Make a Submission
No. XLV/2 (2023)
Articles

The translation of humanity into prison design: How do the new, standardised “Model 2015” prison buildings meet normative demands in Norwegian crime policy?

Przełożenie zasad humanitaryzmu na projektowanie więzień. Jak nowe, wystandaryzowane zgodnie z „Modelem 2015”, budynki więzienne spełniają normatywne wymogi norweskiej polityki kryminalnej?

PDF
  • Berit Johnsen,
  • Aleksandra Bartoszko,
  • Elisabeth Fransson,
  • Hilde Pape,
  • Francesca Giofrè
Berit Johnsen
University College of Norwegian Correctional Service
Aleksandra Bartoszko
VID Specialized University
Elisabeth Fransson
VID Specialized University
Hilde Pape
University College of Norwegian Correctional Service
Francesca Giofrè
Sapienza University of Rome
DOI: https://doi.org/10.7420/AK2023.10

Published 2023-12-31

Keywords

  • prison architecture,
  • quality of prison life,
  • resettlement,
  • dynamic security,
  • humanity,
  • mixed methods

How to Cite

Johnsen, B., Bartoszko, A., Fransson, E., Pape, H., & Giofrè, F. (2023). The translation of humanity into prison design: How do the new, standardised “Model 2015” prison buildings meet normative demands in Norwegian crime policy? Przełożenie zasad humanitaryzmu na projektowanie więzień. Jak nowe, wystandaryzowane zgodnie z „Modelem 2015”, budynki więzienne spełniają normatywne wymogi norweskiej polityki kryminalnej?. Archives of Criminology, (XLV/2), 85–114. https://doi.org/10.7420/AK2023.10
Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Crossref
Scopus
Google Scholar
Europe PMC

Abstract

Prison architecture reflects the ideas and values of a penal policy, providing insights into punishment philosophies. In Norway, normalisation, resettlement and dynamic security norms have shaped correctional care. Based on a mixed method study, this article examines how these norms are translated into “Model 2015” prisons. Despite spaces for positive prisoner relationships, the design faces challenges in escaping pervasive systems of control and discipline. Architectural boundaries obstruct dynamic security and impede the staff’s involvement in resettlement. Inadequate facilities for prisoner progression and daytime activities further undermines these processes. While some architectural and technological initiatives aimed at normalising prison life have proved successful, they tend to normalise not only the prison environment, but also the prisoners. The study demonstrates architecture’s critical role in realising humane prison conditions and emphasises the need for humane design.

