No. XXIX-XXX (2008)
Articles

Assisting Victims. The British Model in Comparative Context

Robert I. Mawby
University of Plymouth
Lesley A. Simmonds
University of Plymouth

Published 2008-04-01

Keywords

  • crime victims,
  • criminal justice system,
  • victim assistance programmes

How to Cite

Mawby, R. I., & Simmonds, L. A. (2008). Assisting Victims. The British Model in Comparative Context. Archives of Criminology, (XXIX-XXX), 555–565. https://doi.org/10.7420/AK2007-2008AR

Abstract

The article focusses on victims of domestic burglary. The author begins by showing the evidence of the harm to the victim’s well being caused by this type of crime. Furthermore, the author presents examples of services that provide personal help shortly after a crime, from both the US (victim assistance programmes) and the UK (victim support services) in order to illustrate the differences between them and the difficulties of moving towards common policies. Research conducted with Plymouth Victim Support shows the cost of spreading a wider net of victim support by replacing personal contact with phones and letters: only a small minority of the victims who are contacted by post request any further contact. The author argues that these forms may make the victims reluctant to ask for help and may leave them unaware of what help is available. The article ends with a critique of the changes made to the British victim support system, which have resulted in a reduced role of direct contact in favour of quicker forms of contact, such as letters and telephone conversations. The author believes that shift to be based on the falseassumption that victims who are particularly in need, at the precise moment they are most vulnerable, will have enough persistence to follow up on the offer of further help.

