Make a Submission
Vol. 43 (2023)
General Articles

What is “A Certain International Criminal Court” and does the Choice of a Fully International or Internationalized (Hybrid) Court/Chambers Matter for the Crime of Aggression Committed Against Ukraine?

PDF
  • Milan Lipovský
Milan Lipovský
Charles University in Prague

Published 2024-06-25

Keywords

  • certain international criminal court,
  • crime of aggression,
  • fully international,
  • hybrid,
  • immunities

How to Cite

What is “A Certain International Criminal Court” and does the Choice of a Fully International or Internationalized (Hybrid) Court/Chambers Matter for the Crime of Aggression Committed Against Ukraine?. (2024). Polish Yearbook of International Law, 43, 213–238. https://doi.org/10.24425/PYIL.2024.152299

Abstract

When the International Court of Justice issued its Arrest Warrant Judgment in 2002, it indicated that personal immunities do not prevent proceedings in front of “certain international criminal courts” and provided three demonstrative examples of such courts.

After the full-scale invasion of Ukraine commenced in February 2022, debates ensued regarding the elements necessary to qualify a court within the meaning of the Arrest Warrant Judgment. They particularly concern two types of tribunals (“fully international” and “hybrid / internationalized”). This article suggests that only fully international courts qualify as “certain international criminal courts”, while hybrid tribunals are far too attached to the sovereignty of State(s) to meet its criteria. The determination of a court as hybrid or international is rather fluid however, and the qualification as “a certain international criminal court” depends on various elements (the establishing mechanism; applicable law; and reflection of the will of the international community) in each individual case.

