Prześlij tekst
Nr 2 (134) (2023)
Articles

Repair of procurement damage: discussion on the basis of the supreme court’s Resolution of 25 February 2021 (III CZP 16/20)

PDF (Angielski)
  • Robert Siwik
Robert Siwik
Institute of Law Studies, Polish Academy of Scineces

Opublikowane 2023-03-25

Słowa kluczowe

  • public procurement,
  • compensation,
  • tort liability,
  • harmonization of law with the EU

Prawa autorskie (c) 2023 Contemporary Central & East European Law

Creative Commons License

Utwór dostępny jest na licencji Creative Commons Uznanie autorstwa 4.0 Międzynarodowe.

Jak cytować

Repair of procurement damage: discussion on the basis of the supreme court’s Resolution of 25 February 2021 (III CZP 16/20). (2023). Contemporary Central & East European Law, 2 (134), 33–41. https://doi.org/10.37232/cceel.2023.03

Abstrakt

The text discusses the judgement of Supreme Court’s resolution regarding compensation for damages resulting from violations of public procurement laws by contracting authorities. The resolution clarifies that contractors can seek damages without first obtaining rulings from appeal or complaint procedures. The absence of specific regulations in both previous and current legislation regarding compensation claims further underscores the importance of this ruling. The text examines the implications of the ruling on the public procurement system, emphasizing the need for alignment with EU directives and consideration of civil law liability for damages. Author also suggests the necessity of legislative amendments to address the legal gap and ensure effective remedies for aggrieved contractors, echoing similar practices in other European countries.

PDF (Angielski)

Bibliografia

  1. Austrian Procurement Act of 2018 [2018] BVergG 65.
  2. Council Directive of 21 December 1989, on the coordination of the laws, regulations and administrative provisions relating to the application of review procedures to the award of public supply and public works contracts (89/665/EEC) [1989] OJ EU L 395/33.
  3. Directive 2007/66/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 December 2007 amending Council Directives 89/665/EEC and 92/13/EEC on improving the effectiveness of appeal procedures for the award of public contracts [2007] OJ EU L 335/31.
  4. Judgment CJEU C-465/11 EU:C:2012:801.
  5. Judgment of the German Federal Court X ZR 124/18 [2019], <https://juris.bundesgerichtshof.de/cgi-bin/rechtsprechung/document.py?Gericht=bgh&Art=en&sid=edd18be659e623bfccb2e2317ff9649a&nr=101051&pos=0&anz=1> accessed 15 Dec 2023.
  6. Judgment of the PSC III CZP 16/20 [2020], <https://www.sn.pl/sprawy/SitePages/Zagadnienia_prawne_SN.aspx?ItemSID=1355-301f4741-66aa-4980-b9fa-873e90506a11&ListName=Zagadnienia_prawne&Rok=2020> accessed 15 Dec 2023.
  7. Konstytucja Rzeczypospolitej Polskiej z 2 kwietnia 1997 r. [Polish Constitution of 2 April 1997] [1997] JoL 78, 483.
  8. The judgment of the Federal Court of Justice XIII ZR 20/19 [2021], <https://juris.bundesgerichtshof.de/cgi-bin/rechtsprechung/document.py?Gericht=bgh&Art=en&Datum=Aktuell&Sort=12288&nr=126099&pos=20&anz=833> accessed 15 Dec 2023.
  9. The opinion of Advocate General Collins C-547/22 EU:C:2023:967.
  10. The opinion of Advocate General P. Cruz Villalón C-568/08 EU:C:2013:325.
  11. The ruling PSC IV CSK 115/14 [2014].
  12. Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union OJ EU C 326/47 [2012].
  13. Ustawa z dnia 11 września 2019 r. – Prawo zamówień publicznych [Public Procurement Law of 11 September 2019] [2019] JoL 2019.
  14. Ustawa z dnia 23 kwietnia 1964 r. – Kodeks cywilny [Civil Code of 23 April 1964] [2023] JoL 1610 [consolidated text].
  15. Ustawa z dnia 29 stycznia 2004 r. Prawo zamówień publicznych [Public Procurement Law of 29 January 2004] [2019] JoL 1843 [consolidated text].