PDF

References

  1. Abdel-Salam S. and Kilmer A. (2023). ‘“A prison is a prison”: Perspectives from incarcerated men on the therapeutic and punitive aspects of Halden prison in Norway.’ British Journal of Criminology 63(4), pp. 929–947. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjc/azac054
  2. Act relating to the execution of sentences etc. (2001). LOV-2001-05-18-21. Available online: https://lovdata.no/dokument/NLE/lov/2001-05-18-21 [28.102023].
  3. Agder Fengsel [Agder prison] (n.d.), Statsbygg.no. Available online: https://www.statsbygg.no/prosjekter-og-eiendommer/agder-fengsler [27.10.2023].
  4. Album D. (1996). Nære fremmede – pasientkulturen i sykehus [Close strangers – the culture of patients in hospitals]. Oslo: Universitetsforlaget.
  5. Armstrong P. and Lowndes R. (eds.) (2018). Creative Teamwork. Developing Rapid, Site-Switching Ethnography. New York: Oxford Academic.
  6. Barker V. (2012). ‘Nordic exceptionalism revisited: Explaining the paradox of a Janus-faced penal regime.’ Punishment & Society 17(1), pp. 5–25. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362480612468935
  7. Beijersbergen K.A., Dirkzwager A.J., Laan P.H. van der, and Nieuwbeerta P. (2016). ‘A social building? Prison architecture and staff-prisoner relationships.’ Crime & Delinquency 62(7), pp. 843–874. https://doi.org/10.1177/0011128714530657
  8. Bentham J. (1995). The Panopticon Writings. London–New York: Verso.
  9. Bosma A.Q., Ginneken E. van, Palmen H., Pasma A.J., Beijersbergen K.A., and Nieuwbeerta P. (2020). ‘A new instrument to measure prison climate. The psychometric quality of the Prison Climate Questionnaire.’ The Prison Journal 100(3), pp. 355–380. https://doi.org/10.1177/0032885520916819
  10. Bronebakk K. (2012). ‘Hvis det var mitt barnʼ [If it was my child]. In Y. Hammerlin and B. Johnsen (eds.) Festskrift til Inger Marie Fridhov [Festschrift to Inger Marie Fridhov]. Oslo: KRUS, pp. 45–54.
  11. Carpiano R.M. (2009). ‘Come take a walk with me. The “Go-Along” interview as a novel method for studying the implications of place for health and well-being.’ Health & Place 15(1), pp. 263–272. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.healthplace.2008.05.003
  12. Clark A. and Emmel N. (2010). ‘Using walking interviews.’ Realities 13, pp. 1–6.
  13. Creswell J.W. and Clark V.L.P. (2018). Designing and Conducting Mixed Methods Research. London: Sage.
  14. Crewe B. (2011). ‘Soft power in prison. Inmplications for staff–prisoner relationships, liberty and legitimacy.’ European Journal of Criminology 8(6), pp. 455–468. https://doi.org/10.1177/1477370811413805
  15. Crewe B., Ievins A., Larmour S., Laursen J., Mjåland K., and Schiele A. (2023). ‘Nordic penal exceptionalism: A comparativ, empirical analyses.’ British Journal of Criminology 63(2), pp. 424–443. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjc/azac013
  16. Crewe B., Warr J., Bennett P., and Smith A. (2014). ‘The emotional geography of prison life.’ Theoretical Criminology 1, pp. 56–74. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362480613497778
  17. Deleuze G. and Guattari F. (1987). A Thousands Plateaus. Capitalism and Schizopheria. Minneapolis–London: University of Minnesota Press.
  18. Directorate of Correctional Service (2019). Kriminalomsorgens retningslinjer for selvforpleining i fengsel og overgangsbolig [The Correctional Service’s guidelines of self-catering in prisons and half-way houses] (27.03.2019).
  19. Douglas M. (1966). Purity and Danger. An Analysis of Concepts of Pollution and Taboo. London–New York: Routledge.
  20. Drake D.H. (2008). ‘Staff and order in prisons.’ In J. Bennett, B. Crewe, and A. Wahidin (eds.) Understanding Prison Staff. Devon: Willan Publishing, pp. 153–167.
  21. Earle R. and Phillips C. (2012). ‘Digesting men? Ethnicity, gender and food. Perspectives from a “prison ethnography”.’ Theoretical Criminology 16(2), pp. 141–145. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362480612441121
