Published
2021-07-19
Keywords
- Achmea,
- arbitral tribunal,
- intra-EU BITs,
- Investor State Arbitration,
- jurisdiction
Abstract
This article examines the consequences of the Court of Justice of the European Union’s (CJEU) ruling in Achmea concerning Investor-State Arbitration (ISA) under intraEU Bilateral Investment Treaties (BITs) from a treaty law perspective. It begins by briefly setting out the arguments of Advocate General Wathelet and the CJEU supporting their different positions on whether intra-EU BITs ISA clauses are compatible with EU law. The article then proceeds to analyse Achmea’s implications for intra-EU BIT ISA. It concludes that, as a result of the CJEU’s ruling, arbitral tribunals are deprived of their jurisdiction to entertain investors’ claims brought under intra-EU BIT ISA clauses. Finally, the article argues that Achmea’s applicability to cases brought under intra-EU BIT ISA clauses is limited, using the application of EU law as a relevant qualification. In order for an arbitral tribunal to be deprived of its jurisdictional competence as a result of Achmea, it must be entitled to interpret and apply EU law directly or indirectly in determining its jurisdiction.
References
- Addiko Bank AG and Addiko Bank D.D. v. Republic of Croatia, ICSID Case no. ARB/17/37, https://www.italaw.com/cases/8215 [accessed: 15.07.2021].
- Agreement between the republic of Austria and the republic of Croatia for the promotion and protection of investments, signed on 19 February 1997 and entered into force on 1 November 1999, https://investmentpolicyhub.unctad.org/iia/mostrecent/treaty/236 [accessed: 30.06.2020].
- Arbitral Tribunal Constituted Pursuant to Article 287, and Article 1 of Annex VII, of the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea for the Dispute Concerning the MOX Plant, International Movements of Radioactive Materials, and the Protection of the Marine Environment of the Irish Sea, The UNCLOS Tribunal in Mox Plant (Ireland v. United Kingdom), ITLOS order no. 3 Suspension of Proceedings on Jurisdiction and Merits, and Request for Further Provisional Measures, 24 June 2003, https://pcacases.com/web/sendAttach/867 [accessed: 15.07.2021].
- Award in the arbitration regarding the Iron Rhine (Ijzeren Rijn) Railway between the Kingdom of Belgium and the Kingdom of the Netherlands, decision of 24 May 2005, https://legal.un.org/riaa/cases/vol_XXVII/35-125.pdf [accessed: 15.07.2021].
- Award of 19 October 1928 in the case Georges Pinson (France) v. United Mexican States, 5 Reports of International Arbitral Awards (1928), pp. 327-466.
- Award of 27 December 2016 in the case Blusun S.A., Jean-Pierre Lecorcier and Michael Stein v. Italian Republic, CSID Case no. ARB/14/3.
- Award on jurisdiction of 22 October 2012 in the case European American Investment Bank AG (EURAM) v. the Slovak Republic, PCA Case no 2010-17, https://www.italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/italaw4226.pdf [accessed: 15.07.2021].
- Award the Tribunal of 21 June 2019 in case United Utilities (Tallinn) BV and Aktsiaselts Tallinna Vesi v. Republic of Estonia, ICSID Case no. ARB/14/24.
- Bastin L., The Amicus Curiae in Investor-State Arbitration, 1 Cambridge Journal of International and Comparative Law 208 (2012).
- Bilanova A., Kudrna J., Achmea: The End of Investment Arbitration as We Know It, 3 European Investment Law and Arbitration Review 261 (2018).
- Case C-453/00 Kühne & Heitz NV v. Produktschap voor Pluimvee en Eieren, ECLI:EU:C:2004:17.
- CJEU judgement in the case C-10/61 Commission v. Italy, European Court Reports 1962, I-00003.
- CJEU judgement in the case C-109/88 Danfoss, European Court Reports 1989, I-03199.
- CJEU judgement in the case C-11/70 Internationale Handelsgesellschaft mbH v. Einfuhr –und Vorratsstelle für Getreide und Futtermittel, European Court Reports 1970 I-01125.
- CJEU judgement in the case C-125/04 Denuit and Cordenier, European Court Reports 2005, I-00923.
