Make a Submission
Vol. 36 (2016)
General Articles

The State between fact and law: the role of recognition and the conditions under which it is granted in the creation of new States

PDF
  • François Finck
François Finck
University of Strasbourg

Published 2016-12-31

Keywords

  • effectiveness,
  • constitutive effect,
  • non-recognized entitie,
  • recognition,
  • secession

Copyright (c) 2021 Polish Yearbook of International Law

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

How to Cite

The State between fact and law: the role of recognition and the conditions under which it is granted in the creation of new States. (2016). Polish Yearbook of International Law, 36, 51-81. https://doi.org/10.7420/pyil2016d

Abstract

This article explores the role of recognition in State creation. Basing on an analysis of relations between effectiveness and legality in the process of State creation, it claims that recognition is constitutive of statehood as a subject of international law. The research revolves around the following themes: the role of effectiveness criteria and the conditions of recognition set by international law, the existence of “statehood without effectiveness” in cases of limited effectiveness but general recognition, the study of acquisition of statehood as a process and the notion of collective recognition based on the cases of Kosovo and Palestine. The argumentation is also supported by the analysis of de facto entities and aspiring States in international practice. It draws on the distinction between legal non-recognition and political non-recognition as able to shed some light on the complexity of international practice in this area. The article concludes that recognition is a pre-requisite of statehood, an essential criterion that may overcome weak effectiveness in certain legal contexts, though not a lack of independence. Conversely, effectiveness of government authority over population and territory does not lead to statehood in the meaning of international law in the absence of international recognition.