  22. Emerson R.M., Fretz R.I., and Shaw L.L. (1995). Writing Ethnographic Fieldnotes. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  23. Engbo H.J. (2017). ‘Normalisation in Nordic prisons – from a prison governor’s perspective.’ In P.S. Smith and T. Ugelvik (eds.) Scandinavian Penal History, Culture and Prison Practice. Embraced by the Welfare State?. London: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 327–352.
  24. Erickson K. and Stull D. (1998). Doing Team Ethnography. Warnings and Advice. London: Sage.
  25. Foucault M. (1979). Discipline and Punish. The Birth of the Prison. Middlesex: Penguin Books.
  26. Fransson E. (2018). ‘The lunch table. Prison architecture, action-forces and the young imprisoned body.’ In E. Fransson, F. Giofrè, and B. Johnsen (eds.) Prisons Architecture and Humans. Oslo: Cappelen Damm Akademisk, pp. 177–199. https://doi.org/10.23865/noasp.31
  27. Fransson E. (2023). ‘How prison spaces work on bodies. Prison design in the Norwegian youth units.’ In D. Moran, Y. Jewkes, K-L. Blount Hill, and V.St. John (eds.) The Palgrave Handbook of Prison Design. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 413–442.
  28. Fransson E. and Brottveit G. (2015). ʻRådsmøte som event. Lokale progresjons- og tilbakeføringspraksiser i et norsk høysikkerhetsfengsel inspirert av et Deleuziansk blikkʼ [The council meeting as an event. Local efforts of progressions and resettlement in a Norwegian high security prison inspired of a Deleuzian gaze]. Psyke & Logos 36, pp. 111–128. https://doi.org/10.7146/pl.v36i1.22827
  29. Fransson E. and Giofrè F. (2020). ‘Prison cell spaces, bodies and touch.’ In J. Turner and V. Knight (eds.) The Prison Cell. Embodied and Everyday Spaces of Incarceration. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 261–282.
  30. Fridhov I.M. and Grøning L. (2018). ‘Penal ideology and prison architecture.’ In E. Fransson, F. Giofrè, and B. Johnsen (eds.) Prison Architecture and Humans. Oslo: Cappelen Damm Akademisk, pp. 269–286. https://doi.org/10.23865/noasp.31
  31. Gennep A. van (2019). The Rites of Passage. Chicago–London: The University of Chicago Press.
  32. Giertsen H. (2021). ‘Prison ideas and architecture 1850-today. Relevance to Norwegian prisoners and prison policy.’ Nordisk Tidsskrift for Kriminalvidenskap 1, pp. 157–174. https://doi.org/10.7146/ntfk.v108i1.125569
  33. Gramsci A. (2011). Letters from Prison. New York: Colombia University Press.
  34. Grønvold M. and Fransson E. (2019). ‘Møter i mellomrommet. En studie blant høgskolekandidater i straffegjennomføring om deres forståelse av miljøarbeid i fengsel’ [Meetings in the spaces in-between. A study of students in corrections and their understanding of social work in prison]. Uniped 42(2), pp. 180–193. https://doi.org/10.18261/issn.1893-8981-2019-02-06
  35. Halvorsen E., Khawaja N., and Storvik B.L. (2019). Rapportlære for kriminalomsorgen [Learning to write reports in the Correctional Service]. Bergen: Fagbokforlaget.
  36. Hammerlin Y. (2021). Hard mot de harde, myk mot de myke [Hard against the hard ones and soft against the soft ones]. Oslo: Universitetsforlaget.
  37. Hay W. and Sparks R. (1991). ‘What is a prison officer?.’ Prison Service Journal summer, pp. 2–7.
  38. Jewkes Y. (2018). ‘Just design. Healthy prisons and the architecture of hope.’ Journal of Criminology 51(3), pp. 319–338. https://doi.org/10.1177/0004865818766768
  39. Jewkes Y. (2022). ‘“An iron fist in a silk glove”: The pains of Halden prison.ʼ In B. Crewe, A. Goldsmith, and M. Halsey (eds.) Power and Pain in the Modern Prison: The Society of Captives Revisited. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 112–132.
  40. Johnsen B. (2018). Nordic Exceptionalism and Politics, Compen.crim.cam.ac.uk. Available online: https://www.compen.crim.cam.ac.uk/Blog/blog-pages-full-versions/guest-blog-by-berit-johnsen [27.10.2023].