- CJEU judgement in the case C-126/97 Eco Swiss China Time Ltd v. Benetton International NV, European Court Reports 1999, I-03055.
- CJEU judgement in the case C-196/09 Miles and others, European Court Reports 2011, I-05105.
- CJEU judgement in the case C-235/87 Annunziata Matteucci v. Communauté Française of Belgium et al., European Court Reports 1988 I-05589.
- CJEU judgement in the case C-24/92 Corbiau v. Administration des Contributions, European Court Reports 1993, I-01277.
- CJEU judgement in the case C-26/62 NV Allgemene Transporten Expeditie Onderneming van Gend & Loos v. Netherlands Inland Revenue Administration, European Court Reports 1963 I-001.
- CJEU judgement in the case C-262/12 Vent de Colère, ECLI:EU:C:2013:851.
- CJEU judgement in the case C-284/16 Slovakische Republic v. Achmea BV [2018], ECLI:EU:C:2018:158.
- CJEU judgement in the case C-284/16 Slowakische Republic v. Achmea BV [2017], ECLI:EU:C:2017:699.
- CJEU judgement in the case C-3/91 Exportur S.A. v. Lor S.A. and Confiserie du Tech S.A., European Court Reports 1992 I-5529.
- CJEU judgement in the case C-337/95 Parfums Christian Dior v. Evora, European Court Reports 1997 I-06013.
- CJEU judgement in the case C-376/03 D. v Inspecteur van de Belastingdienst/ Particulieren / Ondernemingen buitenland te Heerlen, European Court Reports 2005 I-05821.
- CJEU judgement in the case C-377/13 Ascendi Beiras Litoral e Alta, Auto Estradas das Beiras Litoral e Alta, ECLI:EU:C:2014:1754.
- CJEU judgement in the case C-394/11 Belov, ECLI:EU:C:2013:48.
- CJEU judgement in the case C-459/03 Commission v. Ireland, European Court Reports 2006, I-4635.
- CJEU judgement in the case C-469/00 Ravil, European Court Reports 2003 I-05053.
- CJEU judgement in the case C-478/07 Budejovicky Budvar, ECLI:EU:C:2009:521.
- CJEU judgement in the case C-6/64 Flaminio Costa v. E.N.E.L., European Court Reports 1964 I-01141.
- CJEU judgement in the case C-61/79 Amministrazione delle Finance dello Stato v. Denkavit Italiana, ECLI:EU:C:1980:100.
- CJEU judgement in the case C-73/08 Nicolas Bressol and Others and Céline Chaverot and Others v. Gouvernement de la Communauté Française, ECLI:EU:C:2010:181.
- CJEU judgement in the case Nordsee v. Reederei Mond, European Court Reports 1982, I-01095. CJEU judgement in the case C-555/13 Merck Canada, ECLI:EU:C:2014:92.
- CJEU judgement in the joined case C-66, 127 and 128/79 Salumi, ECLI:EU:C:1980:101.
- Consolidated version of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, OJ C 326 of 26.10.2012, p. 47–390.
- Contartese C., Andenas M., Court of Justice: EU Autonomy and Investor-State Dispute Settlement under Inter Se Agreements between EU Member States, 56 Common Market Law Review 157 (2019).
- Craig P., De Búrca G., EU Law: Texts, Cases and Materials, Oxford University Press, Oxford: 2015.
- De Sadeleer N., The End of the Game: The Autonomy of the EU Legal Order Opposes Arbitral Tribunals under Bilateral Investment Treaties Concluded Between Two Member States, 9 European Journal of Risk Regulation 355 (2018).
- De Witte B., The European Union as an International Legal Experiment, [in:] G. De Búrca, J.H.H. Weiler (eds.), The Worlds of European Constitutionalism, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge: 2012.
- Decision of the German Federal Court of Justice (Bundesgerichtshof) of 3 March 2016, https://bit.ly/3iyHegv [accessed: 30.06.2020].
- Decision on jurisdiction of 30 November 2012 in case Electrabel S.A. v. Republic of Hungary, ICSID Case no. ARB/07/19.
