Over the last three years European Union (EU) law has experienced a veritable revolution triggered by the Court of Justice’s rethinking of the fundamental aspects underpinning both the EU’s competence to deal with Rule of Law matters (especially related to the independence and the irremovability of judges at the national level), and the substantive understanding of the key elements of the Rule of Law pertaining to the newly-found competence. An upgraded approach to interim relief in matters related to the Rule of Law completes the picture. As a result, EU law has gone through a profound transformation and the assumptions as to the perceived limits of its reach – insofar as the organization of the national judiciaries is concerned – no longer hold. However, there is also the opposite side to this “Rule of Law revolution.” While its effectiveness in terms of bringing recalcitrant Member States back on track has not been proven (and Poland and Hungary stand as valid reasons for doubts); the division of powers between the Member States and the EU has been altered forever. Rule of Law thus emerges as a successful pretext for a supranational powergrab in the context of EU federalism. The picture is further complicated by the fact that the substantive elements of the Rule of Law required by the Court of Justice of the European Union of the Member States’ judiciaries are seemingly perceived as inapplicable to the supranational level itself. These include structural independence from other branches of power and safeguards of the guarantees of irremovability and security of tenure of the members of the judiciaries. Taking all these elements into consideration, the glorious revolution appears to have triggered at least as many questions as it has provided answers, while being entirely unable to resolve the outstanding problems on the ground in the Member States experiencing significant backsliding in the areas of democracy and the Rule of Law.
A question from D. Kochenov to V. Jourová at CEU Democracy Institute discussion The Future of Democracy in EU Member States (published on YouTube on 1 March 2021), https://bit.ly/3nPLFXn at 43:37.
Adamski D., The Social Contract of Democratic Backsliding in the “New EU” Countries, „Common Market Law Review” 2019, nr 53, s. 623-665.
Blauberger M., Kelemen R.D., Can Courts Rescue National Democracy? Judicial Safeguards against Democratic Backsliding in the EU, „European Journal of Public Policy” 2017, t. 24, nr 3, s. 321-336.
Blokker P., Building Democracy by Legal Means? The Contestation of Human Rights and Constitutionalism in East-Central Europe, „Journal of Modern European History” 2020, t. 18, nr 3, s. 335-351.
Blokker P., EU Democratic Oversight and Domestic Deviation from the Rule of Law, [w:] C. Closa, D. Kochenov (red.), Reinforcing Rule of Law Oversight in the European Union, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge 2016.
Blokker P., Populist Counter-Constitutionalism, Conservatism, and Legal Fundamentalism, „European Constitutional Law Review” 2019, t. 15, nr 3, s. 519-543.
Böse M., The European Arrest Warrant and the Independence of Public Prosecutors: OG & PI, PF, JR & YC’, „Common Market Law Review” 2020, nr 57, s. 1259-1282.
Case 26/62 NV Algemene Transport- en Expeditie Onderneming van Gend & Loos v. Netherlands Inland Revenue Administration, ECLI:EU:C:1963:1, 5 February 1963.
Case C-274/14 Banco de Santander SA ECLI:EU:C:2019:802, 1 October 2019.
Case C-286/12 Commission v. Hungary (Judicial Retirement Age), EU:C:2012:687, 6 November 2012.
Closa B., Reinforcing of EU Monitoring of the Rule of Law, [w:] C. Closa, D. Kochenov (red.), Reinforcing Rule of Law Oversight in the European Union, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge 2016.
Closa C., Kochenov D., Weiler J.H.H., Reinforcing the Rule of Law Oversight in the European Union, EUI RSCAS Research Paper No. 25/2014, https://cadmus.eui.eu/bitstream/handle/1814/30117/RSCAS_2014_25_FINAL.pdf?sequence.
Dawson J., Hanley S., What’s Wrong with East-Central Europe? The Fading Mirage of the “Liberal Consensus”, „Journal of Democracy” 2016, nr 27, s. 20-34.
de Visser M., A Critical Assessment of the Rule of the Venice Commission in Processes of Domestic Constitutional Reform, „American Journal of Comparative Law” 2015, t. 63, nr 4, s. 963-1008, https://www.venice.coe.int/cocentre/A_Critical_Assessment_of_the_Role_of_the_Venice_Commission.pdf.