PDF

References

  1. Ali N.Y.S., For Better or For Worse? The Forced Marriage of Sovereignty and Self-Determination, „Cornell International Law Journal” 2014, vol. 47, no. 2.
  2. Brownlie I., Recognition in Theory and Practice, „British Year Book of International Law” 1982, vol. 53, no. 1, pp. 197-211.
  3. Calus K., Power politics on the outskirts of the EU: Why Transnistria matters, LSEE blog, http://blogs.lse.ac.uk/lsee/2014/06/19/transnistria-power-politics/ [accessed: 30.05.2017].
  4. Christakis Th., quoted by Ouguergouz F. and Tehindrazanarivelo D. L., The Question of Secession in Africa [in:] Kohen (ed.), Secession – International Law Perspectives, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge 2006.
  5. Christakis Th., The State as a ‘Primary Fact’: Some Thoughts on the Principle of Effectiveness [in:] Marcelo G. Kohen (ed.), Secession – International Law Perspectives, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge 2006.
  6. Crawford J., Kosovo and the Criteria for Statehood in International Law [in:] M. Milanovic, M. Wood (eds.), The Law and Politics of the Kosovo Advisory Opinion, Oxford University Press, Oxford 2015.
  7. Crawford J., The Creation of States in International Law, Oxford University Press, Oxford 2007.
  8. D’Aspremont J., The International Law of Statehood: Craftsmanship for the Elucidation and Regulation of Births and Deaths in the International Society, „Connecticut Journal of International Law” 2014, vol. 29.
  9. Dugard J., Raic D., The Role of Recognition in the Law and Practice of Secession [in:] Kohen M. (eds.), Secession – International Law Perspectives, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge 2006.
  10. Dugard J., The Secession of States and Their Recognition in the Wake of Kosovo, „Collected Courses of the Academy of International Law” 2011.
  11. ECtHR, Cyprus v. Turkey, Judgment of 10 May 2001, Application no. 25781/94.
  12. ECtHR, Ilascu and Others v. Moldova and Russia, judgment of 8 July 2004, Application no. 48787/99.
  13. ECtHR, Loizidou v. Turkey, Judgment of 18 December 1996, Application no. 15318/89
  14. Farley B.R., Calling a State a State: Somaliland and International Recognition, „Emory International Law Review” 2010, vol. 24, no. 2.
  15. Frowein J.A., Recognition, in: Max Planck Encyclopedia of Public International Law, OPIL Oxford University Press, Oxford 2010.
  16. German-Polish Mixed Arbitral Tribunal, Deutsche Continental Gas-Gesellschaft v. Polish State, 1 August, 1929.
  17. Grant T., The Recognition of States: Law and Practice in Debate and Evolution, Praeger Publishers, Westport 1999.
  18. Hoogh A.J.J. de, Articles 4 and 8 of the 2001 ILC Articles on State Responsibility, the Tadic Case and Attribution of Acts of Bosnian Serb Authorities to the Federal Republic of Yugoslavia, „British Yearbook of International Law” 2001, vol. 72, no. 1, pp. 255-292.
  19. ICJ, Accordance with International Law of the Unilateral Declaration of Independence in respect of Kosovo, Advisory Opinion, 22 July 2010, ICJ Rep 2010.
  20. ICJ, Case Concerning Application of the Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide, Bosnia and Herzegovina v Serbia and Montenegro, Judgment of 27 February 2007, ICJ Rep 2007.
  21. ICJ, Kosovo Advisory Opinion, 22 July 2010.
  22. ICJ, Legal Consequences for States of the Continued Presence of South Africa in Namibia (South West Africa) notwithstanding Security Council Resolution 276 (1970), Advisory Opinion, ICJ Rep 1971.
  23. ICTY, Appeals Chamber, Prosecutor v. Dusko Tadic, 15 July 1999, IT-94-1-A.
  24. ICTY, Appeals Chamber, Zejnil Delalic and others (“Celebici camp” case), 20 February 2001, IT-96-21.
  25. ICTY, Chamber of 1st instance I, Prosecutor v. Tihomir Blaskic, 3 March 2000, IT-95-14.
  26. Kelsen H., The Law of Nations: A Critical Analysis of Fundamental Problems, Stevens & Sons, London 1951.
  27. Khasavyourt Joint Declaration and Principles for Mutual Relations: http://peacemaker.un.org/russia-khasavyourtdeclaration96 (accessed 30 May 2017).
  28. Koh H.H., Reflections on the Law and Politics of the Kosovo Case [in:] M. Milanovic, M. Wood (eds.), The Law and Politics of the Kosovo Advisory Opinion, Oxford University Press, Oxford 2015.
  29. Lupusor A., DCFTA in the Transnistrian Region: Mission Possible?, Policy Brief, Expert-Group, 20 September 2015, http://www.expert-grup.org/en/biblioteca/item/1173-implementare-aa-tran snistria&category=184 [accessed: 30.05.2017).
  30. PCA, Island of Palmas (or Miangas), United States of America v. Netherlands (arbitrator Max Huber), 4 April 1928.
  31. Peters A., Has the Advisory Opinion’s Finding that Kosovo’s Declaration of Independence was not Contrary to International Law Set an Unfortunate Precedent? [in:] M. Milanovic, M. Wood (eds.), The Law and Politics of the Kosovo Advisory Opinion, Oxford University Press, Oxford 2015.
  32. Summary of Practice of the Secretary-General as Depositary of Multilateral Treaties, doc. ST/ LEG/7/Rev.1.
  33. Talmon S., The Constitutive versus the Declaratory Theory of Recognition: Tertium non Datur?, „British Yearbook of International Law” 2004, vol. 75, no. 1, pp. 101-181.
  34. Tehindrazanarivelo D.L., The Question of Secession in Africa [in:] Kohen (ed.), Secession – International Law Perspectives, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge 2006.
  35. The page of Kosovian Ministry of Foreign Affairs and Diaspora: http://www.mfa-ks.net/?page=2,224 [accessed: 30.05.2017].
  36. UNGA Resolution 1514(XV), Declaration on the granting of independence to colonial countries and peoples.
  37. UNGA, resolution A/RES/67/19, 29 November 2012.
  38. Vidmar J., Explaining the Legal Effects of Recognition, „International and Comparative Law Quarterly” 2012, vol. 61, no. 2, pp. 361-387.
  39. Vidmar J., Palestine and the Conceptual Problem of Implicit Statehood, „Chinese Journal of International Law” 2013, vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 19-41.
  40. Vidmar J., Territorial Integrity and the Law of Statehood, „The George Washington International Law Review” 2013, vol. 44.
  41. Warbrick C., Recognition of States Part 2, 42 International and Comparative Law Quarterly 433 (1993) on British practice concerning the Republics of former Yugoslavia.
  42. Weiler J., Editorial, „European Journal of International Law” 2013, vol. 24, no. 1.
  43. Wood M., Macedonia [in:] Max Planck Encyclopaedia of Public International Law, OPIL Oxford University Press, Oxford 2010.
  44. Zyberi G., Membership in International Treaties of Contested States: The Case of the Permanent Court of Arbitration, ESIL Reflections No. 5, 10 March 2016.