Make a Submission
Vol. 36 (2016)
Polish Practice

Judgement of the Supreme Court, dated 17 February 2016 (Ref. no. WA 16/15)

PDF
  • Agata Kleczkowska
Agata Kleczkowska
Institute of Law Studies of the Polish Academy of Sciences

Published 2016-12-31

Copyright (c) 2021 ILS PAS

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

How to Cite

Judgement of the Supreme Court, dated 17 February 2016 (Ref. no. WA 16/15). (2016). Polish Yearbook of International Law, 36, 267-276. https://doi.org/10.7420/pyil2016n

Abstract

In its Judgment of 17 February 2016, the Polish Supreme Court adjudicated the case of Polish soldiers accused of crimes committed in the village of Nangar Khel in Afghanistan in 2007. Ultimately, the Supreme Court found that Polish soldiers were guilty of, inter alia, breach of Article 318 of the Polish Penal Code, which stipulates that a soldier commits a crime even when executing an order if he is aware of this crime. However, the part of the judgment devoted to the problem of unlawful orders is very limited and almost completely lacks references to international law. The Supreme Court could have referred to a number of international legal acts, starting from the beginning of 20th century and up to the more recent regulations, including those in the Rome Statute. Moreover, the Supreme Court did not use international case law. As a result, the argumentation of the Supreme Court should be assessed as limited and unconvincing.

PDF

References

  1. Convention against Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment, 1465 UNTS 85.
  2. Decyzja Nr 445/MON z dnia 30 grudnia 2013 r. w sprawie wprowadzenia do użytku Regulaminu Ogólnego Sił Zbrojnych Rzeczypospolitej Polskiej, Dziennik Urzędowy Ministra Obrony Narodowej, 2013.12.30, poz. 398. – załącznik [Decision No. 445/MON of December 30, 2013, Official Journal of the Minister of National Defense, 2013.12.30, item 398. – annex].
  3. Draft Additional Protocols to the Geneva Conventions of August 12, 1949, Commentary, Geneva 1973.
  4. Draft Code of Offences against the Peace and Security of Mankind, Yearbook of the International Law Commission, vol. II, United Nations, New York 1954.
  5. Gaeta P., The Defence of Superior Orders: The Statute of the International Criminal Court versus Customary International Law, „European Journal of International Law” 1999, vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 172-191.
  6. German War Trials: Judgment in the Case of Lieutenants Dithmar and Boldt: Hospital Ship ‘Llandovery Castle’ Rendered July 16, 1921, „The American Journal of International Law” 1922, vol. 16, no. 4, pp. 708-724.
  7. Grześkowiak A., Wiak K. (eds.), Kodeks karny. Komentarz [Penal Code. Commentary], CH Beck, Warszawa 2016.
  8. International Committee of the Red Cross (ICRC), Protocol Additional to the Geneva Conventions of 12 August 1949, and relating to the Protection of Victims of Non-International Armed Conflicts (Protocol II), 8 June 1977, 1125 UNTS 609, http://www.refworld.org/docid/3ae6b37f40.html [accessed: 30.05.2017].
  9. International Committee of the Red Cross (ICRC), Rule 154, Obedience to Superior Orders, https://ihl-databases.icrc.org/customary-l/eng/docs/v1_rul_rule154 [accessed: 30. 05.2017].
  10. International Committee of the Red Cross, Practice Relating to Rule 155. Defence of Superior Orders, available at: https://ihl-databases.icrc.org/customaryihl/eng/docs/v2_rul_rule155 [accessed: 30.05.2017].
  11. International Conferences (The Hague), Hague Convention (IV) Respecting the Laws and Customs of War on Land and Its Annex: Regulations Concerning the Laws and Customs of War on Land, 18 October 1907, http://www.refworld.org/docid/4374cae64.html [accessed: 30.05.2017].
  12. International Convention for the Protection of All Persons from Enforced Disappearance, 2716 UNTS 3.
  13. Judgment in the Trial of the Major War Criminals before the International Military Tribunals, Nuremberg 14 November 1945 – 1 October 1946, Nuremberg 1947.
  14. Karski K., The Katyn Crime under Nuremberg Principles [in:] M.B. Szonert (ed.), Katyn: State-Sponsored Extermination, Libra Institute, Cleveland 2012.
  15. Principles of International Law Recognized in the Charter of the Nürnberg Tribunal and in the Judgment of the Tribunal, Yearbook of the International Law Commission, vol. II, United Nations, New York 1950.
  16. Principles of International Law Recognized in the Charter of the Nürnberg Tribunal and in the Judgment of the Tribunal, Yearbook of the International Law Commission, vol. II, United Nations, New York 1950.
  17. Schindler D., Toman J., The Laws of Armed Conflicts, Martinus Nihjoff Publisher, Leiden/Boston 1988.
  18. Smolarek K., Analiza historyczno-prawna wyłączenia odpowiedzialności karnej podwładnego działającego na rozkaz przełożonego w prawie karnym [Historic and legal analysis of the exemption from criminal liability of a subordinate acting upon a superior’s order in criminal law], „Zeszyty Naukowe Wyższej Szkoły Oficerskiej Wojsk Lądowych” 2013, no. 2.
  19. Solis G.D., The Law of Armed Conflicts: International Humanitarian Law in War, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge 2010.
  20. Statute of the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda (as last amended on 13 October 2006), http://www.refworld.org/docid/3ae6b3952c.html [accessed: 30.05.2017].
  21. Statute of the International Criminal Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia http://www.icty.org/x/file/Legal%20Library/Statute/statute_sept09_en.pdf [accessed: 30.05.2017].
  22. Statute of the Special Court for Sierra Leone, http://www.refworld.org/docid/3dda29f94.html [accessed: 30.05.2017].
  23. Statute of the Special Tribunal for Lebanon, S/RES/1757 (2007).
  24. The Prosecutor v. Drazen Erdemovic, Sentencing Judgment, 29 November 1996, Case IT-96-22-T.
  25. The Prosecutor v. Drazen Erdemovic, Sentencing Judgment, 5 March 1998, Case IT-96-22-Tbis.
  26. Vordeen M. van, Rozkaz wojskowy jako instytucja prawa karnego: podstawowe zagadnienia [Military orders as an institution of the criminal law - fundamental issues], „Studia Prawnoustrojowe” 2014, vol. 23, pp. 63-73.
  27. Zimmermann A., Superior Orders [in:] A. Cassese, P. Gaeta, J.R. W.D. Jones (eds.), The Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court: A Commentary, Volume II, Oxford University Press, Oxford 2002.