Make a Submission
Vol. 43 (2023)
General Articles

The European Commission and the Establishment of the European Neighbourhood Policy: A Case-Study for Institutionalist Analysis?

PDF
  • Mor Sobol
Mor Sobol
Department of Diplomacy & International Relations, Tamkang University , Taiwan

Published 2024-06-25

Keywords

  • European Commission,
  • delegation,
  • European Neighbourhood Policy,
  • principal-agent,
  • historical institutionalism

How to Cite

The European Commission and the Establishment of the European Neighbourhood Policy: A Case-Study for Institutionalist Analysis?. (2024). Polish Yearbook of International Law, 43, 71–93. https://doi.org/10.24425/pyil.2024.152294

Abstract

Despite the mushrooming literature on the European Neighbourhood Policy (ENP) and its numerous problems, little attention has been given to the analysis of its origins. Upon examining the scholarship, two contending explanations emerge regarding the policy’s formulation stage. While one perspective maintains that the policy was influenced by the European Commission’s past experience, the other highlights how the policy was affected by the European Commission’s desire to expand its powers vis-à-vis other European Union (EU) actors. Against this backdrop, this paper first seeks to frame both perspectives in theoretical terms. Then, through process-tracing analysis and elite interviews, it aims to determine which theoretical model not only better explains the structure of the Neighbourhood Policy, but also evaluates the nature of the interaction between European Union Member States and the European Commission throughout the policy’s formulation stage. In doing so, the paper seeks to expand our knowledge of the ENP’s genesis, as well as highlight the efficacy of institutionalist analysis of the European Neighbourhood Policy.