- Decision on Jurisdiction, liability and directions on Quantum of 2 December 2019 in the case BayWa R.E. Renewable Energy GmbH and BayWa R.E. Asset Holding GmbH v. the Kingdom of Spain, ICSID Case no. ARB15/16.
- Decision on the Achmea issue in the case Vattenfall v. Germany, ICSID Case no. ARB/12/12.
- Declaration of the representatives of the Governments of the Member states of 15 and 16 January 2019 on the legal Consequences / Enforcement of the judgment of the Court of justice in Achmea and on investment protection in the European Union, https://bit.ly/2zCirun, https://bit.ly/3f2a5yf and https://bit.ly/2vky6eX [accessed: 30.06.2020].
- Dolzer R., Schreuer C., Principles of International Investment Law, Oxford University Press, Oxford: 2012.
- Dörr O., Schmalenbach K. (eds.), Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties: A Commentary, Springer, Cham: 2018.
- Douglas Z., The International Law of Investment Claims, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge: 2009.
- Dragiev D., 2018 in Review: The Achmea Decision and its Reverberations in the World of Arbitration, Kluwer Arbitration Blog 2018, https://bit.ly/3gxvXlt [accessed: 30.06.2020].
- Dragiev D., A Procedural Perspective of Achmea: What Does Achmea Imply in Practice?, Kluwer Arbitration Blog 2018, https://bit.ly/2C6clG8 [accessed: 30.06.2020].
- Fanou M., Intra-European Union Investor-State Arbitration post-Achmea: RIP? An Assessment in the Aftermath of the Court of Justice of the European Union, Case C-284/16, Achmea, Judgment of March 6 2018, EU:C:2018:158, 2 Maastricht Journal of European and Comparative Law 316 (2019).
- Fouchard C., Krestin M., The Judgment of the CJEU in Slovak Republic v. Achmea – A Loud Clap of Thunder on the Intra-EU BIT Sky!, Kluwer Arbitration Blog 2018, https://bit.ly/3gvEvCG [accessed: 30.06.2020].
- Gáspár-Szilágyi S., It Is not Just about Investor-State Arbitration: A Look at Case C-284/16, Achmea BV, 3 European Papers 357 (2018).
- Georgaki K., The Decision of the Svea Court of Appeal in PL Holdings v. Poland: A Mutiny against Achmea?, http://cilj.co.uk/2019/08/07/the-decision-of-the-svea-court-of-appeal-in-pl-holdings-v-poland-a-mutiny-against-achmea/ [accessed: 30.06.2020].
- Georgaki K., The Decision on the Achmea Issue in Vattenfall v. Germany or: How to Escape the Application of the CJEU’s Decision in Achmea in Three Steps, https://www.law.ox.ac.uk/business-law-blog/blog/2018/11/decision-achmea-issue-vattenfall-v-germany-or-how-escape-application [accessed: 30.06.2021].
- Georgaki K., The EU’s Competence over Cross-Border Investment in the Post-Lisbon Era, 1 European Politeia 125 (2018).
- Ghouri A.A., Resolving Incompatibilities of Bilateral Investment Treaties of the EU Member States with the EC Treaty: Individual and Collective Options, 16 European Law Journal 806 (2010).
- Gourgourinis A., After Achmea: Maintaining the EU Law Compatibility of Intra-EU BITs Through Treaty Interpretation, 3 European Investment Law and Arbitration Review 282 (2018).
- Gregoire M., Intra-EU BIT Arbitrations Declared Incompatible with EU Law Judgment Rendered in C-284/16 – Slowakische Republik v. Achmea BV, 4 New Square (2018), https://bit.ly/3iaedHj [accessed: 30.06.2020].
- Günther Wetzel R., Rauschning D., The Vienna Convention on the Law of the Treaties Travaux Préparatoires, Alfred Metzner 1978.
- ICSID Convention, Regulations and Rules, https://icsid.worldbank.org/sites/default/files/ICSID%20Convention%20English.pdf [accessed: 15.07.2021].
- ILC Geneva, Fifty-eighth session 1 May-9 June and 3 July-11 August 2006, Fragmentation of International Law: Difficulties Arising from the Diversification and Expansion of International Law, Report of the study Group of the international law Commission, finalised by M. Koskenniemi, A/CN.4/L.682 13 April 2006, https://legal.un.org/ilc/documentation/english/a_cn4_l682.pdf [accessed: 15.07.2021].
