan J., U.N. General Assembly Should Recommend Creation of Crime of Aggression Tribunal for Ukraine: Nuremberg is Not the Model, Just Security, 7 March 2022, available at: https://tinyurl.com/38t3w8u6 (accessed 30 August 2024).
  56. Kress C., Hobe S., Nußberger A., The Ukraine War and the Crime of Aggression: How to Fill the Gaps in the International Legal System, Just Security, 23 January 2023, available at: https://tinyurl.com/26hdw6e2 (accessed 30 August 2024).
  57. Hathaway O.A., Mills M., Zimmerman H., The Legal Authority to Create a Special Tribunal to Try the Crime of Aggression Upon the Request of the UN General Assembly, Just Security, 5 May 2023, available at: https://tinyurl.com/ycy85psp (accessed 30 August 2024).
  58. McDougall C., The Imperative of Prosecuting Crimes of Aggression Committed against Ukraine, 28(2) Journal of Conflict & Security Law 203 (2023), pp. 203–230.
  59. Owiso O., An Aggression Chamber for Ukraine Supported by the Council of Europe, OpinioJuris, 30 March 2022, available at https://tinyurl.com/5bz5vmeu (accessed 30 August 2024).
  60. FAQs on A Special Tribunal for the Crime of Aggression against Ukraine, Permanent Mission of Estonia to the UN, 20 January 2023, available at: https://un.mfa.ee/faqs-on-a-special-tribunal-for-the-crime-ofaggression-against-ukraine/ (accessed 30 August 2024).

Similar Articles

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.