Editorial Comments, EU Law between Common Values and Collective Feelings, „Common Market Law Review” 2018, nr 55, s. 1329-1340.
European Court of Human Rights, Oleksandr Volkov v. Ukraine (App. No. 21722/11), 9 January 2013.
European Court of Human Rights, Parlov-Tkalčić v. Croatia (App. No. 24810/06), 22 December 2009.
Janse R., De renaissance van de Rechtsstaat, Open Universiteit, Heerlen 2018.
Joined Cases C-508/18 OG (Public Prosecutor’s office of Lübeck) and C-82/19 PPU PI (Public Prosecutor’s office of Zwickau) and Case C-509/18, PF (Prosecutor General of Lithuania).
Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber), Case C-441/17 Commission v. Poland, Order of the Court of 20 November 2017, ECLI:EU:C:2018:255, 17 April 2018.
Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber), Case C-64/16 Associação Sindical dos Juízes Portugueses v. Tribunal de Contas, EU:C:2018:117, 27 February 2018.
Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber), Case C-896/19 Repubblika v. Il-Prim Ministru, ECLI:EU:C:2021:311, 20 April 2021.
Kakouris C.N., La Cour de Justice des Communautés européennes comme cour constitutionnelle. Trois observations, [w:] O. Due, M. Lutter, J. Schwarze (red.), Festschrift für Ulrich Everling, Nomos, Baden Baden 1995.
Kakouris C.N., La Mission de la Cour de Justice des Communautés européennes et l’ethos du juge, „Revue des affaires européennes” 1994, nr 4, s. 35-41.
Kochenov B., Bárd P., The Last Soldier Standing? Courts versus Politicians and the Rule of Law Crisis in the New Member States of the EU, „European Yearbook of Constitutional Law” 2019, nr 1, s. 243-287.
Kochenov B., Butler G., The Independence and Lawful Composition of the Court of Justice of the European Union: Replacement of Advocate General Sharpston and the Battle for the Integrity of the Institution, NYU Jean Monnet Paper No. 02/2020.
Kochenov D., Declaratory Rule of Law: Self-Constitution through Unenforceable Promises, [w:] J. Přibáň (red.), The Self-Constitution of European Society beyond EU Politics, Law and Governance, Routledge, Abingdon 2016.
Kochenov D., EU Enlargement and the Failure of Conditionality: Pre-Accession Conditionality in the Fields of Democracy and the Rule of Law, Kluwer Law International, The Hague 2007.
Kochenov D., EU Law without the Rule of Law: Is the Veneration of Autonomy Worth It?, „Yearbook of European Law” 2015, nr 34, s. 74-96.
Kochenov D., Magen A., Pech L., The Great Rule of Law Debate in the EU, „Journal of Common Market Studies” 2016, nr 54, s. 1043-1259.
Kochenov D., The EU and the Rule of Law: Naïveté or a Grand Design?, [w:] M. Adams et al. (red.), Constitutionalism and the Rule of Law: Bridging Idealism and Realism, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge 2017.
Koncewicz T.T., The Supranational Rule of Law as First Principle of the European Public Space: On the Journey in Ever Closer Union among the Peoples of Europe in Flux, „Palestra” 2020, nr 5, s. 167-206.
Koncewicz T.T., Understanding the Politics of Resentment: Of the Principles, Institutions, Counter-Strategies, Normative Change, and the Habits of the Heart, „Indiana Journal of Global Legal Studies” 2019, nr 26, s. 501-630.
Kosař B., Lixinski L., Domestic Judicial Design by International Human Rights Courts, „American Journal of International Law” 2015, t. 109, nr 4, s. 713- 760.
Kosař D., Baroš J., Dufek P., The Twin Challenges to Separation of Powers in Central Europe: Technocratic Governance and Populism, „European Constitutional Law Review” 2019, t. 15, nr 3, s. 427-461.
Krygier M., The Rule of Law: Legality, Teleology, Sociology, [w:] G. Palombella, N. Walker (red.), Re-locating the Rule of Law, Hart Publishing, Oxford and Portland 2008.
Lacey N., Populism and the Rule of Law, „Annual Review of Law and Social Science” 2019, nr 15, s. 79-95.