References

  1. Brienen M.E.I., Hoegen E.H., Victims of Crime in 22 European Criminal Justice Systems. The Implementation of Recommendation (85) 11 of the Council of Europe on the Position of the Victim in the Framework of Criminal Law and Procedure, University of Tilburg, Nijmegen 2000, www.victimology.nl.
  2. Council of Europe, www.coe.int.
  3. Davis R.C., Lurigio A.J., Skogan W.G., Services for victims. A market research study, „International Review of Victimology” 1999, nr 6.
  4. Decyzja Ramowa Rady z dnia 15 marca 2001r w sprawie pozycji ofiar w postępowaniu karnym, http://eur-lex.europa.eu/smartapi/cgi/sga_doc?smartapi!celexapi!prod!CELEXnumdoc&lg=EN&numdoc=32001F0220&model=guichett.
  5. Dijk J. van, Groenhuijsen M., Benchmarking Victim Policies in the Framework of European Union Law [w:] S. Walklate (ed.), The Handbook of Victims and Victimology, Willan Publishing, Cullompton 2007.
  6. Dijk J. van, Kesteren J. van, Smit P., Criminal Victimisation in International Perspective: Key Findings from the 2004−2005 ICVS and EU ICS, Boom Legal Publishers, The Hague 2008, http://rechten.uvt.nl/icvs/pdffiles/ICVS2004_05.pdf.
  7. Donaldson R., Experiences of Older Burglary Victims, „Findings” 198, Home Office Research, Development and Statistics Directorate, London 2003.
  8. Dugan L., The effect of criminal victimization on a household’s moving decision, „Criminology” 1999, t. 37, nr 4.
  9. Dunn P., Matching Service Delivery to Need [w:] S. Walklate (ed.), The Handbook of Victims and Victimology, Willan Publishing, Cullompton 2007.
  10. European e-Justice Portal, http://ec.europa.eu/civiljustice/comp_crime_victim/comp_crime_victim_gen_en.htm.
  11. European Forum for Victim Services, www.euvictimservices.org.
  12. Gay M.J., Holton C., Thomas M.S., Helping the victims, „International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology” 1975, t. 19, nr 3.
  13. Goodey J., Victims and Victimology. Research, Policy and Practice, Longman, Harlow 2005.
  14. http://europa.eu.int/ comm/justice_home/pdf/com1999-349-en.pdf.
  15. http://www.ovc.gov/publications/infores/intdir2005/poland.html
  16. Jones T., Newburn T., Policy Transfer and Criminal Justice, Open University Press, Maidenhead 2006.
  17. Kesteren J. van, Mayhew P., Nieuwbeerta P., Criminal Victimisation in Seventeen Industrialised Countries. Key Findings from the 2000 International Crime Victims Survey, http://english.wodc.nl/onderzoeksdatabase/w00187-criminal-victimization-in-seventeen-industrialized-countries.aspx?cp=45&cs=6796.
  18. Liska A.E., Sanchirico A., Reed M.D., Fear of crime and constrained behaviour. Specifying and estimating a reciprocal effects model, „Social Forces” 1988, nr 66.
  19. Maguire M., Corbett C., The Effects of Crime and the Work of Victim Support Schemes, Gower, Aldershot 1987.
  20. Maguire M., Impact of burglary upon victims, „British Journal of Criminology” 1980, t. 20, nr 3.
  21. Maguire M., Kynch J., Public perceptions and victims’ experiences of victim support. Findings from the 1998 British Crime Survey, Home Office, London 2000.
  22. Maguire M., Shapland J., Provision for Victims in an International Context [w:] R.C. Davis, A.J. Lurigio, W.G. Skogan (eds.), Victims of Crime, SAGE, London 1997.
  23. Mawby R.I., Alternative measures of ‘fear of crime’. Results from crime audits in a rural county of England, „International Review of Victimology” 2007, t. 14, nr 4.
  24. Mawby R.I., Burglary, Willan Press, Cullompton 2001.
  25. Mawby R.I., Criminal Justice and Crime Victims in Comparative Context [w:] P. Davies, P. Francis (eds.), Crime Victims and the Criminal Justice System, Polity, Oxford 2008.
  26. Mawby R.I., Gill M., Crime Victims. Needs, Services and the Voluntary Sector, Tavistock, London 1987
  27. Mawby R.I., Görgényi I., Ostrihanska Z., Walklate S., Wójcik D., Victims’ Needs and the Availability of Services. A Comparison of Burglary Victims in Poland, Hungary and England, „International Criminal Justice Review” 1999, t. 9, nr 1.
  28. Mawby R.I., Kirchoff G., Coping with Crime. A Comparison of Victims’ Experiences in England and Germany [w:] P. Francis, P. Davies (eds.), Understanding Victimisation. Themes and Perspectives. University of Northumbria Press, Newcastle 1996.
  29. Mawby R.I., Koubova E., Brabcova I., Victims’ needs and support for victims in Prague, „International Journal of the Sociology of Law” 2000, t. 28, nr 2.
  30. Mawby R.I., Walklate S., Critical Victimology. International Perspectives, SAGE, London 1994.
  31. Mayhew P., Dijk J.J.M. van, Criminal Victimisation in Eleven Industrialised Countries, WODC, Amstelveen 1997.
  32. Melup I., United Nations. Victims of crime, „International Review of Victimology” 1991, t. 2, nr 1.
  33. Norris F.H., Kaniasty K., Thompson M.P., The Psychological Consequences of Crime [w:] R.C. Davis, A.L. Lurigio, W.G. Skogan (eds.), Victims of Crime, SAGE, London 1997.
  34. OVC, International Perspectives (New Directions from the Field: Bulletin 19), www.ojp.usdoj.gov/ovc/new/directions/bulletins/welcome.html.
  35. Report by the Comptroller and Auditor General, Helping Victims and Witnesses. The Work of Victim Support, House of Commons. London 2002 (report and other relevant documents available at www.nao.gov.uk), appendix 5.
  36. Rock P., Helping Victims of Crime. The Home Office and the Rise of Victim Support in England and Wales, Clarendon Press, Oxford 1987.
  37. Rountree P.W., Land K.C., Burglary victimization, perceptions of crime risk, and routine activities. A multilevel analysis across Seattle neighborhoods and census tracts, „Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency” 1996, t. 33, nr 2.
  38. Schafer S., Restitution to Victims of Crime, Stevens and Sons, London 1960.
  39. Simmonds L., Matching Provision to Need. The Example of Victim Support, University of Plymouth, Plymouth 2005 unpublished PhD.
  40. Victim and Witness Review. Annual Report and Accounts 2006, Victim Support, London 2007, www.victimsupport.org.uk/vs_england_wales/about_us/_publications/annual_reports/accounts_2006.pdf.
  41. Williams B., Goodman H., The Role of the Voluntary Sector [w:] S. Walklate (ed.), The Handbook of Victims and Victimology, Willan Publishing, Cullompton 2007.