Make a Submission
Vol. 41 (2021)
General Articles

The Missing Post-Holocaust Traces in Recent Case Law of the European Courts

PDF
  • Aleksandra Gliszczyńska-Grabias
Aleksandra Gliszczyńska-Grabias
Institute of Law Studies of the Polish Academy of Sciences (Warsaw)

Published 2022-06-30

Keywords

  • Holocaust,
  • boycotts,
  • ritual slaughter bans,
  • anti-discrimination law,
  • religious freedom

Copyright (c) 2022 Polish Yearbook of International

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

How to Cite

The Missing Post-Holocaust Traces in Recent Case Law of the European Courts. (2022). Polish Yearbook of International Law, 41, 213-234. https://doi.org/10.24425/PYIL.2022.142347

Abstract

The Holocaust constitutes one of the most powerful symbols in the history of humankind. Its memory, and in particular its irrefutable relationship with anti-Semitism, should trigger strict scrutiny every time anti-Semitic attitudes re-emerge, even if disguised as seemingly harmless words or actions. This applies also to legal measures, neutral on their face but which, in their consequences, may have an adverse effect on Jews, and thus raise the suspicion of anti-Semitic implications. Such implications are visible in the recent phenomena that serve as the two case studies for the present article: boycotts of Israel and bans on ritual slaughter (Shechita). While in the case of anti Israeli boycotts, the core arguments relate to international anti-discrimination law and policies, in relations to the Shechita bans claims about violation of the religious freedom of observant Jews prevail. At the same time, in both cases strong references to the Holocaust and the memory of its victims are being invoked, allowing one to raise objections as to the status of the relevant legal developments. Here again history and memory enter into the public and legal discussions, legislative processes, and courtrooms.