PDF

References

  1. st Council meeting (General Affairs and External Relations), Luxembourg, 15 April 2002.
  2. st Council meeting (General Affairs and External Relations), Luxembourg, 15 April 2002.
  3. th Council meeting (General Affairs and External Relations), Luxembourg, 19 March 2003.
  4. nd Council meeting (General Affairs and External Relations), Luxembourg, 14 April 2003.
  5. Aspinwall M., Schneider G., Same menu, separate tables: The institutionalist turn in political science and the study of European integration, 38(1) European Journal of Political Research 1 (2000), pp. 1–36.
  6. Balfour R., Promoting human rights and democracy in the EU’s neighbourhood: tools, strategies and dilemmas, in: R. Balfour, A. Missiroli (eds.), Reassessing the European Neighbourhood Policy, EPC, Brussels: 2007, pp. 8–25.
  7. Baracani E., From the EMP to the ENP: New European pressure for democratisation? The case of Morocco, 1(2) Journal of Contemporary European Research 54 (2005), pp. 54–66.
  8. Berhold M., A Theory of Linear Proft-Sharing Incentives, 85(3) Quarterly Journal of Economics 460 (1971), pp. 460–482.
  9. Bicchi F., European Foreign Policy Making toward the Mediterranean, Palgrave MacMillan, Hampshire: 2007.
  10. Blockmans S., The Obsolescence of the European Neighbourhood Policy, Centre for European Policy Studies, Brussels: 2017.
  11. Bulmer S., The Governance of the European Union: A New Institutionalist Approach, 13(4) Journal of Public Policy 351 (1998), pp. 351–380.
  12. Cologne European Council, Conclusions of the Presidency, available at: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/summits/kol1_en.htm#:~:text=The%20European%20Council%20met%20in%20Cologne%20on%203 (accessed 30 August 2024).
  13. Comelli M., Article 8 TEU and the Revision of the European Neighbourhood Policy, in: L. Rossi, F. Casolari (eds.), The EU after Lisbon, Springer, Vienna: 2014, pp. 267–289.
  14. Cremona M., Hillion C., L’Union fait la force? Potential and Limitations of the European Neighbourhood Policy as an Integrated EU Foreign and Security policy, European University Institute, San Domenico di Fiesole: 2006.
  15. Delreux T., Kerremans B., How Agents Weaken their Principals’ Incentives to Control: The Case of EU Negotiators and EU Members in Multilateral Negotiations, 32(4) Journal of European Integration 357 (2010), pp. 357–374.
  16. Diedrichs U., Wessels W., The Commission and the Council, in: D. Spence, G. Edwards (eds.), The European Commission, John Harper Publishing, London: 2006, pp. 209–231.
  17. Edwards G., The Construction of Ambiguity and the Limits of Attraction: Europe and its Neighbourhood, 30(1) Journal of European Integration 45 (2008), pp. 45–62.
  18. Emerson M., Noutcheva G., Popescu N., European Neighbourhood Policy Two Years on: Time indeed for an ENP Plus, Centre for European Policy Studies, Brussels: 2007.
  19. Epstein D., O’Halloran S., Administrative Procedures, Information, and Agency Discretion, 38(3) American Journal of Political Science 697 (1994), pp. 697–722.
  20. European Commission, Agenda 2000: For a stronger and wider Union, Brussels, 15 July 1997, COM(1997) 2000 final.
  21. European Commission, European Neighbourhood Policy – Strategy Paper, 12 May 2004, COM (2004) 373 final, available at: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/EN/legal-content/summary/neighbourhood-policy-strategy-paper.html#:~:text=This%20document%20maps%20out%20the%20next%20steps%20in (accessed 30 August 2024).
  22. European Commission, Screening of the acquis, available at https://neighbourhood-enlargement. ec.europa.eu/enlargement-policy/glossary/screening-acquis_en (accessed 30 August 2024).
  23. European Commission, The Commission’s Work Programme for 2002, Brussels, 5 December 2001, COM(2001) 620 final.
  24. European Commission, Wider Europe: Neighborhood: A New Framework for Relations with our Eastern and Southern Neighbours, Brussels, 11 May 2003, COM(2003)104 final.
  25. European Council and the Council of the European Union, Copenhagen European Council, Presidency Conclusions, available at: https://www.consilium.europa.eu/media/21225/72921.pdf#:~:text=The%20European%20Council%20welcomed%20the%20presentation%20by%20President (accessed 30 August 2024).
  26. Garrett G., Tsebelis G., An Institutional Critique of Intergovernmentalism, 50 International Organization 269 (1996), pp. 269–299.
  27. Gebhard C., The ENP’s Strategic Conception and Design. Overstretching the Enlargement Template?, in: R. Whitman, S. Wolff (eds.), The European Neighbourhood Policy in Perspective – Context, Implementation and Impact, Palgrave Macmillan, Hampshire: 2010, pp. 89–109.
  28. Ghazaryan N., The European Neighbourhood Policy and the Democratic Values of the EU: A Legal Analysis, Hart Publishing, London: 2014.
  29. Hacker J.S., Pierson P., Thelen K., Drift and conversion: hidden faces of institutional change, in: J. Mahoney, K. Thelen (eds.), Advances in Comparative-Historical Analysis, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge: 2015, pp. 180–210.
  30. Hall P., Taylor R., Political Science and the Three New Institutionalisms, 44(5) Political Studies 936 (1996), pp. 936–957.
  31. Herman L., The European Neighbourhood Policy: An Action Plan or Plan for Action?, 11(3) Mediterranean Politics 371 (2006), pp. 371–394.
