Published
2017-12-31
Keywords
- EU obligations,
- legitimacy,
- Member State interests,
- proportionality
Abstract
This article investigates the engagement of EU law with the interests represented and pursued by the Member States within the framework of the European Union. In principle, because the interests which the Member States feed into the EU governance machinery are formulated in political processes at the national level, and thus possess paramount political legitimacy, EU law may only interact with those interests when a clear and sufcient mandate has been provided for doing so. Such mandates follow from Treaty provisions or EU legislation. They embody common political agreements among the Member States by which they commit themselves to realising the specifc interests they share, as well as achieving related common policy objectives. In practice, however, the boundaries of EU law’s mandate are difficult to determine with precision, and this may weaken the legitimacy of EU law’s interventions. The weaker legitimacy of the law raises particular problems in the law of the Single Market, where the interests pursued by national governments are subjected to filtering, moderation, and even transformation by the Court of Justice.
References
- Barnard C., Derogations, Justifcations and the Four Freedoms: Is State Interest Really Protected?, [in:] C. Barnard, O. Odudu (eds.), The Outer Limits of European Union Law, Hart Publishing, Oxford 2009, pp. 273–306.
- Bermann G.A., Proportionality and Subsidiarity, [in:] C. Barnard, J. Scott (eds.), The Law of the Single European Market, Hart Publishing, Oxford 2002.
- Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 4 May 1993, Federación de Distribuidores Cinematográficos v Estado Español and Unión de Productores de Cine y Televisión. Case C-17/92, ECLI:EU:C:1993:172.
- Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 5 October 1994, TV10 SA v Commissariaat voor de Media. Case C-23/93, ECLI:EU:C:1994:362
- Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 15 November 2007. International Mail Spain SL v Administración del Estado and Correos. Case C-162/06, ECLI:EU:C:2007:681.
- Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 2 June 2005, Commission of the European Communities v Italian Republic. Case C-174/04, ECLI:EU:C:2005:350.
- Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 14 February 2008, Commission of the European Communities v Kingdom of Spain. Case C-274/06, ECLI:EU:C:2008:86.
- Judgment of the Court of 11 July 1985, Cinéthèque SA and others v Fédération nationale des cinémas français. Joined cases 60 and 61/84, ECLI:EU:C:1985:329.
- Judgment of the Court of 17 June 1997, Sodemare SA, Anni Azzurri Holding SpA and Anni Azzurri Rezzato Srl v Regione Lombardia. Case C-70/95, ECLI:EU:C:1997:301.
- Judgment of the Court of 23 October 1997, Commission of the European Communities v Kingdom of the Netherlands. Case C-157/94, ECLI:EU:C:1997:499.
- Judgment of the Court of 23 October 1997, Commission of the European Communities v French Republic. Case C-159/94, ECLI:EU:C:1997:501.
- Judgment of the Court of 26 June 1997, Vereinigte Familiapress Zeitungsverlags- und vertriebs GmbH v Heinrich Bauer Verlag. Case C-368/95, ECLI:EU:C:1997:325.
- Judgment of the Court of 4 June 2002, Commission of the European Communities v Portuguese Republic. Case C-367/98, ECLI:EU:C:2002:326.
- Schwarze J., Die Abwägung von Zielen der Europäischen Integration und Mitgliedstaatliche Interessen in der Rechtsprechung des EUGH, „Europarecht” 2013, vol. 48, no. 3, pp. 285 – 306.
- Tridimas T., The General Principles of EU Law, Oxford University Press, Oxford 2007.