PDF

References

  1. Aghwan Z.A., Regenstein J. M., Slaughter practices of different faiths in different countries, 61(3) Journal of Animal Science and Technology 111 (2019), pp. 111-121.
  2. American Jewish Committee, A World Charter for Human Rights. The Story of the Consultants to the American Delegation to the United Nations Conference on International Organization and their Historic Achievement – The Inclusion of Human Rights Provisions in the Charter of the New World Organization, New York: 1948.
  3. American Jewish Committee, The Jewish Position at the United Nations Conference on International Organization. A Report to the Delegates of the American Jewish Conference, American Jewish Congress, New York: 1945.
  4. Bauer Y., Rethinking the Holocaust, Yale University Press, New Haven: 2000.
  5. Caldwell Z., Bill to criminalize male circumcision is still alive in Iceland, Aleteia, 29 May 2018, available at: https://bit.ly/3FDTLvb (accessed 30 June 2022).
  6. Cotler I., Combating State-Sanctioned Incitement to Genocide: A Legal and Moral Imperative, in: R. Provost, P. Akhavan (eds.), Confronting Genocide, Springer, New York: 2011.
  7. Council Regulation (EC) No 1099/2009 of 24 September 2009 on the protection of animals at the time of killing OJ L 303, 18.11.2009.
  8. Doe N., Law and Religion in Europe. A Comparative Introduction, Oxford University Press, Oxford: 2011.
  9. ECRI General Policy Recommendation no. 9 (revised) on preventing and combating antisemitism, CRI(2021)28, para. 10, p. 8, available at: https://edoc.coe.int/en/racism/10309-ecri-general-policyrecommendation-no-9-revised-on-preventing-and-combating-antisemitism.html (accessed 30 June 2022).
  10. ECtHR, Baldassi and Others v. France (App. No. 15271/16), 11 July 2020.
  11. ECtHR, Behar and Gutman v. Bulgaria (App. No. 29335/13), 16 February 2021.
  12. ECtHR, Cha’are Shalom Ve Tsedek v. France (App. No. 27417/95), 27 June 2000.
  13. ECtHR, Dimitras and Others v. Greece (App. Nos. 42837/06, 3269/07, 35793/07 and 6099/08), 3 June 2010.
  14. ECtHR, Garaudy v. France (App. No. 65831/01, decision on inadmissibility), 23 June 2003.
  15. ECtHR, Jehovah’s Witnesses of Moscow v. Russia (App. No. 302/02), 3 June 2010.
  16. ECtHR, M’Bala M’Bala v. France (App. No. 25239/13), 20 October 2015.
  17. ECtHR, Perry v. Latvia (App. No. 30273/03), 8 November 2007.
  18. ECtHR, Willem v. France (App. No. 10883/05), 10 December 2009.
  19. Eiglad E., The Anti-Jewish Riots in Oslo, Communalism Press, Porsgrunn: 2010.
  20. European Commission, Strategy on Combating Antisemitism and Fostering Jewish Life (2021-2030), Strasbourg, 5 October 2021, COM(2021) 615 final, available at: https://bit.ly/3Lic3DH (accessed 30 June 2022).
  21. Experiences and perceptions of antisemitism. Second survey on discrimination and hate crime against Jews in the EU, EU Fundamental Rights Agency Report 2018, available at: https://bit.ly/3kX0wil (accessed 30 June 2022).
  22. Fishman J.S., The BDS message of anti-Zionism, anti-Semitism, and incitement to discrimination, 18(3) Israel Affairs 412 (2012), p. 412-425.
  23. Fraser R., Anti-Shechita Prosecutions in the Anglo-American World, 1855-1913, Academic Studies Press, Boston: 2018.
  24. Garasic M.D., Keinan S., Boycotting Israeli Academia: Is Its Implementation Anti-Semitic?, 15(3) International Journal of Discrimination and the Law 189 (2015).
  25. Gliszczyńska-Grabias A., Memory Laws or Memory Loss? Europe in Search of its Historical Identity through the National and International Law, 34 Polish Yearbook of International Law 161 (2014), p. 161-186.
  26. Gliszczyńska-Grabias A., Never Again as a cornerstone of the Strasbourg system: the traces of the Holocaust in the jurisprudence of the European Court of Human Rights, in: H. Aust, E. Demir-Gürsel (eds.), The European Court of Human Rights: Current Challenges in Historical Perspective, Edward Elgar Publishing, Cheltenham: 2021.
  27. Gliszczyńska-Grabias A., Przeciwdziałanie antysemityzmowi. Instrumenty prawa międzynarodowego [Combating antisemitism. International law instruments], Wolters Kluwer, Warszawa: 2014.
  28. Glucksmann A., Rozprawa o nienawiści, Czytelnik, Warszawa: 2008.
  29. Greendorfer M.A., The BDS Movement: That Which We Call a Foreign Boycott, By Any Other Name, Is Still Illegal, 22(1) Roger Williams University Law Review 1 (2017), pp. 2-143.
  30. Hehemann L., Religious Slaughtering, a Stunning Matter: Centraal Israëlitisch Consistorie van België and Others, 6(1) European Papers 111 (2021).
  31. Heinze E., The Logic of Equality: A Formal Analysis of Non-Discrimination Law, Routledge, London: 2018.
  32. Joffre T., Greek court annuls permit for kosher, halal slaughter, The Jerusalem Post, 27 October 2021, available at: https://www.jpost.com/diaspora/greek-court-annuls-permit-for-kosher-halal-slaughter-683274 (accessed 30 June 2022).
  33. Julius A., Trials of the Diaspora: A History of Anti-Semitism in England, Oxford University Press, New York: 2010.
  34. Kushner T., Stunning Intolerance: A Century of Opposition to Religious Slaughter, 36 The Jewish Quarterly 216 (1989), pp. 16-20.
  35. Laquere W., The Changing Face of Anti-Semitism: From Ancient Times to the Present Day, Oxford University Press, New York: 2008.
  36. Lyons H., Belgium’s Jews lament ban on ritual slaughter, Politico, 10 October 2021, available at: https://www.politico.eu/article/belgium-jewish-community-ritual-slaughter-ban-antwerp/ (accessed 30 June 2022).
  37. Ministry of Strategic Affairs and Public Diplomacy of Israel, Behind the Mask. The Antisemitic Nature of BDS Exposed, 2019, available at: https://4il.org.il/wp-content/uploads/2019/09/MSA-report-Behind-the-Mask.pdf (accessed 30 June 2022).
  38. Philogos, What Is the Source of the Phrase “Never Again”?, Mosaic, 21 June 2017, available at: https://bit.ly/3Pewt3t (accessed 30 June 2022).
  39. Proskauer J.M., A Segment of My Times, Farrar, New York: 1950.
  40. Rosenfeld A., The Holocaust and Beginning of a New Antisemitism, in: A. Rosenfeld (ed.), Resurgent Atisemitism. Global Perspectives, Indiana University Press, Bloomington: 2013.
  41. Rovinsky J.A., Don’t have cow, Flanders: Guidance for the European Court of Justice as it considers the Flemish parliament’s ban on ritual slaughter, 97(2) University of Detroit Mercy Law Review 353 (2020).
  42. Rovinsky J.A., The Cutting Edge: The Debate over Regulation of Ritual Slaughter in the Western World, 45(1) California Western International Law Journal 79 (2014).
  43. Rudnicki S., Anti-Jewish Legislation in Interwar Poland, in: R.E. Blobaum (ed.), Antisemitism and its Opponents in Modern Poland, Cornell University Press, Ithaca and London: 2005.
  44. Sadurski W., Gliszczyńska-Grabias A., The Law of Ritual Slaughter and the Principle of Religious Equality, 4 Journal of Law, Religion and State 233 (2016), pp. 233-266.
  45. Statement by the World Jewish Congress, 17 December 2020, available at: https://bit.ly/3La97sl (accessed 30 June 2022).
  46. The European Convention for the Protection of Animals for Slaughter, 10 May 1979, ETS No. 102.
  47. United Nations, Throughout History Anti-Semitism Unique Manifestation Of Hatred, Intolerance, Persecution Says Secretary-General In Remarks To Headquarters Seminar, available at: http://www.un.org/press/en/2004/sgsm9375.doc.htm (accessed 30 June 2022).
  48. van der Schyff G., Reviewing the recent Ban on Ritual Slaughter in Flanders, Verfassungsblog, 16 August 2017, available at: https://verfassungsblog.de/reviewing-the-recent-ban-on-ritual-slaughter-inflanders/ (accessed 30 June 2022).
  49. Waldron J., The Harm in Hate Speech, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA: 2012.
  50. Wiesel E., Night, Macmillan, New York: 2006.

Similar Articles

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.