  32. Hillion C., Anatomy of EU norm export towards the neighbourhood: The impact of Article 8 TEU, in: R. Petrov, P. Van Elsuwege (eds.), Legislative Approximation and Application of EU Law in the Eastern Neighbourhood of the European Union, Routledge, London: 2014, pp. 13–20.
  33. Hillion C., The EU neighbourhood competence under Article 8 TEU, Policy Paper No. 69/2023, available at: https://institutdelors.eu/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/euneighbourhoodart8teu-hillion-ne-jdi-feb13-3.pdf (accessed 30 August 2024).
  34. Hollis R., Europe and the Middle East: Power by Stealth?, 73(1) International Affairs 15 (1997), p. 15–29.
  35. Hug S., Endogenous Preferences and Delegation in the European Union, 36(1/2) Comparative Political Studies 41 (2003), pp. 41–74.
  36. Hyde-Price A., A ‘tragic actor’? A realist perspective on ‘ethical power Europe’, 84(1) International Affairs 29 (2008), pp. 29–44.
  37. Ikenberry G.J., The Rise, Character, and Evolution of International Order, in: O. Fioretos, G.T Falleti, A. Sheingate (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Historical Institutionalism, Oxford University Press, Oxford: 2016, pp. 538–552.
  38. Jeandesboz J., Labelling the ‘Neighbourhood’: Towards a Genesis of the European Neighbourhood Policy, 10(4) Journal of International Relations and Development 387 (2007), pp. 387–416.
  39. Johansson-Nogués E., The EU and its neighbourhood: an overview, in: K. Weber, M. Smith, M. Baun (eds.), Governing Europe’s Neighbourhood: Partners or Periphery?, Manchester University Press, Manchester: 2007, pp. 21–35.
  40. Kassim H., Peterson J., Bauer M.W., Connolly S., Dehousse R., Hooghe L., Thompson A., Them European Commission of the twenty-frst century, Oxford University Press, Oxford: 2013.
  41. Kelly J., New Wine in Old Wineskins: Policy Adaptation in the European Neighbourhood Policy, 44(1) Journal of Common Market Studies 29 (2006), pp. 29–55.
  42. Kiewiet D., McCubbins M., The Logic of Delegation: Congressional Parties and the Appropriations Process, University of Chicago Press, Chicago: 1991.
  43. Klein N., European Agents out of Control? Delegation and Agency in the Civil-Military Crisis Management of the European Union 1999–2008, Nomos, Baden-Baden: 2010.
  44. Kochenov D., New developments in the European Neighbourhood Policy: Ignoring the problems, 9 Comparative European Politics 581 (2011), pp. 581–595.
  45. Kochenov D., The European Neighbourhood Policy: Pre-Accession Mistakes Repeated, in: E. Tulmets, L. Delcour (eds.), Pioneer Europe? Testing EU Foreign Policy in the Neighbourhood, Nomos, Baden-Baden: 2008, pp. 1–14.
  46. Kratochvil P., Tulmets E., Constructivism and Rationalism in EU External Relations. The Case of the European Neighbourhood Policy, Nomos, Baden-Baden: 2010.
  47. Krause A., The European Union’s Africa Policy: The Commission as Policy Entrepreneur in the CFSP, 8 European Foreign Affairs Review 221 (2003), pp. 221–237.
  48. Lavenex S., EU external governance in wider Europe, 11(4) Journal of European Public Policy 680 (2004), pp. 680–700.
  49. Leigh M., The European Neighbourhood Policy: A Suitable Case for Treatment, in: S. Gstohl, E. Lannon (eds.), The Neighbours of the European Union’s Neighbours: Diplomatic and Geopolitical Dimensions Beyond the European Neighbourhood Policy, Routledge, London: 2015, pp. 203–226.
  50. Lindh A., Pagrotsky L., EU’s relationship with its future neighbours following enlargement, Letter 7713/02, 8 April 2002.
  51. Lynch D., The new Eastern Dimension of the enlarged EU, in: J. Batt, D. Lynch, A., Missiroli, D. Triantaphyllou (eds.), Partners and Neighbours: A CFSP for a Wider Europe, European Union Institute for Security Studies, Brussels: 2003, pp. 34–59.
  52. Magen A., The Shadow of Enlargement: Can the European Neighbourhood Policy Achieve Compliance?, 12(2) The Columbia Journal of European Law 383 (2006), pp. 383–427.
  53. Majkowska-Szulc S., Wierczyńska K., European Neighbourhood Policy and EU Enlargement, in: A. van Aaken, P. d’Argent, L. Mälksoo, J.J. Vasel (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of International Law in Europe, Oxford Academic, Oxford: 2023.
  54. March G.J., Olsen J.P., The New Institutionalism: Organizational Factors in Political Life, 78(3) The American Political Science Review 734 (1984), pp. 734–749.
  55. McCubbins M., Schwartz T., Congressional Oversight Overlooked: Police Patrols versus Fire Alarms, 28 American Journal of Political Science 165 (1984), pp. 165–179.
  56. McCubbins M.D., Noll R.G., Weingast B.R., Administrative Procedures as Instruments of Political Control, 3(2) Journal of Law, Economics, & Organization 243 (1987), pp. 243–277.
  57. Nervi A., The Making of the European Neighbourhood Policy, Nomos, BadenBaden: 2011.
  58. Oppermann K., Salience and sanctions: a principal-agent analysis of domestic win-sets in two-level games – The case of British European policy under the Blair government, 21(2) Cambridge Review of International Affairs 179 (2008), pp. 179–197.
  59. Pace M., Norm Shifting from EMP to ENP: The EU as a Norm Entrepreneur in the South?, 20(4) Cambridge Review of International Affairs 659 (2007), pp. 659–675.
  60. Pelerin J., The ENP in Interinstitutional Competition – An Instrument of Leadership for the Commission?, in: D. Mahncke, S. Gstohl (eds.), Europe’s Near Abroad: Promises and Prospects of the EU’s Neighbourhood Policy, Peter Lang, Brussels: 2008, pp. 47–67.
