Make a Submission
Vol. 36 (2016)
General Articles

“Social Dumping” and “Letterbox Companies” – Interdependent or Mutually Exclusive Concepts in European Union Law?

PDF
  • Joanna Ryszka
Joanna Ryszka
University of Opole

Published 2016-12-31

Keywords

  • EU Internal Market freedoms,
  • letterbox companies,
  • minimum wages,
  • posting of workers,
  • social dumping

Copyright (c) 2021 ILS PAS

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

How to Cite

“Social Dumping” and “Letterbox Companies” – Interdependent or Mutually Exclusive Concepts in European Union Law?. (2016). Polish Yearbook of International Law, 36, 209-229. https://doi.org/10.7420/pyil2016j

Abstract

This article investigates two interesting phenomena which exist within the framework of the European Union (EU) integration process, i.e. “social dumping” and “letterbox companies”. Taking into account recent EU legislative changes and commentaries in the available legal literature, it contends that the EU’s institutions and its Member States are aware of some negative effects that these phenomena may have for attaining one of the EU’s basic aims, that of a “highly competitive social market economy”, as provided in Article 3(3) (ex 2, as amended) of the Treaty on the European Union. The EU should be understood as being not only focused on the implementation of the Internal Market freedoms, but also the protection of social rights. “Social dumping”, and to a certain extent also “letterbox companies”, reduce the level of this protection. Posting of workers is a good example of an EU integration area where “social dumping” and “letterbox companies” occur on a quite large scale and create some real practical problems. If we can clearly understand the concepts underlying these phenomena and their possible relationships, it would be easier to find a solution to reduce their negative effect on the protection of social rights. This article researches these issues and presents possible solutions to problems they give rise to.