PDF

References

  1. Agreement between the United Nations and the Royal Government of Cambodia Concerning the Prosecution under Cambodian Law of Crimes Committed During the Period of Democratic Kampuchea (adopted 6 June 2003, entered into force 29 April 2005) 2329 UNTS 117.
  2. Corten O., Koutroulis V., Tribunal for the crime of aggression against Ukraine – a legal assessment, Think Tank European Parliament, 14 December 2022, available at: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/thinktank/en/document/EXPO_IDA(2022)702574 (accessed 30 August 2024).
  3. Crawford J., Brownlie’s Principles of Public International Law, Oxford University Press, Oxford: 2012.
  4. ECCC (The Law on the Establishment of Extraordinary Chambers in the Courts of Cambodia for the Prosecution of Crimes Committed During the Period of Democratic Kampuchea, NS/RKM/0801/12 and NS/RKM/1004/006, 10 August 2001, available at: https://www.eccc.gov.kh/en/document/legal/law-on-eccc (accessed 30 August 2024).
  5. Genocide Convention (Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide (adopted 9 December 1948, entered into force 12 January 1951) 78 UNTS 277.
  6. Grzebyk P., Crime of Aggression against Ukraine. The Role of Regional Customary Law, 21 Journal of International Criminal Justice 435 (2023), pp. 435–459.
  7. Hamilton R., Ukraine’s Push to Prosecute Aggression Implications for Immunity Ratione Personae and the Crime of Aggression, 55 Case Western Reserve Journal of International Law 39 (2023), pp. 39–59.
  8. Hansler J., US announces it supports creation of special tribunal to prosecute Russia for ‘crime of aggression’ in Ukraine, CNN Politics, 28 March 2023, available at: https://tinyurl.com/49kp256n (accessed 30 August 2024).
  9. Hathaway O., The Case for Creating an International Tribunal to Prosecute the Crime of Aggression Against Ukraine (Part I). An agreement between the United Nations and Ukraine can pave the way, Just Security, 20 September 2022, available at: https://tinyurl.com/c8d3cj5b (accessed 30 August 2024).
  10. Hathaway O.A., Mills M., Zimmerman H., The Legal Authority to Create a Special Tribunal to Try the Crime of Aggression Upon the Request of the UN General Assembly, Just Security, 5 March 2023, available at: https://tinyurl.com/ycy85psp (accessed 30 August 2024).
  11. Heller K.J., The Best Option: An Extraordinary Ukrainian Chamber for Aggression, Opinio Juris, 16 March 2022, available at: https://tinyurl.com/y9a73nev (accessed 30 August 2024).
  12. Homepage (ECCC), available at: https://www.eccc.gov.kh/en (accessed 30 August 2024).
  13. Homepage (ICTY), available at: https://www.icty.org/ (accessed 30 August 2024).
  14. Homepage (International Residual Mechanism for Criminal Tribunals , including the ICTR), available at: https://unictr.irmct.org/ (accessed 30 August 2024)
  15. Homepage (Kosovo Specialist Chambers), available at: https://www.scp-ks.org/en (accessed 30 August 2024).
  16. Homepage (Residual SCSL), available at: https://rscsl.org (accessed 30 August 2024).
  17. ICC webpage, available at: https://www.icc-cpi.int/situations/ukraine,(accessed 30 August 2024).
  18. ICC, Prosecutor v. Omar Hassan Ahmad Al-Bashir, ICC-02/05-01/09 OA2, 18 June 2018, Written observations of prof. Claus Kreß as amicus curiae.
  19. ICJ, Arrest Warrant of 11 April 2000 (Democratic Republic of Congo v. Belgium), Judgment, 14 February 2002, ICJ Rep 2002.
  20. ICJ, Arrest Warrant of 11 April 2000 (Democratic Republic of Congo v. Belgium), Judgment, 14 February 2002, ICJ Rep 2002, Dissenting opinion of Judge ad hoc Van den Wyngaert.
  21. ICJ, Effects of awards of compensation made by the UN Administrative Tribunal, Advisory Opinion, 13 July 1954, ICJ Rep 1954.
  22. ICTR (Resolution 955 (1994), 8 November 1994, S/RES/955 (1994)
  23. ILC, Immunity of State ofcials from foreign criminal jurisdiction. Texts and titles of the draft articles adopted by the Drafting Committee on frst reading, A/CN.4/L.969, 31 May 2022.
  24. Johnson L.D., United Nations Response Options to Russia’s Aggression: Opportunities and Rabbit Holes, Just Security, 1 March 2022, available at: https://tinyurl.com/2f69ujx6 (accessed 30 August 2024).
  25. Joint Concurring Opinion of Judges Eboe-Osuji, Morrison, Hofmański and Bossa to ICC, The Prosecutor v. Omar Hassan Ahmad Al-Bashir, ICC-02/05-01/09-397-Corr, Appeals Chamber, Judgment, 6 May 2019.
  26. Just Security, available at: https://www.justsecurity.org/82513/just-securitys-russia-ukraine-war-archive/ (accessed 30 August 2024).
  27. Kreicker H., Immunities, in: C. Kreß, S. Barriga (eds.), The Crime of Aggression: A Commentary, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge: 2017, pp. 675–703.