Leloup M., Kochenov D., A. Dimitrovs, Non-Regression: Openning the Door to Solving the “Copenhagen Dilemma”? All the Eyes on Case C-896/19 Repubblika v Il-Prim Ministru, Reconnect Working Paper No. 15 – June 2021.
Lenaerts K., New Horizons for the Rule of Law within the EU, „German Law Journal” 2020, t.21, nr 1, s. 29-34.
Lenaerts K., Our Judicial Independence and the Quest for National, Supranational and Transnational Justice, [w:] G. Sevik et al. (red.), The Art of Judicial Reasoning: Festschrift in Honour of Carl Baudenbacher, Springer, Berlin 2019.
Lindeboom J., Is the Primacy of EU Law Based on the Equality of the Member States? A Comment on the CJEU’s Press Release Following the PSPP Judgment, „German Law Journal” 2020, t. 21, nr 5, s. 1032-1044.
Ochnio A.H., Why Is a Redefinition of the Autonomous Concept of an ‘Issuing Judicial Authority’ in European Arrest Warrant Proceedings Needed?, „European Papers” 2020, t. 5, nr 2, s. 1305-1324.
Palombella B., Beyond Legality – before Democracy: Rule of Law Caveats in the EU Two-Level System, [w:] C. Closa, D. Kochenov (red.), Reinforcing Rule of Law Oversight in the European Union, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge 2016.
Palombella B., The Rule of Law as an Institutional Ideal, [w:] G. Palombella, L. Morlino (red.), Rule of Law and Democracy: Inquiries Into Internal and External Issues, Brill, Leiden and Boston 2010.
Pech L., Article 47(2), [w:] S. Peers et al. (red.), The EU Charter of Fundamental Rights: A Commentary (2nd ed.), Hart Publishing, Oxford 2021.
Pech L., Dealing with “Fake Judges” under EU Law: Poland as a Case Study in Light of the Court of Justice’s Ruling of 26 March 2020 in Simplon and HG, Reconnect Working Paper No. 8/2020.
Pech L., The Rule of Law as a Constitutional Principle of the European Union, Jean Monnet Working Paper Series No. 4/2009.
Sajó A., The Rule of Law as Legal Despotism: Concerned Remarks on the Use of “Rule of Law” in Illiberal Democracies, „The Hague Journal on the Rule of Law” 2019, nr 11, s. 371-376.
Scheppele K.L., Autocratic Legalism, „University of Chicago Law Review” 2018, nr 85, s. 545-583.
Scheppele K.L., Kochenov D., Grabowska-Moroz B., EU Values Are Law, After All: Enforcing EU Values through Systemic Infringement Actions by the European Commission and the Member States of the European Union, „Yearbook of European Law” 2020, nr 39, s. 3-121.
Schout A., Luining M., The Missing Dimension in Rule of Law Policy: From EU Policies to Multilevel Capacity Building, Clingendael Instituut Report, 2018.
Sillen J., The Concept of “Internal Judicial Independence” in the Case Law of the European Court of Human Rights, „European Constitutional Law Review” 2019, nr 15, s. 104-133.
Turmo A., A Dialogue of Unequals: The European Court of Justice Reasserts National Courts’ Obligations under Article 267(3) TFEU, „European Constitutional Law Review” 2019, t. 267, nr 3, s. 340-358.
Tushnet M., Enforcement of National Law against Sub-National Units in the United States, [w:] A. Jakab, D. Kochenov (red.), The Enforcement of EU Law and Values: Methods against Defiance, Oxford University Press, Oxford 2017.
Usher J.A., General Course: The Continuing Development of Law and Institutions, [w:] F. Emmert, (red.), Collected Courses of the Academy of European Law, European Community Law (vol. II, Book 1), Martinus Nijhoff, The Hague 1991.
Usher J.A., How Limited is the Jurisdiction of European Court of Justice?, [w:] J. Dine, S. Douglas-Scott, I. Persaud (red.), Procedure and the European Court, Chancery Law Publishing, London 1991.
Wennerås P., Saving a Forest and the Rule of Law: Commission v. Poland, „Common Market Law Review” 2019, nr 56, s. 541-558.
Williams A., Taking Values Seriously: Towards a Philosophy of EU Law, „Oxford Journal of Legal Studies” 2009, t. 29, nr 3, s. 549-577.