  41. Johnsen B. (2022). ‘Norway.’ In F. Dünkel, S. Harrendorf, and D. van Zyl Smit (eds.) The Impact of Covid-19 on Prison Conditions and Penal Policy. London–New York: Routledge, pp. 385–395.
  42. Johnsen B. (2023). ‘Designing green prisonscapes in Norway. Balancing considerations of safety and security, rehabilitation and humanity.’ In D. Moran, Y. Jewkes, K-L. Blount-Hill, and V.St. John (eds.) The Palgrave Handbook of Prison Design. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 679–701.
  43. Johnsen B. and Fridhov I.M. (2019). ‘Offender resettlement in Norway. Positive principles – challenging practices.’ In F. Dünkel, I. Pruin, A. Storgaard, and J. Weber (eds.) Prisoner Resettlement in Europe. London–New York: Routledge, pp. 252–264.
  44. Johnsen B., Pape H., Fransson E., and Bartoszko A. (2023). Arkitektur og livskvalitet I Modell 2015 fengsler. En undersøkelse av soningsklimaet i standardiserte fengselsbygg [Architecture and the quality of life in Model 2015 prisons. A stydy of the quality of life in standardized prison buildings]. Lillestrøm: KRUS Publikasjon 1/2023. https://hdl.handle.net/11250/3074438.
  45. Kikas L., Koopmansch J.P., Linderborg H., and Stageberg O. (2021). Best Practices in Dynamic Security Training. EPTA: European Penitentiary Training Academies.
  46. Kilmer A., Abdel-Salam S., and Silver I.A. (2023). ‘”The uniforms in the way”. Navigating the tension between security and therapeutic roles in a rehabilitation-focused prison in Norway.’ Criminal Justice Behaviour 50(4), pp. 521–540. https://doi.org/10.1177/00938548221143536
  47. Kinney P. (2022). ‘Walking interviews: A novel way of ensuring the voices of vulnerable populations are included in research.’ In M. Borcsa and C. Willig (eds.) Qualitative Research Methods in Mental Health. Innovative and Collaborative Approaches. Cham: Springer International Publishing, pp. 65–82. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-65331-6_4
  48. Kusenbach M. (2003). ‘Street phenomenology: The go-along as ethnographic research tool.’ Ethnography 4(3), pp. 455–485.
  49. Laursen J., Mjåland K., and Crewe B. (2020). ‘”It’s like a sentence before the sentence” – Exploring the pains and possibilities of waiting for imprisonment.’ British Journal of Criminology 60(2), pp. 363–381. https://www.doi.org/10.1093/bjc/azz042
  50. Liebling A. (2011). ‘Distinctions and distinctiveness in the work of prison officers: Legitimacy and authority revisited.’ European Journal of Criminology 8(6), pp. 484–499. https://doi.org/10.1177/1477370811413807
  51. Liebling A. (assisted by H. Arnold) (2004). Prisons and their Moral Performance. A Study of Values, Quality, and Prison Life. Oxford–New York: Oxford University Press.
  52. Liebling A., Johnsen B., Schmidt B.E., Rokkan T., Beyens K., Boone M., Kox M., and Vanhouche A-S. (2021a). ‘Where two ‘exceptional’ prison cultures meet. Negotiating order in a transnational prison.’ British Journal of Criminology 61(1), pp. 41–60. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjc/azaa047
  53. Liebling A., Schmidt B.E., Beyens K., Boone M., Johnsen B., Kox M., Rokkan T., and Vanhouche A-S. (2021b). ‘Doing team ethnography in a transnational prison.’ International Criminology 1, pp. 123–134. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43576-021-00014-1
  54. Meld. St. 12 (2014–2015). Utviklingsplan for kapasitet i kriminalomsorgen [Development plan for the Correctional Service]. White paper to Parliament, Ministry of Justice. Available online: https://www.regjeringen.no/no/dokumenter/meld.-st.-12-2014-2015/id2356059/?ch=12 [27.10.2023].
  55. Minke L. (2014). ‘Cooking in prison – from crook to cook.’ International Journal of Prison Health 10(4), pp. 228–238. https://doi.org/10.1108/ijph-09-2013-0044