PDF

References

  1. Barnard C., Regulating Competitive Federalism in the European Union? The case of EU Social Policy [in:] M. Shaw (ed.), Social Law and Policy in an Evolving European Union, Hard Publishing, Oxford-Portland 2000.
  2. Barnard C., Social Dumping Revisited: Some Lessons from Delaware (Lecture at the ECSA’s Sixth Biennial International Conference, 2-5 June 1999, Pittsburgh, USA), http:/aei.pitt.edu/id/eprint/2222 [accessed: 30.05.2017].
  3. Barnard C., The Substantive Law of the EU. The Four Freedoms, Oxford University Press, New York 2013.
  4. Bercusson B., The Lisbon Treaty and Social Europe, „ERA Forum”, 2009, no. 10.
  5. Bernaciak M., Social dumping: political catchphrase or threat to labour standards?, ETUI Working Paper, 2012/6.
  6. Biermeyer T., Shaping the Space of Cross-border Conversions in the EU, „Common Market Law Review” 2013, vol. 50, no. 2, pp. 571-589.
  7. Commission Staff Document: Impact Assessment, Revision of the legislative framework concerning the posting of workers in the context of the provision of services, SWD (2012)63.
  8. Craig P., Búrca G. De, EU Law. Text, Cases and Materials, Oxford University Press, New York 2008.
  9. Cremers J., Letter-box companies and abuse of the posting rules: how the primacy of economic freedoms and weak enforcement give rise to social dumping, „ETUI Policy Brief. European Economic, Employment and Social Policy” 2014, no. 5.
  10. Dølvik J.E., Visser J., Free movement, equal treatment and worker’s rights: can the European Union solve its trilemma of fundamental principles?, „Industrial Relations Journal” 2009, vol. 40, no. 6, pp. 491-509.
  11. Dyrberg P., Full free movement of companies in the European Community at last?, „European Law Review” 2003, vol. 28.
  12. ETUC action program 2015-2019’, http://www.etuc.org/sites/www.etuc.org/files/other/files/20151007_action_programme_en-consolidated_0.pdf [accessed: 30.05.2017].
  13. ETUC position on the implementation of Directive 96/71/EC concerning the posting of workers in the framework of the provision of services, Brussels, 14-15 March 2006, http://www.etuc.org/documents/etuc-position-implementation-directive-9671ec-concerning-posting-workers-framework [accessed: 30.05.2017].
  14. ETUC response to ECJ judgments Viking and Laval. Resolution adopted by the ETUC Executive Committee, http://www.etuc.org/sites/www.etuc.org/files/ETUC_Viking_Laval_-_resolution_07038_2.pdf [accessed: 30.05.2017].
  15. ETUC, Free movement, yes! Social dumping, no! Workers in Europe are suffering from social dumping, 2015, http://www.etuc.org/sites/www.etuc.org/files/publication/files/flyer_social_dumping_en_06.pdf [accessed: 30.05.2017].
  16. European Commission, Press release: Transport: Commission launches infringement case on the application of the German Minimum Wage law to the transport sector, available at” http://www.europa.eu/rapid/press-release_IP-15-5003_en.htm [accessed: 30.05.2017].
  17. European Parliament resolution of 14 January 2014 on effective labour inspections as a strategy to improve working conditions in Europe, P7_TA-PROV(2014)0012).
  18. Horspool M., Humphreys M., European Union Law, Oxford University Press, New York 2014.
  19. http://www.doingbusiness.org/rankings [accessed: 10.05.2016].
  20. http://www.ec.europa.eu/eurostat/statisticsexplained/index.php/Minimum_wage_statistic [accessed: 30.05.2017].
  21. Hyman R., Trade Unions, Lisbon and Europe 2020: From Dream to Nightmare, „The International Journal of Comparative Labour Law and Industrial Relations” 2012, vol. 28, no. 1.
  22. Janssens Ch., The Principle of Mutual Recognition in EU Law, Oxford University Press, New York 2013.
  23. Krings T., Varieties of social dumping in an open labour market: The Irish experience of large-scale immigration and the regulation of employment standards, ETUI Policy Brief. European Economic, „Employment and Social Policy”, 2014, no. 6.
  24. Letter to the European Commission on the position of nine Ministers of the Member States opposed to the revision of the basic directive on the posting of workers, http://www.inicjatywa.eu/wp-content/uploads/2015/11/STANOWISKO-Stanowisko-ministrów-9.-państw-członkowskich-sprzeciwiające-sięrewizji-dyrektywy-podstawowej-o-delegowaniu-pracowników.pdf [accessed: 30.05.2017].
  25. Letter to the European Commission on the position of seven Ministers of the Member States opposed to the revision of the basic directive on the posting of workers, http://www.zmpd.pl/aktualnosci_pliki/f-GLOWNY-921-1126-6673.pismo_7_ministrow.pdf [accessed: 30.05.2017].
  26. Maslauskaitė K., Social competition in the EU. Myths and realities, „Studies & Reports” 2013, no. 6.
  27. Mörsdorf O., The Legal Mobility of Companies within the European Union through Cross Border Conversion, „Common Market Law Review” 2012, vol. 49, no. 2, pp. 629-670.
  28. Paschalidis P., Freedom of Establishment and Private International Law for Corporations, Oxford University Press, Oxford 2011.
  29. Peijpe T. Van, Collective Labour Law after Viking, Laval, Rüffert, and Commission v. Luxembourg, „The International Journal of Comparative Labour Law and Industrial Relations” 2009, vol. 25, no. 2, pp. 81-107.
  30. Pelkmans J., Mutual Recognition: economic and regulatory logic in goods and services, „Bruges European Economics Research Papers” 2012, no. 24.
  31. Posting of workers – part of the expected Labour Mobility Package, European Parliamentary Research Service, September 2015, point 9, http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/etudes/BRIE/2015/558784/EPRS_BRI(2015)558784_EN.pdf [accessed: 30.05.2017].
  32. Report from the Commission to the European Parliament and the Council on the State of the Union Road Transport Market, COM(2014) 222 final.
  33. Report from the Commission. Monitoring the application of European Union law 2015 Annual Report, COM(2016) 463 final.
  34. Schwarz S., Zapobieganie obchodzeniu przepisów o delegowaniu przez spółki-skrzynki pocztowe w projekcie dyrektywy wdrożeniowej w zakresie delegowania (Preventing circumvention of the rules on hosting by letterbox companies in the draft of the implementation of the directive on the posting of workers), http://www.inicjatywa.eu/wp-content/uploads/2013/06/Opinia-na-temat-definicjisp%C3%B3%C5%82ek-skrzynek-pocztowych-Inicjatywa-Mobilno%C5%9Bci-Pracy2.pdf [accessed: 30.05.2017].
  35. Sørensen K.E., The fight against letterbox companies in the Internal Market, „Common Market Law Review” 2015, vol. 52, no. 1, pp. 85-118.
  36. Tans S., Case Report on Laval, 18 December 2007 (Case C-341/05) and Viking, 11 December 2007 (Case C-438/05), „European Journal of Migration and Law” 2008, vol. 10, no. 2 pp. 249-275.
  37. The European Commission White Paper on European Social Policy – A Way Forward for the Union, COM(94) 333 final.
  38. The posting of workers in the framework of the provision of services, Opinion of the Committee of the Regions, point 8 (2013/C 17/12).
  39. Verschueren H., The European Internal Market and the Competition Between Workers, „European Labour Law Journal” 2015, vol. 6, no. 2.
  40. Weatherill S., Cases & Materials on EU Law, Oxford University Press, New York 2012.
  41. Wymeersch E., The Transfer of the Company’s Seat in European Company Law, „Common Market Law Review” 2003, vol. 40, no. 3.

Similar Articles

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.