Vol. 35 (2015)
General Articles

Patterns of Democracy in the Case Law of the EU Court of Justice and the European Court of Human Rights

Stefania Ninatti
University of Milano-Bicocca
Maurizio Arcari
University of Milano-Bicocca

Published 2016-06-30

Keywords

  • CJEU,
  • democracy,
  • European Union,
  • Court of Justice of the European Union,
  • European Convention on Human Rights,
  • European Court of Human Rights
  • ...More
    Less

How to Cite

Patterns of Democracy in the Case Law of the EU Court of Justice and the European Court of Human Rights. (2016). Polish Yearbook of International Law, 35, 171-192. https://doi.org/10.7420/pyil2015f

Abstract

This article attempts to discover the key elements of the democratic principle, as described by the judges sitting in Luxembourg and Strasbourg, whose case law reveals the underlying idea of democracy at the supranational level. Until recently the debate on democracy was limited to the national level. But things are changing, and this article shows the gradual emergence of a process led by supranational courts, in which the application of the democratic principle finds multiple grades and variations. In this way the supranational/international courts have opened a new chapter in the process of constitutionalization of international law.

References

  1. Case C-658/11 European Parliament v. Council of the European Union [2014].
  2. Chamon M., The institutional balance, an Ill-fated principle of the EU Law?, “European Public Law” 2015, vol. 21, no. 2, pp. 371–391.
  3. Commission to the European Parliament and the Council “A new EU framework to strengthen the rule of law” COM(2014) 158 final/2 19.3.2014.
  4. Conway G., Recovering a separation of powers in the European Union, “European Law Journal” 2011, vol. 17, no. 3, pp. 304–322.
  5. Council of Copenhagen (7-8 April 1978), http://aei.pitt.edu/1440/1/Copenhagen_1978.pdf [access: 20.04.2016].
  6. Craig P., Burca G. De, The Evolution of EU Law, Oxford University Press, Oxford 1999.
  7. Dahl R.A., A democratic dilemma: System effectiveness versus citizen participation, “Political Science Quarterly” 1994, vol. 109, no. 1, pp. 23–34.
  8. European Court of Human Rights (Grand Chamber), Refah Partisi (The Welfare Party) and Others v. Turkey (App. Nos. 41340/98, 41342/98, 41343/98 and 41344/98), 13 February 2003.
  9. European Court of Human Rights, Castells v. Spain (App. No. 11798/85), 23 April 1992.
  10. European Court of Human Rights, Frodl v. Austria (App. No. 20201/04), 8 April 2010.
  11. European Court of Human Rights, Greens and M.T. v. the United Kingdom (App. Nos. 60041/08 and 60054/08), 23 November 2010.
  12. European Court of Human Rights, Grosaru v. Romania (App. No. 78039/01), 2 March 2010.
  13. European Court of Human Rights, Hajili v. Azerbaijan (App. No. 6984/06), 10 January 2012.
  14. European Court of Human Rights, Handyside v. United Kingdom (App. No. 5439), 7 December 1976.
  15. European Court of Human Rights, Hirst v. United Kingdom (no 2) (App. No. 74025/01), Grand Chamber, 6 October 2005.
  16. European Court of Human Rights, http://www.echr.coe.int [access: 2015].
  17. European Court of Human Rights, Lingens v. Austria (App. No. 9815/82), 8 July 1986.
  18. European Court of Human Rights, Mathieu-Mohin and Clerfayt v. Belgium (App. No. 9267/81), 2 March 1987.
  19. European Court of Human Rights, Murat Vural v. Turkey (App. No. 9540/07), 21 October 2014.
  20. European Court of Human Rights, Observer and Guardian v. United Kingdom (App. No. 13585/88), 26 November 1991.
  21. European Court of Human Rights, Scoppola v. Italy (App. No. 126/05), 22 May 2012.
  22. European Court of Human Rights, United Communist Party of Turkey and Others v. Turkey (App. No. 19392/1992), 30 January 1998.
  23. European Court of Human Rights, Yumak and Sadak v. Turkey (App. No. 10226/03), Grand Chamber, 8 July 2008.
  24. European Court of Human Rights, Zdanoka v. Latvia (App. No. 58278/00), Grand Chamber, 16 March 2006.
  25. Fox G.H., Nolte G., Intolerant democracies [in:] G.H. Fox, B.R. Roth (eds.), Democratic Governance and International Law, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge 2000.
  26. Harris D., O’Boyle M., Warbrick C., Law of the European Convention on Human Rights, Oxford University Press, Oxford 2014.
  27. Hong Q.L., Constitutional review in the mega-leviathan: A democratic foundation for the European Court of Justice, “European Law Journal” 2010, vol. 16, no. 6, pp. 695–716.
  28. Judgment of 6 October 2015, Case C-650/13 Thierry Delvigne v. Commune de Lesparre-Médoc, Préfet de la Gironde [2015].
  29. Judgment of the Court of 11 June 1991, Case C-300/89 Commission of the European Communities v. Council of the European Communities [1991], ECR I-02867.
  30. Judgment of the Court of 14 April 2015, Case C-409/13 Council v. Commission [2015].
  31. Judgment of the Court of 16 October 2012, Case C-614/10 Commission v. Austria [2012].
  32. Judgment of the Court of 17 October 2013, Case C-280/11 P Council of European Union v. Access Info Europe [2013].
  33. Judgment of the Court of 19 July 2012, Case C-130/10 Parliament v. Council [2012].
  34. Judgment of the Court of 21 July 2011, Case C-506/08 Kingdom of Sweden v. European Commission and MyTravel Group plc. [2011] I-06237.