- In the matter of an arbitration before a Tribunal Constituted in Accordance with the Agreement on Encouragement and Reciprocal Protection of Investments Between the Kingdom of the Netherlands and the Czech and Slovak Federal Republic, signed on 29 April 1991, entered into force on 1 October 1992 and the United Nations Commission on International Trade Law Arbitration Rules between Eureko B.V. and the Slovak Republica, Award on jurisdiction, arbitrability and suspension of 26 October 2010, PCA Case no. 2008-13, https://www.italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0309.pdf [accessed: 15.07.2021].
- Johansen S.Ø., The Reinterpretation of TFEU Article 344 in opinion 2/13 and the potential consequences, 16 German Law Journal 169 (2015).
- Joined Cases 28 to 30/62 Da Costa en Schaake NV, Jacob Meijer NV, Hoechst-Holland NV v. Nether-lands Inland Revenue Administration, ECLI:EU:C:1963:6.
- Judgment of Svea Court of appeal on set-aside application of 22 February 2019 in the case PL Holdings S.à.r.l. v. Poland, SCC Case no. 2014/163, https://www.italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/italaw10374.pdf [accessed: 15.07.2021].
- Kapoor V., Slovak Republic v. Achmea: When Politics Came Out to Play, Kluwer Arbitration Blog 2018, https://bit.ly/2yy6y88 [accessed: 30.06.2020].
- Kellerbauer M., Klamert M., Tomkin J. (eds.), The EU Treaties and the Charter of Fundamental Rights: A Commentary, Oxford University Press, Oxford: 2019.
- Kjos H.E., Applicable Law in Investor-State Arbitration, Oxford University Press, Oxford: 2013.
- Klabbers J., The Validity of EU Norms Conflicting with International Obligations, [in:] E. Cannizzaro, P. Palchetti, R.A. Wessel (eds.), International Law as Law of the European Union, Brill, Leiden: 2011.
- Lavranos N., After Achmea: The Need for an EU Investment Protection Regulation, Kluwer Arbitration Blog 2018, https://bit.ly/3iwdpnc [accessed: 30.06.2020].
- Lavranos N., Protecting European Law from International Law, 15 European Foreign Affairs Review 265 (2010).
- Manzini P., The Priority of Pre-Existing Treaties of EC Member States within the Framework of International Law, 12 European Journal of International Law 781 (2001).
- McMahon J., The Court of the European Communities: Judicial Interpretation and International Organisation, 37 British Yearbook of International Law 320 (1961).
- Newing N., Alexander L., Meredith L., What Next for Intra-EU Investment Arbitration? Thoughts on the Achmea Decision, Kluwer Arbitration Blog 2018, https://bit.ly/3e8gnot [accessed: 30.06.2020].
- Nikitin P., The CJEU’s Achmea Judgment: Getting Through the Five Stages of Grief, Kluwer Arbitration Blog 2018, https://bit.ly/3f0iQ0H [accessed: 30.06.2020].
- Opinion 1/09 on the Creation of a Unified Patent Litigation System, ECLI:EU:C:2011:123.
- Opinion 2/13 on the Accession to the ECHR, ECLI:EU:C:2014:2454.
- Opinion 2/15 Free Trade Agreement with Singapore, ECLI:EU:C:2017:376.
- Order in response to a petition by 5 Non-Governmental Organisations for permission to Make an Amicus Curiae submission of 19 May 2005 in the case Suez, Sociedad General de Aguas de Barcelona S.A. and Vivendi Universal S.A. v. the Argentine Republic, ICSID Case no. ARB/03/19.
- Partial award of 27 March 2007 in the case Eastern Sugar B.V. (Nether-lands) v. The Czech Republic, SCC Case no. 088/2004, https://www.italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0259_0.pdf [accessed: 15.07.2021].
- Paulsson J., Arbitration without Privity, 10 ICSID Review 232 (1995).
- Ponomarov V., CJEU Does Not Buy Wathelet’s Opinion in Achmea – What Is Left Unanswered, Kluwer Arbitration Blog 2018, https://bit.ly/2vMjs8r [accessed: 30.06.2020].