  56. Moore M. (2020). Where to Invade Next, Youtube.com. Available online: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ggvzwY-oyXk [27.10.2023].
  57. Moran D. (2011). ‘Between outside and inside. Prison visiting rooms as liminal carceral spaces.’ GeoJournal 78(2), pp. 339–351.
  58. Moran D. (2015). Carceral Geography. Spaces and Practices of Incarceration. Surrey–Burlington: Ashgate.
  59. Moran D. (2019). ‘Back to nature? Attention restoration theory and the restorative effects of nature contact in prison.’ Health and Place 57, pp. 35–43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.healthplace.2019.03.005
  60. Moran D. and Jewkes Y. (2014). ‘“Green” prisons: Rethinking the ‘sustainability’ of the carceral estate.’ Geographica Helvetica 69, pp. 345–353. https://doi.org/10.5194/gh-69-345-2014
  61. Moran D. and Turner J. (2019). ‘Turning over a new leaf? The health-enabling capacities of nature contact in prison.’ Social Science and Medicine 231, pp. 62–69. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2018.05.032
  62. Moran D., Jones P.I., Jordaan J.A., and Porter A.E. (2023). ‘Does nature contact in prison improve wellbeing? Greenspace, self-harm, violence and staff sickness absence in prisons in England and Wales.’ In D. Moran, Y. Jewkes, K-L. Blount-Hill, and V.St. John (eds.) The Palgrave Handbook of Prison Design. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 657–678. https://doi.org/10.1080/24694452.2020.1850232
  63. Möystad O. (2018). Cognition and the Built Environment. New York: Routledge.
  64. Muedeking G.D. (1992). ‘Authentic/inauthentic identities in the prison visiting room.’ Symbolic Interaction 15(2), pp. 227–236. https://doi.org/10.1525/si.1992.15.2.227
  65. Normann T.A.J. (2022). Den gylne trekant. Sikkerhet og beredskap i kriminalomsorgen [The golden triangle. Safety and security in the Correctional Service]. Bergen: Fagbokforlaget.
  66. Norwegian Correctional Service (2021). Operational Strategi Norwegian Correctional Service 2021–2026. Available online: https://www.kriminalomsorgen.no/virksomhetsstrategi.583294.no.html [28.10.2023].
  67. Oslo Economics (2023). Etterevaluering av Agder fengsel, avdeling Mandal og Froland [Evaluation of Agder Prison, department Mandal and Froland]. Report. Available online: https://www.ntnu.no/documents/1261860271/1262012574/Evaluering+av+Agder+fengsel.pdf/e984bac8-b6d0-0b73-f829-b95612b5197b?t=1695300632009 [28.10.2023].
  68. Pink S. and Morgan J. (2013). ‘Short-term ethnography. Intense routes to knowing.’ Symbolic Interaction 36(3), pp. 351–361.
  69. Pratt J. (2008a). ‘Scandinavian exceptionalism in an era of penal excess. Part I: The nature and roots of Scandinavian exceptionalism.’ British Journal of Criminology 48(2), pp. 119–137. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjc/azm072
  70. Pratt J. (2008b). ‘Scandinavian exceptionalism in an era of penal excess. Part II: Does Scandinavian exceptionalism jave a future?.’ British Journal of Criminology 48(3), pp. 275–292. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjc/azm073
  71. Pratt J. (2022). ‘The Nordic exceptionalism thesis revisited.’ In D. Nelken and C. Hamilton (eds.) Research Handbook of Comparative Criminal Justice. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing, pp. 109–125. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781839106385.00015
  72. Pratt J. and Eriksson A. (2013). Contrasts in Punishment. An Explanation of Anglophone Excess and Nordic Exceptionalism. London–New York: Routledge.
  73. Rijt J. van de, Ginneken E. van, and Boone M. (2023). ‘Lost in translation. The principle of normalisation in prison policy in Norway and the Netherlands.’ Punishment & Society 3, pp. 766–783. https://doi.org/10.1177/14624745221103823
  74. Santorso S. (2021). ‘Rehabilitation and dynamic security in Italian prison. Challenges in transforming prison officers’ roles.’ The British Journal of Criminology 61, pp. 1557–1574. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjc/azab015
