Make a Submission
Vol. 37 (2017)
General Articles

Past Conflicts, Present Uncertainty: Legal Answers to the Quest for Information on Missing Persons and Victims of Enforced Disappearance. Three Case Studies from the European Context

PDF
  • Alessandra La Vaccara
Alessandra La Vaccara
Graduate Institute of International and Development Studies
okładka

Published 2017-12-31

Keywords

  • armed conflicts,
  • International humanitarian Law,
  • European Court of Human Rights,
  • continuing violation doctrine,
  • intertemporal law,
  • missing persons,
  • enforced disappearances,
  • Kaprolat/hasselmann incident,
  • Spanish Civil War,
  • Katyń
    • ...More
    Less

Copyright (c) 2021 ILS PAS

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

How to Cite

Past Conflicts, Present Uncertainty: Legal Answers to the Quest for Information on Missing Persons and Victims of Enforced Disappearance. Three Case Studies from the European Context. (2017). Polish Yearbook of International Law, 37, 35-70. https://doi.org/10.7420/pyil2017b

Abstract

This article is intended to provide a legally sound explanation of why and how the contemporary International Humanitarian Law and International Human Rights Law legal frameworks offer tools to address the uncertainty, lack of information, and the consequences thereof in relation to missing persons and victims of enforced disappearances in the context of armed conflicts which predated the adoption of such frameworks. To this end, three scenarios will be examined: the contemporary claims of the families of those who were killed in the Katyń massacre in 1940; the claims for information and justice of the families of thousands who were subjected to enforced disappearances during the Spanish Civil War between 1936 and 1939; and the identifcation efforts concerning those reported missing while involved in military operations in the context of the 1944 Kaprolat/Hasselmann incident which took place during the Second World War. Te analysis of these scenarios is conducive to the development of more general reflections that would feed into the debate over the legal relevance of the distant past in light of today’s international legal framework