- Raiffeisen Bank International AG and Raiffeisenbank Austria d.d. v. Republic of Croatia, ICSID Case no. ARB/17/34, https://www.italaw.com/cases/6634 [accessed: 15.07.2021].
- Reinisch A., Articles 30 and 59 of the Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties in Action: The Decisions on Jurisdiction in the Eastern Sugar and Eureko Investment Arbitrations, 39 Legal Issues of Economic Integration 157 (2012).
- Rubins N., Papanastasiou T., Kinsella S., International Investment, Political Risk and Dispute Resolution: A Practitioner’s Guide, Oxford University Press, Oxford: 2020.
- Schreuer C., Consent to Arbitration, [in:] P.T. Muchlinski, F. Ortino, C. Schreuer (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of International Investment Law, Oxford University Press, Oxford: 2015.
- Schreuer C., Jurisdiction and Applicable Law in Investment Treaty Arbitration, 1 McGill Journal of Dispute Resolution (2015).
- Schütze R., An Introduction to European Law, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge: 2015.
- Schütze R., EC Law and International Agreements of the Member States – An Ambivalent Relationship, 9 The Cambridge Yearbook of International Legal Studies 387 (2007).
- Schwedt K., Ingwersen H., Intra-EU ECT Claims Post-Achmea: Vattenfall Decision Paves the Way, http://arbitrationblog.kluwerarbitration.com/2018/12/13/intra-eu-ect-claims-post-achmea-vattenfall-decision-paves-the-way/ [accessed: 30.06.2020].
- Shany Y., Jurisdiction and Admissibility, [in:] C.P.R. Romano, K. Alter, Y. Shany (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of International Adjudication, Oxford University Press, Oxford: 2015.
- Söderlund C., Intra-EU BIT Investment Protection and the EC Treaty, 24 Journal of International Arbitration 455 (2017).
- Spiermann O., The Other Side of the Story: An Unpopular Essay on the Making of the European Community Legal Order, 10 European Journal of International Law 763 (1999).
- Stefan F., Brace for Impact? Examining the Reach of Achmea v. Slovakia, Kluwer Arbitration Blog 2018, https://bit.ly/3e1mdov [accessed: 30.06.2020].
- Steingruber M., Consent in Investment Arbitration, Oxford University Press, Oxford: 2015.
- Swedish Högsta Domstolen decision of 12 December 2019 in the case PL Holdings S.à.r.l. v. Poland, T 1569-19 https://www.italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/italaw11099.pdf [accessed: 15.07.2021].
- UNCITRAL Ad Hoc Arbitration decision on jurisdiction of 30 April 2010 in the case Jan Oostergetel and Theodora Laurentius v. The Slovak Republic, https://www.italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita1073_0.pdf [accessed: 15.07.2021].
- UniCredit Bank and Zagrebačka Banka v. Republic of Croatia, ICSID Case no. ARB/16/31, https://investmentpolicy.unctad.org/investment-dispute-settlement/cases/747/unicredit-bank-and-zagreba-ka-banka-v-croatia [accessed: 15.07.2021].
- Valdevelde K., Bilateral Investment Treaties, Oxford University Press, Oxford: 2010.
- Vierdag E.W., The Time of the ‘Conclusion’ of a Multilateral Treaty: Article 30 of the Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties and Related Provisions, 59 The British Yearbook of International Law 75 (1989).
- Viñualez J., Amicus Intervention in Investor-State Arbitration, 61 Dispute Resolution Journal 72 (2006).
- Von Papp K., Solving Conflicts with International Investment Treaty Law from an EU Perspective: Article 351 TFEU Revisited, 42 Legal Issues of Economic Integration 325 (2015).
- Waibel M., Investment Arbitration: Jurisdiction and Admissibility, [in:] M. Bungenberg, J. Griebel, S. Hobe, A. Reinisch, Y.-I Kim (eds.), International Investment Law: A Handbook, Hart, Oxford: 2015.
- Wehland H., Intra-EU Investment Agreements and Arbitration: Is European Community Law an Obstacle?, 58 International and Comparative Law Quarterly 297 (2009).