  75. Shalev S. (2014). ‘Solitary confinement as a prison health issue.ʼ In S. Enggist, L. Møller, G. Galea, and C. Udesen (eds.) WHO Guide to Prisons and Health. Copenhagen: World Health Organisation, pp. 27–35.
  76. Shammas V.L. (2014) ‘The pains of freedom: Assessing the ambiguity of Scandinavian penal exceptionalism on Norway’s prison island.’ Punishment & Society 16(1), pp. 104–123. https://doi.org/10.1177/1462474513504799
  77. Smith P. and Ugelvik T. (2017). Scandinavian Penal History, Culture and Prison Practice: Embraced by the Welfare State? London: Palgrave Macmillan.
  78. Smith P.S. (2006). ‘The effects of solitary confinement on prison inmates. A brief history and review of literature’. Crime and Justice 34(1), pp. 441–528. https://doi.org/10.1086/500626
  79. Smith P.S. and Enbo H.J. (2012). Fængsler og menneskerettigheder [Prisons and human rights]. København: Jurist- og Økonomiforbundets Forlag.
  80. Snacken S. (2002). ‘Normalisation’ dans les prisons: Concept et defis. L’exemple de l’Avant-project de loi pénitentiaire belge.’ In O. De Schutter and D. Kaminski (eds.) L’institution du droit pénitentiaire. Enjeux de la reconnaissance de droits aux détenus. Paris-Bruxelles: Librairie Générale de Droit et de Jurisprudence et Bruylant, pp. 133–152.
  81. Spark R., Bottoms A.E., and Hay W. (1996). Prisons and their Moral Performance. Oxford: Claredon Press.
  82. St.meld.nr.37 (2007–2008). Straff som virker – mindre kriminalitet – tryggere samfunn [Punishment that works – less crime – safer society]. White paper to Parliament, Ministry of Justice. Available online: https://www.regjeringen.no/no/dokumenter/stmeld-nr-37-2007-2008-/id527624/ [28.10.2023].
  83. Sykes G.M. (1958). The Society of Captives. A Study of a Maximum Security Prison. New Jersey: Princeton University Press.
  84. Terranova F. (2018). ‘Inputs in the design of prisons.’ In E. Fransson, F. Giofrè, and B. Johnsen (eds.) Prison Architecture and Humans. Oslo: Cappelen Damm Akademisk, pp. 287–308. https://doi.org/10.23865/noasp.31
  85. Todd-Kvam J. (2019). ‘Bordered penal populism: When populism and Scandinavian exceptionalism meet.’ Punishment & Society 21(3), pp. 295–314. https://doi.org/10.1177/1462474518757093
  86. Turner J. and Knight V. (2020). ‘Dissecting the cell. Embodied and everyday spaces of interaction.’ In J. Turner and V. Knight (eds.) The Prison Cell. Embodied and Everyday Spaces of Incarceration. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-39911-5_1
  87. Turner V.W. (1969). The Ritual Process. Structure and Anti-Structure. New York: Cornell University Press.
  88. Ugelvik T. (2011). ‘The hidden food. Mealtime, resistance and identity work in a Norwegian prison.’ Punishment & Society 13(1), pp. 47–63. https://doi.org/10.1177/1462474510385630
  89. Ugelvik T. (2022). ‘The transformative power of trust. Exploring tertiary desistance in reinventive prisons.’ The British Journal of Criminology 62, pp. 623–638. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjc/azab076
  90. Ugelvik T. and Dullum J. (2012). Penal Exceptionalism? Nordic Prison Policy and Practice. New York: Routledge.
  91. Vanhouche A-S. (2022). Prison Food. Identity, Meaning, Practices and Symbolism in European Prisons. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan.
  92. Vollan M. (2016). ‘“Mot normalt”? Normalitetsprinsippet i norsk straffegjennomføring’ [“Compared with the normal average”? The principle of normalisation in Norwegian corrections]. In H.C. Bugge, H. Indreberg, A. Syse, and A. Tverberg (eds.) Lov, liv og lære. Inge Lorange Backer 70 år [Law, life, and learn. Inge Lorange Backer 70 years]. Oslo: Universitetsforlaget, pp. 548–560.
  93. Vos H. de (2023). Beyond Scandinavian Exceptionalism. Normalization, Imprisonment and Society. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan.