Make a Submission
No. XLV/2 (2023)
Articles

In search of the role of punishment from the EU criminal law perspective

W poszukiwaniu roli kary z perspektywy prawa karnego Unii Europejskiej

PDF
  • Joanna Banach-Gutierrez
Joanna Banach-Gutierrez
University of Warmia and Mazury in Olsztyn
DOI: https://doi.org/10.7420/AK2023.15

Published 2023-12-31

Keywords

  • punishment,
  • EU criminal law,
  • criminal justice,
  • fundamental rights,
  • transnational criminal proceedings

How to Cite

Banach-Gutierrez, J. (2023). In search of the role of punishment from the EU criminal law perspective: W poszukiwaniu roli kary z perspektywy prawa karnego Unii Europejskiej. Archives of Criminology, (XLV/2), 29–42. https://doi.org/10.7420/AK2023.15
Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Crossref
Scopus
Google Scholar
Europe PMC

Abstract

This paper deals with punishment in the context of EU criminal law. Its aim is to search for the role of punishment in the area of European criminal justice, focussing on EU legislation and the case law of the Luxembourg and Strasbourg Courts. The methods used are analysis, synthesis and comparative research. The findings lead to the conclusion that, first of all, the priority behind punishment should be the rehabilitation of an offender, followed by their reintegration into society, and not the severity of imposing a long prison sentence itself. Additionally, a life sentence seems unacceptable without the possibility of conditional release or clemency, as it would be contrary to the European standards of protecting human rights. The role of punishment within the EU is therefore strongly influenced by a human rights-based approach in line with the provisions of the CFR and the ECHR.

PDF

References

  1. Akers R.L. and Sellers Ch.S. (2004). Criminological Theories: Introduction, Evaluation and Application. Los Angeles: Roxbury Publishing Company.
  2. Arnull A. (2012). ʻ5 judicial dialogue in the European Union.ʼ In J. Dickson and P. Eleftheriadis (eds.) Philosophical Foundations of European Union Law. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 109–133. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199588770.003.0005
  3. Baker E. and Harding Ch. (2009). ʻFrom past imperfect to future perfect? A longitudinal study of the Third Pillar.ʼ European Law Review 34(1), pp. 25–54.
  4. Barlow H.D. (1987). Introduction to Criminology. Boston-Toronto: Little, Brown and Company.
  5. Björnsson T. and Yuval S. (2014). ʻThe Court of Justice of the European Union.ʼ In Y. Shany (ed.) Assessing the Effectiveness of International Courts. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 277–306. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199643295.003.0012
  6. Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union. Official Journal of the European Union of 26.10.2012, C 326, pp. 391–407.
  7. Council Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA of 13 June 2002 on the European arrest warrant and the surrender procedures between Member States. Official Journal of the European Union of 18.07.2002, L 190, pp. 1–20.
  8. Council Framework Decision 2008/909/JHA of 27 November 2008 on the application of the principle of mutual recognition to judgments in criminal matters imposing custodial sentences or measures involving deprivation of liberty for the purpose of their enforcement in the European Union. Official Journal of the European Union of 5.12.2008, L 327, pp. 27–46.
  9. Council Framework Decision 2008/947/JHA of 27 November 2008 on the application of the principle of mutual recognition to judgments and probation decisions with a view to the supervision of probation measures and alternative sanctions. Official Journal of the European Union of 16.12.2008, L 337, pp. 102–122.
  10. European Convention on Human Rights (1950). Strasbourg: European Court of Human Rights, Council of Europe. Available online: https://www.echr.coe.int/documents/d/echr/convention_eng [05.12.2023].
  11. Guide on Article 6 of the European Convention on Human Rights (2022). European Court of Human Rights, Council of Europe. Available online: https://www.echr.coe.int/documents/guide_art_6_criminal_eng.pdf [05.12.2023].
  12. Heiner R. (2020). Criminology in Brief. Routledge: Abingdon.
  13. Joyce P. (2018). Criminology and Criminal Justice. Routledge: Milton.
  14. Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 12 February 2020 (2020). Kolev and others (Kolev II). Case C-704/18.
  15. Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 29 April 2021 (2021). Criminal proceedings against X. Request for a preliminary ruling from the Rechtbank Amsterdam. Case C‑665/20 PPU.
  16. Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 25 July 2018 (2018). ML. Request for a preliminary ruling from the Hanseatisches Oberlandesgericht in Bremen. Case C-220/18 PPU.
  17. Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 26 March 2020 (2020). Criminal proceedings against A. P. Case C-2/19.
  18. Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 28 July 2016 (2016). JZ v Prokuratura Rejonowa Łódź – Śródmieście. Case C-294/16 PPU.
  19. Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 10 April 2018 (2018). Romano Pisciotti v Bundesrepublik Deutschland. Case C-191/16.
  20. Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 13 November 2018 (2018). Denis Raugevicius. Case C 247/17.
  21. Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 15 October 2019 (2019). Dumitru-Tudor Dorobantu. Case C 128/18.
  22. Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 2 April 2020 (2020). Ruska Federacija v I.N. Case C-897/19 PPU.
  23. Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 5 April 2016 (2016). Pál Aranyosi and Robert Căldăraru v Generalstaatsanwaltschaft Bremen. Joined Cases C-404/15 and C-659/15 PPU.
  24. Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 5 June 2018 (2018). Kolev and others (Kolev I). Case C-612/15.
  25. Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 6 September 2016 (2016). Aleksei Petruhhin. Case C 182/15.
  26. Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber), 5 September 2012 (2012). João Pedro Lopes Da Silva Jorge, Case C 42/11.
  27. Judgment of the Court of 21 September 1989 (1989). Commission of the European Communities v Hellenic Republic. Failure of a Member State to fulfil its obligations – Failure to establish and make available the Community's own resources. Case 68/88.
  28. Kisic N. and King S. (2014). ‘Toward a more lenient law: Trends in sentencing from the European Court of Human Rights.’ Human Rights Brief 21(2), pp. 9–15. Available online: https://www.corteidh.or.cr/tablas/r32819.pdf [28.12.2023].
  29. Klip A. (2016). European Criminal Law: An Integrative Approach. Cambridge: Intersentia.
  30. Marin L. and Montaldo S. (2020). The Fight against Impunity in EU Law. Oxford: Hart Publishing.
  31. Martufi A. (2018). ʻThe paths of offender rehabilitation and the European dimension of punishment: New challenges for an old ideal?.ʼ Maastricht Journal of European and Comparative Law 25(6), pp. 672–688. https://doi.org/10.1177/1023263X18820678
  32. Montaldo S. (2018). ‘Offenders’ rehabilitation: Towards a new paradigm for EU criminal law?.’ European Criminal Law Review 8, pp. 223–243. https://doi.org/10.5771/2193-5505-2018-2-223
  33. Nuotio K. (2020). ʻA legitimacy-based approach to EU criminal law: Maybe we are getting there, after all.ʼ New Journal of European Criminal Law 11(1), pp. 20–39. https://doi.org/10.1177/2032284420903386
  34. Pellonpää M. (2022). ʻReflections on the principle of mutual trust in EU law and judicial dialogue in Europe.ʼ In K. Karjalainen, I. Tornberg, and A. Pursiainen (eds.) International Actors and the Formation of Laws. Cham: Springer, pp. 29–64. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-98351-2_3
  35. Rodrigues A.M. (2019). ‘Fundamental rights and punishment: Is there an EU perspective?.ʼ New Journal of European Criminal Law 10(1), pp. 17–27. https://doi.org/10.1177/2032284419837377
  36. Rosas A. (2007). ‘The European Court of Justice in context: Forms and patterns of judicial dialogue.’ European Journal of Legal Studies 1(2), pp. 1–16. http://hdl.handle.net/1814/7706
  37. Rosas A. (2022). ʻEuropean Union law and national law: A common legal system?.ʼ In K. Karjalainen, I. Tornberg, and A. Pursiainen (eds.) International Actors and the Formation of Laws. Cham: Springer, pp. 11–28. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-98351-2_2
  38. Schroeder W. (2020). ‘Limits to European harmonisation of criminal law.ʼ Eucrim 2, pp. 144–148. https://doi.org/10.30709/eucrim-2020-008
  39. Treaty of Lisbon amending the Treaty on European Union and the Treaty establishing the European Community. Official Journal of the European Union of 13.12.2007, C 306, pp. 1–271.
  40. Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union – Consolidated version of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union. Official Journal of the European Union of 9.05.2008, C 115, pp. 1–390.