  35. Judgment of the Court of 21 October 2008, Cases C-200/07 and C-201/07 Alfonso Luigi Marra v. Eduardo De Gregorio and Antonio Clemente [2008], ECR I-07929.
  36. Judgment of the Court of 23 April 1986, Case C-294/83 Parti Ecologiste ‘Les Verts’ v. European Parliament [1986], ECR 01339.
  37. Judgment of the Court of 24 January 2014, Case C-270/12 UK and Northern Ireland v. European Parliament and Council of the European Union [2014].
  38. Judgment of the Court of 29 March 2011, Case C-352/09 P Thyssen Krupp Nirosta GmbH v. European Commission [2011], ECR I-02359.
  39. Judgment of the Court of 29 October 1980, Case C-138/79SA Roquette Freres v. Council of the European Communities [1980], ECR 3333.
  40. Judgment of the Court of 29 October 1980, Case C-139/79 Maizena GmbH v. Council of the European Communities [1980], ECR 3393.
  41. Judgment of the Court of 29 September 1976, Case C-54/75 Raphael De Dapper and others v. European Parliament [1976], ECR 01381.
  42. Judgment of the Court of 6 December 2001, Case C-353/99 P Council of the European Union v. Heidi Hautala [2001], ECR I-09565.
  43. Judgment of the Court of 6 March 2003, Case C-41/00 P Interporc Im-und Export GmbH v. Commission of the European Communities [2003], ECR I-02125.
  44. Judgment of the Court of 6 September 2011, Case C-163/1 Criminal Proceedings against Aldo Patriciello [2011], ECR I-07565.
  45. Judgment of the Court of 9 March 2010, Case C-518/07 Commission v. Germany [2010], ECR I-01885.
  46. Judgment of the Court of First Instance of 10 January 2006, Case C-344/04 The Queen v. Department of Transport [2006], ECR I-00403.
  47. Judgment of the Court of First Instance of 14 December 2006, Case T-237/02 Technische Glaswerke Ilmenau GmbH v. Commission of the European Communities [2006], ECR II-05131.
  48. Judgment of the Court of First Instance of 2 October 2001, Cases T-222/99, T327/99, T-329/99 Jean-Claude Martinez, Charles de Gaulle, Front national and Emma Bonino and others v. European Parliament [2001], ECR II-02823.
  49. Judgment of the Court of First Instance of 22 March 2011, Case T-233/09 Access Info Europe v. Council of the European Union [2011], ECR II-01073.
  50. Judgment of the Court of First Instance of 26 February 2002, Case T-17/00 Willi Rothley and others v. European Parliament [2002], ECR II-00579.
  51. Judgment of the Court of First Instance of 27 November 2007, T-3/00 and T-337/04 Athanasios Pitsiorlas v. Council of the European Union and European Central Bank II [2007], ECR II-04779.
  52. Judgment of the Court of First Instance of 8 November 2007, Case T-194/04 Bavarian Lager Co. Ltd v. Commission of the European Communities [2007], ECR II-04523.
  53. Judgment of the Tribunal of the First Instance of 17 June 1998, Case T-135/96 Union Européenne de l’artisanat et des petites et moyennes entreprises (UEAPME) v. Council of the European Union [1998], ECR II-02335.
  54. Lenaerts K., The principle of democracy in the case-law of the European Court of Justice, “International and Comparative Law Quarterly” 2013, vol. 62, no. 2, pp. 271–315.
  55. Mancini F., Democracy and the European Court of Justice [in:] F. Mancini (ed.), Democracy and Constitutionalism in the European Union, Hart Publishing, Oxford 2000.
  56. Marks S., The European Convention on Human Rights and its “Democratic Society”, “British Yearbook of International Law” 1996, vol. 66, pp. 209–238.
  57. Marquand D., Parliament for Europe, J Cape, London 1979.
  58. Mowbray A., Contemporary aspects of the promotion of democracy by the European Court of Human Rights, “European Public Law” 2014, vol. 20, no. 3, pp. 469–498.
  59. Opinion concerning the rule of law in Poland, http://europa.eu/rapid/press-release_IP-16-2015_en.htm [access: 2015].
  60. Opinion of Advocate General Jääskinen of 18 December 2014, Case C-409/13 Council v. Commission.
  61. Pustorino P., Detainees’ Right to Vote between CJEU and ECtHR case-law, in SIDIBlog (blog of the Italian Society of International Law), 6 November 2015, www.sidi-isil.org/sidiblog/?p=1620 [access: 20.04.2016].
  62. Rainey B., Wicks E., Ovey C., Jacobs, White & Ovey: The European Convention on Human Rights, Oxford University Press, Oxford 2014.
  63. Sottiaux S., Rummens S., Concentric democracy: Resolving incoherence in the European Court of Human Rights’ case law on freedom of expression and freedom of association, “International Constitutional Law Journal” 2012, vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 106–126.
  64. Stein E. [in:] Thoughts from a bridge: A retrospective of writings on new Europe and American Federalism, The University of Michigan Press, Ann Arbor 2000.
  65. Stein E., International integration and democracy: No love at first sight, “American Journal of International Law” 2001, vol. 95, no. 3, pp. 489–534.
  66. Wallace H., Transparency and the legislative process in the European Union [in:] J. Rideau (ed.), La transparence dans l’Union Européenne. Mithe ou principe juridique?, LGDJ, Paris 1998.
  67. Weiler J.H.H., Trachtman J.P., European constitutionalism and its discontents, “Northwestern Journal of International Law & Business” 1997, vol. 17, no. 2–3, pp. 354–397.