  28. Kreß C., Article 98, in: K. Ambos (ed.), Rome Statute of the ICC, Beck/Hart/Nomos, Munchen, Portland, BadenBaden: 2022, paras. 126–130.
  29. Kreß C., Hobe S., Nußberger A., The Ukraine War and the Crime of Aggression: How to Fill the Gaps in the International Legal System, Just Security, Just Security, 23 January 2023, available at: https://tinyurl.com/mtd4fbtd (accessed 30 August 2024).
  30. Labuda P.I., Countering Imperialism in International Law: Examining the Special Tribunal for Aggression against Ukraine through a Post-Colonial Eastern European Lens, 49 Yale Journal of International Law 272 (2024), pp. 272–310.
  31. Labuda P.I., Making Counter-Hegemonic International Law: Should A Special Tribunal for Aggression be International or Hybrid?, Just Security, 29 September 2023, available at: https://tinyurl.com/56uzpu53 (accessed 30 August 2024).
  32. McDougall C., Why Creating a Special Tribunal for Aggression Against Ukraine is the Best Available Option: A Reply to Kevin Jon Heller and Other Critics, Opinio Juris, 15 March 2022, available at: https://tinyurl.com/53fnawaa (accessed 30 August 2024).
  33. McDougall C.. Why Ukraine needs an international – not internationalised – tribunal to prosecute the crimes of aggression committed against it, 12(2) Polish Review of International and European Law 65 (2023), pp. 65–91.
  34. Ministerial side-event by Liechtenstein and Germany on the occasion of the 25th anniversary of the Rome Statute – The ICC and the Crime of Aggression: In Defense of the UN Charter, UN Web TV, 17 July 2023, available at: https://media.un.org/en/asset/k1m/k1mdo8poz5 (accessed 30 August 2024).
  35. Opening Statement before the International Military Tribunal in Nuremberg, Robert H. Jackson center, 21 November 1945, available at: https://tinyurl.com/fvjpxvsp (accessed 30 August 2024).
  36. Opinio Juris, available at: http://opiniojuris.org/category/topics/international-criminal-law/ (accessed 30 August 2024).
  37. Reisinger Coracini A., Trahan J., The Case for Creating a Special Tribunal to Prosecute the Crime of Aggression Committed against Ukraine. Part VI: On the Non-Applicability of Personal Immunities, Just Security, 8 November 2022, available at: https://tinyurl.com/275dj58j (accessed 30 August 2024).
  38. Reisinger Coracini A., Wrange P., The Specifcity of the Crime of Aggression, in: C. Kreß, S. Barriga (eds.), The Crime of Aggression: A Commentary, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge: 2017, pp. 307–350.
  39. Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court (adopted 17 July 1998, entered into force 1 July 2002), 2187 UNTS 3.
  40. Schabas W., The Special Tribunal for Lebanon: Is a ‘Tribunal of an International Character’ Equivalent to an ‘International Criminal Court’?, 21 Leiden Journal of International Law 513 (2008), pp. 513–528.
  41. SCSL, Prosecutor v. Charles Ghankay Taylor, SCSL-2003-01-I, 31 May 2004, Appeals Chamber’s Decision on Immunity from Jurisdiction.
  42. SCSL, Prosecutor v. Charles Ghankay Taylor, SCSL-2003-01-I, Submissions of the Amicus Curiae on Head of State Immunity by Phillippe Sands and Alison Macdonald.
  43. Situation in Ukraine: ICC judges issue arrest warrants against Vladimir Vladimirovich Putin and Mariam Alekseyevna Lvova-Belova, ICC, 17 March 2023, available at: https://tinyurl.com/482mc3jt (accessed 30 August 2024).
  44. Statutes of the ICTY (Resolution 827 (1993), 25 May 1993, S/RES/827 (1993).
  45. Statutes of the SCSL (Annex to the Agreement between the United Nations and the Government of Sierra Leone on the establishment of a Special Court for Sierra Leone (adopted 16 January 2002, entered into force 12 August 2002), 2178 UNTS 137.
  46. Svaček O., Al-Bashir and the ICC – Tag, Hide-and-Seek … or Rather Blind Man’s Bluff?, in: P. Šturma (ed.), The Rome Statute of the ICC at Its Twentieth Anniversary. Achievements and Perspectives, Brill/Nijhoff, Leiden /Boston: 2019, pp. 177–190.
  47. Trahan J., The Need for an International Tribunal on the Crime of Aggression regarding the Situation in Ukraine, 46 Fordham International Law Journal 671 (2023), pp. 671–689.
  48. Uhlířová K., Head of State Immunity in International Law. The Charles Taylor Case before the Special Court for Sierra Leone, Masarykova Univerzita, Brno: 2013, available at: https://tinyurl.com/4vv34s8c (accessed 30 August 2024).
  49. UNSC Resolution 1315 (2000), 14 August 2000, S/RES/1315 (2000).
  50. Wintour P., UK offers qualifed backing for tribunal to prosecute Russia’s leaders, The Guardian, 20 January 2023, available at: https://tinyurl.com/y5b58fn7 (accessed 30 August 2024).

Similar Articles

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.