  61. Peters B.G., Pierre J., King D.S., The Politics of Path Dependency: Political Conflict in Historical Institutionalism, 67(4) The Journal of Politics 1275 (2005), pp. 1275–1300.
  62. Petrov R., Van Elsuwege P., Article 8 TEU: towards a new generation of agreements with the neighbouring countries of the European Union?, 36 European Law Review 688 (2011), pp. 688–703.
  63. Pierson P., Politics in Time: History, Institutions, and Social Analysis, Princeton University Press, Princeton: 2004.
  64. Pierson P., Skocpol T., Historical Institutionalism in Contemporary Political Science, in: I. Katznelson, H.V. Milner (eds.), Political Science: State of the Discipline, W.W. Norton, New York: 2002, pp. 693–721.
  65. Pierson P., The Path to European Integration: A Historical Institutionalist Analysis, in: W. Sandholtz, A. Stone Sweet (eds.), European Integration and Supranational Governance, Oxford University Press, Oxford: 1998, pp. 27–58.
  66. Pollack M., Delegation, agency, and agenda setting in the European Union, 51(1) International Organization 99 (1997), pp. 99–134.
  67. Pollack M., The Engines of European Integration – Delegation, Agency, and Agenda Setting in the EU, Oxford University Press, Oxford: 2003.
  68. Pollack M., The New Institutionalism and European Integration, Oxford University Press, Oxford: 2008.
  69. Prodi R., A Wider Europe – A Proximity Policy as the Key to Stability, Speech at the Sixth ECSA-World Conference, 5 December 2002, available at: https://ec.europa.eu/commission/presscorner/detail/en/SPEECH_02_619 (accessed 30 August 2024).
  70. Prodi R., Europe and the Mediterranean: Time for Action, Speech at UCL Universite Catholique de Louvain-la-Neuve, EuroMed Report, 26 November 2002.
  71. Report to the European Council, ‘Common Strategies, 8 December 1998, document 13943/98.
  72. Ross S., The Economic Theory of Agency: The Principal’s Problem, 63(2) The American Economic Review 134 (1973). pp. 134–139.
  73. Schumacher T., The EU and its Neighbourhood: The Politics of Muddling Through, 58(1) Journal of Common Market Studies 187 (2020), pp. 187–201.
  74. Spencer C., The EU and Common Strategies: The Revealing Case of the Mediterranean, 6(1) European Foreign Affairs Review 31 (2001), pp. 31–51.
  75. Straw J., EU’s relationship with it future neighbours following enlargement (Ukraine, Belarus and Moldova), Letter 7703/02, 2002/04, available at: https://data.consilium.europa.eu/doc/document/ST-7703-2002-INIT/en/pdf#:~:text=Reform%20momentum%20in%20Ukraine%20and%20Moldova%20is%20uncertain (accessed: 30 August 2024).
  76. Streeck W., Thelen K., Introduction: Institutional Change in Advanced Political Economies, in: W. Streeck, K. Thelen (eds.), Beyond Continuity: Institutional Change in Advanced Political Economies, Oxford University Press, Oxford: 2005, pp. 1–39.
  77. Tallberg J., Delegation to Supranational Institutions: Why, How, and with What Consequences?, 25(1) West European Politics 23 (2002), pp. 23–46.
  78. Thatcher M., Stone Sweet A., Theory and practice of delegation to non-majoritarian institutions, 25(1) West European Politics 1 (2002), pp. 1–22.
  79. Thelen K., How Institutions Evolve: The Political Economy of Skills in Germany, Britain, the United States, and Japan, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge: 2004.
  80. Thelen K., Steinmo S., Historical Institutionalism in Comparative Politics, in: S. Steinmo, K. Thelen, F. Longstreth (eds.), Structuring Politics: Historical Institutionalism in Comparative Analysis, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge: 1992, pp. 1–32.
  81. Tsebelis G., The power of the European Parliament as a conditional agenda-setter, 88(1) The American Political Science Review 128 (1994), pp. 128–142.
  82. Tulmets E., Experimentalist governance in EU’s external relations: The cases of enlargement and of the European Neighbourhood Policy, Conference on “experimentalist governance” University of Madison, Wisconsin, 20–22 April 2007.
  83. Van Elsuwege P., Van der Loo G., Continuity and change in the legal relations between the EU and its neighbours: A result of path dependency and spill-over effects, in: D. Bouris, T. Schumacher (eds.), The Revised European Neighbourhood Policy: Continuity and Change in EU Foreign Policy, Palgrave Macmillan, London: 2017, pp. 97–116.
  84. Van Vooren B., EU External Relations Law and the European Neighbourhood Policy: A Paradigm for Coherence, Routledge, London: 2012.
  85. Vobruba G., Expansion without enlargement – Europe’s dynamism and the EU’s neighbourhood policy, EUROZINE, 28 Seprember 2007, available at: https://www.eurozine.com/expansion-withoutenlargement/ (accessed 30 August 2024).
  86. Wallace W., Looking After the Neighbourhood: Responsibilities for the EU-25, Notre Europe, Paris: 2003.
  87. Wolczuk K., Gamkrelidze T., Tyushka A., Waal T. de, Formulating Proposals for a More Effective Engagement with Neighbourhood Regions, ENGAGE, Barcelona: 2024.
  88. Zaiotti R., Of Friends and Fences: Europe’s Neighbourhood Policy and the Gated Community Syndrome, 29(2) Journal of European Integration 143 (2007), pp. 143–162.

Similar Articles

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.