PDF

References

  1. Advisory Opinion of Inter-American Court of Human Rights in case of¬ Interpretation of the American Declaration of the Rights and Duties of Man within the Framework of Article 64 of the ACHR Requested by the Government of the Republic of Colombia (Doc no. OC-10/89), 1989.
  2. Amnesty International, Written Observations. Case of Janowiec and Others v. Russia ¬ App Nos 55508/07 and 29520/09, 2012.
  3. Article I(a) of the Convention on the Non-Applicability of Statutory Limitations to War Crimes and Crimes Against humanity, 26 November 1968, UN Doc. A/7218.
  4. Bugnion F., Jus ad bellum, jus in bello and non¬international armed conflicts, „Yearbook of International Humanitarian Law, 2003, vol. 6, pp. 167-198.
  5. Burgorgue-Larsen L., de Torres A.U., & Greenstein R., The Inter¬American Court of Human Rights: Case Law and Commentary, Oxford University Press, Oxford 2011.
  6. Cassese A., The Human Dimension of International Law: Selected Papers of Antonio Cassese, Oxford University Press, Oxford 2008.
  7. Causa General informativa de los hechos delictivos y otros aspectos de la vida en la zona roja desde el 18 de julio de 1936 hasta la liberación, Decreto del Ministerio de Justicia, 26 April 1940, http://www.causageneral.org/ [accessed 30 June 2018].
  8. Committee on Enforced Disappearances (CED), Concluding Observations on the Report Submitted by Spain under Article 29, Paragraph 1, of the ICPPED, UN Doc CeD/C/eSP/CO/1, 2013.
  9. Convention for the Protection of All Persons from enforced Disappearance (ICPPeD), 2006.
  10. Corten O. & Klein P., The Vienna Conventions on the Law of Treaties: A Commentary, vol. I, Oxford University Press, Oxford 2011.
  11. Decision of European Court of Human Rights in case of Antonio Gutiérrez Dorado and Carmen Dorado Ortiz v. Spain (App. No. 30141/09), 27 March 2012.
  12. Decision on the Defence Motion for Interlocutory Appeal on Jurisdiction of International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia, Prosecutor v. Duško Tadič aka ‘Dule’ (Case no. It-94-1-A), 1995.
  13. Ferrandiz F., Exhumaciones y relatos de la derrota en la Espana actual, „Revista de Historia Jeronimo Zurita 2009, vol. 84, pp. 135-161.
  14. Gillespie A., A History of the Laws of War, Volume 1: The Customs and Laws of War with Regards to Combatants and Captives, Hart Publishing, Oxford and Portland 2011.
  15. Henckaerts J.-M. and Doswald-Beck L., Customary International Humanitarian Law, Volume 1: Rules, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge 2005.
  16. ICMP, Under a Foreign Flag by Rene Huel, 2015, http://www.icmp.int/news/under-aforeign-flag/ [accessed 30 June 2018].
  17. ICRC - Advisory Service on IHL, Missing Persons and Teir Families (2015), https://bit.ly/2IUhVDU [accessed 30 June 2018].
  18. Institut de Droit International (IDI), Resolution on the Inter¬-Temporal Problem in Public International Law, 1975.
  19. Judgement of Inter-American Court of Human Rights Gomes¬Lund and Others (Guerrilha do Araguaia) v. Brazil (Series C No. 219), Preliminary Objections, Merits, reparations and Costs, 2010.
  20. Judgment of European Court of Human Rights in case of Loizidou v. Turkey (App. No. 15318/89), 28 November 1996.
  21. Judgment of European Court of Human Rights in case of Janowiec and Others v. Russia (App No. 55508/08 and others), Grand Chamber, 21 October 2013.
  22. Judgment of European Court of Human Rights in case of McCann and Others v. the UK (App. No. 19009/04), 13 May 2008.
  23. Judgment of European Court of Human Rights in case of Tyrer v. The UK (App. No. 5856/72), 15 March 1978.
  24. L. Doswald-Beck, Human Rights in Times of Conflict and Terrorism, Oxford University Press, Oxford 2011.
  25. Ley 52/2007, de 26 de diciembre, por la que se reconocen y amplían derechos y se establecen medidas en favor de quienes padecieron persecución o violencia durante la guerra civil y la dictadura, Agencia estatal Boletín Ofcial del estado, https://www.boe.es/diario_boe/txt.php?id=BOe-A-2007-22296 [accessed 30 June 2018].
  26. McCrory S., The International Convention for the Protection of All Persons from Enforced Disappearance, „Human Rights Law Review” 2007, vol. 7. no. 3, pp. 545–566.
  27. Morild I. et al., Identifcation of Missing Norwegian World War II Soldiers, in Karelia Russia, „Journal of Forensic Sciences” 2015, vol. 60, no. 4.
  28. Ofcial Documents and Proceedings of the Trial of the Major War Criminals before the International Military Tribunal, 14 November 1945–1 October 1946, Nuremberg 1947.
  29. Pauwelyn J., The Concept of a “Continuing Violation” of an International Obligation: Selected Problems, „British Yearbook of International Law” 1996, vol. 66, no. 1, pp. 415-450.
  30. Permanent Court of Arbitration, Island of Palmas Case (United States of America v. The Netherlands), Award of the Tribunal, 1928.
  31. R. Higgins, Temes and Teories: Selected Essays, Speeches and Writings in International Law, Oxford University Press, Oxford 2009.
  32. Report of International Court of Justice in case of Barcelona Traction Light and Power Co, Ltd (Belgium v. Spain), Merits, Judgment, 5 February 1970.
  33. Report of the UN Working Group on Enforced and Involuntary Disappearance (WGEID), Addendum – Mission to Spain, UN Doc A/hrC/27/49/Add.1, 2014.
  34. Sandoz Y. et al., Commentary on the Additional Protocols: Of 8 June 1977 to the Geneva Conventions of 12 August 1949, Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, Geneva 1987.
  35. Separate Opinion of Judge Cançado trindade in case of Blake v. Guatemala (Series C No. 36), Merits, IACtHR 1998.
  36. Separate Opinion of Judge Cançado trindade in case of Blake v. Guatemala (Series C No. 27), Preliminary Objections, IACtHR 1996
  37. Shelton D., Regional Protection of Human Rights, Oxford University Press, New York 2008.
  38. The European Court of Human Rights, in the case of Janowiec and Others v. Russia, Applications nos. 55508/07 and 29520/09, 2012.
  39. Trial of the Major War Criminals before the IMT, Nuremberg, 14 November 1945 – 1 October 1946, Official Documents and Proceedings, Nuremberg 1947.
  40. UN Commission on human rights, Promotion and Protection of Human Rights: Impunity. Add. 1 “Updated Set of Principles for the Protection and Promotion of Human Rights through Action to Combat Impunity (Orentlicher Principles)”, UN Doc e/CN.4/2005/102/Add.1, 2005.
  41. UN Commission on human rights, Report of the Inter¬Sessional Open¬Ended Working Group to Elaborate a Draft Legally Binding Normative Instrument for the Protection of All Persons from Enforced Disappearances UN Doc. e/CN.4/2003/71, 2003.
  42. UN Working Group on Enforced or Involuntary Disappearances, General Comment on Enforced Disappearance as a Continuous Crime, UN Doc A/HRC/16/48, 2011.
  43. Veum E., Giske Opptrer Arrogant (Giske Acting Arrogant), NRK 15.06.2008, https://www.nrk.no/norge/-giske-opptrer-arrogant-1.6010263 [accessed 30 June 2018].

Similar Articles

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.